Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

Polypredicative Sentences of the General Following in the Buryat Language: Search of Differentiation Parameter

https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2016-28-6-34-40

Abstract

The article aims to discover suitable parameters for differentiation of polypredicative sentences of the general following in the Buryat language. This aspect is expressed by four variable postpositive participle constructions to be differentiated. The most difficult point was to find semantic and other parameters that would allow to reveal system relations within a group of meaningfully close constructions (according to traditional descriptions those are full synonyms). The author applies parameters of variation linguistics and diverse semantic parameters to differ between the constructions. Oppositions of variation linguistics are formed on the basis of certain styles and dialects, as well as temporary and social frameworks of use. Semantic oppositions include assessment, norm/aberration, discrepancy of expectations, lexical and grammatical restrictions, reference characteristics (same-subject constructions / different-subject constructions). The search of suitable parameters was carried out primarily within the Buryat language by means of analysis of elements of constructions and contexts of their use. Parameters resulting from analysis of other languages, first of all Russian, as well as data from typological works were checked. The research revealed and identified stylistic, functional and semantic preferences in the use of separate constructions. Firstly, this facilitates learning the language, secondly, drafts a way of development of each construction within this semantic group. A bookish variant of constructions of the general following is the construction with the postposition udaa. A semantic opposition as per time of the two events was revealed between the central constructions with the postpositions γüülde and γüüleer (in case of a postposition in the instrumental case the time interval gets extended). Another construction of the type with the postposition γoyno used to express a measure of time in a dependent part (other constructions are impossible) nowadays also successfully competes with the postposition γüülde but differs from the latter by its predominantly different-subject implementation.

About the Author

Nadezhda Darzhaeva
Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the RAS (Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation
Ph. D in Philology, Department of Linguistics, Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the RAS (Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation)


References

1. Lukina A. E. Ponyatie «yazykovoy variativnosti» v otechestvennoy i zarubezhnoy lingvisticheskoy traditsii [Concept of variability in Russian and world linguistics]. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. «Lingvistika» [Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series ‘Linguistics’], 2014, vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 7–11 (In Russ.).

2. Russkaya grammatika T. II. Sintaksis [Russian grammar. Vol. II. Syntax]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982, 709 p. (In Russ.).

3. Skribnik E. K. Grammatika buryatskogo yazyka. Sintaksis slozhnogo (polipredikativnogo) predlozheniya. T. I [Grammar of the Buryat language. The compound sentence: syntax. Vol. 1]. Ulan-Ude, Bur. Scientific Center (of the Siberian Branch of the RAS) Press, 2016, 315 p. (In Russ. and Bur.).

4. Strukturnye tipy sinteticheskikh polipredikativnykh konstruktsiy v yazykakh raznykh system [Structural types of synthetic polypredicative constructions in languages of different systems]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1986, 195 p. (In Russ.).

5. Khomutova T. N. Teoriya yazykovoy variativnosti: sotsiolingvisticheskiy aspekt [The theory of linguistic variability: sociolinguistic aspect]. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. «Lingvistika» [Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series ‘Linguistics’], 2005, iss. 2, No. 11, pp. 28–34 (In Russ.).

6. Khun S. I. Variativnost’ paremicheskikh edinits: pragmalingvisticheskiy aspekt: Avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. Nauk [Variability of paremical units… A Ph. D. thesis abstract]. Krasnodar, 2007. Available at: http://www.dissercat.com/content/variativnost-paremicheskikh-edinits-pragmalingvisticheskii-aspekt#ixzz3pwGB5Raf) (accessed: 7 September 2016) (In Russ.).

7. Cheremisina M. I. Yazyk i ego otrazhenie v nauke o yazyke [Language and its reflection in linguistic studies]. Novosibirsk, Novosib. State Univ. Press, 2002, 252 p. (In Russ.).

8. Givón T. The Diachrony of Grammar. Amsterdam, J. Benjamins Publ., 2015, 928 p. (In Eng.).

9. Labov W. Introduction // Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972. P. XVIII–XVIII.


Review

For citations:


Darzhaeva N. Polypredicative Sentences of the General Following in the Buryat Language: Search of Differentiation Parameter. Oriental Studies. 2016;9(6):34-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2016-28-6-34-40

Views: 727


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)