Middle Neolithic in Baikal-Yenisei Siberia: Technological and Cultural Traditions of Pottery Reviewed

Introduction. The lack of known Middle Neolithic burial complexes in Baikal-Yenisei Siberia makes pottery finds from archaeological sites a key source to explore the cultural and historical situation in the region. According to AMS 14C-dates in the range of ~6,8–6,3 ka cal BP in the territory of Baikal-Yenisei Siberia, two types of ceramics are widespread — Posolsk and Ust-Belaya types. Goals. The study seeks to identify technological and cultural traditions of Middle Neolithic pottery. Materials and methods. The work examines Ust-Belaya and Posolsk type pottery samples from fifteen excavated sites of Baikal-Yenisei Siberia. The paper describes morphological and decorative patterns inherent thereto, provides technical and technological analyses following the methodology of A. Bobrinsky. The molding masses of eighteen Ust-Belaya type vessels and sixteen Posolsk type vessels have been studied with the aid of a binocular microscope. Results. In all cases, ferruginous sandy clay containing quartz sand had served as initial plastic raw material. Molding masses are characterized mainly by an unmixed one-component composition without artificial additives. In two cases, quartz grus has been identified, in another there are traces of organic matter (possibly added intentionally). Vessels of the Posolsk type have closed paraboloid forms with a weak profiling of the upper part and a sharpened bottom. The ornament is localized in the upper part of the vessel and is represented by horizontal ‘receding stick’ rows or drawn lines. The composition below ends with separate shapes, such as triangles or short vertical lines. The rim is decorated with prints of a comb stamp and has a line of round holes which is located over the line made by stick through drawing or receding techniques. The study of molding masses of sixteen Posolsk vessels demonstrates an unmixed one-component composition. In all cases, ferruginous sandy clay had been used as initial plastic raw material. The analysis of the modeling features of Middle Neolithic ceramics makes it possible to formulate hypothetical production programs of theirs. To check the latter, experiments were carried out to model the Ust-Belaya and Posolsk types of vessels. Technical and technological analyses, experiments conducted, and comparisons of models with archaeological vessels reveal technological traditions generally characteristic of Middle Neolithic pottery, such as the method of zonal patchwork modeling in combination with walls knocking out techniques, as well as the use of other vessels as base forms. So, Ust-Belaya vessels could have been completely made on such base forms, while upper parts of Posolsk vessels were profiled after removal from such forms. Knocking out tools for Posolsk ceramics included cord and carved shovels, and for Ust-Belaya type — smooth shovels sometimes wrapped with a woven net. Design patterns of the rim are also different. Conclusions. For the preparatory stage of Middle Neolithic ceramics production, there was a stable tradition of using local sandy clays without additives. The modeling principles common for the two types, along with the absence of flat-bottomed forms, reflect the same level of technological development and similar ideas about the making and functions of vessels, which does not necessarily indicate any ethnocultural closeness of culture bearers. Different traditions of morphology, techniques and decoration indicate that the pottery types belong to different populations. In Posolsk ceramics, there are autochthonous features bringing it closer to the Early Neolithic Khaita pottery. Ceramics of the Ust-Belaya type has no visible origins in the Early Neolithic of the region, which indicates its non-local origin. In addition, the materials of the campsites indicate that the bearers of these traditions had tended to choose different habitats.

1. Abrashina M. E. Posolskaya pottery of Generalov site: A comparative analysis of the two options. In: Konstantinov A. V., Razgildeeva I. I. (eds.) Siberian Archaeology and Ethnography. Contributions of Young Researchers. Conference proceedings (Chita; March 23–26, 2016). Chita: Transbaikal State University, 2016. Pp. 74–75. (In Russ.)

2. Abrashina M. E. Technical décor Neolithic vessels from Baikal Siberia: Outcomes of experimental studies revisited. In: Kenig A. V. (ed.) Exploring Ancient and Traditional Cultures of Eurasia: Contemporary Issues Approached. Conference proceedings (Surgut; April 17–21, 2017). Surgut, Novosibirsk: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography (SB RAS), 2017. Pp. 73–75. (In Russ.)

3. Abrashina M. E. The origins of the corded technical decor on ceramic vessels of the Baikal-Yenisei Siberia: Technologies and an experiment. In: Fourth Bolgar International Archaeological Field School (Bolgar; August 21 – September 3, 2017). Kazan: Kazan Federal University, 2017. Pp. 10–16. (In Russ.)

4. Abrashina M. E., Ulanov I. V., Berdnikov I. M. Ceramic of Posolskaya type in archaeology complexes on Generalov site (North Angara region). Northern Archives and Expeditions. 2021. No. 1. Pp. 9–22. (In Russ.)

5. Bazaliysky V. I. Mortuary complexes of Late Mesolithic and Neolithic in the Baikal region of Siberia: Mortuary traditions, absolute dating. Izvestiya Laboratorii drevnikh tekhnologiy. 2012. No. 9. Pp. 43–101. (In Russ.)

6. Berdnikov I. M. Key aspects of historical and cultural procedures in southern part of Middle Siberia during the Neolithic (Based on pottery complexes). Bulletin of the Irkutsk State University. Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series. 2013. No. 1 (2). Pp. 203–229. (In Russ.)

7. Berdnikov I. M., Goryunova O. I., Novikov A. G., Berdnikova N. E., Ulanov I. V., Sokolova N. B., Abrashina M. E., Krutikova K. A., Rogovskoy E. O., Lokhov D. N., Kogay S. A. Chronology of the Neolithic ceramics of Baikal-Yenisei Siberia: Basic ideas and new data. Bulletin of the Irkutsk State University. Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series. 2020. Vol. 33. Pp. 23–53. (In Russ.)

8. Berdnikov I. M., Krutikova K. A., Dudarek S. P., Berdnikova N. E., Sokolova N. B. On the problem of hiatus – a discontinuity in the burial traditions of the Cis-Baikal Neolithic population. In: Topical Issues of Science in Cis-Baikalia. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University, 2020. Pp. 15–20. (In Russ.)

9. Berdnikov I. M., Krutikova K. A., Dudarek S. P., Berdnikova N. E., Sokolova N. B. On the middle Neolithic of Baikal-Yenisei Siberia. Northern Archives and Expeditions. 2021. No. 1. Pp. 33–55. (In Russ.)

10. Berdnikov I. M., Ulanov I. V. Some aspects of molding technology of Posolskaya pottery in the South of Central Siberia. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2015. Vol. 4. No. 8. Pp. 574–584. (In Eng.)

11. Berdnikov I. M., Ulanov I. V., Sokolova N. B. Neolithic pottery of the Baikal-Yenisei Siberia: Technological tradition in the territorial and chronological context. Stratum plus. 2017. No. 2. Pp. 275–300. (In Russ.)

12. Berdnikova N. E. Ceramic layer of Ust-Belaya: Problem statement approached. In: Quaternary Geology and Prehistoric Archaeology in Southern Siberia. Ulan-Ude: Buryat [Research] Institution (SB USSR Acad. Sc.), 1986. Part II. Pp. 36–39. (In Russ.)

13. Berdnikova N. E. Geoarchaeological site of Ust-Belaya: Cultural complexes. In: Medvedev G. I. (ed.) Stone Age in the South Angara Region. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University, 2001. Vol. 2: Geoarchaeological Area of the Belaya River [Valley]. Pp. 113–146. (In Russ.)

14. Bobrinsky A. A. Pottery of Eastern Europe: Sources and Research Methods. Moscow: Nauka, 1978. 272 p. (In Russ.)

15. Generalov A. G. Neolithic Clusters from the Multilayer Site of Kazachka and Their Significance for Further Research of Neolithic in Krasnoyarsk-Kansk Area. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis. Leningrad, 1979. 188 p. (In Russ.)

16. Glushkov I. G. Pottery as a Source in Archaeology. Novosibirsk: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography (SB RAS), 1996. 328 p. (In Russ.)

17. Goryunova O. I. Multilayer Sites of Maloe More and Olkhon Island. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis abstract. Novosibirsk, 1984. 17 p. (In Russ.)

18. Goryunova O. I., Markhaeva D. A., Novikov A. G. Posolsk type pottery of Chivyrkuisky Bay coast settlements of Lake Baikal. Izvestiya laboratorii drevnikh tekhnologiy. 2019. Vol. 15. No. 3 (32). Pp. 47–61. (In Russ.)

19. Goryunova O. I., Novikov A. G. Radiocarbon dating of pottery complexes from Neolithic settlements on the Baikal coast. Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2018. No. 51. Pp. 98–107. (In Russ.)

20. Khlobystin L. P. Ancient Cultures from Shores of Lake Baikal: Stone and Bronze Ages. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis abstract. Leningrad, 1964. 18 p. (In Russ.)

21. Khlobystin L. P. Dating and correlating Neolithic cultures of Eastern Siberia. Kratkie soobshcheniya Instituta arkheologii (KSIA) AN SSSR. 1978. No. 153. Pp. 93–99. (In Russ.)

22. Kogay S. A., Berdnikov I. M. Neolithic materials of the site Village Martynova (Northern Angara region). Bulletin of the Irkutsk State University. Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series. 2013. No. 2 (3). Pp. 124–137. (In Russ.)

23. Okladnikov A. P. Neolithic and Bronze Age in Cisbaikalia. Moscow, Leningrad: USSR Academy of Sciences, 1950. Parts 1, 2. Ser. ‘Materials and Studies in Archaeology’. Vol. 18. 412 p. (In Russ.)

24. Savelyev N. A. Neolithic in Southern Parts of the Central Siberian Plateau: A History of Key Ideas and Actual Levels of Prior Studies. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis. Novosibirsk, 1989. 302 p. (In Russ.)

25. Savelyev N. A. Neolithic settlements in the south of the Central Siberian Plateau: Research problems revisited. In: Problems of Archaeology and Ethnography is Siberia. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University, 1982. Pp. 62–64. (In Russ.)

26. Savelyev N. A., Medvedev G. I. One early ceramic complex from the multilayer site of Ust-Belaya. In: Smirnov A. P. (ed.) Issues of Archaeology in the Urals and Siberia. Moscow: Nauka, 1973. Pp. 56–64. (In Russ.)

27. Savelyev N. A., Ulanov I. V. Neolithic pottery of the multilayered site Gorelyi Les (South Angara region). Bulletin of the Irkutsk State University. Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series. 2018. Vol. 26. Pp. 46–85. (In Russ.)

28. Savelyev N. A., Ulanov I. V. Posolskaya-type ceramics of the multilayered site Ust-Khaita (Southern Angara region). Bulletin of the Irkutsk State University. Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series. 2020. Vol. 34. Pp. 38–48. (In Russ.)

29. Sinitsina G. V. Neolithic Sites of the Upper Angara Region: Analyzing Materials from Settlements. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis. Leningrad, 1986. 233 p. (In Russ.)

30. Tsetlin Yu. B. Ancient Pottery: Theory and Methods of the Historical/Cultural Approach. Moscow: Institute of Archaeology (RAS), 2012. 384 p. (In Russ.)

31. Ulanov I. V., Berdnikov I. M., Sokolova N. B. Experimental modeling of the early Neolithic vessels from the Baikal-Yenisei Siberia. In: Bazarov B. V., Kradin N. N. (eds.) Ancient Cultures of Mongolia, Baikal Siberia, and North China. Conference proceedings (Ulan-Ude; September 10–14, 2018). In 2 vols. Ulan-Ude: Buryat Scientific Center (SB RAS), 2018. Vol. 1. Pp. 64–69. (In Russ.)

32. Ulanov I. V., Sokolova N. B. Features of raw materials and molding masses of Posolsk type Neolithic pottery from the Southern Angara region. In: Berdnikov I. M., Lokhov D. N. (eds.) Sixty First Russian Archaeological and Ethnographic Conference of Students and Young Scholars. Proceedings. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University, 2021. Pp. 76–77. (In Russ.)

33. Ulanov I. V., Sokolova N. B., Ulanova A. V. Features of raw materials and molding masses of Ust-Belaya type Neolithic pottery from the Southern Angara region. In: Berdnikov I. M., Lokhov D. N. (eds.) Sixtieth Russian Archaeological and Ethnographic Conference of Students and Young Scholars. Proceedings. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University, 2020. Pp. 101–102. (In Russ.)

34. Volkova E. V. Oven or fireplace? (Experimental firings of the vessels). Samara Journal of Science. 2015. No. 3 (12). Pp. 37–55. (In Russ.)

35. Volkova E. V., Tsetlin Yu. B. Some issues of experimental study of clay vessels’ firing process. Samara Journal of Science. 2015. No. 3 (12). Pp. 56–62. (In Russ.)

36. Weber A. W., Link D. W., Katzenberg M. A. Hunter-gatherer culture change and continuity in the Middle Holocene of the Cis-Baikal, Siberia. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2002. Vol. 21. Pp. 230–299. (In Eng.) DOI: 10.1006/jaar.2001.0395

37. Weber A. W., McKenzie H. G., Beukens R. Radiocarbon dating of Middle Holocene culture history in Cis-Baikal. In: Weber A. W., Katzenberg M. A., Schurr T. G. (eds.) Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers of the Baikal Region, Siberia. Bioarchaeological Studies of Past Life Ways. Philadelphia: Penn Museum, 2010. Pp. 27–49. (In Eng.)

38. Weber A. W., Schulting R. J., Ramsey C. B., Bazaliiskii V. I., Goriunova O. I., Berdnikova N. E. Chronology of middle Holocene hunter-gatherers in the Cis-Baikal region of Siberia: Corrections based on examination of the freshwater reservoir effect. Quaternary International. 2016. Vol. 419. Pp. 74–98. (In Eng.)