<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kigiran</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Oriental Studies</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Oriental Studies</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2619-0990</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-1008</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science «Kalmyk Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences» (KalmSC RAS)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22162/2075-7794-2017-31-3-123-130</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">kigiran-268</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЛИНГВИСТИКА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>LINGUISTICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>РОЛЬ ПОРЯДКА СЛОВ ДЛЯ ИДЕНТИФИКАЦИИ ПОДЛЕЖАЩЕГО В ЭРГАТИВНЫХ ЯЗЫКАХ ДАГЕСТАНА</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Ergative Languages of Dagestan: Role of Word Order in Identification of Subject</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Маллаева</surname><given-names>З. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Mallaeva</surname><given-names>Z. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">logika55@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кураева</surname><given-names>М. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kuraeva</surname><given-names>M. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">mkuraeva@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Халидова</surname><given-names>Р. Ш.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Khalidova</surname><given-names>R. Sh.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">rashi-dr@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт языка, литературы и искусств им. Г. Цадасы</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Tsadasa Institute of Language, Literature and Arts</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Дагестанский государственный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Dagestan State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-3"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Дагестанский государственный педагогический университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Dagestan State Pedagogical University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>04</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>123</fpage><lpage>130</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Маллаева З.М., Кураева М.Н., Халидова Р.Ш., 2018</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Маллаева З.М., Кураева М.Н., Халидова Р.Ш.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Mallaeva Z.M., Kuraeva M.N., Khalidova R.S.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://kigiran.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/268">https://kigiran.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/268</self-uri><abstract><p>Дагестанские языки относятся к языкам эргативного строя. На синтаксическом уровне исследуемых языков это проявляется в том, что в них одновременно функционируют несколько (от четырех до шести - в зависимости от конкретного языка) синтаксических структур предложения. Количество главных членов предложения в различных синтаксических структурах не совпадает. В номинативной конструкции предложения, как и во всех номинативных языках, представлены два главных члена предложения: один именной - подлежащее - и один предикативный - сказуемое. Во всех остальных синтаксических конструкциях (эргативной, дативной, генитивной, локативной, аффективной) традиционно выделяют три главных члена предложения - один предикативный (сказуемое) и два именных (подлежащее и прямое дополнение). В статье предпринимается попытка установить приемлемые для эргативных языков Дагестана принципы определения одного из главных членов предложения - подлежащего. Поскольку подлежащее как единица синтаксического уровня характеризуется определенными отношениями с другими членами предложения, то в качестве первого идентифицирующего признака подлежащего предлагается словопорядок, а именно - крайняя слева позиция в предложении. Определение статуса именных членов предложения - один из активно дискутируемых и актуальных вопросов современного дагестановедения. Неоднозначность трактовки и отсутствие четких критериев выделения именных членов предложения в дагестанских языках создает проблемы не только в исследовании синтаксического строя дагестанских языков, но и в их преподавании в школах и вузах республики.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article introduces an attempt to establish suitable principles of defi ning subject as one of the main parts of sentence for ergative languages of Dagestan. The problems of syntactic division of sentence and peculiarities of its members in Dagestani languages are still examined only in general. Even the question of the number of principal sentence members is still under discussion. Only semantic or pure formal features are traditionally used as the criteria for distinguishing between sentence members. Within Dagestani languages studies there are no special researches devoted to this question. To distinguish the predicative of sentence the authors suggest using three levels of the language: syntactical, semantic and pragmatic ones. However, the article gives priority to syntactical features as members of the sentence are syntactical category, and their specifi cs should be found in peculiarities of combination of words while forming a sentence. Formal criteria are also very important, but apart from morphology, syntax is interested not in forms of words separately but in their combination with each other. In some sentence constructions it is exactly the word order that is the only criteria of the subject as a principle member of sentence. Subject as syntactic element is characterized by defi nite relationships with other parts of sentence; therefore word order is suggested to be the fi rst identifi ed feature of subject which holds the fi rst left position in a sentence. In every language there are some means which express syntactical connections between words within a sentence, which help ‘recognize’ members of sentence. These are morphological (structural), semantic and syntactical means. In ergative languages these means play different roles for different structures of sentence. For absolute sentence constructions, morphological means of expressing connections between words in a sentence are rather important. Correlation is a morphological means of connection, as it is used through forms of words. For ergative sentence constructions, semantic means of expressing syntactical connections are also very important. In this case, the semantic factor is the key one in defi ning members of sentence. Subject in this case is defi ned by means of comparison of semantic contents of the sentence (only its meaning), as functional homonymy of ergative and absolutive cases prevents distinguishing between subject and object of sentence. As for ergativoid (bi-absolutive) constructions, their criterion is a pure syntactical means of expressing syntactical connections, i.e. the word order. For other types of constructions word order is not the main criteria for distinguishing members of sentence, however, any change of word order infl uences the meaning of the sentence. In ergative and absolutive constructions syntactical connections and functions of certain words during the change of word order, in contrast to ergativoid construction, do not change but the sentence as a whole obtains a rather new shade of meaning. Thus, the word order in Dagestani ergative languages plays a very important role for the structure and contents of sentence.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>структура предложения</kwd><kwd>порядок слов</kwd><kwd>эргативные языки</kwd><kwd>номинативные языки</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Абдуллаев З. Г. Проблемы эргативности даргинского языка. М.: Наука, 1986. 375 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abdullaev Z. G. Problemy ergativnosti darginskogo yazyka [The Dargin language:  issues of ergativity]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1986, 375 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Будагов Р. А. Этюды по синтаксису румынского языка. М.: Наука, 1958. 234 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Budagov R. A. Etyudy po sintaksisu rumynskogo yazyka [Sketches of Rumanian syntax]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1958, 234 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кацнельсон С. Д. Типология языка и речевое мышление. Л.: Наука, 1972. 213 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chafe W. L. Znachenie i struktura yazyka / per. s angl. Izd. 2-oe [Meaning and the  structure of language. Transl. from English. 2nd ed.]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2003, 427  p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кибрик А. Е. Проблема синтаксических отношений в универсальной грамматике [электронный ресурс] // URL: http://nashaucheba.ru/ (дата обращения: 25.02.2017).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Katsnelson S. D. Tipologiya yazyka i rechevoe myshlenie [Typology of language and  verbal thinking]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972, 213 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кинэн Э. К универсальному определению подлежащего // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. ХI. М., 1982. С. 236-276.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Keenan E. L. Variation in universal grammar // Analyzing variation in language. Eds.  R. Fasold, R. Shuy Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press, 1975, pp. 136–148 (In Eng.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Магомедбекова З. М. О некоторых синтаксических особенностях глаголов чувственного восприятия в аваро-андийских языках // Вопросы синтаксического строя иберийскокавказских языков. Нальчик, 1977. С. 247- 249.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kibrik A. E. Problema sintaksicheskikh otnosheniy v universal’noy grammatike [The  problem of syntactic relations in universal grammar]. Available at:  http://nashaucheba.ru/ (accessed: 25 February 2017) (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мазарчук А. В. История изучения информационной структуры предложения в современном монгольском языке // Вестник Калмыцкого института гуманитарных исследований РАН. 2016. № 2. С. 106-115.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Keenan E. K universal’nomu opredeleniyu podlezhashchego [Universal defi nition of  subject revisited]. Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike (The Latest Achievements of  Foreign Linguistics), iss. XI, Moscow, 1982, pp. 236–276 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маллаева З. М. К вопросу о соотношении логических и грамматических категорий в эргативных языках // Молодежь и наука Дагестана: мат-лы Регион. науч.-практ. конф. Махачкала, 2002. С. 93-95.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Magomedbekova Z. M. O nekotorykh sintaksicheskikh osobennostyakh glagolov chuvstvennogo vospriyatiya v avaro-andiyskikh yazykakh [On some syntactic  peculiarities of sense perception denoting verbs in the Avar- Andic languages].  Voprosy sintaksicheskogo stroya iberiysko-kavkazskikh yazykov [Iberian- Caucasian  languages: issues of syntactic structure]. Nalchik, 1977, pp. 247–249 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маллаева З. М., Адухова Э. З. Соответствие между логическими и грамматическим категориями в синтаксической структуре дагестанских языков // Дагестан и Северный Кавказ в свете этнокультурного взаимодействия Евразии: мат-лы конф., посвящ. 80-летию ИЯЛИ ДНЦ РАН . Махачкала, 2008. С. 104-114.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mallaeva Z. M. K voprosu o sootnoshenii logicheskikh i grammaticheskikh kategoriy v  ergativnykh yazykakh [Revisiting the correlation between logical and grammatical categories in ergative languages]. Mat-ly Region. nauch.-praktich. konf. «Molodezh’  i nauka Dagestana» [Youth and Science of Dagestan: proc. of the regional research  and practice conf.]. Makhachkala, 2002, pp. 93–95 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маллаева З. М., Адухова Э. З. Многообразие синтаксических структур в дагестанских языках // Вестник Дагестанского научного центра РАН. 2008а. № 30. С. 81-86.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mallaeva Z. M., Adukhova E. Z. Mnogoobrazie sintaksicheskikh struktur v  dagestanskikh yazykakh [The diverse syntactic structures of Dagestani languages].  Vestnik Dagestanskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN (Herald of Daghestan Scientifi c  Center), No. 30, Makhachkala, 2008a, pp. 81–86 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Нурмагомедова Э. М. Синтаксическая характеристика глагола аварского языка: автореф. дис. … канд. филол. наук. Махачкала, 2007. 26 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mallaeva Z. M., Adukhova E. Z. Sootvetstvie mezhdu logicheskimi i grammaticheskim kategoriyami v sintaksicheskoy strukture dagestanskikh yazykov [The correlation between logical and grammatical categories within the syntactic structure of  Dagestani languages]. Mat-ly konf., posvyashch. 80-letiyu IYaLI DNTs RAN «Dagestan i  Severnyy Kavkaz v svete etnokul’turnogo vzaimodeystviya Evrazii» [Dagestan and the  North Caucasus in the Context of Eurasian Ethnocultural Cooperation: proc. of the  conf. celebrating the 80th anniversary of the Institute of History, Lamguage and  Literature]. Makhachkala, 2008, pp. 104–114 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Омакаева Э. У. Глагол как доминанта в свете модельного описания предложения-высказывания в монгольских языках (проблемы классификации) // Вестник Калмыцкого института гуманитарных исследований РАН. 2011. № 1. С. 123-131.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mazarchuk A. V. Istoriya izucheniya informatsionnoy struktury predlozheniya v  sovremennom mongol’skom yazyke [The history of sentence information structure  studies in the modern Mongolian language]. Vestnik Kalmytskogo instituta  gumanitarnykh issledovaniy RAN (Bulletin of the Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of  the RAS), No. 2, 2016, pp. 106–115 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тестелец Я. Г. Введение в общий синтаксис. М.: Изд-во РГГУ, 2001. 798 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nurmagomedova E. M. Sintaksicheskaya kharakteristika glagola avarskogo yazyka: Avtoref. dis. … kand. fi lol. Nauk [The Avar language: syntactic characteristics of  the verb. A Ph.D. thesis abstract]. Makhachkala, 2007, 26 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чейф У. Л. Значение и структура языка / пер. с англ. Изд. 2-е. М.: изд-во «URSS», 2003. 427 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Omakaeva E. U. Glagol kak dominanta v svete model’nogo opisaniya  predlozheniyavyskazyvaniya v mongol’skikh yazykakh (problemy klassifi katsii) [The  verb as a dominant element in the context of model description of statement- sentences in Mongolic languages (classifi cation problems)]. Vestnik Kalmytskogo  instituta gumanitarnykh issledovaniy RAN (Bulletin of the Kalmyk Institute for  Humanities of the RAS), No. 1, 2011, pp. 123–131 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Keenan E. L. Variation in universal grammar // Analyzing variation in language. Eds. R. Fasold, R. Shuy Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1975. P. 136-148.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Testelets Ya. G. Vvedenie v obshchiy sintaksis [An introduction to general syntax].  Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities Press, 2001, 798 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schmidt W. Grundlagen der deutschen Grammatik. Berlin: Volk und Wissen, 1965. 323 s.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schmidt W. Grundlagen der deutschen Grammatik. Berlin: Volk und Wissen, 1965. 323 s.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schuchardt H. Über den passiver Charakter des Transitives in den kaukasischen Sprachen // Sitzungsbericht der kaiserlicher Akademie der Wissenschaft. Bund 133, Wien, 1895. S. 1-91.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schuchardt H. Über den passiver Charakter des Transitives in den kaukasischen Sprachen // Sitzungsbericht der kaiserlicher Akademie der Wissenschaft. Bund 133, Wien, 1895. S. 1-91.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
