The 13th Dalai Lama on the Status of Tibet
https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2020-48-2-252-268
Abstract
Goals. The work aims at analysis of the views of the 13th Dalai Lama on the status of Tibet. Russian archival diplomatic and intelligence documents, as well as earlier published data from archives and memoirs of eyewitnesses, were used as materials. Received results reveal that the 13th Dalai Lama had shown that connections between the Dalai Lamas and the Qing emperors were limited only by the fact that the former were ‘spiritual masters’ of the latter, while the 5th Dalai Lama received secular power over Tibet from the Mongol Gushri Khan. Over time, the Qing power in Tibet was strengthened, and the Chinese began to consider Tibet a semi-dependent state. However, there were neither military conquest, nor any state act confirming such dependence, except for unilateral administrative orders from Chinese officials. Tibet was never under the rule of China, only later their relations began to transform into the vassal dependence of Tibet. With the abdication of the Manchu Dynasty, Tibet should become independent as before. These statements of the 13th Dalai Lama correspond to historical facts. Connections between the Dalai Lamas and the Qing emperors may be sufficiently described by the ‘priest–patron’ principle. Documents reveal that the Tibetan–Qing relations were treated in many aspects differently by both sides. Until the end of the Manchu Dynasty, the Dalai Lama never became a vassal to the Emperor, and Tibet was not a part of the Qing Empire. The collapse of this empire and the abdication of this dynasty gave the Dalai Lama new reason to declare final termination of the former connections between Tibet and China. The article quotes the Dalai Lama’s talks with Russian officials. Elaboration of ceremony of his reception by the Dowager Empress Cixi and Guangxu Emperor in Beijing is discussed.
About the Author
Sergius L. Kuzmin
Institute of Oriental Studies of the RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sc. (History), Ph.D. (Biology), Leading Research Associate
12, Rozhdestvenka St., Moscow 12107031, Russian Federation
References
1. Archive of Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire. Coll. ‘Chinese Table (Department)’; coll. ‘Mission in Beijing’. (In Russ.)
2. [Chinese Chamber of External Relations: Code of Laws]. In 2 vols. St. Petersburg: Public Education Dept., 1828. Vol. 1, 326 p.; vol. 2, 319 p. (In Russ.)
3. [Russia and Tibet: Collected Archival Documents, 1900–1914]. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, 2005. 231 p. (In Russ.)
4. A 60-point commentary on the Chinese Government Publication. Dharamsala: DIIR, 2008. 185 р. (In Eng.)
5. Backhouse E., Bland J. O. P. Annals and Memoirs of the Court of Peking (from the 16th to the 20th Century). London: W. Heinemann, 1914. 531 p. (In Eng.)
6. Bell Ch. Portrait of the Dalai Lama. London: Collins, 1946. 414 p. (In Eng.)
7. Bell Ch. The People of Tibet. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928. 319 p. (In Eng.)
8. Bell Ch. Tibet: Past and Present. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924. 326 p. (In Eng.)
9. Belov E. V. Lieutenant colonel Khitrovo’s report on the Dalai Lama and his activity in 1906. Oriens. 1996. No. 4. Pp. 136–141. (In Russ.)
10. Besprozvannykh E. L. [Leaders of Tibet and Their Role in Tibet – China Relations: 17th–18th Centuries]. Volgograd: Volgograd State University, 2001. 356 p. (In Russ.)
11. Cheney A. J. Tibet lost in translation: sovereignty, suzerainty and international order transformation, 1904–1906. Journal of Contemporary China. 2017. Vol. 26. No 107. Pp. 1–15. (In Eng.)
12. Dhondup K. The Water-Bird and Other Years. A History of the 20th Dalai Lama and After. New Delhi: Rang Wang, 1986. 125 p. (In Eng.)
13. Dmitriev S. V., Kuzmin S. L. Qing Empire as China: anatomy of historical myth. Oriens. 2014. No. 1. Pp. 5–17. (In Russ.)
14. Dmitriev S. V., Kuzmin S. L. What is China? Middle State in historical myth and real policy. Oriens. 2012. No. 3. Pp. 5–19. (In Russ.)
15. Fairbank J. K., Teng S. Y. On the Ch’ing tributary system. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. 1941. Vol. 6. No. 2. Pp. 135‒246. (In Eng.)
16. From Tibet Confidentially. Secret correspondence of the Thirteenth Dalai Lama to Agvan Dorzhiev, 1911–1925. Dharamsala: LTWA, 2011. 192 p. (In Eng.)
17. Ishihama Y., Tachibana M., Kobayashi R., Inoue T. The Resurgence of ‘Buddhist Government’. Tibetan-Mongolian Relations in the Modern World. Osaka: Union Press, 2019. 292 p. (In Eng.)
18. Kobayashi R. The Lungshar delegation and Britain in 1913. Focusing on the letters of the 13th Dalai Lama. Inner Asia. 2016. Vol. 18. Pp. 288‒308. (In Eng.)
19. Kobayashi R. The Tibet-Japan relations in the era of the 1911 revolution. Tibetan letters from the Aoki Bunkyō Archive. In: [The Historical Development of Tibeto-Himalayan Civilization]. Kyoto: Kyoto University, 2018. Pp. 101‒22. (In Eng.)
20. Kobayashi R. Tibet in the era of 1911 Revolution. Journal of Contemporary China Studies. 2014. Vol. 3. No. 1. Pp. 91‒113. (In Eng.)
21. Kuzmin S. L. ‘Priest–patron’ relationships and status of Tibet. In: [Science and Buddhism]. Ulan-Ude: Buryat State University, 2012. Pp. 261–273. (In Russ.)
22. Kuzmin S. L. Statehood of Tibet. In: [Peoples of Inner Asia: Issues of Statehood]. Prague: Sociosféra-CZ, 2014. Pp. 140–161. (In Russ.)
23. Kuzmin S. L. The problem of vassalage in the West and the East: relations of the Qing Empire with Mongolia and Tibet. Oriens. 2019. No. 1. Pp. 39-54. (In Russ.)
24. Kuzmin S. L. [Hidden Tibet]. St. Petersburg: A. Terentiev, 2010. 544 p. (In Russ.)
25. Rockhill W. W. The Dalai Lamas of Lhasa and their relations with the Manchu Emperors of China. 1644–1908. T’oung Pao. 2nd Ser. 1910. Vol. 11. No. 1. Pp. 1‒104. (In Eng.)
26. Sabrukova S. S. Letter of the 13th Dalai Lama to the Tibetan people. In: [Buddha’s Teaching in Russia]. St. Petersburg: Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie, 2015. Pp. 134-139. (In Russ.)
27. Schwieger P. The Dalai Lama and the Emperor of China. A Political History of the Tibetan Institution of Reincarnation. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015. 557 p. (In Eng.)
28. Shakabpa W. D. One Hundred Thousand Moons: an Advanced Political History of Tibet. Vol. 2. Leiden: Brill, 2010. 1184 p. (In Eng.)
29. Shakabpa W. D. Tibet: a Political History. St. Petersburg: Narthang, 2003, 428 p. (In Russ.)
30. Smith W. W. Tibetan Nation. Boulder: Westview Press, 1996. 732 p. (In Eng.)
31. Tikhvinsky S. L. Manchu rule in China. In: [Manchu Rule in China]. Moscow: Nauka, 1966. Pp. 5–76. (In Russ.)
32. Van Walt van Praag M. C. The Status of Tibet: History, Rights, and Prospects in International Law. Boulder: Westview Press, 1987. 381 p. (In Eng.)
Review
For citations:
Kuzmin S.L. The 13th Dalai Lama on the Status of Tibet. Oriental Studies. 2020;13(2):252-268. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2020-48-2-252-268
Views:
1011
Email this article 