Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

The Role of China in Vietnam’s Victory over the U. S. (1959-1975)

https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2017-31-3-2-7

Abstract

The article analyses the role of China in the Vietnam War (1959-1975) or, as it is called in Vietnam, the ‘Resistance War Against America’. There is an overall view in Russia that the role of the Soviet Union in the victory of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam over the United States was greater than that of China since the Soviet Union provided more military aid to North Vietnam than the People’s Republic of China did. The article argues that this viewpoint is not entirely correct since China’s role in the Vietnam War was primarily not military but geopolitical. Unlike the Soviet Union, to which Vietnam was not that signifi cant in terms of state and national interests, assistance to Vietnam thus being rather a consequence of not geopolitical but ideological factors, the PRC considered the territory of North Vietnam as a strategic buffer zone to prevent the enemy states from approaching China’s frontiers. This approach of the Chinese side to the Vietnamese problem was explained by the historical use of the territories of Indochina and Korea by European and Japanese colonizers as outposts on the way to China as in the case with the aggravation of the disastrous situation in China in the fi rst half of the 20th century, when the country almost became a colony. In an effort to prevent such a scenario, China fi rmly resisted the U.S.’s attempts to destroy the Communist regime in North Korea by joining the Korean War (1950-1953). For the same reason, China offi cially voiced its readiness to enter the Vietnam War in case of an expansion of the U.S. Army’s military operations to North Vietnam. Thus, China’s determination to enter the war in case of American aggression in North Vietnam kept the U.S. from this step. Since the air operations against North Vietnam were not suffi cient to defeat the latter, with military presence allowed in South Vietnam only, the United States placed themselves in a ‘military stalemate’, due to the fact under the mentioned conditions North Vietnam could choose time and place of battles. Thus, by its fi rm position regarding the expansion of military operations to North Vietnam, the PRC eventually set the territorial limits of the Vietnam War, confi ning it to the territory of South Vietnam, creating security guarantees for North Vietnam and giving the latter an opportunity to conduct offensive operations in the south which ultimately led to a victorious outcome. In this context, China’s role in the victory of Vietnam over the United States is no less important than the role of the Soviet Union.

About the Author

M. I. Garri
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Bogaturov A. D. Velikie derzhavy na Tikhom okeane: Istoriya i teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy v Vostochnoy Azii posle vtoroy mirovoy voyny (1945–1995 [Great Powers in the Pacifi c: history and theory of international relations in East Asia after World War II]. Moscow, Konvert-MONF Publ., 1997, 353 p. (In Russ.).

2. Chen Jian. China’s Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964–69. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, The China Quarterly, No. 142, 1995, pp. 356–387 (In Eng.).

3. Dobrynin A. F. Sugubo doveritel’no. Posol v Vashingtone pri shesti prezidentakh SShA. 1962-1986 gg. [Very trustingly. The Ambassador in Washington who dealt with six U.S. Presidents: 1962–1986]. Moscow, Avtor Publ., 1996, 688 p. (In Russ.).

4. Feskov V. I., GolikovV. I., Kalashnikov K. A., Slugin S. A. Vooruzhennye Sily SSSR posle Vtoroy mirovoy voyny: ot Krasnoy Armii k Sovetskoy [The USSR’s Armed Forces after World War II: from the Red Army to the Soviet one]. Tomsk; NTL 2013, 1585 p. (In Russ.).

5. Kapitsa M. S. Na raznykh parallelyakh: Zap. Diplomata [In different parallels: notes of a diplomat]. Moscow, Kn. i Biznes Publ., 1996, 558 p. (In Russ.).

6. Kissinger H. Diplomacy. New York, Simon & Schuster, 1994, 912 p. (In Eng.).

7. Li Ke, Hao Shengzhang.Wenhua dageming zhong de renmin jiefangjun [The People’s Liberation Army during the Cultural Revolution]. Beijing, CCP Historical Materials Press, 1989, 435 p. (In Chinese).

8. Logevall F. Embers of War: The Fall of an Empire and the Making of America’s Vietnam. New York, Random House, 2012, 837 p. (In Eng.).

9. Min Chen. The Strategic Triangle and Regional Confl icts. Lessons from the Indochina Wars. London, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1992, 230 p. (In Eng.).

10. Ross R. S. The Indochina tangle: China’s Vietnam policy, 1975–1979. New-York, Columbia University Press, 1988, 361 p. (In Eng.).


Review

For citations:


Garri M.I. The Role of China in Vietnam’s Victory over the U. S. (1959-1975). Oriental Studies. 2017;10(3):2-7. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2017-31-3-2-7

Views: 843


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)