Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

The Late 1950s Restoration of Autonomies for Repressed Peoples of Kalmykia and the North Caucasus — and the Problem of Rehabilitation: Debating Issues of Contemporary Russian Historiography

https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2021-53-1-74-86

Abstract

Introduction. The late 1950s restoration of autonomies for the repressed peoples is an important era in the history of those ethnic statehoods. Still, even over 60 years thereafter quite a number of issues remain essentially problematic. And the main question is as follows: Can one interpret the late 1950s restoration of autonomies for the repressed peoples of Southern Russia as a rehabilitation? Materials and Methods. The study analyzes a number of scholarly Russian historiographical publications examining the mentioned period, and employs the historical genetic and historical legal methods. Results. The article considers a range of problematic issues, such as substantial features of ‘rehabilitation’ for repressed peoples in the Soviet era, political and historical essentials of the process, general issues of periodization of the rehabilitation (including that of the Soviet era), debating aspects of the phenomenon in respect to the restoration of autonomies, contemporary political and legal aspects related to the Soviet restoration of South Russia’s ethnic autonomies. Conclusions. In Russian historiography, there is a consensus as to the identification of the period of the restoration of autonomies for the repressed peoples as a rehabilitation, though incomplete one. The paper shows observation of the principle of historicism presupposes this period be viewed in a general context of the whole Soviet era that witnessed the rehabilitation of repressed peoples pinnacled with the rehabilitation decrees of perestroika. Since 1992 there emerged a new — Russian — stage of the rehabilitation. As for critical notes on outdated norms of the RSFSR Law On the Rehabilitation of Repressed Peoples, it seems evident that the agenda of its complete implementation was never actualized by federal government agencies since the mid-1990s. It is possible that another law be created in future to comprise the rehabilitation experiences of the Soviets, including that of the initial stage from the late 1950s. This would require explicit political and legal assessments of the repressed peoples’ rehabilitation in a historical perspective. 

About the Author

Evgeniy A. Gunaev
Kalmyk Scientific Center of the RAS (8, Ilishkin Str., Elista, 358000, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (Law), Senior Research Associate



References

1. Alafaev A. A., Sabanchiev Kh.-M. A. The rehabilitation of the Balkar people: problems and solutions. Otechestvennaya istoriya. 2008. No. 1. Pp. 79–90. (In Russ.)

2. Alibegilov Sh. A. The acts of state on political and legal rehabilitation of the oppressed peoples of the North Caucasus. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Series 9: Philology. Asian Studies. Journalism. 2011. No. 3. Pp. 168–172. (In Russ.)

3. Artizov A. N., Sigachev Yu. V., Khlopov V. G., Shevchuk I. N. (comps.) The Rehabilitation: How It Was. Documents by the Presidium of the CPSU Central Committee and Other Materials. Vol. 2: February 1956 – Early 1980s. Moscow: MFD, 2003. 960 p. (In Russ.)

4. Borov A. Kh., Azikova Yu. M. History and ethno-politics in post-Soviet Kabardin-Balkaria. The New Past. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 218–231. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18522.2500-3224-2020-1-218-231

5. Bugaev A. M. Re-establishment of the Chechen-Ingush ASSR: the initial stage, 1956–1958. Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic. 2009. No. 1 (10). Pp. 65–78. (In Russ.)

6. Bugay N. F. Forced Resettlements of the 20th Century: The Problem of Territories. Moscow: Nauka, 2018. 471 p. (In Russ.)

7. Bugay N. F. Priority areas of the USSR state national policy in the 1960s–1980s. Caucasology. 2020. No. 4. Pp. 107–136. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31143/2542-212X-2020-4-107-136

8. Bugay N. F. The problem of the territories as an integral part of the state national policy in conditions of forced resettlement: ideology and practice. Bulletin of the Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of the RAS (Oriental Studies). 2013. No. 3. Pp. 5–16. (In Russ.)

9. Bugay N. F. The Problems of Repressions and Civic Rehabilitation: History and Historiography, 20th – Early 21st Centuries. Moscow: Grif & Co., 2012. 480 p. (In Russ.)

10. Chornovol E. P. Periodization of evolution of the rehabilitation of the victims of political repressions as a legal institution, a process and a theory. Legal Studies. Online journal. 2015. No. 11. Pp. 1–94. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2015.11.1670. Available at: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_16704.html (accessed: December 15, 2020). (In Russ.)

11. Gunaev E. A. Restoration of national autonomies of repressed peoples in the RSFSR in the late 1950s in the context of legal succession theory. Genesis: Historical Studies. Online journal. 2020. No. 7. Pp. 86–100. Available at: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=31030 (accessed: December 15, 2020). (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2020.7.31030

12. History of Ingushetia. Akhriev Ingush Humanities Research Institute. Rostov-on-Don: Yuzhnyi Izdatelskiy Dom, 2012. 536 p. (In Russ.)

13. Ibragimov M. M. (ed.) History of Chechnya: From Earliest Times to the Present Days. Vol. II: 20th and Early 21st Centuries. Grozny: Knizhnoe Izdatelstvo, 2008. 832 p. (In Russ.)

14. Ibragimov M. M. Evolution of the Chechen statehood and its constitutional development, mid-20th – early 21st centuries. In: Constitutional and Statehood Construction in Southern Russia. Past and Present (The Second Kadyrov Readings). Jubilee Conference Proceedings. (Grozny; March 20, 2013). Grozny: Groznenskiy Rabochiy, 2013. Pp. 295–304. (In Russ.)

15. Krinko E. F., Cherkasov A. A. From the history of regaining autonomies of the repressed peoples in the North Caucasus under the ‘Thaw’. The New Historical Bulletin. 2014. No. 1 (39). Pp. 48–69. (In Russ.)

16. Kruglov V. N. Administrative and territorial structure of the RSFSR, 1950s – early 1960s: traditions and innovations, solutions and consequences. In: Russia–USSR–Russian Federation in Reforms and Revolutions, 20th – 21st Centuries. Conference Proceedings (Saratov; May 26–27, 2016). Saratov: Amirit, 2016. Pp. 65–70. (In Russ.)

17. Lebedev A. N. The Russian Federalism: Late 18th – Late 20th Centuries. Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2018. 217 p. (In Russ.)

18. Lidzhieva I. V. Key Stages in the Rehabilitation of Repressed Peoples: A Case Study of Kalmykia. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis abstract. Astrakhan, 2007. 20 p. (In Russ.)

19. Lidzhieva I. V., Sogdanova Z. G. State programs for the economic revitalization of Kalmyk Autonomous Oblast. In: The Restoration of Chechen-Ingush Autonomy — A Triumph of Historical Justice. Jubilee Conference Proceedings. (Grozny; March 24–25, 2017). Grozny: Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic, 2017. Pp. 165–173. (In Russ.)

20. Maksimov K. N. From the Khrushchev Thaw to political rehabilitation of the Kalmyk people: restoration of the autonomy. Bulletin of the Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of the RAS (Oriental Studies). 2017. No. 1 (29). Pp. 38–47. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22162/2075-7794-2017-29-1-38-47

21. Maksimov K. N., Lidzhieva I. V. Kalmykia in the 20th Century: Historical Experience and Its Significance. Kalmyk Scientific Center (RAS); Russian Historical Society (Kalmykia Branch). Moscow: Nauka, 2017. 461 p. (In Russ.)

22. Maksimov K. N., Ochirova N. G. (eds.) History of Kalmykia: From Earliest Times to the Present Days. In 3 vols. Elista: Gerel, 2009. Vol. 2. 840 p. (In Russ.)

23. Miserbieva L. S. Chechen and Ingush peoples: the problem of rehabilitation, 1950s. In: The Restoration of Chechen-Ingush Autonomy — A Triumph of Historical Justice. Jubilee Conference Proceedings. (Grozny; March 24–25, 2017). Grozny: Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic, 2017. Pp. 199–205. (In Russ.)

24. Murtazaliev V. Yu. The Repressed Peoples of the North Caucasus: Constitutional and Legal Rehabilitation. Cand. Sc. (law) thesis abstract. Makhachkala, 2005. 31 p. (In Russ.)

25. Petrov A. G. Rehabilitation of repressed peoples: legal framework and actual practice. Fundamental and Applied Researches of the Cooperative Sector of the Economy. 2013. No. 2. Pp. 137–143. (In Russ.)

26. Polyan P. M. Against the Will…: History and Geography of Forced Migrations in the USSR. Moscow: O.G.I.-Memorial, 2001. 329 p. (In Russ.)

27. Sabanchiev Kh.-M. A. Re-establishing ethnic statehoods of Southern Russia’s repressed peoples. In: The Restoration of Chechen-Ingush Autonomy — A Triumph of Historical Justice. Jubilee Conference Proceedings. (Grozny; March 24–25, 2017). Grozny: Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic, 2017. Pp. 243–250. (In Russ.)

28. Savina L. M. Rehabilitation of repressed peoples in the SSSR, 1950s–1960s: legal essentials. Armiya i obshchestvo. 2014. No. 3 (40). Pp. 24–29. (In Russ.)

29. Savina L. M. The question of legal process of the rehabilitation of repressed Kalmyks. Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2014. No. 6. Pp. 39–46. (In Russ.)

30. Shebzukhova T. A. Repressed peoples of the USSR: the gradual restitution of civil rights. News of the Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2014. No. 2 (58). Pp. 162–168. (In Russ.)

31. Temmoev I. Yu. Rehabilitation of Repressed Peoples as a Factor of Contemporary Russia’s Political Process. Cand. Sc. (political studies) thesis abstract. Astrakhan, 2009. 27 p. (In Russ.)

32. Tsutsulaeva S. S., Osmaev A. D. On the problems of realization of the law of the RSFSR «On the Rehabilitation of Repressed Peoples» in the Chechen Republic. Bulletin of the Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of the RAS (Oriental Studies). 2012. No. 3. Pp. 43–47. (In Russ.)

33. Ubushaev V. B. The way Russian historiography handle the rehabilitation of repressed peoples in the USSR. Bulletin of Kalmyk University. 2019. No. 1 (41). Pp. 69–75. (In Russ.)

34. Ubushaeva I. V. Political and legal rehabilitationof the repressed people of Russia in 1953–1956 (on a material of Kalmykia). Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta upravleniya i ekonomiki. 2012. No. 3 (38). Pp. 35–39. (In Russ.)

35. Usmanov A. O. The constitutional law regulation of rehabilitation of repressed peoples: the concept and essential attributes. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2018. No. 8. Pp. 22–25. (In Russ.)

36. Yashina A. A. Rehabilitation in the Russian Federation: Constitutional and Legal Essentials. Cand. Sc. (law) thesis abstract. Penza, 2015. 27 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Gunaev E.A. The Late 1950s Restoration of Autonomies for Repressed Peoples of Kalmykia and the North Caucasus — and the Problem of Rehabilitation: Debating Issues of Contemporary Russian Historiography. Oriental Studies. 2021;14(1):74-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2021-53-1-74-86

Views: 597


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)