Tsaritsyn Defense Line and Military-Political Changes in Russia’s Southeastern Frontier, 1720s
https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2021-57-5-900-909
Abstract
Introduction. The Tsaritsyn defense line has attracted the attention of historians since the 18th century, but so far, no special study of the history of the Tsaritsyn line in the 1720s has been undertaken. The period is of interest for its policy of strengthening the military-political influence of Russia in the Caspian region, with the Persian campaign undertaken and control over the movements of the Kalmyks increasing. The article aims to show the role of the Tsaritsyn defense line in these events. Materials and methods. The study intends to systematize and reconsider the information about the Tsaritsyn line presented in the historiography of the Persian campaign, in the history of the Kalmyks, and in the history of the regiments of the Russian imperial army, supplementing them with data of legislative acts and office documentation. Results. Tsaritsyn and the Tsaritsyn line were staging points on the path of the formation and movement of the Nizovoi (Lower), or Persian, Corps; practically all military units involved in the Persian campaign passed through the Tsaritsyn line, which was used for rear functions by the Corps as long as it existed. Tsaritsyn, the fortresses on the line, and the villages of the Don Cossacks closest to the line served as winter quarters for the Corps cavalry: here the dragoon regiments were re-equipped, and individual units were sent on missions along the southern borders of Russia. The Tsaritsyn line introduced serious changes in the life of the nomadic population of the Lower Volga region; passages through the line acquiring great military and political importance. Groups of Kalmyks who passed ‘inside’ turned out to be cut off from the Kuban and Crimeans and from other groups of Kalmyks. There was a symbolic meaning to the crossing of the Tsaritsyn line for Kalmyks who feared that their uluses would be taken away from them or they would be converted to Orthodoxy against their will. The study clarifies the data on the number of troops that served on the Tsaritsyn line in the 1720s. Constant was the presence of at least 500 Cossacks, sent on their mission by the Don army, as well as of several dragoon regiments. In the 1720s, units of the Kronshlots, Olonets, Vologda, Tobolsk, Moscow, Arkhangelsk, Dmitrov, and Saratov dragoon regiments served on the Tsaritsyn line from several months to several years. Conclusions. From the very first years of its construction, the Tsaritsyn line not only protected the southern borders of the Russian Empire, but also became an instrument of the imperial diplomatic and military-political influence on neighboring peoples and states.
About the Author
Alexander L. KleitmanRussian Federation
Dr. Sc. (History), Associate Professor
Director
References
1. Library of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Manuscript Department. Coll. of Handwritten Maps (main part).
2. Museum of Artillery, Engineering Troops and Signal Corps; Scientific Archive. Coll. 2. Cat. 2. File 261. (In Russ.)
3. The 1722 Campaign Diary. St. Petersburg, 1855. 194 p. (In Russ.)
4. Bagaley D. I. Colonization and Everyday Life: Historical Essays on Muscovy and Steppe Peripheries. Moscow: Imperial Society of Russian History and Antiquities (Moscow University), 1887. 614 p. (In Russ.)
5. Bakunin V. M. Description of the Kalmyk Peoples, in Particular Torgout People, and Deeds of Their Khans and Landlords (1761). Elista: Kalmykia Book Publ., 1995. 153 p. (In Russ.)
6. Borisov V., Sytsyanko A. 64th Infantry Kazan Regiment of His Imperial Highness Grand Duke Mikhail Nikolaevich: Campaigns, 1642– 1700–1886. St. Petersburg: I. N. Skorokhodov, 1888. 519 p. (In Russ.)
7. Butkov P. G. Recent History of the Caucasus, 1722 to 1803: Collected Materials. St. Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences, 1869. Vol. 1. 548 p. (In Russ.)
8. Chervinsky P. E. (comp.) 35th Dragoon Belgorod Regiment of His Majesty Franz Joseph I, Emperor of Austria and King of Hungary: A History. Kiev: S.V. Kulzhenko, 1901. 198 p. (In Russ.)
9. Dzhundzhuzov S. V. The vicissitudes of the fate of the Kalmyk nobleman Petr Taishin: From the adoption of Christianity to the establishment of a settlement of baptized Kalmyks in the Middle Volga Region (1724-1737). RUDN Journal of Russian History. 2020. Vol. 19. No. 3. Pp. 525–543. (In Russ.)
10. Ivanyuk S. A. Features of fortifications of the Tsaritsyn Defense Line in the 20s of the 18th century. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations. 2021. No. 1. Pp. 41–52. (In Russ.)
11. Kamolov N. A. Tsaritsyn Defense Line, 1720s–1770s. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: History. Political Science. Sociology. 2009. No. 1. Pp. 11–19. (In Russ.)
12. Kurukin I. V. Persian Campaign of Peter the Great: A Local Corps in the Caspian Shore, 1722–1735. Moscow: Kvadriga, 2010. 381 p. (In Russ.)
13. Kuryshev A. V. Volga Cossack Host, 1730–1804: Creation, Development, and Transformation into Cossack Defense Line Regiments. Volgograd: Izdatel, 2011. 352 p. (In Russ.)
14. Laskovsky F. F. Engineering Arts in Russia: Historical Materials. In 3 vols. Vol. 2: Peter the Great’s Era. St. Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences, 1861. 642 p. (In Russ.)
15. Lavrinova T. I. Tsaritsyn Defense Line: History of Construction (1718–1720) and Earliest Years of Existence. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis. Voronezh, 1990. 22 p. (In Russ.)
16. Lavrinova T. I. Tsaritsyn Defense Line: History of Construction (1718–1720) and Earliest Years of Existence. Volgograd: Izdatel, 2012. 93 p. (In Russ.)
17. Leopoldov A. F. Saratov Governorate: A Statistical Description. In 2 vols. St. Petersburg: Foreign Trade Dept., 1839. 143 p. (In Russ.)
18. Minkh A. N. Saratov Governorate: A Historical and Geographical Dictionary. Vol. 1. Parts 1–3. Saratov, 1898, 1900, 1901. Vol. 1. Part 4. Aktarsk, 1902. (In Russ.)
19. Mogutov V. From Russia to Tartary: A Rare and Notable Account of One Embassy-Ranked Expedition Useful to Government Officers and Commercial Agents. St. Petersburg: Weitbrecht & Schnor, 1777. 63 p. (In Russ.)
20. Palmov N. N. The Volga Kalmyks: Historical Essays. Parts III–IV: Restrictive Measures of Government towards Kalmyks. Vol. 1: 17th and Early 18th Centuries. Astrakhan: Kalmizdat, 1929. 392 p. (In Russ.)
21. Pavlenko N. I. Catherine the Great. Moscow: Molodaya Gvardiya, 2003. 495 p. (In Russ.)
22. Pavlenko N. I. Peter the Great. Moscow: Molodaya Gvardiya, 2000. 428 p. (In Russ.)
23. Ryabov S. I., Samoylov G. P., Suprun V. I. Peter the Great in Tsaritsyn and the Middle Don. Volgograd: Peremena, 1994. 174 p. (In Russ.)
24. Sen D. V. Relations between Kalmyks and Kuban Sultan Bahti Geray: tactics and strategy of frontier cooperation, mid to late 1720s. MAGNA ADSURGIT: HISTORIA STUDIORUM. 2019. No. 1. Pp. 125–161. (In Russ.)
25. Soimonov F. I. Description of the Caspian Sea and Related Russian Conquests as Part of Peter the Great’s History Authored by Fedor Ivanovich Soimonov, Privy Councillor, Governor of Siberia, and Recipient of the Order of St. Alexander Nevsky. St. Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences, 1763. 380 p. (In Russ.)
26. Solovyov S. M. Complete Works. In 18 books. Book 9: History of Russia from Earliest Times. Vols. 17–18. Moscow: Golos, 1997. 708 p. (In Russ.)
27. Tepkeev V. T. The Northern Caspian, 1723–1724: Kalmyk-Kazakh confrontation. Oriental Studies. 2021. Vol. 14. No. 1. Pp. 24–32. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22162/2619-0990-2021-53-1-24-32
28. Tepkeev V. T. Surmounting Political Crisis in Kalmyk Khanate: Background and Arrangement of Nitar-Dorji’s Assassination in 1725. Mongolian Studies. 2021. No. 2. Pp. 231–247. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22162/2500-1523-2021-2-231-247
29. Vasilyev D. V. Formation of the Kalmyk Khanate as a subject of the Russian Empire since the 17th century to the middle of the 18th century. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2015. No. 3–2. Pp. 351–357. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kleitman A.L. Tsaritsyn Defense Line and Military-Political Changes in Russia’s Southeastern Frontier, 1720s. Oriental Studies. 2021;14(5):900-909. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2021-57-5-900-909






































