‘Kalmyk Shapka Bolshaya’: An Oirat Helmet from the Moscow Kremlin Museums Collection

Introduction. The article explores a helmet of the last quarter of the 17th century stored in the Moscow Kremlin Museums collection and mentioned in the Armory Chamber’s documents as ‘Kalmyk shapka bolshaya’ (Russ. ‘big Kalmyk cap’; current inventory no. OР-2059). Previously, the helmet attracted the attention of artists and historians but has never been investigated in an independent scholarly study. Goals. The work seeks to describe the construction and design of the helmet, clarify the dating and attribution, reconstruct its potential original appearance. Results. Analysis of the materials used classifies the helmet as an iron object, that of the design of the crown refers it to riveted ones, and the dome crown shape clusters the item with spherocylindrical helmets. The paper specifies that the helmet is integral to the Oirat spherocylindrical helmet group (‘jug-shaped’, ‘vase-shaped’) of the Late Middle Ages and early Modern Period. Supposedly, the craftsmen to have made such helmets were inspired by Buddhist stupas (Kalm. suburgan). The construction and design features (including Buddhist symbols on the crown), as well as the insight into official documents of the Kremlin Armory make it possible to suggest that the ‘Big Kalmyk Cap’ was forged by Oirat or Southern Siberian gunsmiths for a wealthy Oirat Buddhist warrior in the 1610s – early 1680s (the earlier date is included as one to mark the beginning of the wide spread of Buddhism among Oirats). The helmet was transferred to the Armory Chamber in the mid-to-late 17th century, however no later than 1682 when it was first mentioned in official Russian state papers. In 1683–1687, the helmet was equipped with a comforter and an aventail (presumably a Central Asian-type one). Subsequently, it became a subject of restoration. In the late 19th – early 20th century at the earliest, a ringed aventail was attached to it. The comprehensive analysis of the sources available made it possible to reconstruct the likely initial appearance of the helmet. Conclusions. The ‘Big Kalmyk Cap’ is a striking sample of 17th-century Oirat helmets. It can be used as a reference benchmark in the dating and attribution of Central Asian helmets of the specified period. Culturally, the ‘Big Kalmyk Cap’ can be clustered with the most important historical relics of the ethnos.

1. Akhmetzhan K. S. Ethnography of Traditional Kazakh Weaponry. Almaty: Almatykitap, 2007. 216 p. (In Russ.)

2. Anisimova M. A. Military-Historical Museum of Artillery, Engineer and Signal Corps: Weapons of the East, 15th – Mid-20th Centuries. St. Petersburg: Atlant, 2013. 527 p. (In Russ.)

3. Astakhov A. Yu. (comp.) Body Armor, Weapons, Carriages, and Horse Tack. Drawings of F. Solntsev. St. Petersburg: Belyi Gorod, 2015. 146 p. (In Russ.)

4. Beer R. The Handbook of Tibetan Buddhist Symbols. Moscow: Orientaliya, 2013. 336 p. (In Russ.)

5. Bobrov L. A. ‘A flock of crows’ over the Crimea. Tatar and Kalmyk confrontation in the northern Black Sea steppes (September 1661 – January 1663). Medieval Turkic-Tatar States. 2014. Vol. 6. Pp. 239–249. (In Russ.)

6. Bobrov L. A. ‘The Tatar’ helmet with combined camail (protection of a neck and a throat) from the Tobolsk State Historical-Architectural Museum-Reserve. Novosibirsk State University Bulletin. Series: History and Philology. 2009. Vol. 8. No. 3. Pp. 251–254. (In Russ.)

7. Bobrov L. A., Khudyakov Yu. S. Nomads of Central Asia and Southern Siberia in the Late Medieval and Modern Ages (15th – Mid-18th Centuries): Weaponry and Tactics. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University, 2008. 770 p. (In Russ.)

8. Bobrov L. A., Khudyakov Yu. S. Nomads of Mongolia and Kalmykia: military headgears, mid-16th – early 18th centuries. In: Soyonov V. I. (ed.) Antiquities of the Altai. Vol. 11. Gorno-Altaysk: Gorno-Altaysk State University; Surazakov Institute for Altaic Studies, 2003. Pp. 138–155. (In Russ.)

9. Bobrov L. A., Kushkumbayev A. K., Salnikov A. V. Oirat helmet of the XVII – mid-XVIII centuries from the Akmola Regional History Museum. Bylye Gody. 2018. Vol. 48. No 2. Pp. 443–455. (In Eng.)

10. Bobrov L. A., Orlenko S. P. ‘Kalmyk Caps’ of the Kremlin Armoury. Oriental Studies. 2020. No. 2. Pp. 278–304. (In Russ.)

11. Bobrov L. A., Orlenko S. P. A late 16th to early 17th century Mongolian ceremonial helmet from the Moscow Kremlin Armoury. Archaeology, Ethnography and Anthropology of Eurasia. 2017. No. 4. Pp. 127–135. (In Russ.)

12. Bobrov L. A., Ozheredov Yu. I. Late medieval ‘robe’-type body armor of a Buddhist warrior. In: Ozheredov Yu. I. (ed.) Ancient, Medieval and Modern North and Central Asia: Materials and Studies. Tomsk: Tomsk State University, 2010. Vol. III. Is. 1. Pp. 7–64. (In Russ.)

13. Bobrov L. A., Ryumshin M. A. ‘… And against them, they could not withstand anywhere and they are not able to fight against them’. Arms and military tactical aspect of the Kalmyk-Nogai and Kalmyk-Tatar wars during the first half – middle of the 17th century. Golden Horde Civilization. 2015. Vol. 8. Pp. 357–378. (In Russ.)

14. Bobrov L. A., Zaytsev V. P., Orlenko S. P. Central Asian ‘bulat helmet’ of the end of the 16th – the first third of the 17th century from among the gifts of Erdeni Dai mergen Nangso. Archaeology of the Eurasian Steppes. 2017. No. 5. Pp. 216–230. (In Russ.)

15. Bobrov L. A., Zaytsev V. P., Orlenko S. P., Salnikov A. V. The late Jurchen (early Manchu) helmet of the second half of the 1610s to the mid-1630s from the collection of the Armoury Chamber of the Moscow Kremlin. Bylye Gody. 2017. Vol. 46. No. 4. Pp. 1140–1173. (In Eng.)

16. Bobrov L., Obraztsov V., Salnikov A. Oirat helmet of the XVII – mid-XVIII centuries from the State Hermitage Museum. Bylye Gody. 2019. Vol. 51. No. 1. Pp. 5–19. (In Eng.)

17. Boeheim W. An Encyclopedia of Weapons. St. Petersburg: Orkestr, 1995. 576 p. (In Russ.)

18. Elikhina Yu. I. (ed.) The Shrines of Mercy: Tibetan Buddhist Art. Exhibition Catalogue. St. Petersburg: State Hermitage Museum, 2015. 512 p. (In Russ.)

19. Gorelik M. Oriental armour of the Near and Middle East from the eighth to the fifteenth centuries as shown in works of art. In: Elgood R. (ed.) Islamic Arms and Armour. London, 1979. Pp. 38–41. (In Eng.)

20. Gorelik M. V. Armies of 10th-14th Century Mongols (Tatars): Art of War, Ammunition, Weaponry. Moscow: Vostochnyi Gorizont, 2002. 84 p. (In Russ.)

21. Gorelik M. V. Early Mongolian body armor: 9th – mid-14th centuries. In: Derevyanko A. P., Natsagdorj Sh. (eds.) Archaeology, Ethnography, and Anthropology of Mongolia. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1987. Pp. 163– 208. (In Russ.)

22. Gorelik M. V. Medieval Mongolian body armor. In: The Third International Congress of Mongolists. Proceedings. Ulaanbaatar, 1979. Pp. 76–97. (In Russ.)

23. Gorelik M. V. Mongol (Tatar) defensive weapons: mid-14th – early 15th centuries. In: Rybakov B. A. (ed.) The Battle of Kulikovo in Our National History and Culture. Moscow: Moscow State University, 1983. Pp. 244–269. (In Russ.)

24. Khizhnyak O. S. The Stupa: Beginnings of the Shaping of a Buddhist Cult. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University, 2008. 272 p. (In Russ.)

25. Khudyakov Yu. S., Bobrov L. A., Filippovich Yu. A. Body armor of late medieval Central Asian warriors: experimental reconstruction and functional analysis. Novosibirsk State University Bulletin. Series: History and Philology. 2005. Vol. 4. No. 5. Pp. 95–103. (In Russ.)

26. Kravtsova M. E. World Artistic Culture: A History of China’s Arts. St. Petersburg: Lan, TPIADA, 2004. 960 p. (In Russ.)

27. LaRocca D. J. An approach to the study of arms and armour from Tibet. Royal Armouries Yearbook. 1999. Vol. 4. Pp. 113–132. (In Eng.)

28. LaRocca D. J. Warriors of the Himalayas. Rediscovering the Arms and Armor of Tibet. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art; New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 2006. 307 p. (In Eng.)

29. Lenz E. Count S. Sheremetev’s Collection of Weapons: Inventory Catalogue. St. Petersburg, 1895. 223 p. (In Russ.)

30. Martyushov R. A., Shirin Y. V. Difficulties interpreting of written and archaeological ­sources of information of ferrous metallurgy of the Kuznetsk Tatars. Bylye Gody. 2018. Vol. 49. No. 3. Pp. 915– 930. (In Eng.)

31. Samigulov G. Kh. The Seydyashevs and Kulmametevs — reconstruction attempts. In: Russia’s Annexation of Siberia. New Data. Tyumen: Tyumen State University, 2014. Pp. 162–166. (In Russ.)

32. Samigulov G. Kh., Tychinskikh Z. A. New sources on the history of Murzas Kulmametev. Vestnik Arheologii, Antropologii i Etnografii. 2018. No. 1 (40). Pp. 99–107. (In Russ.)

33. Shindler O. V. On the question of the legitimacy of using the term ‘shishak’ in the 16th century, its origin and the debunking of one outdated myth. History of Military Affairs: Research and Sources. Posted on September 24, 2018. Vol. X. Pp. 163–187. Available at: http://www.milhist.info/2018/09/24/schindler_6 (accessed: February 16, 2020). (In Russ.)

34. Shindler O. V. Russian helmets of the 16th century. History of Military Affairs: Research and Sources. Posted on May 10, 2016. Vol. VIII. Pp. 167–219. Available at: http://www.milhist.info/2016/05/10/schindler_3 (accessed: May 10, 2016). (In Russ.)

35. Veltman A. F. The Kremlin Armoury (Moscow). 2nd ed., rev. Moscow: Bakhmetev, 1860. 288 p. (In Russ.)

36. Veltman A. F. The Kremlin Armoury (Moscow). Moscow: I. Stepanov, 1844. 172, 74, VIII p., 33 p. (In Russ.)

37. Vodyasov E. V. Kondoma Tatars and the bloomery process (source: the Great Northern Expedition). Bylye Gody. 2016. Vol. 40. No. 2. Pp. 335–344. (In Eng.)

38. Zlatkin I. Ya. History of the Dzungar Khanate: 1635–1758. Moscow: Nauka, 1983. 332 p. (In Russ.)