Mother Tongue in the Context of a Polyethnic Country

The article analyzes the role of mother tongue in present-day polyethnic countries, specificity of ethnic language identity, correlation between the level of ethno-linguistic identity and language competence through the example of the Oirat-Kalmyks. In recent decades, research of the ethno-linguistic factor in ethnic identity of ethnos has become especially urgent that is caused by a trend of growth in ethnicity level world-wide. Each individual perceives reality through language which reflects the entire life experience, history of the ethnos. Language is one of the symbols of ethnic unity, so that when the national identity of an ethnos gets promoted - a revival of the ethnic language comes first. Changes in ethno-linguistic identity and in native language have affected both Russia’s Kalmyks who have a separate administrative territory, the Republic of Kalmykia, and are an integral part of the Russian nation, and Oirat-Kalmyk communities represented by diasporas in different regions of the world. Attempts to form a new ethnic identity of the Kalmyk ethnos at the present time suggest that the revival of ethnic identity - in terms of culture and policy - is urgent for the Kalmyks who lost it due to various objective and subjective reasons. The main social and psychological factor affecting the vitality of a language is ethno-linguistic identity. High level of ethnic identity, as a rule, neutralizes negative factors in the functioning of the language, while its low level results in a loss of the language; moreover, younger generations can sometimes adopt ‘language nihilism’ towards the mother tongue. But this interaction between language and ethnic identity is ambiguous. For example, the Oirats of China and the Volga Kalmyks have a high level of ethnic language identity but the virtual level of language competence in mother tongue among the Kalmyks of Russia as compared to that of Xinjiang Oirats is much lower. The difference is in the approach to the phenomenon of ‘native language/mother tongue’. ‘Mother tongue’ usually means the language of the family in which primary speech skills are formed. ‘Ethnic language’ stands for the language of the ethnos, i.e. it is an ethnic symbol. The Volga Kalmyks in most cases confuse these notions and, unable to speak the native language, by the ‘mother tongue’ mean an ‘ethnic symbol’. Probably, this mother tongue knowledge gap in the high level of ethnic identity of Volga Kalmyks is compensated by other important elements of their ethnic identity, such as common historical past, ethnic traditions, customs, religion, etc. The Kalmyks of Russia have experienced a strong cultural influence of the dominant community, Russification process takes place but the high level of ethnic identity is still retained. For the Oirats of China the ‘mother tongue’ is actually their mothers’ language, the language of family communication which forms their primary speech skills. The main distinguishing feature of China’s Oirats is that they are more integrated into their own ethnos, their native language which is the bearer of traditions, history, culture of the people, functions as an intra-ethnic communication mean. It should be also noted that the significance and degree of use of language depend on historical, social, geopolitical factors. On the materials of the sociolinguistic research performed from 2002 to 2016, the author has considered these peculiar aspects of the role of the native language in the development of Oirat-Kalmyk communities, the structure of their ethnic identity and language transformations in the ethnic groups of the Oirat-Kalmyks residing in different regions of the world.

родной язык, языковые аттитюды, этноязыковое самосознание, языковая ситуация, языковая политика, полиэтническое государство

1. Bromley Yu. V. K voprosu o vliyanii osobennostey kul’turnoy sredy na psikhiku [Cultural environment and its impact on an individual’s state of mind]. Sovetskaya etnografi ya [Soviet Ethnography journal], 1983, No. 3, pp. 68–75 (In Russ.).

2. Bromley Yu. V. Ocherki teorii etnosa [Sketches on the theory of ethnos]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1983, 412 p. (In Russ.).

3. Budilova E. A. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie problemy v russkoy nauke [Social and psychological problems in Russian science]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1983, 230 p. (In Russ.).

4. Vundt V. Problemy psikhologii narodov [Problems of ethnic psychology]. Moscow, Kosmos Publ., 1912, 132 p. (In Russ.).

5. Vygotsky V. L. Soznanie kak problema psikhologii [Mind as a problem of psychology]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1982, 576 p. (In Russ.).

6. Gumilev L. N. Etnogenez i biosfera Zemli [Ethnogenesis and the biosphere]. Moscow, Didik Publ., 1997, 640 p. (In Russ.).

7. Guchinova E.-B. M. Vynuzhdennye pereseleniya i etnicheskoe samosoznanie (na primere etnopoliticheskoy istorii kalmykov v XX v.): dis…. dokt. ist. Nauk [Deportations and ethnic identity (evidence from ethno-political history of the Kalmyks in the 20th c.). A Ph. D. thesis]. Moscow, 2004, 452 p. (In Russ.).

8. Dashdamirov A. F. K metodologii issledovaniya natsional’no-psikhologicheskikh problem [Revisiting research methods of ethnopsychological problems]. Sovetskaya etnografi ya [Soviet Ethnography], 1983, No. 2, pp. 62–74 (In Russ.).

9. Drobizheva L. M. Vliyanie etnokontaktnoy sredy na mezhnatsional’nye otnosheniya [Infl uence of ethnic environment on interethnic relations]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvennaya praktika [Social psychology and practices]. Moscow, 1985, pp. 117–123 (In Russ.).

10. Durkheim E. O razdelenii obshchestvennogo truda. Metod sotsiologii [The division of labor in society]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1991, 572 p. (In Russ.).

11. Zdravomyslov A. G. Etnopoliticheskie protsessy i dinamika natsional’nogo samosoznaniya rossiyan [Ethno-political processes and dynamics of national identity of Russia’s citizens]. Sotsis (journal), 1996, No. 12, pp. 23– 32 (In Russ.).

12. Imkenova A. B. Etnicheskaya identichnost’ kalmykov [Ethnic identity of the Kalmyks]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ., 1999, 91 p. (In Russ.).

13. Kozlov V. I. Sovremennye etnicheskie protsessy v SSSR (k metodologii issledovaniya) [Contemporary ethnic processes in the USSR]. Sovetskaya etnografi ya [Soviet Ethnography], 1969, No. 2, pp. 60–72 (In Russ.).

14. Kozlov V. I. Problema etnicheskogo samosoznaniya i ee mesto v teorii etnosa [The problem of ethnic identity and its place in the theory of ethnos]. Sovetskaya etnografi ya [Soviet Ethnography], 1974, No. 2, pp. 78–84 (In Russ.).

15. Kushner P. Etnicheskie territorii i ekonomicheskie granitsy [Ethnic territories and economic borders]. Moscow, USSR Acad. of Sc. Press, 1951, 280 p. (In Russ.).

16. Le Bon G. Psikhologiya naroda i mass [The psychology of peoples]. St. Petersburg, Pavlenko Publ., 1896, 332 p. (In Russ.).

17. Moskalev A. A. Teoreticheskaya baza natsional’noy politiki KNR (1949–1999) [Theoretical basis of the PRC’s national policies (1949–1999)]. Moscow, Pamyatniki Ist. Mysli Publ., 2001, 224 p. (In Russ.).

18. Ovsyanniko-Kulikovsky D. N. Psikhologiya natsional’nosti [Psychology of nationality]. St. Petersburg, Vremya Publ., 1922, 40 p. (In Russ.).

19. Potebnya A. A. Mysl’ i yazyk [Thought and language]. Kharkov, Mirny Trud Publ., 1913, 222 p. (In Russ.).

20. Tishkov V. A. Mezhnatsional’nye otnosheniya v RF. Doklad na zasedanii Prezidiuma RAN

21. [Interethnic relations in Russia. Report at the Presidium of the RAS]. Moscow, Instit. of Ethnography and Anthropology (RAS) Press, 1993, 72 p. (In Russ.).

22. Cheshko S. V. Raspad Sovetskogo soyuza [Decline of the USSR]. Moscow, Instit. of Ethnography and Anthropology (RAS) Press, 1996, 398 p. (In Russ.).

23. Etnicheskie i etno-sotsial’nye kategorii: Svod etnografi cheskikh ponyatiy i terminov. Vyp. 6 [Ethnic and ethno-social categories: a collection of ethnographic concepts and terms. Iss. 6]. Moscow, Instit. of Ethnography and Anthropology (RAS) Press, 1995 (In Russ.).

24. Aubin F. Une societe d’emigres: la colonie des Kalmouks de France [An expatriate community: the Kalmyk camp in France]. L’annee sociologique. 1968 (In French).

25. Dashefsky A., Shapiro H. M. Ethnic identification among American Jews. Socialization and Social Structure. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1974, 290 p. (In Eng.).

26. Moerman M. Ethnic identifi cation in a complex civilization: who are in the Lue? American Antropologist, 1965, vol. 67, pp. 1219–1229 (In Eng.).

27. Theodorson G. and Achilles G. A modern dictionary of sociology. New York, Crowell Publ., 1969, 469 p. (In Eng.).