Migration of Rural Population in Southern Russian Regions: Problems, Trends, Directions*
https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2018-37-3-152-164
Abstract
In the modern world, migration serves as a fundamental regulator of demographic, social, economic, and ethnic processes. Still, among the current numerous and multidirectional migrations those are migrations of rural population that keep playing a significant role in the socio-economic development of certain countries. The intensity of migration processes and its directions indicate, on the one hand, different social, economic and demographic problems in the region (that lie behind such migrations), and, on the other hand, show the economic attractiveness of the host region.
The article aims to examine migration processes involving rural population of southern Russian regions. The latter ― those of the South and North Caucasus Federal Districts ― constitute the macroregion of South Russia with a prevailing share of rural population (as compared to other federal districts). Due to natural climatic conditions and traditions of native peoples, it is agriculture which is crucial to virtually all local economies.
The paper analyzes statistical data of the Russian Federal Statistics Service on the considered federal districts and examines a number of statistical indicators, such as share of urban and rural populations, general birth rates, composition of the unemployed by settlement patterns, internal village-to-city migration by source and host teritories, internal village-to-village migration by source and host teritories, etc.
Our statistical analysis shows that the larger the share of rural population gets, the larger the share of unemployed rural residents is. Village-to-village migration is 2,5 times as small as village-to-city one. The two types of migration differ economically, i. e. including in terms of economic and infrastructure attractiveness of regions / federal districts. This leads to a conclusion that migrations of rural population result in decreases in the share of rural population within the nation’s social structure, accelerate urbanization, rural depopulation, reduce and worsen the demographic potential of rural territories.
Thus, the unfolding situation of village depopulation constitutes a great problem for Russia’s agricultural regions.
In view of this, the key strategic goal of the government should be to boost employment and efficiently regulate the labor market in rural areas, which is supposed to change directions of internal labor migration. So, the paper suggests regional governments should tackle the priority tasks as follows:
creation of new (modernized) jobs in farm businesses that would facilitate a transition to innovative technologies and industrial economic patterns,
formation of policies to stimulate development of entrepreneurship, peasant farm enterprises, self-employment, and family employment patterns (household plots and consumers’ co-operatives), including measures to facilitate the integration of large and small-sized businesses,
enhancement of territorial and professional mobility of rural residents, availability of professional and supplementary training programs,
creation of conditions to attract and keep young professionals in rural territories.
The mentioned tasks also include development of non-agricultural types of activities and alternative employment patterns. As economists note, contemporary rural labor markets are constituted by the two differing employment types ― agricultural employment and alternative one, the latter experiencing the formation period nowadays. Special emphasis upon certain characteristics of territories allows to develop a viable and progressive marketfor alternative employment.
About the Author
Nogan V. BadmaevaRussian Federation
Research Associate,
References
1. Абдулманапов 2017 — Абдулманапов П. Г. Совершенствование демографической и миграционной политики в регионах Северо-Кавказского федерального округа с учетом этнодемографической и социально-экономической дифференциации территорий // Региональные проблемы преобразования экономики. 2017. № 3 (77). С. 83–89. [Abdulmanapov P. G. Sovershenstvovanie demograficheskoy i migratsionnoy politiki v regionakh Severo-Kavkazskogo federal’nogo okruga s uchetom etnodemograficheskoy i sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoy differentsiatsii territoriy [Improvement of demographic and migration policy in the regions of North Caucasian Federal District taking into account the ethno-demographic and social-economic differentiation of territories]. Regional’nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki. 2017. No. 3 (77). Pp. 83–89].
2. Бухер 2016 — Бухер С. Современные тенденции старения населения России // Вестник Российской академии наук. 2016. Т. 86. № 3. С. 215–223. [Bukher S. Population ageing in Russia: current trends. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2016. Vol. 86. No. 3. Pp. 215–223].
3. Воробьева, Топилин 2014 — Воробьева О. Д., Топилин А. В. Сельско-городская миграция России в материалах переписей населения 1970 и 1989 гг. // Актуальные проблемы социально-экономического развития России. 2014. № 4. С. 47–57. [Vorobyova O. D., Topilin A. V. Village-to-city migration in Russia: a case study of 1970 / 1989 Census materials. Aktual’nye problemy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii. 2014. No. 4. Pp. 47–57]
4. Демографический словарь 2003 — Демографический понятийный словарь / под ред. Л. Л. Рыбаковского. М.: ЦСП, 2003. 352 с. [Demograficheskiy ponyatiynyy slovar’ [Demographic dictionary]. L. L. Rybakovsky (ed.). Moscow: TSSP, 2003. 352 p.]
5. Зайончковская 1972 — Зайончковская Ж. А. Новоселы в городах. М.: Статистика, 1972. 164 с. [Zayonchkovskaya Zh. A. Novosely v gorodakh [Newly arrived city dwellers]. Moscow: Statistika, 1972. 164 p.]
6. Зайончковская 1988 — Зайончковская Ж. А. Миграция и урбанизация в СССР в послеоктябрьский период // Население СССР за 70 лет. М.: Наука, 1988. С. 37–74. [Zayonchkovskaya Zh. A. Migration and urbanization in the USSR during the post-October period. Naselenie SSSR za 70 let. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. Pp. 37–74].
7. Корель 1982 — Корель Л. В. Перемещения населения между городом и селом в условиях урбанизации. Новосибирск: Наука: СО АН СССР, 1982. 192 с. [Korel L. V. Peremescheniya naseleniya mezhdu gorodom i selom v usloviyakh urbanizatsii [Village-city migration in the context of urbanization]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1982. 192 p.]
8. Мкртчян 2017 — Мкртчян Н. В. Миграция молодежи из малых городов России // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2017. С. 225–242. [Mkrtchyan N. V. The youth migration from small towns in Russia. Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny [Public opinion monitoring: economic and social changes]. 2017. Pp. 225–242].
9. Мкртчян 2016 — Мкртчян Н. В. Внутрироссийская трудовая миграция: масштабы и структурные характеристики // Научные труды: Институт народнохозяйственного прогнозирования РАН. 2016. № 1. С. 546–561. [Mkrtchyan N. V. Intra-Russian labor migration: incidence and structural features. Nauchnye trudy: Institut narodnokhozyaystvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN. 2016. No. 1. Pp. 546–561].
10. Нефедова, Мкртчян 2017 — Нефедова Т. Г., Мкртчян Н. В. Миграция сельского населения и динамика сельскохозяйственной занятости в регионах России // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 5. География. 2017. № 5. С. 58–67. [Nefedova T. G., Mkrtchyan N. V. Migration of rural population and dynamics of agricultural employment in the regions of Russia. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya. 2017. No. 5. Pp. 58–67].
11. Нефедова 2003 — Нефедова Т. Г. Сельская Россия на перепутье: географические очерки. М.: Новое издательство, 2003. 408 с. [Nefedova T. G. Sel’skaya Rossiya na pereput’e: geograficheskie ocherki [Rural Russia in crosshairs: geographical sketches]. Moscow: Novoe Izdatel’stvo, 2003.
12. p.]
13. Переведенцев 1975 — Переведенцев В. И. Методы изучения миграции населения. М.: Наука, 1975. 231 с. [Perevedentsev V. I. Metody izucheniya migratsii naseleniya [Population movement: research methods]. Moscow: Nauka, 1975. 231 p.]
14. Россия — страна … — Россия — страна умирающих деревень [электронный ресурс] // Центр экономических и политических реформ. 9.12.2016. URL: http://cepr.su//2016/12/09/россия-страна-умирающих-деревень/ (дата обращения: 25.01.2018). [Rossiya — strana umirayuschikh dereven’ [Russia: a country of depressed villages]. Center for Economic and Political Reforms.] Available at: http://cepr.su//2016/12/09/россия-страна-умирающих-деревень/ (accessed: 25 January 2018).
15. Рубинская 2016 — Рубинская Э. Д. Социально-экономическое развитие Южного федерального округа и структура международной трудовой миграции // Вестник Ростовского государственного экономического университета (РИНХ). 2016. №2 (54). С. 53–61. [Rubinskaya E. D. Socio-economic development of Southern Federal District and structure of international labor migration. Vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta (RINKh). 2016. No. 2 (54). Pp. 53–61].
16. Староверов 1975 — Староверов В. И. Социально-демографические проблемы деревни: Методология, методика, опыт анализа миграции сельского населения. М.: Наука, 1975. 287 с. [Staroverov V. I. Sotsial’no-demograficheskie problemy derevni: Metodologiya, metodika, opyt analiza migratsii sel’skogo naseleniya [Social and demographic problems of the village: methodology, procedure, experience of rural population migration analysis]. Moscow: Nauka, 1975. 287 p.]
17. Тарасова 2016 — Тарасова Т. Т. Современные миграционные процессы в Южном Федеральном округе // PRIMO ASPECTU. 2016. № 4 (28). С. 40–44. [Tarasova T. T. Modern migration processes in the Southern Federal District. PRIMO ASPECTU. 2016. No. 4 (28). Pp. 40–44].
18. Чапек 1983 — Чапек В. Н. Миграция и стабилизация трудовых ресурсов села. Ростов-на-Дону: Изд-во Ростовского университета, 1983. 143 с. [Chapek V. N. Migratsiya i stabilizatsiya trudovykh resursov sela [Labor resources of the village: migration and stabilization]. Rostov-on-Don: Rostov State Univ., 1983. 143 p.]
19. Эльдяева, Кованова 2015 — Эльдяева Н. А., Кованова Е. С. Оценка влияния внутренней трудовой миграции населения на социально-экономическое развитие региона // Статистика и экономика. 2015. № 6. С. 106–111. [Eldyaeva N. A., Kovanova E. S. Assessment of internal labor migration on the socio-economic development of regions. Statistika i ekonomika. 2015. No. 6. Pp. 106–111].
20. Doeringer, Piore 1971 — Doeringer P., Piore M. Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath, 1971. 344 p.
21. Du, Park 2005 — Du Y., Park A., Wang S. Migration and rural poverty in China. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2005. Vol. 33. No. 4. Pp. 688–709.
22. Fei, Ranis 1975 ― Fei J., Ranis G. A model of growth and employment in the open dualistic economy: the case of Korea and Taiwan. The Journal of Development Studies. 1975. Vol. 11. Iss. 2. Pp. 32–63.
23. Harris, Todaro 1970 — Harris J., Todaro M. Migration, Unemployment, and Development: a Two-Sector Analysis. American Economic Review. 1970. No. 60. Рp. 126–142.
24. Lewis 1954 — Lewis W. A. Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour. Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies. 1954. Vol. 22. No. 2. Рp. 139–191. Available at: http://faculty.smu.edu/tosang/pdf/Lewis_1954.pdf (accessed: 15 February 2018).
25. Lipton 1980 — Lipton M. Migration from rural areas of poor countries: the impact on rural productivity and income distribution. World Development. 1980. Vol. 8. No. 1. Рp. 1–24.
26. Stiglitz 2012 — Stiglitz Joseph E. The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2012. 307 p.
Review
For citations:
Badmaeva N. Migration of Rural Population in Southern Russian Regions: Problems, Trends, Directions*. Oriental Studies. 2018;11(3):152-164. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2018-37-3-152-164