Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

The Site of Kombak-te (Northern Caspian): Some New Data

https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2024-71-1-110-122

Abstract

Introduction. The article examines stone artifacts from a Northern Caspian Eneolithic site of the Khvalynsk culture. Stone tool industries also serve to characterize Early Metal Age cultures. Goals. The work seeks to determine the cultural affiliation of stone implements from the site of Kombak-te. To facilitate this, the paper shall analyze a variety of such stone implements and their groups. Materials and methods. The publication focuses on finds from the third major Khvalynsk site of Kombak-te. The latter was investigated in 1989 but only some pottery data were published. The article is the first to introduce into scientific circulation and analyze stone artifacts excavated on the site. The study employs the typological and radiocarbon dating methods. Results. Our preliminary typological analysis of pottery yielded a number of cultural/chronological groups, which made it possible to classify the stone artifacts in greater detail. The technical and typological features serve a basis for distinguishing between items representing the Caspian and Khvalynsk cultures. The identified differences are manifested in the involved source materials (quartzite and flint), blank manufacturing techniques, categories and types of the implements. Conclusions. The comprehensive insights attest to the stone artifacts of Kombak-te come from different cultures and eras. So, Khvalynsk-type items are paralleled by some of the Caspian culture. The paper identifies some characteristic and specific properties of source materials, primary splitting and subsequent processing techniques, describes various tools. The available radiocarbon determinations confirm those of the Caspian culture are more ancient.

About the Authors

Aleksandr A. Vybornov
Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
Russian Federation

Dr. Sc. (History), Professor, Head of Department



Natalya S. Doga
Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
Russian Federation

Senior Lecturer



References

1. Barynkin P. P. Pottery of the Khvalynsk culture (Volga River basin): Characterizing typological ties between sites of the region. In: Agapov S. A. (comp.) Khvalynsk Eneolithic Grave Fields and the Khvalynsk Eneolithic Culture. Collected articles. Samara: Povolzhye, 2010. Pp. 133–152. (In Russ.)

2. Barynkin P. P. The Eneolithic and Early Bronze Age of the Northern Caspian. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis abstract. Moscow, 1992. 26 p. (In Russ.)

3. Barynkin P. P. The Eneolithic site of Kairshak VI from southern parts of the Volga-Ural river system. In: The Neolithic and Eneolithic of the Northern Caspian. Kuybyshev: Kuybyshev State Pedagogical Institute, 1989. Pp. 106–117. (In Russ.)

4. Barynkin P. P., Kozin E. V. The Early and Middle Holocene of the Northern Caspian: Natural, climatic, cultural, and demographic processes. In: The Northern Caspian in Prehistory. Samara: Samara State Pedagogical University, 1998. Pp. 66–82. (In Russ.)

5. Barynkin P. P., Vasilyev I. B. On some newly discovered Eneolithic sites of the Northern Caspian. In: Archaeological Sites in the European Soviet Union. Voronezh: Voronezh State Pedagogical Institute, 1985. Pp. 58–73. (In Russ.)

6. Barynkin P. P., Vasilyev I. B. The Khvalynsk site of Kara-Khuduk (Northern Caspian). In: Merpert N. Ya. (ed.) Archaeological Cultures of the Northern Caspian. Kuybyshev: Kuybyshev State Pedagogical Institute, 1988. Pp. 123–141. (In Russ.)

7. Borodulin K. I., Doga N. S., Ignatyev Yu. I. The Stone Age site of Istai II (Northern Caspian): Cultural and chronological analyses. In: Vasilyev D. V. (comp., ed.) Seventh Lower Volga Archaeological Conference. Proceedings (Astrakhan, 2–4 October 2023). Astrakhan: R. Sorokin, 2023. Pp. 9–13. (In Russ.)

8. Doga N. S. Stone industry of the Caspian culture. Archaeology of the Eurasian Steppes. 2023. No. 1. Pp. 271–279. (In Russ.)

9. Gorashchuk I. V. Stone tools of the Khvalynsk culture: Manufacturing techniques. In: Issues of the Volga Region’s Archaeology. Vol. 3. Samara: Samara Scientific Center (RAS), 2003. Pp. 118–133. (In Russ.)

10. Melentyev A. N. Neolithic sites of the Northern Caspian (Caspian culture). In: Archaeology of the Volga and Ural Regions. Kuybyshev: Kuybyshev State Pedagogical Institute, 1976. Pp. 13–14. (In Russ.)

11. Melentyev A. N. Seroglazovo sites. In: The Neolithic of the Northern Caspian. Kuybyshev: Kuybyshev State Pedagogical Institute, 1975. Pp. 112–117. (In Russ.)

12. Vasilyev I. B. Khvalynsk Eneolithic culture of the Volga-Ural steppe and forest steppe. In: Issues of the Volga Region’s Archaeology. Vol. 3. Samara: Samara Scientific Center (RAS), 2003. Pp. 61–99. (In Russ.)

13. Vasilyev I. B. The Eneolithic of the Volga Region. Kuybyshev: Kuybyshev State Pedagogical Institute, 1981. 130 p. (In Russ.)

14. Vybornov A. A., Doga N. S., Popov A. S., Phillipsen B. Materials from the site of Kombak-te (Northern Caspian). In: Koltsov P. M. et al. (eds.) Fifth Lower Volga Archaeological Conference. Proceedings (Elista, 15–18 November 2016). Elista: Gorodovikov Kalmyk State University, 2016. Pp. 20–24. (In Russ.)

15. Vybornov A. A., Kosintsev P. A., Kulkova M. A., Doga N. S., Platonov V. I. When food producing economy appeared in the Lower Volga Region. Stratum Plus. 2019. No. 2. Pp. 359–368. (In Russ.)

16. Yudin A. I. Caspian culture in the Eneolithic agenda of the Lower Volga. Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2005. Special issue. Pp. 160–167. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Vybornov A.A., Doga N.S. The Site of Kombak-te (Northern Caspian): Some New Data. Oriental Studies. 2024;17(1):110-122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2024-71-1-110-122

Views: 379


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)