The Choné Kangyur: A Socio-Archaeographic Analysis
https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2024-75-5-1106-1114
Abstract
Introduction. The paper attempts a socio-archaeographic analysis of the Choné Kangyur housed at the Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies (SB RAS). Goals. The work primarily seeks to introduce one previously unknown edition (set) of the Tibetan Buddhist canon into scientific circulation. Methods. In terms of methodology, the study rests on that of ‘social archaeography’, with some provisions of historical phenomenology be as involved. Results. The socio-archaeographic analysis of the specified collection facilitates deeper understanding of its social significance and certain specifics of Buddhist book culture in the Baikal Region throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The main research target is to reconstruct somewhat social aspects behind the shaping of Buddhist canonical heritage across Russia’s regions — with a view to establish the edition’s place in the modern national book system. Conclusions. The content analysis shows Buryat monasteries had shaped a harmonious hierarchical book system centered around the Kangyur by the early twentieth century. Those had been both practical and soteriological motives that underlay decisions made by leaders of the region’s Buddhist communities to purchase Kangyur editions in large quantities from Qing China. The Choné Kangyur (IMBT SB RAS) proves a fundamental source for numerous studies in history, archaeography, and social agenda. The Choné Kangyur introduced herein attests to Tibetan-language publications have been — and still are — an important and integral part of Russia’s book resources, serve as a factor in the formation of the nation’s book culture. The article also pays particular attention to some newly discovered episodes in the history of the Choné Kangyur.
About the Author
Andrei A. BazarovRussian Federation
Dr. Sc. (Philosophy), Leading Research Associate
References
1. Balzhurova A. Zh., Boronoeva T. A. Ivolginsky datsan: Preservation of the historical monument, creation of a museum. Iskusstvo Evrazii – The Art of Eurasia. 2019. No. 4 (15). Pp. 255–266. DOI: 10.25712/ASTU.2518-7767.2019.04.017 (In Russ.)
2. Bakhtina O. N., Dutchak E. E., Kerov V. V. “When we are reading, the Lord is talking to us...”: The question of institution of social archaeography. RUDN Journal of Russian History. 2006. No. 2. Pp. 75–85. (In Russ.)
3. Galdanova G. R., Gerasimova K. M., Dashiev D. B., Mitupov G. Ts. Lamaism in Buryatia, Eighteenth to Early Twentieth Centuries: The Cult System, Its Structure and Social Impacts. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1983. 232 p. (In Russ.)
4. Zorin A. V., Mitruev B. L., Sabrukova S. S., Sizova A. A. Institute of Oriental Manuscripts (RAS): A Catalogue of Tibetan Buddhist Canonical Writings. Vol. 1: Kangyur and Tengyur. St. Petersburg: Vostochnaya Literatura, 2017. 512 p. (In Tib. and Russ.)
5. Muzraeva D. N. Tibetan- and Oirat-Language Buddhist Written Sources in Kalmykia’s Collections. E. Bakaeva, A. Burykin (eds.). Elista: Dzhangar, 2012. 224 p. (In Russ.)
6. Muzraeva D. N. Prayer books (early monuments of Kalmyk Cyrillic writing) as a source of Buddhist literature and Kalmyk writing study. Izvestia of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University. 2011. No. 7 (61). Pp. 121–125. (In Russ.)
7. Natsov G.-D. Materials on Lamaism in Buryatia. G. Galdanova (foreword, transl., etc.). Pt. 2. Ulan-Ude: Buryat Scientific Center (SB RAS), 1998. 186 p. (In Russ.)
8. Sinitsyn F. L. The Red Storm: Soviets and Buddhism, 1917–1946. St. Petersburg: A. Terentyev, Save Tibet Foundation, 2013. 528 p. (In Russ.)
9. Syrtypova S. D., Garmaeva Kh. Zh., Dashiev D. B. Center of Oriental Manuscripts and Xylographs (IMBT SB RAS): The Tibetan Collection, Its Structure and Contents. Ulan-Ude: Buryat Scientific Center (SB RAS), 2006. 226 p. (In Russ.)
10. Tsyrempilov N. V. Buddhism and Empire: Buryat Buddhist Community in Russia, Eighteenth to Early Twentieth Centuries. Ulan-Ude: Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies (SB RAS), 2013. 338 p. (In Russ.)
11. Uspensky V. L. The expedition of Baron Pavel L. Schilling von Cannstadt to Siberia in 1830–1832 and its significance for Tibetan and Mongolian studies. In: The Roerich Heritage. Conference proceedings. Vol. 8: Nicholas K. Roerich and His Contemporaries. Architects and Architecture. The East in Western Eyes. St. Petersburg: Roerich Family Museum and Institute, 2011. Pp. 292–294. (In Russ.)
12. Nourse B. J. Canons in Context: A History of the Tibetan Buddhist Canon in the Eighteenth Century. PhD dissertation. University of Virginia. Charlottesville, VA, 2014. 239 p.
Review
For citations:
Bazarov A.A. The Choné Kangyur: A Socio-Archaeographic Analysis. Oriental Studies. 2024;17(5):1106-1114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2024-75-5-1106-1114