Old Written Kalmyk: the Category of Number. Nouns
https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2016-28-6-41-47
Abstract
The article examines the grammatical category of number (forms of the plural) in Old Written Kalmyk. In Old Written Kalmyk the category was represented by two grammatical meanings: 1) the singular and 2) the plural. Nouns in the singular have a zero ending while in the plural there are a number of grammatical forms constituted by means of special formants. Nouns of Old Written Kalmyk have the categories of case, number and may also contain indicators of the possessive. Indicators of the categories get joined to the noun stem in strict order: an indicator of the plural comes first and is followed by a case suffix which, in turn, is followed by a possessive suffix that sometimes makes an integral unit with the case suffix.
Ever since the emergence of Mongol studies, the category of number has been dealt with according to the ‘the singular — the plural’ scheme inherent to the Indo-European languages. In Old Mongolian, the category of number (the plural) was widely developed and, thus, was regular enough. The ‘contingent of nouns’ that could take plural forms was far larger than in present-day languages. G. Sanzheev noted that ‘in Mongolian languages those were special suffixes determined by corresponding ending phonemes of singular noun stems that served to express the category of the plural’. In Old Written Kalmyk, the indicators of the plural are as follows: -d, -s, -muud / -müüd / -muus, -noγoud / -nögüüd, -nar / -ner, -oud / -uud / -üüd, -coud / -coud / -cuud / -cüüd / -čiud, -tan / -ten. In most cases noun stems coincide with singular nominative forms, except for nouns with the ending ‘unstable –n’ in the singular. The latter form the plural by means of the suffix –d and –n disappears. Thus, the choice of an indicator of the plural in Old Written Kalmyk largely depends upon the stem ending and the semantics of the noun. E. g., plural forms of nouns ending in vowels develop by means of the suffix –s. The semantic factor proves crucial for application of the suffix –nar / -ner since it can join only stems of nouns denoting people and professions.
In Old Written Kalmyk, there was a trend of adding explicit indicators of the plural which signifies quite a low level of grammatization for the category of number. Weakening of the meaning of the plural resulted in the emergence of compound plural formants –doud (-d and –oud put together) or -s and –noγoud.
About the Authors
Evgeniy Bembeev
Kalmyk Scientific Center of the RAS (Elista, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation
Senior Research Associate, Kalmyk Scientific Center of the RAS (Elista, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Senior Research Associate, Kalmyk Scientific Center of the RAS (Elista, Russian Federation
Tsagan Mandzhieva
Kalmyk Scientific Center of the RAS (Elista, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation
Laboratory Assistant, Kalmyk Scientific Center of the RAS (Elista, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Laboratory Assistant, Kalmyk Scientific Center of the RAS (Elista, Russian Federation
References
1. Badmaev B. V. «Saryn gerel» — pamyatnik oyratskoy pis’mennosti XVII v. (tekstologo-lingvistichekiy analiz). Dis…. kand. fil. Nauk [Saryn Gerel — a 17th century Oirat written monument (textual and linguistic analysis). A Ph. D. thesis]. Moscow, 2001, 167 p. (In Russ.).
2. Badmaev B. V. Ob odnom pokazatele mnozhestvennosti v «Sarin gerel» (Biografii Zaya-pandity) [About one indicator of the plural in Sarin Gerel (Zaya Pandita’s biography)]. Problemy sovremennogo kalmykovedeniya. Mat-ly Resp. nauch. konf., posvyashch. 70-letiyu prof. A. Bormandzhinova [Problems of Contemporary Kalmyk Studies. Proc. of the Republican research conf. …]. Elista, Kalmyk State Univ. Press, 2000, pp. 109–111
3. (In Russ.).
4. Badmaev B. V. Obrazovanie mnozhestvennogo chisla v oyratskom pamyatnike XVII v. «Sarin gerel» (Biografiya Zaya-pandity) [Formation of the plural in the 17th cent. Oirat composition Sarin Gerel (Zaya Pandita’s biography)]. European Social Science Journal, Moscow, Mezhdunarodnyy Issledovatel’skiy Institut Publ., 2012, pp. 149–152 (In Russ.).
5. Bertagaev T. A. Suffiks -tan i ego proizvodnye v mongol’skikh yazykakh [The suffix –tan and its derivatives in Mongolic languages]. Zapiski KNIIYaLI [Notes of Kalmyk Institute of Language, Literature and History], iss. 3, Elista, Kalm. State Publ. House, 1964, pp. 100–107 (In Russ.).
6. Blagova G. F. Kombinatsiya affiksov mnozhestvennosti — iskonno altayskaya konstanta ili tipologicheskiy parallelizm? [Combination of plural affixes — a genuine Altaic constant or typological parallelism?]. Problema obshchnosti altayskikh yazykov [Altaic languages: problem of affinity]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1971, pp. 351–361 (In Russ.).
7. Bobrovnikov A. A. Grammatika mongol’sko-kalmytskogo yazyka [Grammar of the Kalmyk-Mongolian language]. Kazan, Kazan Univ. Press, 1849, 403 p. (In Russ.).
8. Gedeeva D. B. Formanty mnozhestvennogo chisla v yazyke kalmytskikh zakonodatel’nykh pamyatnikov XVII–XIX vv. [Plural formants in the language of the 17th–19th cc. Kalmyk legislative monuments]. Mongol’skie yazyki: istoriya i sovremennost’: Mat-ly Mezhd. nauch. konf. (g. Sankt-Peterburg, 21–23 oktyabrya 2013 g.) / otv. red. P. O. Rykin [Mongolic Languages: History and Contemporaneity. Proc. of the Internat. research conf. …]. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2013, pp. 41–43 (In Russ.).
9. Godzinski S. Kategoriya chisla v srednemongol’skom yazyke [The category of number in Middle Mongolian]. Teoreticheskie problemy vostochnogo yazykoznaniya. Ch. 5 [Theoretical problems of Oriental linguistics. Part 5]. Moscow, 1985, p. 42 (In Russ.).
10. Kovalevskiy O. M. Kratkaya grammatika mongol’skogo knizhnogo yazyka [A brief grammar of literary Mongolian]. Kazan, Kazan Univ. Press, 1835, 202 p. (In Russ.).
11. Kozin S. A. K voprosu o pokazatelyakh mnozhestvennosti v mongol’skikh yazykakh [Revisiting indicators of the plural in Mongolic languages]. Uchenye zapiski LGU [Scholarly Notes of Leningrad State University], No. 69, series ‘Philological Studies’, iss. 10, Leningrad, 1946, pp. 123–127 (In Russ.).
12. Kotvich V. L. Opyt grammatiki kalmytskogo razgovornogo yazyka. Izd. 2-oe [Grammar of colloquial Kalmyk. 2nd edit.]. Prague, 1929, 418 p. (In Russ.).
13. Kotvich V. L. Issledovaniya po altayskim yazykam (per. s pol’skogo) [Studies in Altaic languages (transl. from Polish)]. Moscow, Inostr. Lit. Publ., 1962, 371 p. (In Russ.).
14. Popov A. V. Grammatika kalmytskogo yazyka [Kalmyk Grammar]. Kazan, Kazan Univ. Press, 1847, 392 p. (In Russ.).
15. Poppe N. N. Voprosy grammatiki mongol’skogo yazyka [Questions of Mongolian grammar]. Zapiski Instituta Vostokovedeniya AN SSSR [Notes of Oriental Studies Institute of USSR Acad. of Sc.], 1933, vol. 2, iss. 2, pp. 51–68 (In Russ.).
16. Pyurbeev G. Ts. Soglasovanie v chisle kak grammaticheskiy priem v istorii mongol’skikh yazykov [Number agreement as a grammatical device in the history of Mongolic languages]. V Mezhdunarodnyy kongress mongolovedov. Doklady sovetskoy delegatsii. T. I. Filologiya [5th Internat. Congress of Mongolists. Reports of the Soviet delegation. Vol. I. Philology]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1987, pp. 118–126 (In Russ.).
17. Pyurbeev G. Ts. Istoriko-tipologicheskaya kharakteristika genitivnykh konstruktsiy v mongol’skikh yazykakh [Historical and typological characteristics of Mongolian genitive constructions]. Mongol’skiy lingvisticheskiy sbornik [Mongolian linguistic digest]. Moscow, 1992, pp. 85–95 (In Russ.).
18. Rudov L. N. Problemy kidan’skoy pis’mennosti [Problems of Khitan scripts]. Sovetskaya etnografiya [The Soviet Ethnography journal], 1963, No. 1, pp. 89–98 (In Russ.).
19. Sanzheev G. D. Grammatika kalmytskogo yazyka [Kalmyk grammar]. Moscow, Publ. House of the USSR Acad. of Sciences, 1940, 156 p. (In Russ.).
20. Sanzheev G. D. Sravnitel’naya grammatika mongol’skikh yazykov. T. 1 [Comparative grammar of Mongolian languages. Vol. 1]. Moscow, Publ. House of the USSR Acad. of Sciences, 1953, 240 p. (In Russ.).
21. Sanzheev G. D. Staropis’mennyy mongol’skiy yazyk [The Old written Mongolian language]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1964, 90 p. (In Russ.).
22. Suseeva D. A. Grammaticheskiy stroy kalmytskogo yazyka XVIII v.: morfonologiya i morfologiya (na materiale pisem kalmytskikh khanov i ikh sovremennikov / otv. red.: A. V. Dybo, E. U. Omakaeva [The grammatical system of the 18th c. Kalmyk language: morphonology and morphology (evidence from letters of Kalmyk rulers and their contemporaries. Edit. by A. Dybo, E. Omakaeva)]. Elista, Publ. Dept. of Kalmyk Inst. for Humanities of the RAS, 2011, 240 p. (In Russ.).
23. Trofimova S. M. Kategoriya mnozhestvennosti v kalmytskom yazyke [The category of number in Kalmyk]. Vestnik Buryatskogo universiteta. Ser. 6. Filologiya [Bulletin of the Buryat State University], Ulan-Ude, 1999, iss. 4, pp. 159–166 (In Russ.).
24. Tsydendambaev Ts. B. Grammaticheskie kategorii buryatskogo yazyka v istoriko-sravnitel’nom osveshchenii [Grammatical categories of the Buryat language in a historical and comparative context]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979, 147 p. (In Russ.).
25. Tsydendambaev Ts. B. Buryatskie istoricheskie khroniki i rodoslovnye (istoriko-lingvisticheskoe issledovanie) [Historical chronicles and genealogical tables of the Buryats (historical and linguistic research)]. Ulan-Ude, Buryat Book Publ., 1972, 662 p. (In Russ.).
26. Yakhontova N. S. Oyratskiy literaturnyy yazyk XVII v. [The 17th c. Oirat language]. Moscow, Vost. Lit. Publ., 1996, 152 p. (In Russ.).
27. Schmidt I. Grammatik der Mongolischen sprache [Mongolian grammar]. St. Petersburg, Imperial Academy of Sciences Press, 1831, 179 p. (In Germ.).
Review
For citations:
Bembeev E., Mandzhieva Ts. Old Written Kalmyk: the Category of Number. Nouns. Oriental Studies. 2016;9(6):41-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2016-28-6-41-47
Views:
813
Email this article 