Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

‘The Expedition to China’: Corruption and Shaping of British Pacific Policy in the Early-to-Mid Nineteenth Century

https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2024-73-3-476-

Abstract

Introduction. The paper examines some features inherent to the shaping of Britain’s Pacific policy throughout the early-to-mid nineteenth century in China. The issue was never approached comprehensively in the context of UK parliamentary debates that first mentioned the term ‘Pacific policy’. Additionally, the work is first to analyze the mentioned aspects in the context corruption then practiced both in China and Great Britain. The foreign-policy agenda to have included the British trade in opium, naval blockades and corruption is abundant in contradictions between the nations yet to be revealed in further research. Goals. The study seeks to analyze the evolution and features inherent to the shaping of Britain’s Pacific policy in China in the context of how the very policy was being articulated by the UK Parliament, and the problem of corruption faced by both the countries in the early-to-mid nineteenth century. To facilitate this, the work shall consider the stands of UK government and parliament members who sought to give grounds for the Pacific policy with the aid of laws, the media, colonial ideologies, and naval blockades of Chinese ports. Materials and methods. The paper focuses on materials of parliamentary debates, legislative enactments, British print media, personal documents, periodicals of Australia and India. The historical-genetic and system-analysis methods have proved most instrumental herein. Results. As is shown, the early nineteenth century was witnessing initial attempts to develop some Pacific policy in the UK Parliament, e.g., it was offered to expand trade with China through the port of Canton and use warships for national interests. The subsequent anti-corruption enactments would coordinate activities of British superintendents and prohibit them from accepting gifts or engaging in any personal trade. The latter would also be granted powers and privileges previously owned by representatives of the East India Company. The UK Parliament was seeking to control the corrupt Chinese government, but corruption was as characteristic of Britain’s public administration too. The rationale for the new foreign-policy course was that the very vector of colonial policy changed ― from India to China, and they were striving to preserve commercial profits and displace the monopoly of the East India Company. Military operations in Chinese waters diplomatically referred to as ‘the Expedition’ in the UK Parliament did consolidate the shaping of Britain’s Pacific policy characterized by the use of naval forces and sea blockades, corruption and military invasions conducted with minimal costs. The deployment of naval forces to China, their financing and military actions were cynically justified in the Parliament as ‘protection of the UK’s national interests’.

About the Authors

Olga Yu. Zhukovets
Admiral Ushakov Maritime State University (93 Lenin Av., 353918 Novorossiysk, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (Philosophy), Assistant Professor 



Elena K. Sklyarovа
Southern Federal University (105/42, B. Sadovaya St., 344006 Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Dr. Sc. (History), Professor 



Madinat A. Gutieva
Gorsky State Agrarian University (37, Kirov St., 362020 Vladikavkaz, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (History), Associate Professor 



References

1. Bombay Times. 1840, April 15. (In Eng.)

2. Hansard (Parliamentary Debates). 1833. Vol. 15. Pp. 645–655. (In Eng.)

3. Hansard (Parliamentary Debates). 1833. Vol. 18. Pp. 377–378. (In Eng.)

4. Hansard (Parliamentary Debates). 1840. Vol. 52. Pp. 1221–1223. (In Eng.)

5. Hansard (Parliamentary Debates). 1840. Vol. 53. Pp. 674–966. (In Eng.)

6. Hansard (Parliamentary Debates). 1840. Vol. 54. Pp. 2–48. (In Eng.)

7. Hansard (Parliamentary Debates). 1840. Vol. 55. Pp. 124–1409. (In Eng.)

8. Hansard’s (Parliamentary Debates). 1843. Vol. 71. P. 272. (In Eng.)

9. The Builder. 1852. Vol. 10. No. 11. P. 510. (In Eng.)

10. The Economist. 1854, August 5. P. 1. (In Eng.)

11. The London Gazette.1843, November 7. P. 2. (In Eng.)

12. An Act to regulate the trade to China and India, 1833. In: 3 & 4 Will. IV. China Trade Act. 1833. P. 93. (In Eng.)

13. British opium trade with China. Leeds Mercury. 1839, September 7. Pp. 2–3. (In Eng.)

14. Brook T., Wakabayashi B. (eds.) Opium Regimes: China, Britain, and Japan, 1839–1952. Berkley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 2000. 444 p. (In Eng.)

15. Butakov A., Tizengauzen A. The Opium Wars: A Review of How European Powers Confronted China in 1840–1842, 1856–1858, 1859, and 1860. Moscow: AST, 2002. 400 p. (In Russ.)

16. China. The Chinese Treaty 1844. The Sydney Morning Herald. 1844, February 29. P. 2. (In Eng.)

17. Corrigan G. Wellington: A Military Life. London: Hambledon Continuum, 2006. 396 p. (In Eng.)

18. Curry-Machado J., Stubbs J., Gervase Clarence-Smith W., Vos J. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Commodity History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. 697 p. (In Eng.)

19. Derks H. History of the Opium Problem: The Assault on the East, 1600–1950. Leiden: Brill, 2012. 824 p. (In Eng.)

20. Fairbank J. K. Trade and Diplomacy on the China Coast: The Opening of the Treaty Ports, 1842–1854. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1953. XIII, 489 p. (In Eng.)

21. Garver J. W. China’s Quest: The History of the Foreign Policy of the People’s Republic of China. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. 868 p. (In Eng.)

22. Hanes W. T., Sanello F. The Opium Wars: The Addiction of One Empire and the Corruption of Another. Naperville: Sourcebooks Inc., 2002. 352 p. (In Eng.)

23. Haushofer K. Geopolitik des Pazifischen Ozeans. Heidelberg; Berlin: K. Vowinckel, 1924. 452 p. (In Germ.)

24. Kalachov B. F. The Russian Empire against drugs. Age of Globalization. 2012. No. 1 (9). Pp. 161–177. (In Russ.)

25. Melancon G. Palmerston, Parliament and Peking: The Melbourne Ministry and the Opium Crisis, 1835–1840. Louisiana: University of Southwestern Louisiana, 1994. 262 p. (In Eng.)

26. Mertvago D. Sea Contacts between European Countries and China before the Year 1860. Essay. St. Petersburg: Naval Ministry [of the Russian Empire],1884. 655 p. (In Russ.)

27. Nepomnin O. E. China in the ‘closed-door era’. In: History of China from Earliest Times to the Beginning of the Twentieth Century. In 10 vols. Vol. 6: Qing Dynasty, 1644–1911. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, 2014. Pp. 175–191. (In Russ.)

28. Nield R. China’s Foreign Places: The Foreign Presence in China in the Treaty Port Era, 1840–1943. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2015. 400 p. (In Eng.)

29. Perminova V. A. The concept of colonialism and effects of foreign presence in China. Society and State in China. 2012. Vol. 42. Pt. 3. Pp. 176–182. (In Russ.)

30. Peskova G. N. Foreign opium trade [in China] and Russia’s position. In: Tikhvinsky S. L. (ed.) Documents Do Refute: Against Falsifications in the History of Russia-China Relations. Moscow: Mysl, 1982. Pp. 377–422. (In Russ.)

31. Platt S. R. Imperial Twilight: The Opium War and the End of China’s Last Golden Age. New York: A. Knopf, 2018. 592 p. (In Eng.)

32. Postnikov V. V. Historical eras in the Pacific: The Pacific in modern European policies and worldviews. Oriental Institute Journal. 2014. No. 1(23). Pp. 57–81. (In Russ.)

33. Reed J. China on our minds: History and policy in the Asia-Pacific world. International Journal. 2006. Vol. 61. No. 2. Pp. 453–467. (In Eng.)

34. Report of the Commissioners Appointed to Inquire into the Municipal Corporations in England and Wales (Parliamentary Papers 23). London: C. Knight, 1835. 395 p. (In Eng.)

35. Sargent A. Anglo-Chinese commerce and diplomacy (Mainly in the nineteenth century). The Economic Journal. 1908. Vol. 18. No. 69. Pp. 69–73. (In Eng.)

36. Savin P. T. Countering corruption in China: History and contemporaneity. Problemy nauki. 2017. No. 20 (102). Pp. 55–58. (In Russ.)

37. Skachkov P. E. Chinese Studies in Russia: Historical Essays. Moscow: Nauka, 1977. 505p. (In Russ.)

38. Sklyarova E. K., Kamalova O. N., Zhbannikova M. I. Problems of corruption, pauperism, migration and public health in the UK. In: Osipyan N. B., Dmitrieva M. A., Zhbannikova M. I. (eds.) Integrated Security of Society and State. Conference proceedings (Rostov-on-Don, 21 April 2017). Rostov-on-Don: Fond Nauki i Obrazovaniya, 2017. Pp. 169–175. (In Russ.)

39. Sklyarova E., Kamalova O. Features of the formation of the British-Turkish diplomacy of the second half of the XIX century. Science Almanac of Black Sea Region Countries. 2019. No. 1 (17). Pp. 48–55. (In Eng.)

40. Valiyeva K., Asal U. Y. Theorizing Chinese foreign policy: Conceptual tenets in historical continuum. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2021. Vol. 10. No. 2. Pp. 1389–1408. (In Eng.)

41. Webb A. Wellesley Richard Colley. In: Webb A. A Compendium of Irish Biography: Comprising Sketches of Distinguished Irishmen, and of Eminent Persons Connected with Ireland by Office or by Their Writings. Dublin: M. H. Gill & Son, 1878. Pp. 550–552. (In Eng.)

42. Wellesley A. The Speeches of the Duke of Wellington in Parliament. London: J. Murray, 1854. 2 vols. 773 p. (In Eng.)

43. Wong J. Y. Deadly Dreams: Opium and the Arrow War (1856–1860) in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 542 p. (In Eng.)

44. Xiaobing Li (ed.) China at War: An Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, Oxford: ABC-CLIO, 1954. 605 р. (In Eng.)

45. Yanbin Wu. Britain’s Indo-Pacific strategy: Historical nostalgia, security responses and ambivalence towards China. Locus: People, Society, Cultures, Meaning. 2023. Vol. 14. No. 1. Pp. 166–181. (In Russ.)

46. Yefimov G. V. Modern and Contemporary History of China. Essays. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1951. 577 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Zhukovets O.Yu., Sklyarovа E.K., Gutieva M.A. ‘The Expedition to China’: Corruption and Shaping of British Pacific Policy in the Early-to-Mid Nineteenth Century. Oriental Studies. 2024;17(3):476-488. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2024-73-3-476-

Views: 198


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)