Communicative Solidarity in Social Media: Methodological Peculiarities of Research
https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2016-26-4-185-191
Abstract
In modern science, the topic of social solidarity is certainly relevant and is evolving. A special factor in the development of the theme is the active formation of social communities in not only the real world but also in the virtual one. The article aims to examine the methodological peculiarities of research of communicative solidarity in social media. The phenomenon of solidarity provides explicit opportunities for interpretation in the context of large-scale social transformations that have been taking place in our country in the past two decades. In a situation of deep and structural crises, peculiarities of social interactions based on solidarity get manifested most clearly. Synthesizing the defi nition of “solidarity” and characteristics of communicative solidarity, we can assert that in the broadest sense communicative solidarity arises in the course of transmission and reception of information based on harmony and mutual trust given that it also serves as the basis for unity of social actors pursuing a certain goal. Studies of communicative solidarity in social media should be based on the methodology of the network analysis (SNA). The main distinct feature of the latter from other approaches is that it focuses the researcher’s attention on the interaction within the network rather than on separate attributes and characteristics of the object under consideration. At the empirical level, application of the methodology of the network analysis in studies of the phenomenon of communicative solidarity makes it possible to defi ne the basic structural components of typical communicative practices in social media, to perform their typology and classifi cation in the context of defi nite situations. Moreover, the network analysis has extensive capabilities for analyzing textual information which is important enough for studies of communicative solidarity in social media. The network analysis of texts fi lls the structure of communicative solidarity with meaningful and essential characteristics. Such analysis helps identify new mechanisms of social interactions that affect the characteristics of communicative solidarity. The methodology of the network analysis can signifi cantly reduce research costs when it comes both to studies of social solidarity in diverse virtual forms as well as those of communication practices typical of network communitie
About the Authors
A. E. GapichRussian Federation
Ph. D. in Sociology, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology
A. P. Istomina
Russian Federation
Ph. D. in Sociology, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology
References
1. Arestova A. N., Babanin L. N., Voiskunsky A. E. Kommunikatsiya v komp’yuternykh setyakh: psikhologicheskie determinanty i posledstviya [Communication in computer networks: psychological determinants and consequences]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [The Moscow University Herald], ser. 14, Psychology, 1996, No. 4, pp. 14–20 (In Russ.).
2. Bataeva E. V. Usloviya kommunikativnoy solidarnosti v diversifi tsirovannom obshchestve [Terms of communicative solidarity in a diversifi ed society]. Gumanitarny chasopis [Humanities Journal], 2015, No. 2, pp. 12–18 (In Russ.).
3. Vladimirova T. V. Setevye kommunikatsii kak istochnik informatsionnykh ugroz [Network communications as a source of information threats]. Available at: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/2011/09/20/1267451215/Vladimirova.pdf (accessed: 5 October 2016) (In Russ.).
4. Golovakha E. I., Panina N. V. Sotsial’noe bezumie: istoriya, teoriya i sovremennaya praktika [Social Madness: history, theory and current practices]. Kiev, Abris Publ., 1994, 168 p. (In Russ.).
5. Gradyushko A. A. Sotsial’nye media v sisteme internet-kommunikatsiy [Social media in the Internet communications system]. Available at: http://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/16643 (accessed: 6 October 2016) (In Russ.).
6. Gubanov D. A., Novikov D. A., Chkhartishvili A. V. Modeli vliyaniya v sotsial’nykh setyakh [Models of infl uence in social networks]. Upravlenie bol’shimi sistemami: sbornik trudov [Control of Large Networks: a collection of works], 2009, No. 29, pp. 207–284 (In Russ.).
7. Durkheim E. The defi nition of moral fact. E. Durkheim Sociology: Its subject matter, method, purpose. Moscow, TERRA Publ., 2008, pp. 244–275 (In Russ.).
8. Ksenofontova I. V. Rol’ interneta v razvitii protestnogo dvizheniya [The role of the Internet in the development of the protest movement]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny [The Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes journal], 2012, No. 3 (109), pp. 114– 116 (In Russ.).
9. Lezhebokov A. A., Sergodeeva E. A., Sergodeev V. A. Setevye soobshchestva v sotsial’nykh media Runeta [Network communities in the social media of the Runet: a monograph]. Stavropol, North-Caucasus Federal Univ. Press, 2016, 182 p. (In Russ.).
10. Obukhov K. N. Set’ kak sotsial’naya struktura: model’ setevoy kommunikatsii v teorii M. Kastel’sa [Network as a social structure: a model of the network communication in the theory of M. Castells]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Udmurt University], ser. “Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy”, 2008, No. 1 (55), pp. 107–110 (In Russ.).
11. Reutov E. V., Kolpina L. V., Reutova M. N., Boyarinova I. V. Effektivnost’ sotsial’nykh setey v regional’nom soobshchestve [The effectiveness of social networks in a regional community]. Available at: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/2011/04/25/1268026819/Reutov.pdf (accessed: 5 October 2016) (In Russ.).
12. Semenov E. E. Virtual’naya setevaya paradigma politicheskoy aktivnosti [The virtual network paradigm of political activity]. Vlast’ [Power journal], 2013, No. 4, pp. 34–38 (In Russ.).
13. Usik E. Y. Sotsial’naya set’ kak sotsiologicheskaya kategoriya i sotsial’nyy fenomen [Social network as a sociological category and social phenomenon]. Metodologiya, teoriya i praktika sotsiologicheskogo analiza sovremennogo obshchestva [Methodology, theory and practice of the sociological analysis of modern society], 2011, pp. 82–85 (In Russ.).
14. Shestyorkina L. P., Borchenko I. D. Osnovnye kharakteristiki novykh sotsial’nykh media [Basic descriptions of new social media]. Uchenye zapiski ZabGU [Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University], 2014, No. 2 (55), pp. 107– 111 (In Russ.).
15. Shibut I. P. Kompleksnyy podkhod k kommunikatsii v sotsial’nykh media: orientatsiya na tselevye gruppy [A comprehensive approach to communication in social media: focus on target groups]. Available at: http://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/54530 (accessed: 7 October 2016) (In Russ.).
16. Steinberg I. E. Paradigma chetyrekh «K» v issledovaniyakh sotsial’nykh setey podderzhki [The paradigm of the four “К” in studies of social support networks]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya (journal), 2010, No. 5, pp. 40–50 (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Gapich A.E., Istomina A.P. Communicative Solidarity in Social Media: Methodological Peculiarities of Research. Oriental Studies. 2016;9(4):185-191. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2016-26-4-185-191