Ilchikdai Ulus in the Empire of Amir Timur
https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2024-73-3-464-475
Abstract
Introduction. The history of the empire of Amir Timur and domains ruled by his descendants has been subject to many studies dealing with political history, administrative-military system, tribes and clans, social structure and other aspects. However, the history of Ilchikdai Ulus — a largest military-nomadic domain of the empire which served a stronghold in the shaping of Amir Timur’s state and his empire — has remained beyond the scope of researchers’ interests. Goals. The paper attempts an analytical insight into a variety of sources to trace the formation processes of Ilchikdai Ulus in the empire of Amir Timur and examine its history. Materials. The study employs a number of sources relating both to the history of Amir Timur’s empire and that of the tribes to have been part of the domain under consideration — the Durbat, Nukus, Kipchak, and Naiman. The sources include as follows: The Book of Victories by Sharaf ad-Din Ali Yazdi, Mu’izz al-ansab, Shams al-husn by Khoja Taj ad-Din Salmani, Muntahab at-tawarikh-i Mu‛ini by Mu‛in ad-din Natanzi, Zubdat al-Tavarikh by Hafiz-i Abru, History of Yuan (Yuán Shǐ), Bahr al-asrar fi manakib al-akhyar by Mahmud ibn Vali, The Secret History of the Mongols (Yuáncháo Mìshǐ), The Compendium of Chronicles by Rashid al-Din, Habib-us-siyar by Ghiyath al-Din Khvandamir, Zayn al-akhbar by Abū Saʿīd ʿAbd-al-Ḥayy ibn Żaḥḥāk ibn Maḥmūd Gardīzī and others. The principle of historicism proves instrumental in depicting ethnocultural processes within Amir Timur’s empire and Ilchikdai Ulus throughout the specified period. Component analysis tools have been used to reveal key ethnogenetic problems in the study of clan and tribal relations. Results. Ilchikdai Ulus had been formed through the resettlement of the nomadic tribes of Durbats, Nukuzes, Kipchaks, and Naimans from the Irtysh deep into Chagatai Ulus by Khan Eljigidey (Ilchigidai) in the early fourteenth century. Conclusions. The shaping of the empire of Amir Timur — along with his native Barlas tribe — was most significantly contributed to by representatives of Ilchikdai Ulus who inter alia would serve as military and political elites — and enter the circle of his closest associates. Natives of Ilchikdai Ulus would form mighty clans that held highest positions in the empire.
About the Authors
Rustam A. AbdumanapovRussian Federation
Cand. Sc. (History), Associate Professor
Zhaxylyk M. Sabitov
Kazakhstan
PhD (History), Director
References
1. Abru H. Zail-i Jāmiʿ al-tawārīkh-i Rashidi (Supplements to Rashid al-Din’s Compendium of Chronicles). E. Talyshkhanov (transl., foreword, etc.), I. Mirgaleev (ed.). Kazan: Yaz, 2011. 320 p. (In Russ.)
2. Ando Sh. Timuridische Emire nach dem Mu’izz al-ansab: Untersuchung zur Stammesaristokratie Zentralasiens im 14. und 15. Jahrhundert. Berlin: K. Schwarz, 1992. 337 p. (In Germ.)
3. Atygayev N. A. Transformation of the semantics of the term and ethnonym Kazakh (قزاق / Qazaq / Kazakh) in the East Desht-i Kypchak. Ural-Altaic Studies. 2021. No. 3 (42). Pp. 7–18. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.37892/2500-2902-2021-42-3-7-18
4. Bartold V. V. Central Asia, 1893–1894: A Research Travel Report (delivered at a meeting of the History and Linguistics Department on 10 May 1895). St. Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences, 1897. 151 p. (In Russ.)
5. Bartold V. V. Writings. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, 1963. Vol. 2. Pt. 1. 1020 p. (In Russ.)
6. Bidlisi Sh. Sharafnama. E. Vasilyeva (transl., foreword, etc.). Moscow: Nauka — GRVL, 1976. Vol. 2. 352 p. (In Russ.)
7. Biran M. The Chaghadaids and Islam: The Conversion of Tarmashirin Khan (1331–34). Journal of the American Oriental Society. Vol. 122. No. 4 (Oct.–Dec. 2002). Pp. 742–752. (In Eng.)
8. Dardess J. W. Conquerors and Confucians: Aspects of Political Change in late Yüan China (Studies in Oriental Culture 9). New York, London: Columbia University Press, 1973. 245 p. (In Eng.)
9. Ekeev N. V. The Altaians: Materials on Ethnic History. Gorno-Altaysk: A. Orekhov, 2005. 176 p. (In Russ.)
10. Franke H., Twitchett D. (eds.) The Cambridge History of China. Vol. 6: Alien Regimes and Border States, 907–1368. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. XXIX, 864 p. (In Eng.)
11. Grum-Grshimailo G. E. Western Mongolia and Uryankhay Krai. Leningrad: MPR Science Committee, 1926. Vol. 2. 896 p. (In Russ.)
12. Kitinov B. U. The Buddhist Factor in Political and Ethnic History of the Oirats, 1450s–1771. Dr. Sc. (History) thesis. Moscow, 2020. 526 p. (In Russ.)
13. Manz B. F. The Rise and Rule of Tamerlane. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. 227 p. (In Eng.)
14. Muminov A. K. (ed.) History of Kazakhstan from Persian Sources. Vol. 3: Muizz al-Ansab. Almaty: Daik-Press, 2005. 672 p. (In Russ.)
15. Nasilov D. M. Kipchaks in the Dīwān Lughāt al-Turk by Mahmud Kashgari. In: Klyashtorny S. G., Sultanov T. N., Trepavlov V. V. (eds.) Turcologica 2007–2008. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, 2009. Pp. 284–293. (In Russ.)
16. Ochir A. Mongolian Ethnonyms: Mongols and Their Ethnogenesis. Elista: Kalmyk Humanities Research Institute (RAS), 2016. 286 p. (In Russ.)
17. Petrov K. I. The Kyrgyz, Their Contacts with Oirats, and Migration to the Tian Shan: Thirteenth to Fifteenth Centuries. Frunze: Kyrgyz SSR Academy of Sciences, 1961. 215 p. (In Russ.)
18. Petrov P. N. Chagatai Khanate and its rulers, 1271–1368: A chronology of regnal years from numismatic materials. In: Klyashtorny S. G., Sultanov T. N., Trepavlov V. V. (eds.) Turcologica 2007–2008. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, 2009. Pp. 294–319. (In Russ.)
19. Potapov L. P. The Altaians, Their Ethnic Structure, and Origins: An Essay in History and Ethnography. A. Okladnikov (ed.). Leningrad: Nauka, 1969. 196 p. (In Russ.)
20. Rashid al-Din. Compendium of Chronicles. Moscow, Leningrad: USSR Academy of Sciences, 1952. Vol. 1. Book 2. 316 p. (In Russ.)
21. Rashid al-Din. Compendium of Chronicles. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences, 1952. Vol. 1. Book 1. 220 p. (In Russ.)
22. Sanchirov V. P. Iletkhel Shastir as a Source on Oirat History. Moscow: Nauka — GRVL, 1990. 137 p. (In Russ.)
23. Sharfuddin M. The Zafarnamah by Maulana Sharfuddin ’Ali of Yazd. M. M. Ilahdad (ed.). Vol. 1. Calcutta: J. W. Thomas, Baptist Mission Press, 1887. 813 p. (In Pers.)
24. Stroeva L. V. Struggle between nomadizing and sedentarized Chagataid elites in the early-to-mid fourteenth century. In: Works and Endeavors of Academician Ignatius Yu. Krachkovsky. Collected papers. Leningrad: Leningrad State University, 1958. Pp. 206–220. (In Russ.)
25. Subtelny M. Timurids in Transition. Turko-Persian Politics and Acculturation in Medieval Iran (Brill’s Inner Asian Library 19). Leiden, Boston: Brill Academic Publishers, 2007. 411 p. (In Eng.)
26. Sultanov T. I. Genghis Khan and Genghisids: Fate and Power. Moscow: AST, 2006. 445 p. (In Russ.)
27. Tağ as-Salmani. Šams al-husn: Eine Chronik vom Tode Timurs bis zum Jahre 1409 von Tağ as-Salmani. H. R. Roemer (text prep., transl., etc.). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1956. 151 p. (In Germ.)
28. The Anonymous Chronicle of Iskandar. O. Akimushkin (transl.). In: Materials in the History of the Kyrgyz and Kyrgyzstan. Moscow: Nauka — GRVL, 1973. Vol. 1. Pp. 112–128. (In Russ.)
29. The Secret History of the Mongols: A Mongolian Chronicle of 1240. S. Kozin (transl., texts, etc.). Vol. 1: An Introductory Study. Moscow, Leningrad: USSR Academy of Sciences, 1941. 620 p. (In Russ. and Mong.)
30. Trepavlov V. V. The Shibans: A failed ethnonym. Golden Horde Review. 2019. Vol. 7. No. 2. Pp. 351–371. (In Russ.)
31. Vostrov V. V., Mukanov M. S. The Kazakhs: Clans, Tribes, and Their Inhabited Territories in the Late Nineteenth to Early Twentieth Centuries. Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1968. 256 p. (In Russ.)
32. Yazdi Sh. Zafarnama (‘Book of Victories [of Amir Timur]’). A. Akhmedov (foreword, transl., etc.). Tashkent: San’at, 2008. 486 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Abdumanapov R.A., Sabitov Zh.M. Ilchikdai Ulus in the Empire of Amir Timur. Oriental Studies. 2024;17(3):464-475. https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2024-73-3-464-475