Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

‘No Changes in Kalmyk Lifestyles of the Newly Converted Witnessed’: Confessional Identity of Kalmyk Christians Revisited

https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2018-35-1-31-35

Abstract

The article deals with confessional identity of Kalmyks who converted to Christianity. Despite almost a two-centuries long policy of Christianization, the Kalmyks managed to preserve their religious identity remaining committed to their ancestral religion. The Russian Government conducted somewhat flexible and moderate policy towards the Kalmyks preferring to leave them as they were in the territory of the Kalmyk Khanate. But migrations of Kalmyks to other governorates and their conversion to Christianity outside the khanate were welcomed and encouraged. During this period a number of settlements outside the khanate were established, e.g., those in the Don River region, Kalmyks also resettled to Chuguev in Kharkov Governorate, Belyaevo in Eastern Ukraine, Tereshka River area in the right bank of the Volga to the north of Saratov, Stavropol-on-Volga, uninhabited territories around Churkinsky Monastery, to the Urals and Terek River region. The paper mentions that the newly converted Kalmyk Christians migrated to the granted lands but retained their ethnic status. Furthermore, despite being virtually isolated from fellow tribesmen and being nominally referred to as Orthodox Christians, those newly converted Kalmyks kept professing Buddhism whatever remote regions of Russia they inhabited, and despite great distances between those Kalmyk families they perceived themselves as members of the Kalmyk ethnos. The fact that the newly converted Kalmyks kept perceiving Buddhism as their national religion and thus remained committed to it was due to a number of reasons including: numerical superiority of Buddhist clergymen over Orthodox missionaries within Kalmyk communities, special emphasis laid by the missionaries upon sheer quantitative indices during Christianization of Buddhist populations, etc. Thus, the relative isolation of the newly converted and resettled Kalmyks guaranteed no Russianization of theirs, nor that they had adopted lifestyle patterns of ethnic Russians. As a result, positions and influences of the Kalmyk Buddhist clergy on their compatriots were too strong despite the imposed measures for administrative control over their activities. So, Buddhism proved one of the key factors in resisting the policy of Christianization of the Kalmyks and served as an important socio-cultural element of the emerging ethnic identity.

About the Author

Keemia V. Orlova
Department for Korean and Mongol Studies, Institute of Oriental Studies of the RAS
Russian Federation
Ph.D. in History (Doct. of Historical Sc.), Leading Research Associate


References

1. Витевский 1889 ― Витевский В. Н. Н. Н. Неплюев и Оренбургский край в прошлом его составе до 1758 года. Казань: Тип. Б. Л. Добровского, 1889. Вып. 1. 176 с. [Vitevskiy V. N. N. N. Neplyuev i Orenburgskiy kray v proshlom ego sostave do 1758 goda [N. Nepluev and Orenburg Krai within its borders and structure before 1758]. Kazan: B. L. Dobrovsky. 1889. Iss. 1. 176 p.].

2. Гурий 1911 ― Гурий (иеромонах). Донские калмыки и история их христианского просвещения по трудам Казанского миссионерского съезда // Миссионерское обозрение. Отд. оттиск. СПб.: Тип. «Колокол», 1911. 40 c. [Guriy (hieromonk). The Don Kalmyks and a history of their conversion to Christianity according to transactions of Kazan Missionary Congress. Missionerskoe obozrenie. Otd. ottisk. St. Petersburg: Kolokol, 1911. 40 p.].

3. Джунджузов, Любичанковский 2017 ― Джунджузов С. В., Любичанковский С. В. Калмыки на Южном Урале в XVIII – начале XX века: проблемы ассимиляции, аккультурации и сохранения этнической идентичности // Былые годы. 2017. Т. 46. Вып. 4. С. 1194–1206. [Dzhundzhuzov S. V., Lyubichankovskiy S. V. Kalmyks of Southern Ural in the XVIII – early XX century: problems of assimilation, acculturation and preservation of ethnic identity. Bylye gody. 2017. Vol. 46. Iss. 4. Pp. 1194–1206].

4. Дорджиева 1995 ― Дорджиева Г. Ш. Буддизм и христианство в Калмыкии. Опыт анализа религиозной политики правительства Российской империи (середина XVII – начало XX вв.). Элиста: АПП «Джангар», 1995. 126 c. [Dordzhieva G. Sh. Buddizm i khristianstvo v Kalmykii. Opyt analiza religioznoy politiki pravitel’stva Rossiyskoy imperii (seredina XVII – nachalo XX vv.) [Buddhism and Christianity in Kalmykia. Religious policies of the Russian Empire: an effort of analysis]. Elista: Dzhangar, 1995. 126 p.].

5. Дорджиева 2008 ― Дорджиева Е. В. Конфессиональный вопрос в имперской политике по отношению к традиционной калмыцкой элите в XVIII в. // [электронный ресурс] Известия Самарского научного центра РАН. 2008. Т. 10. № 4. С. 975–982. URL: http://www.ssc.smr.ru/media/journals/izvestia/2008/2008_4_975_982.pdf (дата обращения: 3.03.2018). [Dordzhieva E. V. The Russian Empire’s religious politics towards the Kalmyk traditional elite in the 18th century. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN. 2008. Vol. 10. No. 4. Pp. 975–982]. Available at: http://www.ssc.smr.ru/media/journals/izvestia/2008/2008_4_975_982.pdf.

6. Жамцарано 1907 ― Жамцарано Ц. Народническое движение бурят и его критик // Сибирские вопросы. 1907. № 21. С. 16–21. [Zhamtsarano Ts. The Narodnik movement among Buryats and its critic. Sibirskie voprosy. 1907. No. 21. Pp. 16–21].

7. Материалы для истории… 1893 ― Материалы для истории православно-российского миссионерства Вып. 1. М.: Тип. А. И. Снегиревой, 1893. 189 с. [Materialy dlya istorii pravoslavno-rossiyskogo missionerstva [Materials for the history of Russian Orthodox missionary activities]. Iss. 1. Moscow: A. I. Snegireva, 1893. 189 p.].

8. Овсянников 1904 ― Овсянников Е. (священник). Современное религиозное состояние донских калмыков в связи с вопросом о развитии миссионерской деятельности среди них (по данным последнего отчета Донского епархиального комитета Православного миссионерского общества) // Донские епархиальные ведомости. 1904. № 21. С. 620–623; № 26. С. 753–757. [Ovsyannikov E. (priest). The issue of development of missionary activities among the Don Kalmyks and the current religious affiliation of the latter (according to data from the latest report by the Don Eparchial Committee of Orthodox Missionary Society). Donskie eparkhial’nye vedomosti. 1904. No. 21. Pp. 620–623; No. 26. Pp. 753–757].

9. ПСЗРИ 1830 ― ПСЗРИ (Полное собрание законов Российской империи). Собрание 1. В 48 т. СПб.: Типография II отделения Собственной Его Императорского Величества канцелярии, 1830. Т. 14. C 1754–1757. [PSZRI (Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire). Coll. 1. in 48 vol. St. Petersburg: Department II of His Imperial Majesty’s Own Chancellery, 1830. Vol. 14. Pp. 1754–1757].


Review

For citations:


Orlova K. ‘No Changes in Kalmyk Lifestyles of the Newly Converted Witnessed’: Confessional Identity of Kalmyk Christians Revisited. Oriental Studies. 2018;11(1):31-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2018-35-1-31-35

Views: 547


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)