Ceremonial Folklore of Mongolic Peoples: Functions of the Snake Revisited

Introduction. In mythologies of the world, the image of the snake ranks among the most studied characters and has various interpretations. In folklore of Turko-Mongols, it has also been a subject of multiple analyses. Still, the article makes a first attempt at revealing the image of the snake as a taboo sacred character in ritual folklore of the Mongolic peoples. Goals. The paper primarily seeks to identify functions of the snake therein, delineate the symbolic framework, reveal positive and negative connotations. Materials and Methods. The main research method employed is that of comparative analysis instrumental in examining the image of the snake as a semiotic sign. Interdisciplinary analysis of ethnographic and folklore materials, as well as comparisons to Turkic ritual actions, expand the boundaries of identifying the semantics of the image. Results. The snake in shamanic mythology of the Mongolic peoples appears in the hypostasis of the otherworldly Spirit closely associated with the shaman. Images of snakes in cave drawings, petroglyphs, shamanic ongons (sanctuaries), and costumes emphasize their sacred function. In shamanic practice, a snake image can be used as a protective element in the form of a walking-stick or whip. Symbolically, a snake in the form of straps implies a connotation of the animal’s magical abilities. The role of a mediator between worlds allows the snake simultaneously performing the function of a protective force. Functions of the snake in rites are interchangeable and complement each other. Shamanic texts of the Mongolic peoples consistently mention the main function of the snake is that of a carrier between worlds, which is closely related to its transforming abilities. Conclusions. The study resumes the snake in shamanic ritual actions of the Mongolic peoples — with positive connotations — functions as an assistant, intermediary, carrier, and envoy from another world that provides communication between realms. It also reveals patterns of transcoding the snake image in different semiotic systems, interconnectedness and interchangeability of sacral reptile functions.

sacral function, ritual, shamanism, defender, intermediary, mediator, carrier

1. Badmaev A. A. The image of the snake in Buryat traditional culture. In: Sagalaev K. A. (comp.), Derevyanko A. P., Elert A. Kh. (eds.) The

2. Mirror of Cultures. Commemorating Prof. A. Sagalaev. K. Sagalaev (foreword). Novosibirsk: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography

3. (Siberian Branch of RAS), 2019. Pp. 118–126. (In Russ.)

4. Basangova T. G. Animals in Kalmyk Folklore. Elista: Kalmyk State University, 2019. 192 p. (In Russ.)

5. Burnakov V. A. ‘Snake motives’ in Khakas folklore. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology. 2020. No. 1(27). Pp. 90–100. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2020-1-90-100

6. Dampilova L. S. Mythological semantics of snakes (mogoy), water spirits (luz) and dragon (luu) in the folklore of the Mongolian peoples.

7. Traditional Culture. 2017. No. 4. Pp. 182–189. (In Russ.)

8. Khangalov M. N. Collected Works. In 3 vols. Vol. III. Ulan-Ude: Respublikanskaya Tipografiya, 2004. 312 p. (In Russ.)

9. Manzhigeev I. A. Buryat Shamanic and PreShamanic Terms. Moscow: Nauka, 1978. 125 p. (In Russ.)

10. Nanzatov B. Z., Sodnompilova M. M. Baitog: ‘Baruun buurahuud’. Investigation of local group of Buryats. In: Turov M. G., Kononova T. N.

11. (eds.) Peoples and Cultures of Siberia. Interaction as a Formation and Development Factor. Irkutsk: Irkutsk Interregional Institute of Social

12. Sciences, 2005. Vol. 4. Pp. 47–54. (In Russ.)

13. Okladnikov A. P. Petroglyphs of Central Asia. Leningrad: Nauka, 1980. 272 p. (In Russ.)

14. Potanin G. N. Essays on Northwestern Mongolia. Vol. IV: Ethnographic Materials. St. Petersburg: Kirschbaum, 1883. 1026 p. (In Russ.)

15. Propp V. Ya. Historical Roots of the Wonder Tale. Moscow: Labirint, 2009. 332 p. (In Russ.)

16. Rinchen B. Mongolian Shamans: Invocation Texts. Ulaanbaatar: Udam Soel, 2013. 300 p. (In Mong.)

17. Sanzheev G. D. The Darkhad: Language and Folklore. Leningrad: USSR Academy of Sciences, 1931. 12 p. (In Russ.)

18. Tsivyan T. V. Snake = bird: the equivalence interpreted. In: Putilov B. N. (ed.) Folklore and Ethnography. At the Ethnographic Origins of

19. Folklore Plots and Images. Leningrad: Nauka, 1984. Pp. 47–57. (In Russ.)

20. Wulf Ch. Anthropology. Philosophy, History, Culture. G. Khaydarova (transl.). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press, 2008. 280 p.

21. (In Russ.)

22. Zatoplyaev N. I. Zuruktun-ongon. In: Non-Russian Populations of Eastern Siberia and Their Shamanic Beliefs. Collected Papers. Irkutsk:

23. K. Vitkovskaya, 1890. Pp. 1–10. (In Russ.)