Ganden Phodrang: Government of the Dalai Lama in the 18th Century
https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2020-49-3-478-492
Abstract
Introduction. The article examines the structure and features of Ganden Phodrang (Tib. dGa’-ldan pho-brang) — Tibetan traditional Government founded by the 5th Dalai Lama Lobsang Gyatso (1617–1682) in 1642 — in the context of interaction with institutions of the Qing administration in the 18th century. Diarchy based on the principles of unity of monastic and secular government (Tib. Сhos-srid) became the basis of the political and legal system of the Tibetan state and was reflected in some specifics of relations with Buddhist countries and peoples. The influence of the Qing Empire in the region by the end of the 18th century increased, and that was traced in formal characteristics but did not affect the functioning laws of Ganden Phodrang. Goals. The paper reviews and analyzes the origins, structure and features of the Dalai Lama’s traditional government Ganden Phodrang (1642–1959); identifies the main changes in the political structure of Tibet during the period of the greatest influence of the Qing government institutions in the 18th century; clarifies the position and role of the Dalai Lama as head of state, as well as the importance of regents and Qing ambans in governing the country. Materials and Methods. In addition to Qing sources, the article uses works by German and French Tibetan scholars (in English), as well as studies by Indian and Chinese Tibetologists. In Russian historiography, special attention is paid to the Dalai Lamas and Panchen Lamas, their relations with the Qing emperors, as well as to such administrative institutions of the Qing as ambans, legislative acts, and the Golden urn lot. Methodologically, the study employs historical and comparative approaches, and the problem-chronological principle. Conclusions. The article concludes that the Dalai Lama’s Government was uniquely independent in the 18th century, and tulku regents possessed special ‘dual’ status and significance. It is necessary to emphasize the importance of studying the topic in the context of international polemics around classification of the socioeconomic structure of Tibet in the Middle Ages, and its status in relation to China.
Supporting agencies: The reported study was supported (funded) by RUDN University Program 5-100.
About the Author
Anastasiya G. Lyulina
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Institute of Oriental Studies of the RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (History), Lecturer
(6, Miklouho-Maclay Str., Moscow 117198, Russian Federation
Research Associate
12, Rozhdestvenka Str., Moscow 104031, Russian Federation
References
1. Ardley J. The Tibetan Independence Movement: Political, Religious and Gandhian Perspective. London, New York: Routledge Curzon, 2003. 224 p. (In Eng.)
2. Besprozvannykh E. L. ‘The Code of Chinese External Affairs Chamber’: about new principles of Tibet management. Science
3. Journal of Volgograd State University. 2008. No. 2. Pp. 38–51. (In Russ.)
4. Besprozvannykh E. L. Tibet–China Relations: 17th–18th Centuries. Volgograd: Volgograd State University, 2005. 120 p. (In Russ.)
5. Dao Wei Cai Zhangjia (Dava Tsering). Ganden Phodrang era: a review of official documents and archives. Zhongguo zangxue. 2014. No. 3. Pp. 107–112. (In Chin.)
6. Dawa Norbu. China’s Tibet Policy. Richmond: Curzon Press, 2001. 470 p. (In Eng.)
7. Dijie Caidan (ed.) History of Relations between Local Authorities of Tibet and Chinese Central Government: Since the Yuan Era. Collected Archival Documents and Materials. Vol. 2. Beijing: China Tibetology Press, 1994. (In Chin.)
8. Dreyfus G. Law, state, and political ideology in Tibet. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies. 1995. Vol. 18. No.1. Pp. 117–138. (In Eng.)
9. Glossary for Tibetan Terms. On: Tibetan Oral History Archive Project (Digital Online Web Archive). Available at: https://www.loc.gov/collections/tibetan-oral-history-project/articles-and-essays/glossary/ (accessed: May 20, 2020)
10. (In Eng.)
11. Goldstein M. C. An Anthropological Study of the Tibetan Political System. PhD thesis. University of Washington. 1968. 266 p. (In Eng.)
12. Goldstein M. C. The circulation of estates in Tibet: reincarnation, land and politics. The Journal of Asian Studies. Cambridge, 1973. Vol. 32. No. 3. Pp. 445–455. (In Eng.)
13. Guo Qing. Historical role of Qing ambans revisited. Xizang yanjiu. 1998. No. 2. Pp. 55–61. (In Chin.)
14. He Wenxuan. Ambans in Tibet during the Qing Era: Chronicles of Great Deeds. Beijing: China Tibetology Press, 1993. 537 p. (In Chin.)
15. Huang Weizhong. Living Buddhas: reincarnation system of Tibetan Buddhism. In: Collected Studies in Tibetan Buddhism and Tulku Reincarnation System. Beijing: China Tibetology Press, 2007. Pp. 420–437. (In Chin.)
16. Ishihama Y. The conceptual framework of the dGa’- ldan’s war based on the beye dailame wargi amargi babe necihiyeme toktobuha bodogob i bithe, ‘Buddhist Government’ in the TibetMongol and Manchu relationship. In: Mckey A. (ed.) Tibet and Her Neighbors: A History. London, 2003. Pp. 157–165. (In Eng.)
17. Ishihama Y. The notion of ‘Buddhist government’ (chos-srid) shared by Tibet, Mongol and Manchu in the early seventeenth century. In: Cüppers C. (ed.) The Relationships between
18. Religion and State (chos srid zung ‘brel) in Traditional Tibet. Lumbini, 2004. Pp. 15–32. (In Eng.)
19. Kitinov B. U., Lyulina A. G. The first tulku-Regents of Tibet and their role in governing the country. Oriental Studies. 2019. No. 2. Pp. 164–173. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22162/2619-0990-2019-42-2-
20. -173
21. Kolmaš J. A Chronology of the ambans of Tibet. Tibetan Studies. PIATS V. 1992. No. 2. Pp. 541–558. (In Eng.)
22. Komatsubara Y. The political relationship between Tibet and the Qing Dynasty in the latter half of the eighteenth century and the nineteenth century: an analysis how Bka’-blon was chosen.
23. Journal of Research Institute: Historical Development of the Tibetan Languages. Meiji University. 2014. Vol. 51. Pp. 201–217. (In Eng.)
24. Kychanov E. I., Melnichenko B. I. History of Tibet: since Earliest Times to the Present Days. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, 2005. 351 p. (In Russ.)
25. Kychanov E. I., Savitsky L. S. People and Gods in the Land of Snows: An Essay on the History and Culture of Tibet. Moscow: Nauka, 1975. 304 p. (In Russ.)
26. Lü Shengqi. Policy of the Qing Government in Ű-Tsang on the eve and after the civil war of 1727–1728. Minzu yanjiu. 2004. No. 1. Pp. 92– 101. (In Chin.)
27. Luobu. Qingchu Gandan pozhang zhengquan de xingzhi he diwei wenti zaitan (Ganden Phodrang in the Early Qing era: status and features revisited. Zhongguo zangxue. 2011. No. 1. Pp. 44–53. (In Chin.)
28. Lyulina A. G. Some aspects of regent titles in Tibet (XVII–XVIII). RUDN Journal of World History. 2019. No. 3. Pp. 202–211. (In Russ.)
29. Martynov A. S. Status of Tibet in the 17th–18th Centuries: A Perspective from the Traditional Chinese Political System of Political Beliefs. Moscow: Nauka, 1978. 284 p. (In Russ.)
30. Nian Gengyao. Collected Reports of General Nian Gengyao. In Manchu and Chinese Languages. Chinese Translation. Tianjin: Tianjin Chinese Classics Press, 1995. Available at: https://max.
31. book118.com/html/2018/0323/158266855.shtm (accessed: May 12, 2020) (In Chin.)
32. Pag Sam Jon Zang: History and Chronology of Tibet. R. Pubaev (foreword., transl., comments). Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1991. 264 p. (In Russ.)
33. Petech L. China and Tibet in the Early XVIIIth Century: History of the Establishment of the Chinese Protectorate in Tibet. Leiden: Brill, 1972. 309 p. (In Eng.)
34. Petech L. The Dalai-Lamas and Regents of Tibet: a chronological study. In: T’oung Pao, Second Series. Leiden: Brill, 1959. Vol. 47. Pp. 368–394. (In Eng.)
35. Rahul. R. The Government and Politics of Tibet. Delhi: Vikas Publications, 1969. 160 p. (InEng.)
36. Richardson H. Tibet and Its History. London: Oxford University Press, 1962. 308 p. (In Eng.)
37. Ruegg D. S. Mchod yon, yon mchod and mchod gnas / yon gnas: on the historiography and semantics of a Tibetan religio-social and religio-politicalconcept. In: McKay A. (ed.) The History of Tibet. London, New York: Routledge Curzon, 2003. Vol. 2. Pp. 362–372. (In Eng.)
38. Schwieger P. The Dalai Lama and the Emperor of China: A Political History of the Tibetan Institution of Reincarnation. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015. 342 p. (In Eng.)
39. Shakabpa W. D. Tibet: A Political History. New York: Potala Publications, 1984. 369 p. (In Eng.)
40. Sinha Nirmal C. Chhos Srid Gnyis Ldan. Bulletin of Tibetology. 1968. Vol. 5. No. 3. Pp. 13–27. (In Eng.)
41. THL Tibetan to English Translation Tool. Version 3.3.0. On: The Tibetan & Himalayan Library. Available at: http://www.thlib.org/reference/dictionaries/tibetan-dictionary/translate.php (accessed: April 9, 2020) (In Eng.)
42. Travers A. The Tibetan army in the Ganden Phodrang in various legal documents (17th – 20th centuries). In: Schuh D. (ed.) Secular Law and Order in the Tibetan Highland. Andiast:
43. International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies, 2015. Pp. 249–267 (In Eng.)
44. Travers A., Venturi F. Buddhism, both the means and the end of the Ganden Phodrang army (1642–1959). Cahiers d’Extrême Asie. 2018. Vol. 27. Pp. 13–22. (In Eng.)
45. Wang Lixiong. Reflections on Tibet. New Left Review. 2002. No. 14. Pp. 79–111. (In Eng.)
46. Wang Xianjun. Early Ganden Phodrang era: secular and spiritual powers united. Xizang minzu xueyuan xuebao. 1997. No. 1. Pp. 49–57. (In Chin.)
47. Ya Hanzhang. Biographies of the Dalai Lamas. Beijing: China Publ. House, 1999. 389 p. (In Chin.)
48. Yeshi Choedon. Review of socio-political development of Tibet (600–1950). Bulletin of Tibetology. Gangtok-Sikkim. 1996. No. 1.
49. Pp. 21–29. (In Eng.)
50. Zhao Xue Ni, Chang Wei Min (eds.) Administering Tibet by the Central Government, and the Reincarnation System of Living Buddhas. Collected Historical Materials of the Qing Era.
51. Beijing: China Publ. House, 1996. 546 p. (In Chin.)
52. Zhou Qiang. Policy of the Qing Dynasty in Tibet: a perspective from the institution of ambans. Chongqing gongshang daxue. 2011. No. 1. Pp. 138–141. (In Chin.)
Review
For citations:
Lyulina A. Ganden Phodrang: Government of the Dalai Lama in the 18th Century. Oriental Studies. 2020;13(3):478-492. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2020-49-3-478-492
Views:
752
Email this article 