A History of Tsam in Mongolia by the Abbot of Gandan Monastery Ka-Chu Erdenipel
https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2018-37-3-61-67
Abstract
The article examines the published excerpt from A History of Tsam in Mongolia, a historical work by the Abbot of Gandan Monastery (Ulaanbaatar) ka-chu Erdenipel (1877–1960) who was one of the last representatives of the classical Mongolian academic tradition with expertise in Buddhist literature and held the position of Gandan’s Abbot after the 1944 reinstatement of religious services. As compared to many other educated Buddhists of Mongolia, he is distinguished for written literacy in both Tibetan and Mongolian. Still, only few his works survived to the present day. E.g., he is known to have written Khor-Choijun (A History of Religion in Mongolia) but the work was never discovered, and only a Russian translation of part one is available nowadays. According to Ts. Damdinsuren’s diaries, historical works of the priest were kept by his student Dangaasuren who attempted to publish them. Acad. Ts. Damdinsuren’s House Museum (Ulaanbaatar) stores two Mongolian-language works by Erdenipel ― A History of Khambo Nomyn Khans of Ikh Khüree and A History of Tsam in Mongolia. The composition about Tsam is a manuscript written in ink and feather. Ts. Damdinsuren’s inscription says the text was composed in 1942. And the autograph may very possibly have been made by Erdenipel himself. It contains a number of marks and corrections that could have been made by the author only.
A History of Tsam in Mongolia comprises a brief introduction and a list of Mongolian monasteries indicating whether and which specific kind of Tsam (dance) used to be arranged there. The introduction relates about origins of Tsam supposed to have developed from magic rites of Indian Yogâcâryas who made use of special garments and ritual objects during corresponding performances. Erdenipel concludes Tsam appeared in Tibet during the second (‘later’) dissemination of Buddhism, i.e. after the 11th century AD. Moreover, Tsam was initially performed by monks of the Red Hat sects, while the Yellow Hat Gelugpa introduced Tsam into its rites only under the 1st Panchen Lama Chӧkyi Gyaltsen in Tashilhunpo and Namgyal Monasteries in the late 16th – 17th centuries.
After that Erdenipel starts explaining the meanings of Tsam moves supposed to suppress anti-religious and anti-human demonic powers, and describes attributes of the mystery characters. Special attention is paid to Tsam characters, such as tarnichi who direct Tsam dancers (the so-called Black Hats), or tarnichi who suppress evil powers (masks of oxen and deer) and act as assistants to the Ruler of Hell Chӧejel, the dead in the form of skeletons, the merciful Hushan, White Old Man, acharyas and others.
The most interesting part is a narrative about the dissemination of Tsam in Mongolia. According to Erdenipel, the beginnings of Tsam in Khalkha Mongolia were laid by the 2nd Khalkha Dzaya Pandita Lobsang Nyandag Geleg Namgyal in 1744, though there is no data about that Tsam. Still, concrete facts testify about a 1787 Tsam performance in Erdene Zuu Monastery where it was initiated by the famous Abbot Nomchi Tsorji Dagvadarj (1734–1803). The dance scheme followed the pattern of Namgyal Monastery (Lhasa) but was supplemented with Tsam characters of Sakya Monastery which significantly influenced the rituals in Erdene Zuu.
The capital of Northern Mongolia ― Ikh Khüree ― first witnessed a Tsam mystery only in 1810. Its principles and scheme also followed the pattern of Tashilhunpo and Namgyal Monasteries. As time passed, the number of Tsam characters increased upon initiatives of different Mongolian public and religious officials. So, there were added masks of lions, Gombo, Chadrabal, Jnanamitra, Dagiradza, Daragsada, Lhamo, etc. Tsam was performed in winters and summers, a complete variant being the privilege of summer ceremonies only.
About the Author
Anna D. TsendinaRussian Federation
Ph.D. in Philology (Doct. of Philological Sc.), Professor,
References
1. арадийн 1909 ― Барадийн Б. Цам Миларайбы: (из жизни в Лавране) // Записки Императорского Русского Географического Общества по отделу этнографии: Сб. в честь 70-летия Г. Н. Потанина. 1909. Т. 39. С. 135–147. [Baradiyin B. Milarepa’s Tsam (glimpses of life in Labrang). Zapiski Imperatorskogo Russkogo Geograficheskogo Obschestva po otdelu etnografii: Sb. v chest’ 70-letiya G. N. Potanina. 1909. Vol. 39. Pp. 135–147].
2. Дневники 1975 ― Дневники академика Цэндийна Дамдинсурэна. 1975. Рукописи хранятся в архиве А. Д. Цендиной. [Dnevniki akademika Tsendiyna Damdinsurena. 1975. Ruk. khranyatsya v arkhive A. D. Tsendinoy [Diaries by prof. Tsendiin Damdinsüren. 1975. Manuscripts from A. Tsendina’s archive].]
3. Жуковская 1977 ― Жуковская Н. Л. Ламаизм и ранние формы религий. М.: Наука, Гл. ред. вост. лит., 1977. 200 с. [Zhukovskaya N. L. Lamaizm i rannie formy religiy [Lamaism and early forms of religion]. Moscow: Nauka, Vost. Lit., 1977. 200 p.]
4. История Эрдэни-дзу 1999 ― История Эрдэни-дзу. Факсимиле рукописи. Пер с монг., введ., коммент. и прилож. А. Д. Цендиной. М.: Вост. лит. РАН, 1999. 255 с. [Istoriya Erdeni-dzu [A history of Erdene Zuu]. A facsimile of the manuscript. A. D. Tsendina (foreword, transl., comment. and suppl.). Moscow: Vost. Lit., 1999. 255 p.]
5. Кимура 1997 ― Кимура Аяко. Монголын Хүрээ цамыг бусад орны цамтай харьцуулан судалсан нь: автореф. дис. … д-ра ист. наук. Улаанбаатар: Монгол улсын их сургууль, 1997. 52 х. [Kimura Ayako. Mongolyn Khüree tsamyg busad orny tsamtay khar’tsuulan sudalsan n’ [Ikh Khüree Tsam and other types of the dance: a comparative study]. A PhD thesis abstract. Ulaanbaatar: National University of Mongolia, 1997. 52 p.]
6. Позднеев 1887 ― Позднеев А. М. Очерки быта буддийских монастырей и буддийского духовенства в Монголии в связи с отношением сего последнего к народу. СПб.: Тип. Имп. акад. наук. 1887. 492 с. [Pozdneev A. M. Ocherki byta buddiyskikh monastyrey i buddiyskogo dukhovenstva v Mongolii v svyazi s otnosheniem sego poslednego k narodu [Essays on the life of Buddhist monasteries and clergy in Mongolia in connection with the latter’s relation to the people]. St. Petersburg: Imperial Acad. of Sc., 1887. 492 p.]
7. Позднеев 1880 ― Позднеев А. М. Ургинские хутухты: исторический очерк их прошлого и современного быта. СПб: Тип. брат. Пантелеевых. 1880. 84 с. [Pozdneev A. M. Urginskie khutukhty: istoricheskiy ocherk ikh proshlogo i sovremennogo byta [Urga khutuktus: a historical overview of their past and present life]. St. Petersburg: Panteleevy Brothers, 1880. 84 p.]
8. Хүрэлбаатар 2017 ― Хүрэлбаатар Л. Монгол цамын цоохор тэмдэглэл // Утга зохиол судлагч, товдч эрдэмтэн Лхамсурэнгийн Хурэлбаатар. Улаанбаатар: «Жиком пресс» ХХК, 2017. С. 83–142. [Khurelbaatar L. Various notes on the Mongolian Tsam. Utga zokhiol sudlagch, tovdch erdemten Lkhamsurengiyn Khurelbaatar [Literary researcher and Tibetologist Lhamsurengiin Hurelbaatar]. Ulaanbaatar: «Zhikom Press» Ltd., 2017. Pp. 83–142] (In Mong.).
9. Цендина 2015 ― Цендина А. Д. О настоятеле монастыря Гандан габджу Эрдэнипэле (1877–1960) и его сочинениях на монгольском языке // Россия и Монголия в первой половине ХХ века: концептуальные вопросы российско-монгольских отношений (диломатия, экономика, наука). Сб. науч. тр. Кн. 5. Улан-Батор; Иркутск: Изд-во Байкальского ун-та, 2015. С. 328–330. [Tsendina A. D. About the abbot of Gandan Monastery ka-chu Erdenipel (1877–1960) and his Mongolian-language compositions. Rossiya i Mongoliya v pervoy polovine XX veka: kontseptual’nye voprosy rossiysko-mongol’skikh otnosheniy (dilomatiya, ekonomika, nauka). Sb. nauch. tr. Vol. 5. Ulaanbaatar–Irkutsk: Baikal State University, 2015. Pp. 328–330].
10. Цендина, Железняков 2005 ― Цендина А. Д., Железняков А. С. История в трудах ученых лам. М.: Товарищество научных изданий КМК, 2005. 275 с. [Tsendina A. D., Zheleznyakov A. S. Istoriya v trudakh uchenykh lam [History in the works of educated clergymen]. Moscow: KMK Academic Publications Association, 2005. 275 p.]
11. Шастина 1935 ― Шастина Н. П. Религиозная мистерия цам в монастыре Дзун Хурэ // Современная Монголия. № 1. Улан-Батор, 1935. С. 92–113. [Shastina N. P. Tsam religious mystery in Dzun Khuree Monastery. Sovremennaya Mongoliya. No. 1. Ulaanbaatar, 1935. Pp. 92–113].
12. Шастина 1974 ― Шастина Н. П. Следы примитивных религий в ламаистской мистерии цам // Исследования по восточной филологии. М.: Наука, 1974. С. 306–318. [Shastina N. P. Traces of primitive religions in the Lamaist Tsam mystery (dance). Issledovaniya po vostochnoy filologii. Moscow, 1974. Pp. 306–318].
13. Bareja-Starzynska 2012 ― Bareja-Starzynska A. Description of the Erdeni Zuu Monastery (Including čam Ritual) Based on Notes from the Kotwicz Expedition. In the Heart of Mongolia. 100th Anniversary of W. Kotwicz’s Expedition to Mongolia in 1912. Jerzy Tulisow et al. (eds.). Cracow: Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2012. Pp. 131–189.
14. Erdeni 1997 ― Erdeni. Mongγol čam. Beijing: National Publ. House, 1997. 159 p.
15. Formann, Rintschen 1967 ― Formann W., Rintschen B. Lamaistische Tanzmasken (Der Erlik-Tsam in der Mongolia) [Lamaist dance masks (Erlik Tsam in Mongolia)]. Leipzig: Koehler und Amelang, 1967. 144 p.
16. Heissig 1989 ― Heissig W. Der Tsam-Tanz und seine Masken [Tsam dance and ist masks]. Die Mongolen. Begleitband zur Ausstellung im Haus der Kunst München 22. März bis 28. Mai 1989. W. Heissig, G.C. Müller (eds.). Innsbruck: Pinguin-Verlag, 1989. Pp. 240–244.
17. Kollmar-Paulenz, Mununchimeg 2015 ― Kollmar-Paulenz K., Mununchimeg B. Der mongolische Maskentanz (Tsam) in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart [The Mongolian mask dance (Tsam) in past and present]. Asia. 2015. No. 69(3). Pp. 625–683.
18. Stein 1972 ― Stein R. F. Tibetan Civilization. Stanford University press, 1972. 336 p.
19. Teleki 2013 ― Teleki K. The Khüree-Tsam and its Relation with the Tsam Figures of the Leder Collection. The Mongolian Collection Retracing Hans Leder. Maria-Lhatarina Lang, Stefan Bauer (eds.). Wien: Austrian Academy of Sciences, 2013. Pp. 76–83.
Review
For citations:
Tsendina A. A History of Tsam in Mongolia by the Abbot of Gandan Monastery Ka-Chu Erdenipel. Oriental Studies. 2018;11(3):61-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2018-37-3-61-67