Artifacts of the Modern Era from Pervomaisky-1 Site (Southern Trans-Urals): Typology, Chronology and Ethnocultural Affiliation of the Archaeological Monument Revisited

Goals. The article publishes and analyzes archaeological materials of the modern period found at Pervomaisky-1 site discovered in foothill-steppe areas of the Southern Trans-Urals (a high plateau 14 km west of the right bank of the Ural River, Abzelilovsky District, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia) in 2019. Materials. The collection includes three groups of pottery (coarse, gray-clay and red-clay), porcelain and earthenware dishes, various iron products (knives, harrow teeth, fragments of a cast-iron pot, horseshoes, etc., and no weapons traced), pieces of iron ore, animal bones, etc. Results. The source analysis of the finds and analogies from the rest of the Urals, Volga Region and Western Siberia made it possible to date the site to the mid — late 19th century and typologically classify it a short-term sedentary agricultural settlement. The paper establishes a relative synchronicity of all types of pottery (including impurities to clay dough), porcelain and earthenware, showing a high proportion of tableware and ‘tea’ utensils, which may be associated with the type of the site. The absence of large cast-iron cauldrons is defined as a marker of some agricultural (not nomadic) population. The involvement of historical data and cartographic materials deepened the analysis and made it possible to determine the site is a field camp of Cossacks from Magnitnaya stanitsa (Orenburg Cossack Host) that emerged after the establishment of Novolineiny District and the 200 km eastward transfer of Russia’s national frontier. This resulted in the territory turned into a deep rear area. So, the former fortress became a rich village where trade was developing and the population was rapidly increasing. Cartographic data show the object was located in the center of a narrow (5-6 km) arable land strip bounded by the main transport artery of the region — Orenburg Post Road — in the east, and by the border of Cossack and Bashkir lands in the west. The conducted comprehensive studies substantiate dating parameters of the archaeological complex which is of great importance for further development of modern history-related archeology in the entire Ural–West Siberian Region, and show the likely abundance of agricultural field camps across the territory that can be viewed as a separate type of archaeological objects.

Southern Urals, modern history, Orenburg border line, Cossacks, Magnitnaya stanitsa, material culture, archeology, settlement system

1. Atnagulov I. R. Kazakhs of Chelyabinsk Region: a brief ethno-cultural characteristics (to the problem of ethnic identity in the multiethnic

2. environment). Journal of Historical, Philological and Cultural Studies. 2017. No. 1 (55). Pp. 260–268. (In Russ.)

3. Dvurechensky O. V. Horseshoeing means and methods in Moscow and Tsardom of Muscovy: 13th to 19th centuries. In: Engovatova A. V. (ed.) Archaeology of Podmoskovye. Seminar Proceedings. Vol. 1. Moscow: Institute of Archaeology (RAS), 2004. Pp. 238–244. (In Russ.)

4. Fomichev A. V. Fortifications of the Novolineiny District in the east of the Orenburg Region. Theory and Practice of Archaeological

5. Research. 2018. Vol. 24. No. 4. Pp. 174–180. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.14258/tpai(2018)4(24).-15

6. Galiguzov I. F., Bakanov V. P. Magnitnaya Stanitsa: From a Cossack Settlement to the Metallurgical City. Magnitogorsk: Chelyabinsk

7. State University, 1994. 398 p. (In Russ.)

8. Goncharova G. I. Legendary roads of Abzelil. Abzelil. 2016, January 19. No. 5(8556). P. 3. (In Russ.)

9. Goncharova G. I. Name of Fatherland: Toponymy of Abzelilovsky District. Ufa: Institute of History, Language and Literature (Ufa Federal Research Centre of RAS), 2011. 184 p. (In Russ.)

10. Gudkov G. F., Gudkova Z. I. Mining and Processing Works of the Southern Urals: 18th – 19th Centuries. Essays in Local History. Vol. 1. Ufa: Bashkir Book Publ., 1985. 424 p. (In Russ.)

11. Kalugin I. Walking along Lomovka: observations of the insider. Respublika Bashkortostan. 2019, April 25. No. 48. P. 6. (In Russ.)

12. Kamaleev E. V. Archeological complex ‘Eldyakskaya Fortress’ of the first half XVIII – early XX centuries. Magistra Vitae: Electronic

13. Journal of Historical Sciences and Archeology. 2018. No. 1. Pp. 160–168. (In Russ.)

14. Kamaleev E. V., Kolonskikh A. G., Antonov I. V. Modern era ceramics of Ufa-III settlement (by the materials of M. H. Sadykova’s excavations of 1969). Manuscript. 2018. No. 12 (98). Part 1. Pp. 37–41. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.30853/manuscript.2018-12-1.7

15. Kamaleev E.V. Archaeological study in the territory of the Tabynsk Fortress of the XVIIIth–XXth centuries in Central Bashkiria. Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research. 2019. No. 1 (25). Pp. 147–156. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.14258/tpai(2019)1(25).-12.

16. Kirpichnikov A. N. Horseman’s Gear and Riding Horse Tack in Rus’: 9th – 13th Centuries AD. Ser.: Archaeology of the USSR. Vol. E1-36.

17. Moscow; Leningrad: Nauka, 1973. 140 p. (In Russ.)

18. Kirsanov R. S. Pottery from Samara areas of the Volga Region as a source in history and culture. In: Samara Region in Russian History. Jubilee Conference Proceedings. Samara: Alabin Samara Oblast Museum of Local History and Lore, 2001. Pp. 215–223. (In Russ.)

19. Kobzov V. S. The new line. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 1992. No. 1 (3). Pp. 12–26. (In Russ.)

20. Kozlov Yu. Ya. Navarinsky village. In: Kamenskaya L. V. (comp.) The Chronicler. Chelyabinsk: Tsitsero, 2016. Pp. 33–47. (In Russ.)

21. Kurmaev V. N. Salt industrialists and service class people of Tabynskoye Usolye: 1636–1740. In: Rodnov M. I. (comp., ed.) Historical Portraits. In 5 vols. Vol. 2. Ufa: Alfa-Reklama, 2019. Pp. 203–250. (In Russ.)

22. Matveev A. V., Anoshko O. M., Siryushova N. F. Olden porcelain and faience dishes from the cultural layer of Tobolsk. Vestnik Arheologii,

23. Antropologii i Etnografii. 2011. No. 2(15). Pp. 116–124. (In Russ.)

24. Melnikova O. N. Metalwork Section of the State Historical Museum: a gold miner’s gear. Museums. 2008. No. 2. Pp. 23–30. (In Russ.)

25. Nikiforov B. A. (ed.) Magnitogorsk: A Brief Encyclopedia. Magnitogorsk: Magnitogorsk Printing House, 2002. 560 p. (In Russ.)

26. Obydennova G. T., Ovsyannikov V. V. Historic and archival study of Tabynsk settlement. Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2015. Vol. 17. No. 3. Pp. 312–318. (In Russ.)

27. Obydennova G. T., Ovsyannikov V. V., Bubnel E.V., Protsenko A. S., Babin I. M. Archaeological studies of fortifications in Bashkir Cis-Urals Region. The Volga River Region Archaeology. 2016. No. 4(18). Pp. 278–295. (In Russ.)

28. Samigulov G. Kh. 17th-early 19th century earthenware from Chelyabinsk. Izvestiya Chelyabinskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN. 2003. No. 3 (20). Pp. 90–95. (In Russ.)

29. Savelev N. S., Nikolaev S. Yu. Sarmatian dagger complex from the surrounding area the village Tolbazy in the Southern Urals. The Lower Volga Archaeological Bulletin. 2020. Vol. 19. No. 1. Pp. 149–166. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15688/nav.jvolsu.2020.1.8

30. Savelyev N. S. Swords and daggers of the ScythoSarmatian period: finds from southwestern foothills of the Southern Ural (development

31. of the territory and dispersal of the nomadic population revisited). Oriental Studies. 2018. Vol. 38. No. 4. Pp. 24–31. (In Russ.) DOI:

32. 22162/2619-0990-2018-37-3-24-31

33. Zefirov V. V. Journey to Tabynsk. In: Rodnov M. I. (comp.) Southern Urals, 19th – Early 20th Centuries: Studies in Local History. Ufa, 2014. Pp. 25–37. (In Russ.)