Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

Ethno-Cultural Education in the Republic of Kalmykia: Is Civil Identity Formation in Danger?

https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2016-24-2-176-186

Abstract

The article examines the issues of ethno-cultural education in the Republic of Kalmykia within the general framework of maintaining balance between the all-Russian and ethnic identities. The authors explore the dynamics and ways of introducing ethno-cultural content into education standards since the early 1990s. At the same time special attention is paid to the reducing influence of ethno-cultural education on shaping the all-Russian civil identity. The empirical studies aimed at discovering the experience of implementing ethno-cultural educational component in Kalmykia indicate a rather balanced combination of ethno-cultural and all-Russian civil educational subjects. The analysis of the empirical survey results has identified a difference in understanding the meaningful focus of ethno-cultural subjects by generations of parents and pupils. In parents’ opinion, the main goal of teaching those subjects is to shape the ethno-cultural identity. The young people, on the one hand, take a pragmatic approach to the use of this aspect of knowledge but, on the other hand, they do understand that the knowledge is targeted at maintaining customs and traditions. To actualize the interest of Kalmykia’s youth in ethno-cultural education it is required to proceed to active methods of education that would meet their present-day needs. The collected data also points out that a common civil identity prevails in the republic alongside the trend towards reproduction of ethnic culture.

About the Authors

G. S. Denisova
Institute of International Relations, Southern Federal University
Russian Federation


A. V. Denisova
Institute of Philology, Journalism and Cross-Cultural Communication, Southern Federal University
Russian Federation


L. V. Namrueva
Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of the RAS
Russian Federation


References

1. Bor’ba za identichnost’ i novye instituty kommunikacii (pod red. P. V. Panova, K. A. Sulimova, L. A. Fadeevoj) [Struggle for the identity and the new institutions of communication]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2012, 263 p. (In Russian).

2. Denisova A. V. Jazykovaja situacija v Respublike Kalmykija [Linguistic situation in the Republic of Kalmykia]. Teorija i praktika obshhestvennogo razvitija (Theory and Practice of Social Development). 2015, no. 24, pp. 92– 95 (In Russian).

3. Drobizheva L. M., Ryzhova S. V. Grazhdanskaja i jetnicheskaja identichnost’ i obraz zhelaemogo gosudarstva v Rossii [Civil and ethnic identities and the image of a desirable state]. Politicheskie issledovanija (Political Studies). 2015, no. 5, pp. 9-24 (In Russian).

4. Dyakieva B. B. Razvitie nacional’no-regional’nogo obrazovanija Respubliki Kalmykija (organizacionno-upravlencheskie aspekty) [Development of national and regional education in the Republic of Kalmykia (organizational and management aspects)]. Elista, Kalmyk State Univ. Publ., 2005, 245 p. (In Russian).

5. Grazhdanskaja, jetnicheskaja i regional’naja identichnost’: vchera, segodnja, zavtra (otv. red. L. M. Drobizheva) [Civil, ethnic and regional identities: yesterday, today, tomorrow (edited by L. M. Drobizheva]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2013, 485 p. (In Russian).

6. Kuz’min M., Artemenko O., Petrova T. Ob’edinenie obrazovatel’nogo prostranstva [Unifi cation of the educational space]. Jetnokul’turnoe obrazovanie. Metody social’noj orientacii rossijskoj shkoly (Ethno-Cultural Education. Russian school’s methods of social orientation). Moscow, Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of the RAS Publ., 2010, is. 1, pp. 176–180 (In Russian).

7. Makarova G. I. Identichnosti tatar i russkih v kontekste jetnokul’turnyh politik Rossijskoj Federacii i Respubliki Tatarstan [Identities of the Tatars and Russians in the context of ethno-cultural policies adopted by the Russian Federation and Republic of Tatarstan]. Kazan, Kazan State Univ. Publ., 2010, 248 p. (In Russian).

8. Mezhjetnicheskie i konfessional’nye otnoshenija v Juzhnom federal’nom okruge. Jekspertnyj doklad 2015. Pod obsh. red. V. A. Tishkova [Interethnic and confessional relations in the Southern Federal District. The 2015 Expert Report. Under the general editorship of V. A. Tishkov]. Rostov-on-Don, Izd-vo Fond nauki i obrazovanija Publ., 2016, 112 p. (In Russian).

9. Mezhjetnicheskie otnoshenija i religioznaja situacija v sub’ektah Juzhnogo federal’nogo okruga. Jekspertnyj doklad (po sostojaniju na pervoe polugodie 2014 g.) / pod red. G. S. Denisovoj [Interethnic relations and religious situation in the subjects of the Southern Federal District. The Expert Report (as of the fi rst half of 2014). Ed. by G. S. Denisova]. Rostov-on-Don, South Federal Univ. Publ., 2014, 108 p. (In Russian).

10. Namrueva L. V. Kak kalmyki znajut svoj jazyk [How competent are the Kalmyks in their mother tongue?]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija (Sociological Studies). 2010, no. 4, pp. 138– 141 (In Russian).

11. Namrueva L. V. Sovremennaja molodezh’ i sostojanie kalmyckogo jazyka (po itogam sociologicheskogo analiza 2000-h gg.) [The modern youth and current status of the Kalmyk language (evidence from a sociological analysis of the 2000s)]. Rossijskij akademicheskij zhurnal (Russian Academic Journal). 2014, no. 1, pp. 109–113 (In Russian).

12. Namrueva L. V. 2015a — Namrueva L. V. Jazykovaja assimiljacija i problemy jetnicheskoj identichnosti (po itogam oprosov 2000-h gg. v Kalmykii) [Linguistic assimilation and problems of ethnic identity (evidence from surveys conducted in Kalmykia in the 2000s)]. Mongolovedenie v nachale XXI veka: sovremennoe sostojanie i perspektivy razvitija: mat-ly mezhdunar. nauch. konf., posvjashh. 100-letiju B. H. Todaevoj (Elista, 23–26 aprelja 2015 g.): v 2 ch. Ch II (Mongol Studies in the Early 21st Century: Actual Status and Prospects of Development). Elista, Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of the RAS Publ., 2015, pp. 196– 199 (In Russian).

13. Namrueva L. V. 2015b — Namrueva L. V. Jazyk jetnicheskoj prinadlezhnosti [Language of ethnic identity]. Jetnicheskaja socializacija molodezhi Respubliki Kalmykija (analiz 2000– 2010-h gg.) (Ethnic socialization of youth in the Republic of Kalmykia (analysis of the 2000s-2010s). Elista, Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of the RAS Publ., 2015, pp. 71–85 (In Russian).

14. Shnirel’man V. A. Obrazovatel’nyj standart i nacional’naja shkola [The educational standard and national school]. Jetnokul’turnoe obrazovanie. Metody social’noj orientacii rossijskoj shkoly (red. V. V. Stepanov) (Ethno- Cultural Education. Russian school’s methods of social orientation). Moscow, Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of the RAS Publ., 2010, is. 1, pp. 193–205 (In Russian).

15. Voroncov V. S. Pomozhet li novyj federal’nyj zakon rodnomu jazyku? [Shall the new federal law support the native language?]. Jetnokul’turnoe obrazovanie. Metody social’noj orientacii rossijskoj shkoly (red. V. V. Stepanov) (Ethnocultural education. Methods of social orientation in the Russian school system). Moscow, Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of the RAS Publ., 2010, is. 1, pp. 180–188 (In Russian).

16. Yankovskaja G. A. Bor’ba za identichnost’ v kontekste sovremennyh kommunikacij [Struggle for identity in the context of in the context of modern communications]. Politicheskie issledovanija (Political Studies). 2014, no. 4, pp. 175–178 (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Denisova G.S., Denisova A.V., Namrueva L.V. Ethno-Cultural Education in the Republic of Kalmykia: Is Civil Identity Formation in Danger? Oriental Studies. 2016;9(2):176-186. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2016-24-2-176-186

Views: 256


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)