Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

Immigrants in Semirechye (Zhetysu): Legal Basis for Land Tenure and Land Use in the Late 19th – Early 20th Centuries

https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2019-45-5-771-786

Abstract

The relevance of addressing the issue of land management by peasant migrants in the national peripheries of the Russian Empire is associated not only with the need to take into account interethnic and religious relations in the regions and provide a detailed analysis of external and internal migration flows, but also with insufficient study of the topic. Land relations were especially difficult in all Russia’s regions with prevailing nomadic populations: Semirechye (Zhetysu), Lower Volga region, Ciscaucasian steppes, etc. The greatest contribution to the study of the question was made by pre-revolutionary researchers who, as a rule, were government officials obliged to deal with the resettlement (Rumyantsev P. P., Kaufman A. A., Palen K. K., etc.). In the Soviet period, the topic was examined in detail by N. E. Bekmakhanova. Currently, the study of the problem has become actual due to the need to clarify and reassess some of the established past views. Goals. The paper seeks to analyze the legal status of migrant peasants in the region inhabited by nomadic peoples and their land management practices. Materials and Methods. The work involves a wide range of legislative and statistical sources, eyewitness accounts and materials from central archives of Russia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, revealing the complex nature of legal land system definitions of immigrant peasants. Results. During the government-initiated and spontaneous colonization of Semirechye in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, various types of rural peasant settlements ― old-timed, newly emerged and self-willed ones ― were established, which required legal land management regulation. Since administrative agencies in many cases found it difficult to determine legal statuses of peasant lands in Semirechye, the migrants had to solve the problem of land use on their own entering into negotiations with nomadic communities, directly renting land from the latter under different conditions. This made it even more difficult to finally resolve the issue of legal regulation of land tenure and land use. Conclusions. Local administrations – due to the complexity of land relations between immigrants and nomads, poor vision of a complete picture of land management in the region, lack of land for the growing population and the difficulty of conducting Stolypin land management – were able to start collecting information about land management in Semirechye and actually conduct land allocation only in the beginning of the 20th century. The outbreak of World War I and subsequent social upheavals made it impossible to complete the determination of legal foundations of resettlement land management in Semirechye in the pre-revolutionary period.

About the Authors

Fyalka N. Miymanbaeva
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kazakhstan

Cand. Sc. (History), Associate Professor, Department of World History, Historiography and Source Studies

 


Alexander N. Komandzhaev
Gorodovikov Kalmyk State University
Russian Federation
Dr. Sc. (History), Head of Department of Russian History, Archives and Records Management


Evgeny A. Komandzhaev
Gorodovikov Kalmyk State University
Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Law), Head of Department of Theory and History of State and Law


References

1. [Review of Semirechye Oblast: 1883]. Verniy: Semi­rechye Oblast Executive Office, 1884. 96 p. (In Russ.)

2. Russian State Archive of Military History.

3. Russian State Historical Archive:

4. [Statistical Yearbook: 1917–1923]. D. P. Krasnovsky (ed.). Tashkent, 1924. Vol. 1. (In Russ.)

5. Central State Archive of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

6. Central State Archive of the Republic of Uzbekistan.

7. Abdirov M. J., Aktamberdyeva Z. S. [Semirechye Cossack Host: Glimpses of the 1867–1917 Military Cossack Colonization of Zhetysu]. Almaty: Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 2011. 362 p. (In Russ.)

8. Aristov N. A. [Works on the History and Ethnic Composition of Turkic Tribes]. V. M. Ploskikh (ed.). Bishkek: Ilim, 2003. 460 p. (In Russ.)

9. Barthold V. V. Turkestan: history of cultural life. In: [Collected Works]. Vol. 2. Part 1. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, 1963. Pp. 169–434. (In Russ.)

10. Bekmakhanova N. E. [Multinational Population of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan in the Capitalist Era: 1860s – 1917)]. Moscow: Nauka, 1986. 246 p. (In Russ.)

11. Belous S. G. O. A. Shkapsky about agrarian policy in the Kazakh steppe at the end of XIX – the beginning of the XXth centuries. Scientific E-journal «edu.e-history.kz». 2019. No. 2 (10). An Internet resource: http://edu.e-history.kz/ru/publications/view/678 (accessed: October 10, 2019). (In Russ.)

12. Dalaeva T. T. Land policy of the Russian Empire in Southern Kazakhstan and Semirechye in the mid-to-late 19th century. In: [History of Kazakhstan: Contemporary Studies and Topical Issues of Teaching]. Conf. proc. Almaty: Ulagat, 2012. Pp. 198–202. (In Russ.)

13. Graham S. Through Russian Central Asia. London; New York; Toronto; Melbourne: Cassell and Co Ltd, 1916. 279 p. (In Eng.)

14. Ilyasov S. I. [Land Relations in Kyrgyzstan: Late 19th - Early 20th Centuries]. Frunze: Kyrgyzstan Academy of Sciences, 1963. 447 p. (In Russ.)

15. Kaufman A. A. [Resettlement and Colonization]. St. Petersburg: Obshchestvennaya Polza, 1905. 443 p. (In Russ.)

16. Loganov G. Russia in Central Asia. Voprosy kolonizatsii. 1909. No. 4. Pp. 1–77. (In Russ.)

17. Miymanbaeva F. N. [Russian Settlers in Semirechye: Late 19th – Early 20th Centuries]. Almaty, 2002. 50 p. (In Russ.)

18. Palen K. K. [Resettlement Case in Turkestan: Report on the Audit of Turkestan Region Compiled by Senator K. K. Palen]. St. Petersburg: Governing Senate, 1910. 430 p. (In Russ.)

19. Rumyantsev P. P. Conditions of colonization in Semirechye. Voprosy kolonizatsii. 1911. No. 9. Pp. 191–224. (In Russ.)

20. Sapelkin A. A. [Agrarian Relations in Kyrgyzstan by the Early 20th Century]. Frunze: Ilim, 1977. 281 p. (In Russ.)

21. Satenova M. R. Key aspects of the Russian administration’s land policy in Semirechye (2-nd half of the XIX century). Scientific E-journal «edu.e-history.kz». 2019. No. 1. An Internet resource: http://edu.e-history.kz/ru/publications/view/149 (accessed: August 15, 2019). (In Russ.)

22. Shkapsky O. A. Self-willed immigrants and the agrarian question in Semirechye Oblast. Voprosy kolonizatsii. 1907. No. 1. Pp. 1–32. (In Russ.)

23. Zabirov K. Resettlement policies and colonization of Northern Kyrgyzstan. In: [Faculty of History, Kyrgyz State University: Scholarly Notes]. Vol VI. Frunze, 1958. Pp. 147–151. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Miymanbaeva F.N., Komandzhaev A.N., Komandzhaev E.A. Immigrants in Semirechye (Zhetysu): Legal Basis for Land Tenure and Land Use in the Late 19th – Early 20th Centuries. Oriental Studies. 2019;12(5):771-786. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2019-45-5-771-786

Views: 723


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)