Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

The Verb болох / болохо / болха / болх ‘Become, Make; Be’ in Mongolic Languages: Some Ways of Grammaticalization Revisited

https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2020-52-6-1677-1691

Abstract

Introduction. The article discusses some ways of grammaticalization of the verb bolokh / bolokho / bolha / bolh ‘become, make; be’ in Mongolic languages (Mongolian, Buryat, Oirat and Kalmyk). This verb acts as an auxiliary component in composite predicates, and also functions in the system of service parts of speech to form postpositions and conjunctions. The phenomenon of grammaticalization reflects the dynamics of linguistic processes occurring at the junction of the significant and official functioning of words. The results of studying various lexical units as sources of grammatical indicators significantly expand the understanding of the functioning of grammatical systems in a language. Goals. The research aims at describing the ways of grammaticalization of verbs in Mongolic languages through the example of the verb bolokh / bolokho / bolha / bolh ‘become, make; be’. Materials. The paper analyzes literary, folklore, journalistic texts extracted from the corpora of the examined national languages (Mongolian, Buryat and Kalmyk), as well as data from respective dictionaries. Results. The study shows that the verb bolokh / bolokho / bolha / bolh ‘become, make; be’ is undergoing various changes. In the formation of compound nominal and verbal predicates, it is used as an auxiliary verb. As a result of grammaticalization, there are indicators of the categories of time and modality, classes of words that denote various semantic concepts. The verb can express various modal meanings (assumption, obligation, intention, opportunity, prohibition, etc.). As a result of grammaticalization, modal words derived from the given verb are quite often in Mongolic languages. The adverbial and participial forms of this verb are actively used as official words. The analysis reveals that the meanings of most postpositions and conjunctions in Mongolic languages coincide. But there are also those characteristic only of certain languages. Some words lose their ancient primordial meanings, while others acquire additional ones that rest on their main seme.

About the Authors

Liudmila A. Lidzhieva
Gorodovikov Kalmyk State University (11, Pushkin St., Elista 358000, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (Philology), Associate Professor



Tsolmon Shirnen
Mongolian State University of Education (8, Baga Toyruu-14, Ulaanbaatar 210648, Mongolia)
Mongolia

Cand. Sc. (Philology), Head of Department



Nadezhda B. Badmatsyrenova
Banzarov Buryat State University (24A, Smolin St., Ulan-Ude 670000, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (Philology), Associate Professor



References

1. Authors’ Field Data.

2. Buryat National Corpus. Available at: http://web-corpora.net/BuryatCorpus (accessed: October 10, 2020). (In Bur.)

3. Kalmyk National Corpus. Available at: http://web-corpora.net/KalmykCorpus. (accessed: October 10, 2020). (In Kalm.)

4. Mongolian National Corpus. Available at: http://web-corpora.net/MongolianCorpus. (accessed: October 10, 2020). (In Kalm.)

5. National Corpus of the Kalmyk Language. Available at: http://kalmcorpora.ru (accessed: October 10, 2020). (In Kalm.)

6. Altan Tobči. H.-P. Vietze, G. Lubsang (text, index). Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, 1992. 278 p. (In Mong.)

7. Khabunova E. E. (comp.) Folktales of Eurasia: The Stepmother and the Stepdaughter. Elista: Dzhangar, 2018. 200 p. (In Russ.)

8. Kozin S. A. The Secret History: A Mongolian Chronicle of 1240 Titled ‘Mongγol-un niγuča tobčiγan. Yuáncháo Mìshǐ’. Moscow, Leningrad: USSR Academy of Sciences, 1941. 620 p. (In Russ.)

9. Pyurbeev G. Ts., Luvsandendev A., Tsedendamba Ts. (eds.) Unabridged Academic Mongolian-Russian Dictionary. In 4 vols. Vol. 1: A–Г. Moscow: Academia, 2001. 520 p. (In Mong. and Russ.)

10. Pyurbeev G. Ts., Luvsandendev A., Tsedendamba Ts. (eds.) Unabridged Academic Mongolian-Russian Dictionary. In 4 vols. Vol. 2: Д–O. Moscow: Academia, 2001. 536 p. (In Mong. and Russ.)

11. Pyurbeev G. Ts., Luvsandendev A., Tsedendamba Ts. (eds.) Unabridged Academic Mongolian-Russian Dictionary. In 4 vols. Vol. 3: Ө–Ф. Moscow: Academia, 2001. 440 p. (In Mong. and Russ.)

12. Pyurbeev G. Ts., Luvsandendev A., Tsedendamba Ts. (eds.) Unabridged Academic Mongolian-Russian Dictionary. In 4 vols. Vol. 4: Х–Я. Moscow: Academia, 2002. 532 p. (In Mong. and Russ.)

13. Shagdarov L. D., Cheremisov K. M. Buryat-Russian Dictionary. In 2 vols. Vol. 1: A–Н. Ulan-Ude: Respublikanskaya Tipografiya, 2010. 636 p. (In Bur. and Russ.)

14. Shagdarov L. D., Cheremisov K. M. Buryat-Russian Dictionary. In 2 vols. Vol. 2: O–Я. Ulan-Ude: Respublikanskaya Tipografiya, 2010. 708 p. (In Bur. and Russ.)

15. Todaeva B. Kh. Dictionary of Xinjiang Oirat. Elista: Kalmyk Book Publ., 2001. 493 p. (In Kalm. and Russ.)

16. Dambueva P. P. Category of Modality in Modern Buryat. Ulan-Ude: Buryat State University, 2000. 252 p. (In Russ.)

17. Doraeva R. P. Grammatical mood. In: Kalmyk Grammar. Elista: Kalmyk Book Publ., 1983. Pp. 205–234. (In Russ.)

18. Guzev V. G. Essays on the Theory of Turkic Inflection: Name (A Case Study of Old Anatolian Turkish). Leningrad: Leningrad State University, 1987. 144 p. (In Russ.)

19. Kharchevnikova R. P. System of Grammatical Mood in Modern Kalmyk. Elista: Kalmyk State University, 1995. 94 p. (In Russ.)

20. Lidzhieva L. A. Reflection of the process of grammaticalization in forming of postpositions in Mongolian languages. Buryat State University Bulletin. 2014. No. 10 (3). Pp. 53–58. (In Russ.)

21. Maysak T. A. Constructs with Verbs of Movement and Position: Typology of Grammaticalization. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis. Moscow, 2002. 287 p. (In Russ.)

22. Maysak T. A. Constructs with Verbs of Movement and Position: Typology of Grammaticalization. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskikh Kultur, 2005. 480 p. (In Russ.)

23. Monraev M. U. Postpositions. In: Kalmyk Grammar. Phonetics and Morphology. Elista: Kalmyk Book Publ., 1983. Pp. 276–283. (In Russ.)

24. Pyurbeev G. Ts. Kalmyk Grammar: Syntax. Elista: Kalmyk Humanities Research Institute (RAS), 2010. 299 p. (In Russ.)

25. Pyurbeev G. Ts. Khalkha Jirum: A 17th-Century Monument of Mongolian Law. Vocabulary. Grammar. Transliteration. Moscow, Kaluga: Eidos, 2012. 270 p. (In Russ. and Mong.)

26. Sanzheev G. D. Comparative Grammar of Mongolic Languages: Verb. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, 1963. 267 p. (In Russ.)

27. Sanzheev G. D., Orlovskaya M. N., Shevernina Z. V. Etymological Dictionary of Mongolic Languages. In 3 vols. Vol. I: A ― E. G. Sanzheev, L. Kontsevich, V. Rassadin, Ya. Leman (eds.). Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies (RAS), 2015. 224 p. (In Russ.)

28. Sevortyan E. V. Etymological Dictionary of Turkic Languages: Common and Intra-Turkic Stems Beginning with the Letter ‘B’. Moscow: Nauka, 1978. 352 p. (In Turk. and Russ.)

29. Shagdarov L. D. The Buryat Language: Issues of a New Academic Grammar (Noun, Adjective, Adverb, Postpositions, Modal Lexemes, Words of the Category of State, and Descriptive Ones). Ulan-Ude: Buryat Scientific Center (Sib. Branch of RAS), 2013. 192 p. (In Russ.)

30. Todaeva B. Kh. Grammar of Modern Mongolian: Phonetics and Morphology. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences, 1951. 196 p. (In Russ.)

31. Tsydypov Ts.-Zh. Ts. Buryat Analytical Constructs. Ulan-Ude: Buryat Book Publ., 1972. 299 p. (In Russ.)

32. Yartseva V. N. (ed.) Encyclopedic Dictionary of Linguistics. Moscow: Sovetskaya Entsiklo­pediya, 1990. 685 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Lidzhieva L.A., Shirnen Ts., Badmatsyrenova N.B. The Verb болох / болохо / болха / болх ‘Become, Make; Be’ in Mongolic Languages: Some Ways of Grammaticalization Revisited. Oriental Studies. 2020;13(6):1677-1691. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2020-52-6-1677-1691

Views: 604


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)