Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

The First Tulku-Regents of Tibet and their Role in Governing the Country

https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2019-42-2-164–173

Abstract

Goals and materials of the research.  The article investigates Qing sources and studies the personalities of three tulku-regents (Demo Tulku Jampel Geleg, Tsemoling Tulku Ngavang Tsültrim, Tatsak Tulku Yeshe Gonpo) considered to have played great  roles in the management of Tibet in the mid-to-late 18th  and early 19th centuries. Examining the origins of the regency in Tibet, the study aims to identify the main reasons for the restoration of this position in the new status (tulku) during the heyday of Qing Administration; characterize features of the position of the first tulku regents in the government, as well as assess their role in the management of Tibet. Conclusion. The analysis of the historical facts relating to activities of the three representatives of the regency institute and their functions within the government concludes that desrids and regents had gained exceptional position since 1642. The desrid under the 5th Dalai Lama became not only the head of the civil and political administration but also a personal adviser, not even being a tulku. The regent whose status was established by law was selected by the Dalai Lama or by the Khoshut khan. The Qing Government functioned within the frame of the mentioned categories and with due regard to peculiarities of the structure and administration of the Tibetan Government. Presumably inspired by the Emperor, the tulku-regency institute became the guide of the Qing’s influence in Tibet, on the one hand; and on the other hand, it restored and reinforced the importance of the regent in general in the Dalai Lama’s government, the regent’s role in making decisions regarding search, enthronement and maintenance of the Tibetan hierarch’s power.

About the Authors

Baatr Kitinov
Institute of Oriental Studies of the RAS (12, Rozhdestvenka Str., Moscow 107031, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (History), Research Associate


Anastasiya Lyulina
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (6, Mikluho-Maklay Str., Moscow 117198, Russian Federation) Institute of Oriental Studies of the RAS (12, Rozhdestvenka Str., Moscow 107031, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (History), Assistant

Research Associate



References

1. Sources

2. [Administration of Tibet by the central Government (of China) and the system of reincarnate ‘living Buddhas’. Coll. historical materials: from the Qing period (to the present)]. Zhao Xueni, Chang Weimin (eds.). Beijing: Huawen Publ., 1996. 546 p. (In Chin.)

3. [Pag Sam Jon Zang: History and Chronology of Tibet]. R. E. Pubaev (transl., annot., comment.). Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1991. 264 p. (In Russ.)

4. A Collection of Historical Archives of Tibet. Beijing: Cultural Relics Publishing House, 1995. 107 р. (In Eng. and Chin.)

5. References

6. [To celebrate the 360th Anniversary of the foundation of the Central Government (of Tibet) — Ganden Phodrang]. Dharamsala: LTWA, 2002. Vol. 1. (In Tib.)

7. Barnett R. The Dalai Lama’s ‘Deception’: Why a Seventeenth-Century Decree Matters to Beijing. NYR Daily. April 6, 2011. An Internet resource: https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2011/04/06/dalai-lamas-deception/ (accessed: 15 February 2019). (In Eng.)

8. Bu Qiong. [The Four Great monasteries of Lhasa: origins]. Beijing: Xizang Yanjiu, 2004. No. 2. An Internet resource: http://www.tibet.cn/periodical/xzyj/2004/02/200705/t20070514_235691.html (accessed: 15 February 2019). (In Chin.)

9. Dewey W. A. Union of Religion and Politics: The Tibetan Regency of Ngawang Tsültrim. Dissertation for the Doctor of Philosophy in Religious Studies. Santa Barbara: University of California, 2017. 298 p. (In Eng.)

10. Elikhina Yu. I. Cults of Main Bodhisattvas and their terrestrial reincarnations in the history and art of Buddhism. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Historia, 2010. 292 p. (In Russ.)

11. Goldstein M. C. The Circulation of Estates in Tibet: Reincarnation, Land and Politics. The Journal of Asian Studies. Cambridge, 1973. Vol. 32, No. 3. 448 p. (In Eng.)

12. Ishihama Y. New Light on the ‘Chinese Conquest of Tibet’ in 1720 (based on the new Manchu sources). PIATS VII. 1997. Pp. 419–426. (In Eng.)

13. Ishihama Y. On the Dissemination of the Belief in the Dalai-lama as a Manifestation of the Bodhisattva Avalokitesvara. The History of Tibet. The Medieval Period: 850–1895. The development of Buddhist Paramountcy. London; New York, 2003. Pp. 541–545. (In Eng.)

14. Jin Lei. The 6th Panchen Lama Palden Yeshe. [Investigating Tibetan Buddhism and the ‘tulku’ reincarnation system: collected articles]. Beijing: Zhongguo Zangxue Publ., 2007. Pp. 293–317. (In Chin.)

15. Kitinov B. U. Sacred Tibet and martial steppe: Buddhism among the Oirats (13th – 17th centuries). G. M. Bongard-Levin (ed.). Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd., 2004. 190 p. (In Russ.)

16. Kitinov B. U. The Tibetan context in Khoshut-Qing relations: from equality to subordination. Bulletin of the Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of the RAS. 2018. Vol. 36, No. 2. Pp. 20–28. (In Russ.)

17. Petech L. China and Tibet in the Early 18th Century: History of the Establishment of Chinese Protectorate in Tibet. Leiden: Brill, 1972. 309 p. (In Eng.)

18. Petech L. The Dalai-Lamas and Regents of Tibet: A Chronological Study. T’oung Pao. Second Series. Leiden, 1959. Vol. 47. Pp. 368–394. (In Eng.)

19. Rahul R. The Government and Politics of Tibet. Delhi: Vikas Publications, 1969. 160 p. (In Eng.)

20. Schwieger P. The Dalai Lama and the Emperor of China: A Political History of the Tibetan Institution of Reincarnation. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015. 342 p. (In Eng.)

21. Shakabpa W. D. Tibet. A Political History. New York: Potala Publications, 1984. 369 p. (In Eng.)

22. Sinha, Nirmal C. Chos Srid Gnyis Ldan. Bulletin of Tibetology. 1968. Vol. 5. No. 3. Рp. 13–27. (In Eng.)

23. Soloshcheva M. A. The Koko Nor Rebellion of 1723–1724 and its significance for the history of Tibet. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. 2013. Vol. 13, No. 1. Pp. 58–67. (In Russ.)

24. Soloshheva M. A. [Policies of the Qing Empire towards Tibet during the Yongzheng Emperor’s reign (1723–1735)]. A Cand.Sc. (history) thesis. St. Petersburg, 2014. 221 p. (In Russ.)

25. The Eighth Tatsak Jedrung, Yeshe Lobzang Tenpai Gonpo. Treasury of Lives. August 3, 2018. An Internet resource: https://www.tsemrinpoche.com/tsem-tulku-rinpoche/great-lamas-masters/the-eighth-tatsak-jedrung-yeshe-lobzang-tenpai-gonpo.html (accessed: 15 February 2019). (In Eng.)

26. Tu Xia. [The Four Great Khutukhtus of Qamdo during the Qing era]. Beijing: Zhongguo Zangxue, 2001. No. 4. An Internet resource: https://www.docin.com/p-1638754923.html (accessed: 15 February 2019). (In Chin.)

27. Wang Xiangyun. The Qing Court’s Tibet Connection: Lcang skya Rol pa’i rdo rje and the Qianlong Emperor. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. 2000. Vol. 60. No. 1. Рp. 125–163. (In Eng.)

28. Xie Ting Jie, Luosang Qun Jue. [Qamdo, Tibet: history and geography]. Lhasa: Xizang Renmin Publ., 2000. 370 p. (In Chin.)

29. Ya Hanzhang. [Biographies of the Dalai Lamas]. Beijing: Huawen Publ., 1999. 389 p. (In Chin.)


Review

For citations:


Kitinov B., Lyulina A. The First Tulku-Regents of Tibet and their Role in Governing the Country. Oriental Studies. 2019;12(2):164–173. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2019-42-2-164–173

Views: 534


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)