The ethnicity of the bayirqu population revisited
https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2016-25-3-55-62
Abstract
The article explores the ethnogenesis and ethnicity of the medieval Bayirqu people, one of the most influential tribes in the Tiele Turkic union. Though the issue was widely discussed in the last century, the researchers still have not reached a consensus. Thorough, objective and unbiased analysis of ancient Turkic and especially Chinese sources mostly testifies of the Turkic origin of the Bayirqu, due to the facts as follows: - the Bayirqu were governed by chieftains referred to as ‘eltebers’ and ‘irkins’; - the Tiele tribes, including the Bayirqu, were genetically close to the Tujue (Gokturks); - the Bayirqu language had little difference from the language of the Tiele and therefore, that of the Tujue. This is also supported by the fact that during the period of the Turkic khaganates there was no Mongolian ethnos as an ethnic unit. It emerged after the defeat of the Rouran khaganate when proto-Mongols started to form an ethnic group in the remote area of Ergenekon on the right bank of the Ergune (Argun). Formation and development of the Bayirqu is related to the east side of Lake Baikal. As a result of the mongolization of the territory that began in the late 1st millenium AD, the Bayirqu experienced dramatic changes in terms of their ethnic characteristics and gradually joined the Mongolian ethnic groups. There was a change of the language as well, and the mongolization process over, self-designation of the Bayirqu turned into ‘Barga’ (Bargut). This predetermined the Bayirqu’s entry into the union of Mongolian ethnic groups. The Bayirqu’s remote descendants now live in Northeast China.
About the Author
B. R. Zoriktuev
Institute of Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies, Siberian Branch of the RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Bernshtam A. N. Zametki po etnogenezu narodov Severnoj Azii [Notes on the ethnogenesis of the peoples of North Asia]. Sovetskaja etnografi ja [Soviet Ethnography]. 1947, No. 2, pp. 60–66. (In Russ.).
2. Vasilevich G. M. Samonazvanie orochon, ego proiskhozhdenie i rasprostranenie [The ethnonym ‘orochon’, its origin and dissemination]. Izvestija Sibirskogo otdelenija Akademii nauk SSSR. Ser. obshh. nauk [Proceedings of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences. The series of social sciences], 1963, No. 9, vol. 3, pp. 71–73. (In Russ.).
3. Zoriktuev B. R. Aktual’nye problemy etnicheskoj istorii mongolov i burjat [Actual problems of ethnic history of Mongols and Buryats]. Moscow, Oriental Literature Publ., 2011, 278 p. (In Russ.).
4. Zoriktuev B. R. O vremeni i putjah pribytija dvuh grupp bargutov Bargudzhin-Tokuma v Severo- Vostochnyj Kitaj [About the period and ways of the arrival of the two groups of the Barguts of Bargudzhin-Tokum to the Northeast China]. Severo-Vostochnyj gumanitarnyj vestnik [North-Eastern journal of the humanities], 2016, No. 1 (14), pp. 14–20.(In Russ.).
5. Istorija Burjat-Mongol’skoj ASSR. T. I. Izd. 2-e. [History of the Buryat-Mongol ASSR. Vol. I. Edition 2]. Ulan-Ude, Buryat-Mongolian Book Publ., 1954, 495 p. (In Russ.).
6. Kovalevskij O. M. Mongol’sko-russko-francuzskij slovar’, sostavlennyj prof. O. Kovalevskim. T. 2 [The Mongolian-Russian-French dictionary compiled by prof. O. Kovalevskiy. Vol. 2]. Kazan, Kazan University Press, 1846, 595– 1545 pp.
7. Kovychev E. V. Istorija Zabajkal’ja (I—ser. II tys. n. e.) [The history of Transbaikalia (the 1st – mid-2nd millennium AD)]. Irkutsk, Irkutsk State Pedagogical Institute Publ., 1984, 82 p. (In Russ).
8. Kozin S. A. Sokrovennoe skazanie. Mongol‘skaja hronika 1240 g. Vvedenie v izuchenie pamjatnika, perevod, teksty, glossarii [The Secret history. The Mongolian chronicle of 1240. Introduction into the study of the manuscript, translation, texts, glossaries]. Moscow, USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1941, 619 p. (In Russ.).
9. Konovalov P. B. Bargudzhin-Tukum i etnicheskaja genealogija burjat [Bargudzhin-Tukum and ethnic genealogy of Buryats]. Barguty: istorija i sovremennost’. Sb. nauch. statej [Barguts: history and contemporaneity. Collection of scientifi c articles]. Irkutsk, Ottisk Publ., 2016, pp. 3–15 (In Russ.).
10. Konovalov P. B., Miyagasheva S. B. K probleme etnogeneza bargutov [On the problem of ethnogenesis of Barguts]. Vestnik Burjatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 8.
11. Vostokovedenie [Bulletin of the Buryat State University], 2012, No. 8, pp. 174–182 (In Russ.).
12. Malov S. E. Pamjatniki drevnetjurkskoj pis’mennosti Mongolii i Kirgizii [Monuments of the ancient Turkic script of Mongolia and Kyrgyzia]. Moscow, USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1959, 108 p. (In Russ.).
13. Malov S. E. Pamjatniki drevnetjurkskoj pis’mennosti: teksty i issledovanija [Monuments of ancient Türkic Literature: texts and studies]. Moscow, USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1951, 451 p. (In Russ.).
14. Malyavkin A. G. Tanskie hroniki o gosudarstvah Central’noj Azii: teksty i issledovanija [Tang Chronicles of Central Asian states: texts and studies]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1989, 431 p. (In Russ.).
15. Materialy po istorii drevnih kochevyh narodov gruppy dunhu. Vved., per. i komm. V.S. Taskina [Materials on the history of ancient nomadic peoples — the Donghu. Introduction, translation and commentary by V. S. Taskin]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984, 486 p. (In Russ.).
16. Potapov L. P. Etnicheskij sostav i proiskhozhdenie altajcev. Istoriko-etnografi cheskij ocherk [Ethnic composition and origin of the Altaians. Historical and Ethnographic Sketch]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1969, 196 p. (In Russ.).
17. Rashid-ad-din. Sbornik letopisej. T. 1, kn. 1 [Collection of chronicles. Vol. 1. Book 1]. Moscow, USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1952, 219 p. (In Russ.).
18. Svod etnografi cheskih ponjatij i terminov. Etnicheskie i etnosocial’nye kategorii [Collection ethnographic concepts and terms. Ethnic and ethnosocial categories]. Moscow, Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology (RAS) Publ., 1995, 216 p. (In Russ.).
19. Khafi zova K. Sh. Kochevoj mir v tanskoj pojezii [The nomadic world in Tang poetry]. Iranname. Nauch. vostokoved. zhurnal [Iran-Name. Oriental Scientifi c journal], 2014, No. 1–2 (29– 30), pp. 304–331 (In Russ.).
20. Shervashidze I. N. Fragment drevnetjurkskoj leksiki. Titulatura [Fragment of the ancient Turkic vocabulary. Titulature]. Voprosy jazykoznanija [Questions of Linguistics], 1990, No. 3, pp. 81– 91 (In Russ.).
21. Yudakhin K. K. Kirgizsko-russkij slovar’. Kn. 1 [Kyrgyz-Russian dictionary. Book 1]. Moscow, Soviet Encyclopedia Publ., 1965, 503 p. (In Russ.).
22. Bei shi (Istorija severnyh dinastij) [Bei shi (History of the northern [dynasties])]. Beijing, 1973, 3303 p. (in Chinese).
23. Czju Tan shu (Staraja istorija [dinastii] Tan). [Czju Tang shu (Old History of the Tang [dynasty])]. Beijing, 1959, 5356 p. (in Chinese).
24. Sin’ Tan shu (Novaja istorija [dinastii] Tan). [Xin Tang shu (New History of the Tang [dynasty])]. Beijing, 1975, Zhonghua shutszyuy, 6140 p. (in Chinese).
25. Suj shu (Istorija [dinastii] Suj). [Sui shu (History of the Sui [dynasty])]. Beijing, Zhonghua shutszyuy, 1973, 3766 p. (in Chinese).
Review
For citations:
Zoriktuev B.R. The ethnicity of the bayirqu population revisited. Oriental Studies. 2016;9(3):55-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2016-25-3-55-62
Views:
460
Email this article 