Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

The Tibetan Question in British Foreign Policy, 1858–1904: Expansion Methods and Funding Sources

https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2025-78-2-297-310

Abstract

Introduction. The article examines the Tibetan question in British foreign policy between 1858 and 1904. In Russian historiography, the issue was never comprehensively approached in the context of parliamentary debates over expansion methods and funding sources in Tibet. Britain’s colonial policy was aimed at expanding its trade with Tibet, providing access to oil fields, and displacing China, Nepal, and Russia. The identified points keep motivating historians to seek for the beginnings of centuries-old contradictions between the nations that have shaped somewhat foreign policy continuities. Goals. The study attempts an analysis into the Tibetan question as part of the British international agenda in the context of expansion techniques and funding aspects. To facilitate this, the paper shall consider the then positions of parliament members and government officials who ― despite the growing international resistance ― tended to use colonial ideologies and methods for a break in the isolation of Tibet. Materials and methods. The work employs the historical genetic and comparative methods to focus on publications of parliamentary debates and British laws, documents of personal origin, periodicals and international treaties. Results and conclusions. The era of Queen Victoria witnessed the shaping of a new course in British foreign policy that would lead to further development of trade with Tibet, displacement of China, Nepal and Russia from the region. The military intelligence activities in Tibet, cynically referred to in Parliament as ‘the Mission’, proved a continuation of Victorian policy in India, Nepal and China. The Mission’s methods included military operations, intelligence duties, the deployment of Britain’s permanent representative, and penetrations into territories adjacent to India, Nepal, and China. The military and scientific expansion was funded by the Parliament following the Victorian Act 1858 ― from revenues collected through India’s colonization. The colonial forces were compiled from Gurkhas, Pathans, Indian surveyors, British surgeons, cartographers and intelligence officers. Minimal costs, violation of Tibet’s isolation, and military actions were justified in the Parliament as a mission supposed to protect the national interests of both India and Great Britain.

About the Authors

Diana V. Volkova
Don State Technical University (1, Gagarin Sq., 344003 Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation)
Россия

Cand. Sc. (Philosophy), Associate Professor



Elena K. Sklyarovа
Southern Federal University (105/42, B. Sadovaya St., 344006 Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation)
Россия

Dr. Sc. (History), Professor



Inna V. Topchiy
Don State Technical University (1, Gagarin Sq., 344003 Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation)
Россия

Cand. Sc. (Philosophy), Associate Professor



Liudmila N. Gorbunova
Don State Technical University (1, Gagarin Sq., 344003 Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation)
Россия

Cand. Sc. (Philosophy), Associate Professor



References

1. Zhukovets O. Yu., Sklyarova E. K., Gutieva M. A. ‘The Expedition to China’: Corruption and shaping of British Pacific policy in the early-to-mid nineteenth century. Oriental Studies. 2024. Vol. 17. No. 3. Pp. 476–488. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22162/2619-0990-2024-73-3-476-488

2. Kozlov P. K. British expedition to Tibet. Istoricheskiy vestnik. 1907. Vol. 5. Pp. 522–539. (In Russ.)

3. Kozlov P. K. Dalai Lama of Tibet. Istoricheskiy vestnik. 1907. Vol. 107. Pp. 230–249. (In Russ.)

4. Kryuchkov I. V., Kryuchkova N. D., Melko­nyan A. A. Foreign Trade of British Raj at the Turn of the 20th Century: Analyzing Materials From Russia’s Diplomatic Missions. Oriental Studies. 2022. Vol. 15. No. 2. Pp. 200–213. (In Russ.) doi: 10.22162/2619-0990-2022-60-2-200-213

5. Leontiev V. P. Foreign Invasions of Tibet, 1888–1919. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences, 1956. 225 p. (In Russ.)

6. Lopatin V. V. British imperial policy in theocratic Tibet. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2007. No. 53. Pp. 148–151. (In Russ.)

7. Mongush M. V. Tibetan issue in the foreign policy of Russia and Great Britain (On the base of archival sources). Asian Studies: History and Modernity. 2023. No. 4 (8). Pp. 41–57. (In Russ.)

8. Pokrovsky M. N. Diplomacy and Wars of Nineteenth-Century Russia. Moscow: Krasnaya Nov, 1923. 392 p. (In Russ.)

9. Sergeev E. Yu. Great Game, 1856–1907: Myths and Truths of Russia-Britain Relations in Central and East Asia. Moscow: KMK, 2012. 454 p. (In Russ.)

10. Sidorova S. E. Battle of ideologies: Litton’s conservative strategy and Ripon’s liberal reforms in India (Based on the materials of the

11. Economist). Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaia i zarubezhnaia literatura. Seria 9, Vostokovedenie i Afrikanistika. 2023. No. 2. Pp. 102–127. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31249/rva/2023.02.06

12. Sklyarova E. K., Maksimenko M. A. Britain’s Foreign Policy in the Reign of Queen Victoria: Sanctions and External Relations. Rostov-on-Don, Taganrog: Southern Federal University, 2024. 161 p. (In Russ.)

13. Waddell L. A. Lhasa and Its Mysteries (With a Record of the Expedition of 1903–1904). E. Chistyakova-Ver (transl.). St. Petersburg: P. Panteleev, 1906. 344 p. (In Russ.)

14. Barrow I. Making History, Drawing Territory: British Mapping in India, c. 1756–1905. New Delhi, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 212 p. (In Eng.)

15. Bench C. Tibet: Past and Present. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924. 326 p. (In Eng.)

16. Convention between Great Britain and China, relating to Sikkim and Tibet. Signed at Calcutta, March 17, 1890. In: The Question of Tibet and the Rule of Law. Geneva: International Commission of Jurists, 1959. Pp. 105–106. (In Eng.)

17. Convention between Great Britain and Tibet. Signed at Lhasa, September 7, 1904. In: The Question of Tibet and the Rule of Law. Geneva: International Commission of Jurists, 1959. Pp. 110–112. (In Eng.)

18. Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates. 1904. Vol. 130. Pp. 1110–1150. (In Eng.)

19. Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates. 1904. Vol. 133. Pp. 488–502. (In Eng.)

20. Kiernan V. G. India, China and Sikkim: 1886–1890. The Indian Historical Quarterly. 1955. No. 31. Pp. 31–51. (In Eng.)

21. Landon P. The Opening of Tibet. New York: Doubleday, 1905. 484 p. (In Eng.)

22. Macdonald D. Twenty Years in Tibet: Intimate and Personal Experiences of the Closed Land among All Classes of Its People from the Highest to the Lowest. London: Seeley, Service & Co. Ltd, 1932. 318 p. (In Eng.)

23. Plarr V. Plarr’s Lives of the Fellows of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. London: J. Wright & Sons, 1938. Vol. 3. 1348 p. (In Eng.)

24. Phuntsho K. The provenance and cataloguing of the Younghusband Collection. Inner Asia. 2012. Vol. 14. No. 1. Pp. 121–130. (In Eng.)

25. Preston C. The rise of man in the gardens of Sumeria: a biography of L. A. Waddell. Brighton and Portland: Sussex Academic Press, 2009. 260 p.

26. Regulations regarding Trade, Communication, and Pasturage, appended to the Convention between Great Britain and China of March 17, 1890 relative to Sikkim and Tibet. Signed at Darjeeling, December 5, 1893. In: The Question of Tibet and the Rule of Law. Geneva: International Commission of Jurists, 1959. Pp. 107–110. (In Eng.)

27. Tandy E. Colonel C. H. Ryder. Empire Survey Review. 1946. No. 8 (59). Pp. 198–200. (In Eng.)

28. Government of India Act 1858. In: 21 & 22 Vict. c. 106. (In Eng.).

29. Tibet. The Sydney Morning Herald. 1933, June 17. No. 29 (783). P. 8. (In Eng.)

30. Waddell L. A. Lhasa and Its Mysteries. With a Record of the Expedition of 1903–1904. London: John Murray, 1905. 813 p. (In Eng.)

31. Waller D. The Pundits: British Exploration of Tibet and Central Asia. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 1990. 327 p. (In Eng.)

32. Walton H. Appendix A: Notes on the natural history of southern Tibet. In: Landon P. The Opening of Tibet. New York: Doubleday, 1905. Pp. 419–432. (In Eng.)


Review

For citations:


Volkova D.V., Sklyarovа E.K., Topchiy I.V., Gorbunova L.N. The Tibetan Question in British Foreign Policy, 1858–1904: Expansion Methods and Funding Sources. Oriental Studies. 2025;18(2):297-310. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2025-78-2-297-310

Views: 331

JATS XML

ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)