Models of Elementary Simple Sentences with the Structure (S) + NAcc + VF in Bashkir Generalized Personal Proverbs
https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2021-56-4-834-846
Abstract
Introduction. Modern philological science associates with structural-semantic approaches to the study of linguistic phenomena. But so far, the structural-semantic study of Bashkir proverbs based on the entire corpus, as well as the identification of the final types of models has not been undertaken. The purpose of this article is to study models of elementary simple sentences of the structural type (S) + NAcc + VF. This type, with an object in the accusative case, is the most frequent one; the accusative in the Bashkir language is a grammatical means of formalizing the actant as an object of direct immediate impact. Data and methods. Generalized personal proverbs selected from the folklore database of the Machine Corpus of the Bashkir language were used as the research material. The proverb corpus contains 354 proverbial expressions representing generalized personal sentences, i.e., 73.5 percent of the total number of one-part verb proverbs. The research method consisted in isolating an elementary simple sentence, which includes a predicate and obligatory actants; the author draws here on the work of Novosibirsk syntax students. The syntactic model is understood as the content plane of an elementary simple sentence, which is determined by its proposition. The structural diagram represents the expression plane of an elementary simple sentence. At this stage, the study focuses on proverbs with simple finite verbs. Results. The study shows that 8 models are implemented within the structural scheme (S) + NAcc + VF. Of these the model of physical impact on the object [(S) + NPatAcc + VActf] is the most frequent one, 62 proverbial expressions have been identified for this model. Each model of the structure in question is characterized by its inherent set of semantic roles and typical meaning, while in most cases, object actants act in the form of a certain accusative. Conclusions. The syntactic features characteristic of the construction of this type of proverbial expressions are likely to occur in modern literary language and colloquial speech with a more complex syntactic structure.
Keywords
About the Author
Zinnur A. SirazitdinovRussian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Philology), Leading Research Associate
References
1. Abdullina G. R. Bashkir Inflection. Ufa: Gilem, 2008. 124 p. (In Russ.)
2. Akhmatov I. Kh. Structural and Semantic Sentence Patterns in Modern Karachay-Balkar. Nalchik: Elbrus, 1983. 360 p. (In Russ.)
3. Aleksanova S. A. Adverbial distributors in simple sentence structure. The Bulletin of the Adyghe State University, the Series ‘Philology and the Arts’. 2009. No. 1. Pp. 93–98. (In Russ.)
4. Appoev A. K. Semantic structure paremiches statements in Karachay-Balkar language. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University. 2014. No. 2. Pp. 281–290. (In Russ.)
5. Bayzhanova N. R. Elementary Simple Sentence Patterns in Altaian: The Structural Scheme ESS N1-Vf. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2004. 176 p. (In Russ.)
6. Beloshapkova V. A. Minimal structural schemes of Russian sentence. Russkiy yazyk za rubezhom. 1978. No. 5. Pp. 55–59. (In Russ.)
7. Biner I. Proverbs and Sayings in Bashkir and Turkish: Lexical and Stylistic Features Reviewed. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Ufa, 2004. 28 p. (In Russ.)
8. Bolshakova E. I., Vorontsov K. V., Efremova N. E., Klyshinsky E. S., Lukashevich N. V., Sapin A. S. Automated Natural Language Processing and Data Analysis. Moscow: HSE University, 2017. 269 p. (In Russ.)
9. Buskunbaeva L. A., Sirazitdinov Z. A. Shamsutdinova G. G. Types of one-member sentences in proverbial fund of the Bashkir language (on materials of folk corpora). Oriental Studies. 2018. No. 6 (40). Pp. 120–129. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22162/261909902018406120129
10. Chebyshev F. A. Semantics of Expectation and Means of Its Expression: A Case Study of the Russian Language. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Perm, 2017. 24 p. (In Russ.)
11. Cheremisina M. I. Model description of sentence: Theoretical issues revisited. In: Sentence in Siberian Languages. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1989. Pp. 3–18. (In Russ.)
12. Cheremisina M. I. Simple sentence in Siberia’s languages: Research outcomes. In: Indigenous Siberian Languages. Novosibirsk: Institute of Philology (Sib. Branch of RAS), 1998. Vol. 4. Pp. 3–31. (In Russ.)
13. Cheremisina M. I., Ozonova A. A., Tazranova A. R. Turkic Languages of South Siberia: Elementary Simple Sentence with Verbal Predicate. Novosibirsk: Lyubava, 2008. 205 p. (In Russ.)
14. Chugunekova A. N. Verbs of Motion and Derived Simple Sentence Patterns: A Case Study of the Khakass Language. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Novosibirsk, 1998. 20 p. (In Russ.)
15. Idrisova P. G. Syntax of Kumyk Sayings and Proverbs. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Moscow, 2015. 27 p. (In Russ.)
16. Ketenchiev M. B. Nominal Sentences in Modern Karachay-Balkar: Formal Semantic Patterns Analyzed. Nalchik: Kabardino-Balkarian State University, 1993. 80 p. (In Russ.)
17. Khisamitdinova F. G., Bagautdinova M. I., Yagafarova G. N. Color terms in Bashkir proverbs. In: Proverbial Conceptualization of Some Aspects Inherent to the Bashkir View of the World. Ufa: Institute of History, Language and Literature (Ufa Research Centre of RAS), 2013. Pp. 61–68. (In Russ.)
18. Kildibekova T. A. Action Verbs: Semantic Field Structure. Ufa: Bashkir State University, 1983. 76 p. (In Russ.)
19. Lomtev T. P. Sentence formula: structural essentials. Filologicheskie nauki. 1969. No. 5. Pp. 56–68. (In Russ.)
20. Nikitin M. V. Linguistic Theory of Meaning: Fundamentals Reviewed. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1988. 168 p. (In Russ.)
21. Omelchenko S. R. Russian mental verbs: Functional semantic characteristics. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2004. No. 31. Pp. 217–229. Available at: https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/23834/1/iurg-2004-31-17.pdf (accessed: May 17, 2021). (In Russ.)
22. Online Corpora of the Bashkir Language. Available at: http://http://mfbl2.ru/ (accessed: May 17, 2021). (In Bash.)
23. Ovsyannikova M. V. Verbs of caused motion to goal in Bashkir. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2017. Vol. XIII. No. 1. Pp. 179–230. (In Russ.)
24. Oynotkinova N. R. Altaian Sayings and Proverbs: Poetics and Pragmatics of Genres. O. Laguta (ed.). Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University, 2012. 354 p. (In Russ.)
25. Paducheva E. V. Dynamic Patterns in Lexical Semantics. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoy Kultury, 2004. 608 p. (In Russ.)
26. Perekhvalskaya E. V. Causative constructions in Bashkir. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2017. Vol. XIII. No. 1. Pp. 231–254. (In Russ.)
27. Psyanchin Yu. V. Bashkir Verbs of Motion: The Lexical Semantic Field Reviewed. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Baku, 1990. 21 p. (In Russ.)
28. Raspopov I. P. What is sentence structural scheme? Voprosy Jazykoznanija. 1976. No. 2. Pp. 65–70. (In Russ.)
29. Sanyarova R. R., Usmanova N. G. The lexicon of water landscape in the Bashkir language on the example of phraseological units and proverbs. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. 2018. No. 9 (26). Pp. 362–364. (In Russ.)
30. Shaikhislamova Z. F. Some cognitive aspects of ethnolinguistic interpretation of paremiology of the Turkic languages (based on Bashkir and Kazakh proverbs and adages). Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta. 2015. Vol. 20. No. 1. Pp. 202–209. (In Russ.)
31. Shvedova N. Yu. Russian Grammar. Vol. 2: Syntax. Moscow: Nauka, 1980. 709 p. (In Russ.)
32. Shvedova N. Yu. Structural schemes of simple sentence and its paradigms: Some controversial issues revisited. Voprosy Jazykoznanija. 1973. No. 4. Pp. 25–36. (In Russ.)
33. Sirazitdinov Z. A., Buskunbaeva L. A., Ishmukhametova A. Sh., Shamsutdinova G. G. The sub-corpus of Bashkir aphoristic folklore genres revisited. In: TURKLANG–2017. Conference proceedings. In 2 vols. 2017. Kazan: Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, 2017. Pp. 329–335. (In Russ.)
34. Sozinova E. M. Common and Specific Features of Equivalent Paroemias: A Case Study of Bashkir, Russian, and English. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Ufa, 2006. 23 p. (In Russ.)
35. Tikeev D. S. Fundamentals of Modern Bashkir Syntax. Moscow: Nauka, 2004. 312 p. (In Russ.)
36. Tybykova A. T. Studies in Altaian Syntax: Simple Sentence. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University, 1991. 228 p. (In Russ.)
37. Usmanova M. G. Functional Semantic Classification of Bashkir Verbs. Ufa: Bashkir State University, 2002. 212 p. (In Russ.)
38. Valieva G. D., Davletshina A. Kh. Lexical and grammatical peculiarities of sayings and proverbs. In: Science and Education in Contemporary World. Conference proceedings. Karaganda: Bolashak, 2015. Pp. 62–63. (In Russ.)
39. Yuldashev A. A. (ed.) Grammar of Modern Standard Bashkir. Moscow: Nauka, 1981. 495 p. (In Russ.)
40. Yusupov M. G. Syntactic Structure of Bashkir Proverbs. Sterlitamak: Sterlitamak State Pedagogical Institute, 1996. 75 p. (In Bash.)
41. Zaynullin M. V. Modern Bashkir Morphology. Ufa: Bashkir State University, 2002. 387 p. (In Bash.)
42. Zolotova G. A. An Essay in Russian Functional Syntax. Moscow: Nauka, 1973. 351 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Sirazitdinov Z.A. Models of Elementary Simple Sentences with the Structure (S) + NAcc + VF in Bashkir Generalized Personal Proverbs. Oriental Studies. 2021;14(4):834-846. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2021-56-4-834-846