<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">kigiran</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Oriental Studies</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Oriental Studies</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2619-0990</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-1008</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science «Kalmyk Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences» (KalmSC RAS)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">kigiran-55</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИСТОРИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ И АРХЕОЛОГИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>HISTORY STUDIES &amp; ARCHEOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ЛИЧНОСТЬ КАК ОСНОВА СОХРАНЕНИЯ КУЛЬТУРНО-ИСТОРИЧЕСКОЙ ТРАДИЦИИ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Personality as a Basis for Saving of Cultural and Historical Traditions</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Данчай-Оол</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Danchay-Ool</surname><given-names>A. ..</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Айыжы</surname><given-names>Е. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Aiyzhy</surname><given-names>E. ..</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Тувинский государственный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Tuvan State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2015</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>04</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>82</fpage><lpage>85</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Данчай-Оол А.А., Айыжы Е.В., 2018</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Данчай-Оол А.А., Айыжы Е.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Danchay-Ool A..., Aiyzhy E...</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://kigiran.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/55">https://kigiran.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/55</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья посвящена актуальным проблемам диалектики личности и культурно-историчес­кой традиции. Формулируется особый подход к решению проблемы сохранения целостной культурно-историчес­кой традиции в связи с  антропологическими и духовно-ценностными основами деятельности. Противоречия современной цивилизации связываются с редукцией системы образования к простой схеме передачи информации. Указывается, что передача культурно-исторической традиции должна быть включена в систему формирования полноценной личности, а также подчеркивается необходимость анализа коллективного субъекта в виде симфонической личности.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article is devoted to the problems of preservation of cultural and historical traditions in the context of globalization and the uniﬁcation of values and categorical systems. An important aspect of overcoming these contradictions of social development is seen as a special understanding of the individual, not only as individuals but also as a subject of particular historical community. The system of socialization, which mainly lies in the educational structure of society forms the people who will carry out certain functions in the system of social production. Holistic personality development is not a priority. Values and spirituality of the people create the whole person, for this reason, the subject is not only the individual, but also the subject of cultural-historical community, symphonic personality. Spiritual values are fundamental to the individual person. They indicate the objectives, targets, provide an opportunity to dialectically overcome all the problems posed by reality. Man is a creature both biological and social, and thus it is born only in society. Outside of society is born only individual who is very far from being able to become a full and integral member of the human race. Gradually formed individual personality, which has a vital connection with the cultural and historical tradition, from the spiritual foundation of the people. The moral principle lies in the basis of thinking. Consciousness in the goal-setting is not only the motives, but also collective. Personality can not go against moral principles. Such an act leads to its internal conﬂict, which becomes intractable. Value system is formed by a person of culture.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>культурно-историческаятрадиция</kwd><kwd>диалектика</kwd><kwd>личность</kwd><kwd>субъект</kwd><kwd>индивид</kwd><kwd>ценность</kwd><kwd>духовность</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>cultural and historical tradition</kwd><kwd>dialectics</kwd><kwd>personality</kwd><kwd>subject</kwd><kwd>individual</kwd><kwd>value</kwd><kwd>spirituality. * Работа выполнена при финансовой поддержке РГНФ. Проект 15-21-03002 «Диалог цивилиз</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Валицкая А. П. Образ России в контексте национального самосознания // Образ России: Сборник научных статей. СПб.: Пневма, 2009 г. С. 6-22.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Валицкая А. П. Образ России в контексте национального самосознания // Образ России: Сборник научных статей. СПб.: Пневма, 2009 г. С. 6-22.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Давыдов В. В. Теория развивающего обучения. М.: ИНТОР, 1996. 544 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Давыдов В. В. Теория развивающего обучения. М.: ИНТОР, 1996. 544 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кемеров В. Е. Проблема личности: методология исследования и жизненный смысл. М.: Политиздат, 1977. 256 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Кемеров В. Е. Проблема личности: методология исследования и жизненный смысл. М.: Политиздат, 1977. 256 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Карсавин Л. П. О личности // Карсавин Л. П. Путь православия. М.: ООО «Изд-во АСТ»; Харьков: Фолио, 2003. С. 120-168.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Карсавин Л. П. О личности // Карсавин Л. П. Путь православия. М.: ООО «Изд-во АСТ»; Харьков: Фолио, 2003. С. 120-168.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Корольков А. А. Духовная антропология. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ, 2005. 324 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Корольков А. А. Духовная антропология. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ, 2005. 324 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фейербах Л. История философии. Собрание произведений в трех томах. Т. 2. М.: Мысль, 1974. 480 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Фейербах Л. История философии. Собрание произведений в трех томах. Т. 2. М.: Мысль, 1974. 480 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хоружий С. С. Философия Карсавина в судьбах европейской мысли о личности // Лев Платонович Карсавин. М.: Рос. полит. энцикл. (РОССПЭН), 2012. С. 193-214.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Хоружий С. С. Философия Карсавина в судьбах европейской мысли о личности // Лев Платонович Карсавин. М.: Рос. полит. энцикл. (РОССПЭН), 2012. С. 193-214.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хоружий С. С. После перерыва. Пути русской философии. СПб.: Алетейя, 1994. 448 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Хоружий С. С. После перерыва. Пути русской философии. СПб.: Алетейя, 1994. 448 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
