Ethno-Confessional Landscape of the Altai Republic: Global Challenges and Local Responses
https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2020-48-2-436-454
Abstract
Introduction. The article studies the contemporary ethno-confessional landscape of the Altai Republic as part of historical/cultural heritage, and as a factor influencing certain present-day sociocultural processes. Goals. The work seeks to identify constants and development trends in ethno-confessional relations in the region. Methods. M. Weber’s theory of social action and several sociophilosophical concepts, including those of sociocultural neotraditionalism, collective memory and collective trauma, constitute the theoretical framework of the study. The latter summarizes results of 2003-2018 sociological surveys that revealed most significant — for the collective memory of the Altai peoples – historical events to have posed global challenges in modern and contemporary history, namely: disintegration of nomadic power structures and inclusion in the orbit of an essentially differing civilization, transition to modernization, and pressure of world religions. Results. At the turn of the 21st century, a number of trends have emerged that can be qualified as collective responses to such global challenges: revival of family and clan self-organization forms, preservation of traditional economic paradigms, rejection of technocratic attributes of modernization, development of neo-traditional syncretic religious forms. Conclusions. The analysis of statistical data, materials of regional media and social networks, included observations make it possible to distinguish some actual development trends in ethno-confessional relations in the region: conservation (despite the crisis) of local human potential characterized by that quite a number of individuals tackle ethnocultural, religious/mystical, and mythopoetic creativity jobs which, thus, transform the sphere of the sacred into a space for political, civil, and generational discourse. Public consciousness of natives is also marked by dualism of secular and religious aspects, while sacralization of memory might be a means to use cultural heritage in overcoming the collective trauma caused by modernization.
About the Author
Elena A. Erokhina
Institute of Philosophy and Law, Siberian Branch of the RAS
Institute for the Humanities, Novosibirsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sc. (Philosophy), Leading Research Associate
8, Nikolaev St., Novosibirsk 630090, Russian Federation
1, Pirogov St., Novosibirsk 630090, Russian Federation
References
1. Evidence collected by members of the Ethnosocial Research Department (Institute of Philosophy and Law, Siberian Branch of the RAS)from residents of Zhana-Aul village (Kosh-Agachsky District, Altai Republic) in the autumn of 2014. (In Russ. and Alt.)
2. Anzhiganova L. V. Ethnical neotraditionalism in the conditions of social transformations. The World of Sciences, Culture and Education. 2012. No. 6 (37). Pp. 438‒440. (In Russ.)
3. Average Per Capita Incomes (Table 4.4). At: Regions of Russia: Socioeconomic Indicators – 2019. Federal State Statistic Service (website). Available at: https://gks.ru/bgd/regl/b19_14p/Main.htm (accessed: February10, 2020). (In Russ.)
4. Certeau de M. Walking in the city. A.A. Kosmarsky (transl.) Russian Sociological Review. 2008. Vol. 7. No. 2. Pp. 24‒38. (In Russ.)
5. Chemchieva A. P. [Altaian Sub-Ethnic Groups: in Search of Identity]. Novosibirsk: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography (Sib. Branch) of RAS, 2012. 254 p. (In Russ.)
6. Dilekova S. D. Altai Republic: rural employment problems. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2016. No. 1 (199). Pp. 185‒193. (In Russ.)
7. Doronin D. Yu. What is wrong again with the ‘Altai Princess’? New facts from newslore biography of Ak Kadyn. Siberian Historical Research. 2016. No. 1. Pp. 74‒99. (In Russ.)
8. Dyrenkova N. P. Turkic tribes of the Altai-Sayan Highland: water, mountains and forest in their worldviews. In: Dyrenkova N. P. [Turks of the Sayan-Altai: Articles and Ethnographic Materials]. St. Petersburg: Peter the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (RAS), 2012. Pp. 131–188. (In Russ.)
9. Erokhina E. A. [Civilizational and Geopolitical Space of Russia: Ethnic Diversity]. Novosibirsk: Siberian Branch of RAS, 2014. 240 p. (In Russ.)
10. Erokhina E. A. Ethnocultural neotraditionalism as a source of civic activism: a case study of public attitudes towards industrial projects in the Altai Republic. In: [Paths of Russia, 1917–2017: a Century of Changes]. Moscow, St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2018. Pp. 245–251. (In Russ.)
11. Erokhina E. A. Inter-ethnic communities of South Siberian Turkic republics: between regionalization and globalization. In: [Regulating Ethnosocial and Ethnocultural Processes in Regions of Russia: Positive Experiences]. Conf. proc. Kazan: Institute of History (Tatarstan Academy of Sciences), 2018. Pp. 486‒489. (In Russ.)
12. Erokhina E. A. Youths of Gorno-Altaysk: collective memory and ethnic identities. Sociological Studies. 2009. No. 3. Pp. 115–120. (In Russ.)
13. Ethnic Composition of Population by Regions of Russia (Table 7). In: [Russian Census of 2010: Final Outcomes]. Federal State Statistic Service (website). Available at: https://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/demo/per-itog/tab7.xls (accessed: February10, 2020). (In Russ.)
14. Khvastunova Yu. V. Methodological aspects of religion study (by example of religious environment in Altai Republic). Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. No. 356. Pp. 42‒44. (In Russ.)
15. Knorre B. K. Contemporary Altai shamanism in the context of the national religious policy of the Altai Republic. Russian State University for the Humanities Bulletin. Turkic-Mongolian Field Studies. 2016. No. 12 (21). Pp. 89–114. (In Russ.)
16. Kydyeva V. Ya. [Land Relations in the Altai Highland, Late 19th–20th Centuries: a Historical/Ethnographic Study]. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis abstract. Moscow, 1997. 21 p. (In Russ.)
17. Lamazhaa Ch. K., Abdulaeva M. Sh. Archaization and neotraditionalism: regional forms in Russia. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. 2014. No. 3. Pp. 68‒80. (In Russ.)
18. Madyukova S. A., Persidskaya O. A. Peoples of the Altai Republic: national, regional and ethnic identities. In: [Regulating Ethnosocial and Ethnocultural Processes in Regions of Russia: Positive Experiences]. Conf. proc. Kazan: Institute of History (Tatarstan Academy of Sciences), 2018. Pp. 290‒293. (In Russ.)
19. Madyukova S. A., Popkov Yu. V. [Phenomenon of Sociocultural Neotraditsionalism]. St. Petersburg: Aletheia, 2011. 132 p. (In Russ.)
20. Mirsky G. I. Back to the Middle Ages? Russia in Global Affairs. 2017. No. 6. Pp. 102‒113. (In Russ.)
21. Moiseev V. A. Russia’s incorporation of the Altai Highland, 1750s: external political factors. In: [Altai — Russia: through Centuries into the Future]. Conf. proc. (May 16–19, 2006). Gorno-Altaysk: Gorno-Altaysk State University, 2006. Vol. 1. Pp. 12–17. (In Russ.)
22. Ovchinnikov V. V. [The Sakura and the Oak]. Moscow: AST, 2016. 608 p. (In Russ.)
23. Pepilova S. M. ‘Non-traditional’ religions in the Altai Republic, and their native adherents. In: [Altai — Russia: through Centuries into the Future]. Gorno-Altaysk: Gorno-Altaysk State University, 2016. Pp. 356–361. (In Russ.)
24. Plets G., Soenov V. I., Konstantinov N. A., Robinson E. Repatriation of the ‘Ukok Princess’ in an international perspective (Are Russian archaeologists ready to engage in a dialogue with indigenous peoples?) In: [Antiquities of Siberia and Central Asia]. 2014. No. 7 (19). Pp. 17‒45. (In Russ.)
25. Potapov L. P. [Altaian Shamanism]. Leningrad: Nauka, 1991. 321 p. (In Russ.)
26. Regions of Russia: Population by Age, Gender, and Level of Education (Table 1). In: [Russian Census of 2010: Outcomes]. Vol. 3: Education. Available at: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/ ssp/rus_edu_10.php (accessed: February10, 2020). (In Russ.)
27. Sagalaev A. M. [Mythology and Traditional Cults of the Altaians: Lamaist Elements]. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis abstract. Leningrad, 1981. 18 p. (In Russ.)
28. Sagalaev A. M., Oktyabrskaya I. V. [Traditional Worldview of South Siberian Turks: Sign and Ritual]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1990. 209 p. (In Russ.)
29. Sherstova L. I. Indigenous peoples of Southern Siberia in the context of the Stolypin agrarian reform. In: [Siberian Society in the 20th-Century Social Transformations]. Conf. proc. Tomsk: Tomsk State University, 2007. Pp. 85–91. (In Russ.)
30. Sztompka P. Trauma of social change. Sociological Studies. 2001. No. 1. Pp. 6‒16. (In Russ.)
31. Table 2. 3. Nationwide Proportions of Urban and Rural Residents. In: [Regions of Russia: Socioeconomic Indicators. 2018]. Statistical digest. Federal State Statistic Service. Moscow, 2018. Available at: https://www.gks.ru/free_doc/doc_2018/region/reg-pok18.pdf (accessed: February10, 2020). (In Russ.)
32. Table 3.10. Employment Rates: Summarizing Results of Manpower Sample Surveys. At: Regions of Russia: Socioeconomic Indicators – 2019. Federal State Statistic Service (website). Available at: https://gks.ru/bgd/regl/b19_14p/Main.htm (accessed: February10, 2020). (In Russ.)
33. Table 3.12. Number of the Unemployed. At: Regions of Russia: Socioeconomic Indicators – 2019. Federal State Statistic Service (website). Available at: https://gks.ru/bgd/regl/b19_14p/Main.htm (accessed: February10, 2020). (In Russ.)
34. Tadina N. A. Mountain as a core structural element of Altaian culture. In: [Field Studies in the Ob Headwater Regions and the Altai: Archaeology, Ethnography, Oral History]. Vol. 6. Conf. proc. Barnaul: Altai State Pedagogical Academy, 2009. Pp. 161–165. (In Russ.)
35. Tadina N. A. National symbols of the Altai Republic: Pazyryk images revisited. In: [Archaeological and Ethnographic Studies Integrated]. Omsk: Nauka, 2018. Pp. 155–157. (In Russ.)
36. Tadina N. A. On the three modernization stages of the Altai clan society. Bulletin of the Irkutsk State University. Geoarchaeology, Ethnology, and Anthropology Series. 2019. Vol. 28. Pp. 88‒97. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.26516/2227-2380.2019.28.88
37. Tadina N. A. Symbolism and ethical values in the practices of the revived Burkhanism. Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2013. No. 4 (24). Pp. 97‒100. (In Russ.)
38. Tadina N. A. Two views on Burkhanism among the Altai-Kizhi. The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2013. Vol. 16. No. 4. Pp. 159‒166. (In Russ.)
39. Tadina N. A., Irkitova A. A., Ukhanova E. V. Conservation of clan structures in Altaian villages revisited: a case study of Shebalinsky District, Altai Republic. In: [Cultural Heritage of the Altai Lands: Preservation and Exploration]. Barnaul: Altai State University, 2019. Pp. 262‒266. (In Russ.)
40. Tadina N. A., Yabyshtaev T. S. Christian Cossacks of the Turata River valley and the zaisanat (indigenous hereditary nobility). In: [Makariev Readings]. Conf. proc. Gorno-Altaysk: Gorno-Altaysk State University, 2016. Pp. 142–146. (In Russ.)
41. Tokarev S. A. [Early Forms of Religion]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1990. 622 p. (In Russ.)
42. Tyukhteneva S. P. ‘Earth Mother’ in the ontology and the folklore of modern Altaians. Scientific Problems of Humanities Research. 2011. No. 6. Pp. 111‒116. (In Russ.)
43. Tyukhteneva S. P. Altaians: livestock breeding in the 21st century. In: [Field Studies]. Elista: Kalmyk Scientific Center of RAS, 2016. Pp. 65‒81. (In Russ.)
44. Tyukhteneva S. P. The Individual and society in the Altai: from clan affiliation to all-Altaic identity. Bulletin of the Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of the RAS (Oriental Studies). 2015. No. 4. Pp. 72‒81. (In Russ.)
45. Weber M. The Sociology of Religion. M. I. Levina (transl.). M. Weber. [Image of Society: Selected Works]. Moscow: Yurist, 1994. Pp. 78–308. (In Russ.)
46. Yabyshtaev T. S. Actualization of clan identity among the Altaians revisited. In: [Turko-Mongolian World of the Big Altai: Historical-Cultural Heritage, and Contemporaneity]. Barnaul, Gorno-Altaysk: Altai State University, 2019. Pp. 181‒183. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Erokhina E.A. Ethno-Confessional Landscape of the Altai Republic: Global Challenges and Local Responses. Oriental Studies. 2020;13(2):436-454. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2020-48-2-436-454
Views:
523
Email this article 