The Rite of Seter Tatakh and the Cult of Water Spirits among the Mongolic Peoples
https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2024-75-5-1066-1075
Abstract
Introduction. The article deals with archaic layers of Mongolic traditional cultures — worship of water, water sources and bodies — to specifically analyze the cult of water spirits. Goals. The study seeks to describe the rite of venerating the water master Luusan Khan through dedicating a sacrificial animal referred to as ‘seter’. Materials and methods. To facilitate this, the work shall address a variety of ethnographic and folklore sources of the Mongolic peoples. Still, the main source herein be the Mongolian-language manuscript titled ‘Luus-un qaγan-u seter-ün sudur bui’ (‘Sutra of Seter [Offering] for Khan of the Luus’) and housed at the Center of Oriental Manuscripts and Xylographs (IMBT SB RAS). Results. The article provides a source analysis of the manuscript, its text being newly introduced into scientific circulation. It attempts an insight into the semantics of setertatakh and its elements, identifies certain motifs of exchange and propitiation traced in the worship of water and water masters, and delineates some mythological parallels between the water cult practice and traditional worldviews of Turko-Mongols. The ritual of animal dedication was aimed at appeasing the master of water, the animal be a prominent one with certain qualities and signs. In return, the addressee was expected to take care of the involved humans and their livestock, bestow protection, longevity, and various benefits. The consecrated animal was hence considered the property of the water spirit, and had to be ritually clean. It was endowed with sacred powers and believed to contain the life force of livestock. The paper resumes with due regard of its purpose, the ritual text helps us understand key development directions of Buryat ritual practices throughout the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Conclusions. The work reveals that the rite of setertatakh was part of the Buryat ritual agenda believed of utmost importance for economic activities of livestock breeders, since it was meant to deliver to Luusan Khan — requests for juicy grass, health, fertility of humans and animals. It is also established that the examined written source clusters with essentially syncretic Buryat ritual texts for religious and everyday cults and practices, a unique and rare one of the latter being that of the water master Luusan Khan.
About the Author
Surzhana B. MiyagashevaRussian Federation
Cand. Sc. (History), Research Associate
References
1. Abaeva L. L. Phenomenon of sacralization of water in religious dominants of Mongolian peoples. Vlast’. 2022. Vol. 30. No. 6. Pp. 262—268. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v30i6.9395
2. Badmaev A. A. About “Seterleh” shamanistic rite of animal initiation at the Zakamensk Hongodors. Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Neighboring Territories. 2014. Vol. 20. Pp. 334–336. (In Russ.)
3. Badmaev A. A. Underwater world in the traditional Buryat worldview. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2018. Vol. 17. No. 3. Pp. 148–155. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25205/1818-7919-2018-17-3-148-155
4. Bakaeva E. P. Pre-Buddhist Beliefs of Kalmyks. Elista: Dzhangar, 2003. 358 p. (In Russ.)
5. Butanaev V. Ya., Mongush Ch. V. Archaic Customs and Rites of Sayan Turks. Abakan: Katanov Khakas State University, 2005. 196 p. (In Russ.)
6. Vyatkina K. V. Horse cults among Mongols. Sovetskaya etnografiya. 1968. No. 6. Pp. 117–122. (In Russ.)
7. Gerasimova K. M., Galdanova G. R., Ochirova G. N. Buryat Traditional Culture. Coursebook. Second edition. Ulan-Ude: Belig, 2006. 144 p. (In Russ.)
8. Dampilova L. S. Mythological semantics of snakes (mogoy), water spirits (luz) and dragon (luu) in the folklore of the Mongolian peoples. Traditional Culture. 2017. No. 4 (68). Pp. 182–189. (In Russ.)
9. Zhukovskaya N. L. Impacts of Mongolian-Buryat shamanism and pre-shamanic beliefs on Lamaism. In: Stratanovich G. G. (ed.) East and Southeast Asia: Issues of Ethnography and Ethnic History. Moscow: Nauka, 1968. Pp. 211–236. (In Russ.)
10. Zorin A. V. Institute of Oriental Manuscripts (RAS): [Analyzing] one text dealing with the cult of Vajrapani and Eight Naga Kings in the ancient Tibetan manuscript Дх-178. In: Albedil M. F., Vasilkov Ya. V. (eds.) Zograf Collection. Vol. 4. St. Petersburg: Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (RAS), 2014. Pp. 170–197. (In Russ.)
11. Kenin-Lopsan M. B. Tuvan Traditional Culture. Kyzyl: Tyva Book Publ., 2006. 248 p. (In Russ.)
12. Lipets R. S. Images of Batyr and His Horse in Turko-Mongolian Epic Narratives. Moscow: Nauka, 1984. 262 p. (In Russ.)
13. The Moose-Grey Horse. In: True and Untrue Stories of the Steppe. Ulan-Ude: Respublikanskiy Informatsionnyi Tsentr, 2010. Pp. 144–146. (In Russ.)
14. Menkenova K. V., Alzheeva M. M., Erdnieva E. A., Seldikov A. M. The cult of Nagas-water spirits (usna ezen) in Kalmyk folk tales. Modern Humanities Success. 2020. No. 12. Pp. 252–256. (In Russ.)
15. Namzhilov O. N. Buddhism in Lay Terms. Ulan-Ude: Respublikanskaya Tipografiya, 2022. 424 p. (In Russ.)
16. Natsov G. D. Materials in Buryat History and Culture. Pt. 1. G. Galdanova (introd., transl., etc.). Ulan-Ude: Buryat Scientific Center (SB RAS), 1995. 155 p. (In Russ.)
17. Neklyudov S. Yu. These capricious and lazy dragons: From proverb to myth. Forum for Anthropology and Culture. 2014. No. 21. Pp. 152–165. (In Russ.)
18. Neklyudov S. Yu. The many-faced dragon. In Umbra: demonologiya kak semioticheskaya sistema. 2017. Vol. 6. Pp. 157–202. (In Russ.)
19. Neklyudov S. Yu. Folklore Landscapes of Mongolia: Myth and Ritual. Moscow: Indrik, 2019. 520 p. (In Russ.)
20. Nesterov S. P. Horse in Cults of Medieval Central Asian Turks. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1990. 141 p. (In Russ.)
21. Potanin G. N. Essays on Northwestern Mongolii: Outcomes of the Expedition Undertaken in 1876–1877. Vol. 4: Ethnographic Materials. St. Petersburg: V. Kirshbaum, 1883.1025 p. (In Russ.)
22. Sodnompilova M. M. The World in Traditional Worldviews and Practical Activities of Mongols. Ulan-Ude: Buryat Scientific Center (SB RAS), 2009. 366 p. (In Russ.)
23. Sodnompilova M. M., Nanzatov B. Z. ‘Zov zus’ or ‘right’ horse paint in the horse-breeding culture of the Mongolian peoples: Horse paint symbolism. Bulletin of the Buryat Scientific Center SB RAS. 2014. No. 3 (15). Pp. 100–116. (In Russ.)
24. Tsydenov E. M. On some rites in the modern Buryat shamanism. Buryat State University Bulletin. 2012. No. 8. Pp. 242–247. (In Russ.)
25. Terentyev V. I. Religious practices of nomads of Western Mongolia: The setertey mal custom of Derbets. Forum for Anthropology and Culture. 2014. No. 22. Pp. 191–211. (In Russ.)
26. Khangalov M. N. Collected Writings. In 3 vols. Vol. 1. Ulan-Ude: NovaPrint, 2021. 568 p. (In Russ.)
27. Erdenebold L. Traditional Beliefs of Oirat Mongols, Late Nineteenth – Early Twentieth Centuries. Ulan-Ude: Buryat Scientific Center (SB RAS), 2012. 194 p. (In Russ.)
28. Sukhbaatar O. A Dictionary of Loanwords in Mongolian. Ulaanbaatar: Admon, 1997. 233 p. (In Mong.)
29. Tsyrempilov N. (comp.) Annotated Catalogue of the Collection of Mongolian Manuscripts and Xylographs M II of the Institute of Mongolian, Tibetan and Buddhist Studies of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (CNEAS Monograph Series 24). Ts. Vanchikova (ed.). Sendai: Tohoku University, 2006. 210 p. (In Eng.)
30. Nebesky-Wojkowitz R. Oracles and Demons of Tibet: The Cult and Iconography of the Tibetan Protective Deities. Varanasi: Book Faith India, 1993. 572 p. (In Eng.)
31. Luus-un qaγan-u seter-ün sudur bui (‘Sutra of Seter [Offering] for Khan of the Luus’). Manuscript. Pothi format. 10x34 (8,5x29,5) cm. At: Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies (SB RAS); Center of Oriental Manuscripts and Xylographs. Coll. M-II. Inv. no. 498. (In Mong.)
Review
For citations:
Miyagasheva S.B. The Rite of Seter Tatakh and the Cult of Water Spirits among the Mongolic Peoples. Oriental Studies. 2024;17(5):1066-1075. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2024-75-5-1066-1075