The 1957–1958 Reestablishment of Kalmykia’s Autonomy: division of territories with Astrakhan Oblast and return of the Native population. administrative and humanitarian aspects
https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2019-42-2-207-219
Abstract
Introduction. One of the main questions in restoring autonomies of repressed peoples in the south of the RSFSR in the late 1950s was the demarcation of borders and territorial delimitation between neighboring regions. There was a problem of returning deported populations to their native places of residence, including areas that were not territorially included in the newly established autonomies. For Kalmykia, such a question included the initiation of the return of territories of two former districts, the delimitation of land use borders, and the return of the Kalmyk population from places of exile to the indicated territories of Astrakhan Oblast. Historical Background. Despite the existence of a number of publications, including monographs, on the history of the restoration of Kalmykia’s autonomy in 1957, the problems of territorial demarcation from Astrakhan Oblast and the return of the Kalmyk population have been no subject of any special scientific study, although the question was and is relevant and debatable in the society. The article seeks to examine the problems in unity: in managerial and humanitarian perspectives. The objectives of the study are to scrutinize into administrative-managerial (analysis of actions and decisions of authorities at various levels) and humanitarian aspects (opinions of the Kalmyk population who wanted to return to their native places of residence, positions of the state and local authorities; statistics on displaced population reflected in official documents). Results. The paper concludes that the unresolved territorial and land dispute between Kalmykia and Astrakhan Oblast depends on, among other things, the unresolved issue of this dispute between Stavropol Krai and Astrakhan Oblast that had been emerged before the reestablishment of Kalmykia’s autonomy. The geographical factor also played its role, namely: the territories of the two Kalmykia’s former districts had access to the Volga and in some places adjoined the city of Astrakhan. However, the authorities of Kalmykia would appeal to the higher-level authorities of the RSFSR, offering arguments that certain portions of the Kalmyk population were thus forced to return to Astrakhan Oblast, as the territories as such being of great economic significance.
About the Author
Evgeniy GunaevRussian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Law), Senior Research Associate
References
1. Sources
2. [Report by Astrakhan Regional Statistics Department regarding administrative-and-territorial changes within Astrakhan Oblast’s districts as of April 1, 1957]. State Archive of the Russian Federation. A-374. Ser. 30. F. 11919. P. 36. (In Russ.)
3. [Resolution of the Executive Committee of Stavropol Krai Council of Workers’ Deputies of January 19, 195 No. 24 ‘On Establishment of Administrative Borders between Stavropol Krai and Astrakhan Oblast, and (Establishment of) Administrative Borders of Chernozemelsky District of Stavropol Krai’]. State Archive of Stavropol Krai. FR-1852. Ser. 14. F. 412. Pp. 1–2. (In Russ.)
4. Referencies
5. [Deportation of the Kalmyk People: a Memorial Book]. Vol. 1, book 3: Restitution of the autonomy and rehabilitation of the Kalmyk people. Book 3, part 1: Restitution of the autonomy (1956–1963). V. Z. Atuyeva et al. (comps.). Elista: Kalm. Book Publ., 2004. 586 p. (In Russ.)
6. [The Rehabilitation: How It Was]. Documents of the Presidium of the CPSU Central Committee and other materials. Vol. II. February 1956 – early 1980s. Artizov A. N., Sigachev Yu. V., Khlopov V. G., Shevchuk I. N. (comps.). Moscow: MFD, 2003. 960 p. (In Russ.)
7. Belousov S. S. Administrative-and-territorial changes in the Lower Volga Region during the Great Patriotic War and their consequences. [Peoples of South Russia in Patriotic Wars]. Conf. proc. (Rostov-on-Don, 6–7 September 2012). Rostov-on-Don: Southern Scientific Center of RAS, 2012. Pp. 290–295. (In Russ.)
8. Belousov S. S. Kalmykia’s lands temporarily used by economic agents of Astrakhan Oblast and the Republic of Dagestan: the problem of restitution revisited. Bulletin of the Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of the RAS. 2009. No. 1. Pp. 21–26. (In Russ.)
9. Belousov S. S. National-and-territorial entities of the Kalmyk people in the 19th – early-to-mid 20th centuries: the role of ‘ethnic factor’ in the formation of administrative borders. [Interethnic and Interconfessional Dialogue as a Consolidating Social Basis in the Struggle against Global Terrorism and Extremism]. Conf. proc. (Astrakhan, 10 October 2013) Astrakhan: Sorokin R. V., 2013. Pp. 102–110. (In Russ.)
10. Berkasinova S. G. Administrative-and-territorial structure of the Kalmyk ASSR on the eve of its disestablishment (late 1930s to 1943). [Restitution of National Statehoods of Russia’s Repressed Peoples and Prospects of Their Development]. Conf. proc. (Elista, 12–13 January 2007). Elista: Kalm. State Univ., 2006. Pp. 101–103. (In Russ.)
11. Berkasinova S. G. Territories and borders of the Kalmyk ASSR on the eve of its disestablishment (late 1930s to 1943). Vestnik Kalmytskogo instituta sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh i pravovykh issledovaniy. 2006. No. 2. Pp. 202–205. (In Russ.)
12. Borisenko I. V. Territories and borders of the Kalmyk ASSR on the eve of the Great Patriotic War. [Contribution of the North Caucasus Peoples to the Victory over Fascism in the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945]. Conf. proc. (Elista, 27–28 April 2005) Elista: Kalm. State Univ., 2005. Pp. 67–68. (In Russ.)
13. Bugay N. F. The problem of territories as an integral part of state nationalities policies in the context of forced resettlements: ideologies and practice. Bulletin of the Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of the RAS. 2013. No. 3. Pp. 5–16. (In Russ.)
14. Kruglov V. N. The administrative-territorial organization of the Russian Federation in 1950s – early 1960s: traditions and innovations, decisions and consequences. [Russia — USSR — Russian Federation in the Context of Reforms and Revolutions: 20th – 21st Centuries]. Conf. proc. (Saratov, 26–27 May 2016). Saratov: Amirit, 2016. Pp. 65–70. (In Russ.)
15. Maksimov K. N. The Soviet Kalmykia: settling administrative-and-territorial issues during the Socialist construction era. [Studies in historical geography of the Kalmyk ASSR]. Elista: Kalm. Res. Inst. of Hist., Philol. and Econ., 1981. Pp. 105–120. (In Russ.)
16. Oglaev Yu. O. Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR of January 9, 1957 ‘On Establishment of Kalmyk Autonomous Oblast within the R.S.F.S.R.’: an effort of critical analysis. Vestnik Kalmytskogo instituta sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh i pravovykh issledovaniy. 2006. No. 2. Pp. 48–51. (In Russ.)
17. Orlova M. F. [Territories and borders of a federal subject of Russia: a case study of Astrakhan Oblast]. A Cand.Sc. (jurisprudence) thesis abstract. Moscow, 2002. 24 p. (In Russ.)
18. Tuguz Kh. I. Disestablishment and restitution of the national statehood of the Kalmyks: political and legal aspects. The Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. 2006. No. 4. Pp. 82–94. (In Russ.)
19. Ubushaev K. V. The 1943 disestablishment of the Kalmyk ASSR and its consequences. [Contribution of the North Caucasus Peoples to the Victory over Fascism in the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945]. Conf. proc. (Elista, 27–28 April 2005). Elista: Kalm. State Univ., 2005. Pp. 66–67. (In Russ.)
20. Ubushaev V. B., Ubushaev K. V. [The Kalmyks: deportation, return, and revival. 1943–1959]. Elista: Kalm. State Univ., 2007. 494 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Gunaev E. The 1957–1958 Reestablishment of Kalmykia’s Autonomy: division of territories with Astrakhan Oblast and return of the Native population. administrative and humanitarian aspects. Oriental Studies. 2019;12(2):207-219. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2019-42-2-207-219