Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

‘For Sound Reconciliation between the Kaisak and Kalmyk Peoples, It Is Necessary to Please Them’: a Mediating Means in the Mid-18th-Century Steppe Diplomacy

https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2019-45-5-750-760

Abstract

Studies of relations between the peoples of Russia at various stages of its statehood development remain much needed and relevant in contemporary historical science. The process of Russia’s historical development involved most different nations into the orbit of its domestic and foreign policies. So, the Russian government was constantly facing with the challenge of retaining them within the state. To facilitate that, it was essential to determine their places and roles in the state structure. However, not all nations had previously maintained peaceful relations with their new neighbors. The central and local Russian authorities had to search for ways to overcome the difficulties encountered in establishing peaceful coexistence of different peoples, employing vast military, administrative and diplomatic methods. The latter included retention and return of hostages or captives. Goals. The paper seeks to examine Kalmyk-Kazakh relations in the mid-18th century, identifying the Russian government’s role in establishing peaceful coexistence of the two steppe peoples within one state under the rule of Russian law; it also aims to investigate various aspects related to the role of captives in diplomatic contacts between the Russian establishment and representatives of steppe nobility. Results. The fact that in the 1730s Kazakhs of the Junior and Middle Zhuzes virtually became Russian citizens resulted a certain phenomenon: one state was then housing two steppe peoples relations between which were primarily reduced to mutual raids and hostilities. In the 1740s, Russian authorities made some efforts to facilitate peaceful coexistence of Kalmyks and Kazakhs under the rule of the Russian Empire. The diplomatic tool to have accompanied negotiation processes was the practice of voluntary return of captives. Conclusions. The analysis of the facts examined suggests that when it came to relations with the steppe peoples in the mid-18th century, the Russian authorities made extensive use of captives exchange to achieve wanted results in negotiation processes.

About the Authors

Ilya V. Toropitsyn
Astrakhan State University
Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (History), Assistant Professor


Zhanat B. Kundakbaeva
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kazakhstan
Dr. Sc. (History), Professor


Danara A. Suseeva
Gorodovikov Kalmyk State University
Russian Federation
Dr. Sc. (Philology), Professor


References

1. [Kazakh-Russian Relations: 16th – 18th Centuries]. Coll. documents and materials. Almaty: Aca­demy of Sciences of Kazakh SSR, 1961. 741 p. (In Russ.)

2. [Materials on the History of the Kazakh SSR]. Vol. II, part 2: 1741–1751. M. P. Vyatkin (ed.). Almaty: Academy of Sciences of Kazakh SSR, 1948. 456 p. (In Russ.)

3. National Archive of the Republic of Kalmykia.

4. State Archive of Astrakhan Oblast.

5. A. B. (A. M. Birze). Excerpts from the history of Kazakhstan: 18th century. Krasnyi arkhiv. 1938. No. 2 (87). Pp. 129–173. (In Russ.)

6. Apollova N. G. [Economic and Political Ties between Kazakhstan and Russia: 18th – Early 19th Centuries]. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences, 1960. 456 p. (In Russ.)

7. Bakunin V. M. [Description of the Kalmyk Peoples, in Particular, Torgout People, and Deeds of Their Khans and Landlords (1761)]. M. M. Batmaev (introd.); V. Razumovskaya (foreword). Elista: Kalmyk Book Publ., 1995. 153 p. (In Russ.)

8. Basin V. Ya. [Russia and Kazakh Khanates: 16th – 18th Centuries (Kazakhstan in Russia’s Imperial Foreign Political Framework)]. Almaty: Nauka, 1971. 275 p. (In Russ.)

9. Kundakbaeva Zh. B. [‘By the Law of Mercy…’: Russia and the North Caspian Peoples in the 18th Century]. Moscow: AIRO-XXI; St. Petersburg: Dmitry Bulanin, 2005. 304 p. (In Russ.)

10. Levshin A. I. [Description of Kirgiz-Kazak, or Kirgiz-Kaisak, Hordes and Steppes]. Almaty: Sanat, 1996. 656 p. (In Russ.)

11. Mitirov A. G. [Oirats – Kalmyks: Centuries and Generations]. Elista: Kalmyk Book Publ., 1998. 384 p. (In Russ.)

12. Novoletov M. [The Kalmyks: a Historical Essay]. St. Petersburg: V. Demakov, 1884. 79 p. (In Russ.)

13. Palmov N. N. [The Volga Kalmyks: Historical Sketches]. Part II: 18th century. Astrakhan: Kalmyk Oblast Executive Committee, 1927. 231 p. (In Russ.)

14. Popov N. [V. N. Tatishchev and His Time: an Episode from the History of Russia’s State, Public and Private Life in the Early-to-Mid 18th Century]. K. Soldatenkov and N. Shchepkin (eds.). Moscow: V. Gracheva and Co, 1861. 804 p. (In Russ.)

15. Toropitsyn I. V. Cossack service team in cases Kalmyk in the first half of XVIII century. Journal of Frontier Studies. 2016. No. 2. Pp. 23–42. (In Russ.)

16. Toropitsyn I. V. Defense operations of Kalmyk uluses: 1730–1740s. In: [United Kalmykia in United Russia]. Conf. proc. (Elista; September 13–18, 2009). In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Elista: Dzhangar, 2009. Pp. 242–246. (In Russ.)

17. Toropitsyn I. V. New data about the fate of the participants of the Khiva expedition of Prince A. Bekovich-Cherkassky. 1718–1719. In: [The Mid-Volga Peoples: Excerpts from the History and Culture]. Kazan: Mӓrcani History Research Institute (Tatarstan Academy of Sciences), 2016. Pp. 266–273. (In Russ.)

18. Toropitsyn I. V. Participation of Astrakhan Yurt Tatars in Kalmyk affairs: early-to-mid 18th century. In: [The Mid-Volga Peoples: Excerpts from the History and Culture]. Kazan: Mӓrcani History Research Institute (Tatarstan Academy of Sciences), 2018. Vol. 8. Part 2. Pp. 5–14. (In Russ.)

19. Tsyuryumov A. V. [Kalmyk Khanate as Part of Russia: Problems of Political Relations]. Elista: Dzhangar, 2007. 464 p. (In Russ.)

20. Vitevsky V. N. [I. I. Neplyuev and Orenburg Lands before 1758]. Vol. I. Kazan: V. M. Klyuchnikov, 1897. 616 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Toropitsyn I.V., Kundakbaeva Zh.B., Suseeva D.A. ‘For Sound Reconciliation between the Kaisak and Kalmyk Peoples, It Is Necessary to Please Them’: a Mediating Means in the Mid-18th-Century Steppe Diplomacy. Oriental Studies. 2019;12(5):750-760. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2019-45-5-750-760

Views: 566


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)