he Functioning of the Verbal Hesitation Marker Ni / Nei ‘Whatchamacallit’ in Oral Monologues of Bashkirs: A Case Study of Bashkir Dialectal Texts

The article studies the functioning of the verbal hesitation marker ni / nei ‘whatchamacallit’ in Bashkir spontaneous speech. Goals. The research aims to analyze and identify the main functions of the investigated hesitation marker in the process of organizing spontaneous discourse. Materials and Methods. The study explores dialectal materials included in the text database of the dialectological cluster within the Digital Corpus (lit. ‘Machine Fund’) of the Bashkir Language (https://mfbl2.ru). The total of the studied materials is 209 dialectal texts. The database contains 718 tokens of the investigated hesitation marker. The selection of examples for analysis was carried out through the method of continuous sampling. The employed research methods are those of discourse and contextual analysis, as well as the statistical method. Results. Asemantization of the basic meaning of the interrogative pronoun in spontaneous speech results in the emergence of a pragmatic meaning, and the lexeme begins to function as a filler for hesitational pauses. The multifunctionality of this hesitation marker is confirmed by numerous examples of its use. In spontaneous speech, the verbal hesitation marker performs the hesitative (fills in pauses in speech production), discursive (as a means to organize speech) and search (temporary substitutions in search for a speech unit corresponding to the original intention) functions. The uniqueness of this hesitation marker is that in spontaneous speech it can replace any notional word that one has ‘on the tip of the tongue’ and, thus, help avoid the occurrence of long pauses or interruptions in utterances. The analysis of materials reveals the main methods of correcting problem areas in speech production. Being a characteristic attribute of spontaneous speech, the lexemes can also be stylistically used in fiction works as instruments to reveal the author’s intention — depicting a psychological portrait of the character through the latter’s speech features. 

1. Digital Corpus of the Bashkir Language. Available at: http://mfbl2.ru (accessed: November 15, 2020). (In Bash.)

2. Belitskaya A. A. On the role of hesitation pauses in spontaneous speech. Philology and Literature. Electronic scientific and practical journal. 2014. No. 2. Available at: http://philology.snauka.ru/2014/02/697 (accessed: October 11, 2020). (In Russ.)

3. Bogdanova-Beglaryan N. V. Pragmatic items in everyday speech: definition of the concept and general typology. Perm University Herald. 2014. No. 3(27). Pp. 7–20. (In Russ.)

4. Bogdanova-Beglaryan N. V. Verbal hesitatives of Russian oral speech: implementation of the search function and the ‘search reflex’. In: Language and Method. Research on the Russian Language in the 21st Century. Conference Proceedings. Krakow: Jagiellonian University Press, 2015. Pp. 345–354. (In Russ.)

5. Buskunbaeva L. A. Hezitational pause as a metacommunication marker in the Bashkir language (based on the dialectal corpus of the Bashkir language). In: The Second International Nevruz Summit. Proceedings. Antalya: Iksad Yayinevi, 2019. Pp. 70–74. (In Russ.)

6. Buskunbaeva L. A., Sirazitdinov Z. A. Creating the audio corpus of the eastern dialect of the Bashkir language: problems and prospects. Izvestiya Ufimskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN. 2020. No. 2. Pp. 90–97. (In Russ.)

7. Buskunbaeva L. A., Sirazitdinov Z. A. On the problems of creating a corpus of the Bashkir language. In: Contemporary Kazakh Linguistics. Topical Issues of Applied Linguistics. Jubilee Conference Proceedings. Almaty: Baytursynov Institute of Linguistics, 2012. Pp. 54–58. (In Russ.)

8. Cardwell M. The Dictionary of Psychology. K. Tkachenko (transl.). Moscow: FAIR-PRESS, 2000. 448 p. (In Russ.)

9. Fakova R. A., Perepelitsina Yu. R. Filler words in modern Russian. Evraziyskiy nauchnyy zhurnal. 2015. No. 12. Pp. 651–654. (In Russ.)

10. Goldman-Eisler F. Sequential temporal patterns and cognitive processes in speech. Language and Speech. 1967. Vol. l. Pp. 122–132. (In Eng.)

11. Karimova R. N., Sirazitdinov Z. A. Compiling a multivolume academic dictionary of the Bashkir language: practical application of materials from the (Bashkir) Prose Corpus. In: Akhnaf Kharisov and Topical Issues of Bashkir Philology. Jubilee Conference Proceedings. Ufa: Institute of History, Language and Literature (Ufa Scientific Centre of RAS), 2014. Pp. 163–166. (In Russ.)

12. Karimova R. N., Sirazitdinov Z. A., Buskunbaeva L. A. Digital Corpus of the Bashkir Language: text database (dialectological cluster) revisited. In: Topical Issues of Russia’s Dialectal Studies. Conference Proceedings. Ufa: Institute of History, Language and Literature (Ufa Scientific Centre of RAS), 2010. Pp. 186–188. (In Russ.)

13. Khammatov Ya. Gold is Collected Meticulously. Ufa: Bashkir Book Publ., 1966. 328 p. (In Bash.)

14. Khisamitdinova F. G. (ed.) Academic Dictionary of the Bashkir Language. In 10 vols. Vol. VI. Ufa: Kitap, 2014. 944 p. (In Bash. and Russ.)

15. Korotaev N. A. Speech pauses and speech planning system. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/38592634/ (accessed: November 15, 2020). (In Russ.)

16. Ladygin Yu. A. The problem of influence of the author’s discourse on the reader in the novel. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. 2012. No. 2 (18). Pp. 134–140. (In Russ.)

17. Laurinavichyute A. K., Fedorova O. V. Effects of hesitation in speech on syntactic structure in comprehension: evidence from Russian speakers. In: Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Technologies. Dialogue. Conference Proceedings. Vol. 9. No. 16. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities, 2010. Pp. 279–284. (In Russ.)

18. Levontina I., Shmelev A. False emptiness: Are so called ‘parasitical words’ really semantically void? Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/author/I.-Levontina/65991029 (accessed: October 20, 2020). (In Eng.)

19. Malov E. M., Gorbova E. V. Discursive words in colloquial Russian: analyzing spontaneous colloquial speech. In: Analysis of Colloquial Russian. Seminar Proceedings. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation (RAS), 2007. Pp. 31–37. (In Russ.)

20. Meshcheryakov B. G., Zinchenko V. P. (eds.) The Unabridged Dictionary of Psychology. 4th ed., suppl. Moscow: AST; St. Petersburg: Praym-Evroznak, 2009. 811 p. (In Russ.)

21. Nikolaeva T. M. A new trend in the research of spontaneous speech: the so called speech hesitations revisited. Voprosy Jazykoznanija. 1970. No. 3. Pp. 117–123. (In Russ.)

22. Podlesskaya V. I. ‘They shot him dead, oh, no, they knifed him dead with a saber’: self-repairs in oral stories. In: Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Technologies. Dialogue. Conference Proceedings. Vol. 13 (20). Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities, 2014. Pp. 526–540. (In Russ.)

23. Podlesskaya V. I. Syntax and prosody of self-repairs: a corpus approach. In: Corpus Linguistics — 2013. Conference Proceedings. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University, 2013. Pp. 396–404. (In Russ.)

24. Podlesskaya V. I., Khurshudyan V. G. Hesitation markers in spontaneous discourse: some evidence from Armenian. In: Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Technologies. Dialogue 2006. Conference Proceedings. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities, 2006. Pp. 429–440. (In Russ.)

25. Podlesskaya V. I., Kibrik A. A. Correction of failures in oral spontaneous speech: experience of corpus research. In: Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Technologies. Dialogue. Conference Proceedings. Moscow, 2005. Available at: http://www.dialog-21.ru/media/2416/podlesskaya-kibrik.pdf (accessed: October 16, 2020). (In Russ.)

26. Podlesskaya V. I., Kibrik A. A. Self-repairs and other speech failures as data annotation objects in oral corpuses. Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 2007. Vol. 2. No. 23. Pp. 2–23. (In Russ.)

27. Racheva A. A. Deictic Units with Spatial Semantics in Oral Discourse: Marking Conversational Processes. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis. Kemerovo, 2018. 204 p. (In Russ.)

28. Rozental D. E., Telenkova M. A. The Reference Dictionary of Linguistic Terms. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1976. 543 p. Available at: http://rus-yaz.niv.ru/doc/linguistic-terms/fc/slovar-209-2.htm#zag-1454 (accessed: November 27, 2020). (In Russ.)

29. Russian Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Humanities. Moscow: VLADOS; St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University (Faculty of Philology), 2002. Vol. 2. Available at: http://niv.ru/doc/dictionary/russian-humanitarian/index.htm (accessed: November 18, 2020). (In Russ.)

30. Ryskuzhina R. The reporting and election meeting. Available at: https://tamasha-rb.rbsmi.ru/articles/satira-m-yumor/satira-m-yumor/?sphrase_id=47775 (accessed: November 19, 2020). (In Bash.)

31. Sirazitdinov Z. A., Buskunbaeva L. A., Karimova R. N. Dialectological base of the Digital Corpus of the Bashkir language as a tool for research Bashkir dialect continuum. Oriental Studies. 2016. No. 9(1). Pp. 212–219. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22162/2075-7794-2016-23-1-212-219

32. Sirotinina O. B. Contemporary Colloquial Speech and Its Peculiarities. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1974. 144 p. (In Russ.)

33. Verkhodanova V. O., Karpov A. A. Speech disfluencies modelling in automatic speech recognition systems. Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. No. 363. Pp. 10–15. (In Russ.)

34. Viktorova E. Yu. Auxiliary System of Discourse. Saratov: Nauka, 2015. 404 p. (In Russ.)

35. Yakovleva E. B. Speech Hesitation: Formal and Functional Aspects: An Analytical Review. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences (RAS), 2016. 73 p. (In Russ.)

36. Yakupova G. Women: A Trilogy. Book 3: Small Universe – Big Universe. Ufa: Kitap, 2013. 728 p. (In Bash.)

37. Zaynullina G. D. Russian-Bashkir Dictionary of Linguistic Terms. Ufa: Bashkir State University, 2002. 280 p. (In Russ. and Bash.)

38. Zemskaya E. A., Kitaygorodskaya M. V., Shiryaev E. N. Russian Conversational Speech: General Issues, Word Formation, Syntax. Moscow: Nauka, 1981. 275 p. (In Russ.)