Foreign Trade of British Raj at the Turn of the 20th Century: Analyzing Materials From Russia’s Diplomatic Missions

Introduction. The history of British Raj’s foreign economic activity development at the turn of the 20th century remains somewhat understudied both in Russian and foreign historiography. Since the 1880s, India significantly increased foreign trade to become Asia’s leader in this regard. Goals. The paper aims at examining dynamics of India’s export-import operations and foreign trade by countries. Materials and methods. The article analyzes reports and accounts of Russian diplomats to have worked in British Raj, the Near East, and Great Britain. The employed research methods include the historical/genetic, comparative historical, and historical/typological ones. Results. Britain had been India’s dominating trading partner. However, gradually other states also increased trade operations with the latter, especially import ones. The paper emphasizes Russia failed to become a key foreign trade partner of British Raj (except for export of kerosene and import of tea). The identified reasons are contentious British-Russian relations in Central Asia in the 1860s–1890s, poor knowledge of the Indian market, and geographical remoteness. British Raj turned an outpost of Great Britain’s economic strength in the Persian Gulf. At the same time, Indian goods displaced products from other countries — including Britain manufactured ones — in many ports of the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Peninsula. The article stresses that the bulk of India’s foreign economic relations were maintained via maritime transport. This was due to complicated natural and climatic factors along land borders, instability in frontiers (Afghanistan and Persia). Nonetheless, British Raj was increasing its economic presence in Afghanistan, Persia, Nepal, Ceylon, Siam, and western provinces of China. An important place in India’s foreign trade was occupied by transit trade and re-export of goods from other states, which makes it difficult to accurately determine the actual volume of its foreign trade. Conclusions. The specifics of India’s national economic development can thus be traced in the structure of its foreign trade. The exports were dominated by raw materials and foodstuffs; manufactured products were only making their way to foreign markets. The difficulties were largely associated with the Great Britain’s colonial policy in India since the former sought to keep using the latter as a market for industrial products produced in the British Isles. On the eve of WW I, British Raj was building up its economic potential through strengthening its positions in world trade.

1. Adamov A. A International trade in the Persian Gulf reviewed: A report by Dragoman of [Russia’s] Consul-General to Tabriz. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1900. Year Three. Vol. II. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1900. Pp. 95–123. (In Russ.)

2. Adamov A., Savinov A. Russian trade in Mesopotamia: Analyzing reports by Consul-General to Bagdad and Consul to Basra. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1903. Year Six. Vol. VI. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1903. Pp. 502–508. (In Russ.)

3. Charlesworth N. British Rule and the Indian Economy: 1800–1914. London: MacMillan, 1982. 464 p. (In Eng.)

4. Chirkin S. Trade of India: A report by Secretary of Consulate-General to Bombay reviewed. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1910. Year Thirteen. Vol. IV. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1910. Pp. 269–278. (In Russ.)

5. Danilov N. Russian export to Northern France: A report by Consul to Le Havre and Rouen. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1907. Vol. IV. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1907. Pp. 271–285. (In Russ.)

6. Heyking A. Development of Russia-India trade revisited: A report by former Consul-General to Bombay. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1909. Year Twelve. Vol. III. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1909. Pp. 185–225. (In Russ.)

7. Ivashchentsov G. A. India. Moscow: Mysl, 1989. 160 p. (In Russ.)

8. Klemm von V. Kerosene trade in India: A report by Consul-General to Bombay. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1904. Year Seven. Vol. II. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1904. Pp. 87–109. (In Russ.)

9. Klemm von V. Sugar trade in India: A report by Consul-General to Bombay. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1902. Year Five. Vol. IV. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1902. Pp. 311–334. (In Russ.)

10. Kolokolov S. Economy of Kashgaria reviewed: A report by Consul to Kashgar. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1906. Vol. III. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1906. Pp. 183–251. (In Russ.)

11. Lavrov M. Russian trade in Kashgaria: A report by Consul-General to Kashgaria. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1904. Year Seven. Vol. III. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1904. Pp. 169–204. (In Russ.)

12. Meytarova O. D. The history of trade, cultural and religious relations between Russia and India from ancient times to the late nineteenth century. Humanity Space. 2017. Vol. 6. No. 3. Pp. 583–591. (In Russ.)

13. Miller A. Russian trade in Persia revisited. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1905. Vol. I. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1905. Pp. 49–55. (In Russ.)

14. Miller A. Trade of Bahramabad: A report by Consul to Kerman. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1907. Year Ten. Vol. I. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1907. Pp. 3–15. (In Russ.)

15. Miller A. Trade of Sistan, 1903–1904: A report by Vice-Consul to Sistan. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1904. Year Seven. Vol. IV. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1904. Pp. 251–258. (In Russ.)

16. Nassek N. Oman – Muscat – Bahrain: A report by Consul-General to Bandar Bushehr. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1906. Vol. II. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1906. Pp. 99–128. (In Russ.)

17. Nekrasov V. India-Afghanistan trade: A report by Secretary of Consulate-General to Bombay. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1904. Year Seven. Vol. VI. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1904. Pp. 448–456. (In Russ.)

18. Nikolsky M. Trade of Gilan, 1908: A report by acting Secretary of Consulate to Rasht. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1901. Vol. II. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1909. Pp. 110–124. (In Russ.)

19. Nikolsky M. Trade of Hejaz: A report by Consul to Jeddah. In: Collected Consular Reports, 1906. Vol. I. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1906. Pp. 3–16. (In Russ.)

20. Note by Dragoman of Russia’s Consulate-General to Calcutta. In: Industry and Trade Related Dispatches from Imperial Russia’s Consular Agencies. Vol. 35: Denmark, Copenhagen, Germany, Lübeck, Great Britain, London, Calcutta. St. Petersburg: V. F. Kirschbaum, 1914. Pp. 54–181. (In Russ.)

21. Raychaudhuri T., Kumar D., Habib I., Desai M. The Cambridge Economic History of India. Vol. 2. CUP Archive, 1983. 1078 p. (In Eng.)

22. Rittikh P. A. The Journey to Persia and Persian Balochistan: A Report. Part 1. St. Petersburg: Ministry of War of the Russian Empire (General Staff, Military Science Commission), 1901. 321 p. (In Russ.)

23. Rothermund D. An Economic History of India. 2nd ed. London; New York: Routledge, 2002. 240 p. (In Eng.)

24. Shkunov V. N. Russia-India Trade and Economic Relations, 18th–19th Centuries. Moscow: Ru-Sciences, 2017. 192 p. (In Russ.)

25. Smirnov E. V. Russia and India. In: Dyakov N. N., Samoylov N. A. (eds.) Russia and the East: Phenomenology of Interaction and Identification in Modern Times. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University, 2011. Pp. 232–244. (In Russ.)

26. Stewart G. Jute and Empire: The Calcutta Jute Wallahs and the Landscapes of Empire. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998. 258 p. (In Eng.)

27. Tomlinson B. R. India and the British Empire, 1880–1935. Indian Economic and Social History Review. 1975. Vol. 12. Pp. 337–380. (In Eng.)