Proposals by the Ministry of Internal Affairs Commission Headed by F. K. Girs to Subordinate the Kirghiz Inner Horde under Astrakhan Governorate: Administrative Structure and Judicial System, 1873

Introduction. The article examines the 1873 proposals by the Ministry of Internal Affairs Commission headed by F. K. Girs to place the Kirghiz Inner Horde under the administrative control of Astrakhan Governorate. The mentioned proposals constituted a total of five journals and were an earliest reform-related resolution that basically dealt with and somewhat criticized the preceding initiatives of Orenburg-based authorities to restructure the Horde. Results. The paper discusses a number of issues pertaining to the Inner Horde’s administrative restructuring project, relocation of its headquarters from Naryn-Peski, centralized localities for uyezd-level authorities, and its judicial system. Conclusions. The major criteria for the Inner Horde’s resubordination to Astrakhan Governorate included geographical, political, and socioeconomic ones. In terms of geography, the Governorate’s capital was closer, there were vacant pastures and a water transport route, the region was characterized by a sparser population and ‘well-rounded’ borders. The political reasons were that the Bukey Kazaks had somewhat detached from their fellow tribesmen that inhabited Trans-Ural steppes and were subordinate to Orenburg frontier-guarding forces, and from the latter’s Cossack-inhabited lands. Any further division into northern and southern parts — with the former be incorporated into Samara Governorate — would give rise to the necessity that ethnic Kazakhs get involved into zemstvo-level activities, which the authorities believed hardly feasible because of the population’s low civic awareness. The latter circumstance and a meagre population were also viewed by the aforementioned officials as hindrances to that the Inner Horde be transformed into an autonomous oblast. However, the Russian authorities did tend to retain the court of biys for certain spheres of Kazakh life. The socioeconomic criterion was manifested in that the Inner Horde’s executives would stay economically and financially dependent on the Astrakhan office, need to coordinate activities with neighboring nomads of the Governorate (Kalmyks, Kundrau Tatars), and take due account of stationary settlements. The proposals set forth by the Commission may serve a historical source indicative of Imperial Russia’s positions and viewpoints on further administrative resubordination of subject nomads.

1. Aspandiyarov B. Bukey Horde: Its Emergence and Abolition. Almaty: Qazaq Entsiklopediyasy, 2007. 400 p. (In Russ.)

2. Bekmakhanova N. E., Nazarbayev N. B. Kazakh biys and their judicial functions in the nineteenth century: Adapting to Imperial Russia’s governance system. In: Trepavlov V. V. (ed.) History of Russia’s Peoples: Studies and Documents. Vol. 4. Moscow: Institute of Russian History (RAS), 2010. Pp. 154–175. (In Russ.)

3. Belousov S. S. The Inner Kirghiz Horde of Astrakhan Governorate: The impact of trades and crafts people on the establishment of stationary settlements in Kazakh-inhabited lands. 19th century. Oriental Studies. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 4. Pp. 634–644. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22162/2619-0990-2019-44-4-634-644

4. Chulkov N. P. (ed.) The Russian Biographical Dictionary. Vol. 5: Герберский – Гогенлоэ. St. Petersburg: G. Lissner & D. Sovko, 1916. 444 p. (In Russ.)

5. Gryzlov B. V., Samokhvalov N. F. (eds.) Governorates of the Russian Empire: History and Executives, 1708–1917. Moscow: Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (Joint Editorial Office), 2003. 480 p. (In Russ.)

6. Gunaev E. A. Administrative-territorial and land arrangement of Bukeev (Inner) Horde in the Russian Empire: Pre-revolutionary historiography. Bulletin of Kalmyk University. 2022. No. 4(56). Pp. 6–11. (In Russ.)

7. Gunaev E. A. Establishment of the Bukeev (Internal) Horde and its administrative-territorial and land arrangement in the Russian Empire: Modern historiography. Law: History and Modernity. 2023. Vol. 7. No. 1. Pp. 15–24. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17277/pravo.2023.01.pp.015-024

8. Kittary M. Ya. Inner Kirghiz Horde and headquarters of its rulers. In: Kulkenov M. (ed.) Celebrating the 200th Anniversary of the Bukey Horde. Vol. 3. Almaty: Olke, 2001. Pp. 5–38. (In Russ.)

9. Lyubichankovskiy S. V. The imperial-era evolution of Russia’s administrative governance patterns across the Volga-Ural region. In: Zhiromskaya V. B. (comp.) Population and Territory of Russia: Past and Present. Forum proceedings (Samara, 15–16 September 2016). V. Zhiromskaya, Yu. Petrov (eds.). Samara: Institute of Russian History (RAS), 2017. Pp. 421–432. (In Russ.)

10. Pochekaev R. Yu. Between St. Petersburg, Orenburg and Astrakhan: Relations of the Inner Horde with central and frontier authorities of the Russian Empire. In: Yemaletdinova G. E. (ed.) The Southern Urals, Eighteenth–Twentieth Centuries: Shaping an Efficient Governance/Self-Governance System. Collected scholarly papers. Sterlitamak: Bashkir State University, 2014. Pp. 73–87. (In Russ.)

11. Suleymenov B. S., Basin V. Ya. Kazakhstan as Part of Russia: Eighteenth to Early Twentieth Centuries. Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1981. 247 p. (In Russ.)

12. Vasilyev D. V. The Imperial Burden: Russia’s Administrative Policy in Central Asia, Mid-to-Late Nineteenth Century. Moscow: Politicheskaya Entsiklopediya, 2018. 638 p. (In Russ.)

13. Volkov S. V. Executive Officers and Officialdom of Imperial Russia: A Concise Dictionary. Moscow: Dmitry Pozharsky University, 2016. 798 p. (In Russ.)

14. Zhanayev B. T., Inochkin V. A.. Sagnayeva S. Kh. (comps.) History of the Bukey Khanate, 1801–1852: Collected Documents and Materials. Almaty: Dayk-Press, 2002. 1118 p. (In Russ.)

15. Zimanov S. Z. Russia and the Bukey Khanate. Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1982. 171 p. (In Russ.)