Social Symbolism of Toreutics in Kimek Society: Status of Male Warrior Revisited

The article aims to show the role of toreutic items in the demonstration of the status of a male warrior. Materials. In the Middle Ages toreutics was mainly used in decorating costume details and items of military and horse equipment. The field of its application indicates the crucial importance of artistic metalworking in the study of medieval societies. Interesting samples of toreutics in the period under consideration are metal items produced in the Kimak Khaganate that existed in the Ob-Irtysh interfluve between the 9th and 11th cc. Many of such items found in the burials of the Kimaks clearly indicate the leading role of toreutics in the demonstration of the social roles in the Middle Ages. The article discusses the research history of the Kimaks, which were most actively studied in the 1970s and 1980s. Recently, new information has been obtained thanks to the archaeological research in the region. The study of the steppe elite burials of the mounds Karakaba I and II, Tuyetas, and Ayan produced important data that may shed new light on the social structure of the Kimak society. Results. This study focuses on the evidence of ten male burials, which comprise a rich inventory of grave goods, including belts, military and horse equipment, as well as such status items as gold jewelry, musical instruments, and silk clothing. The pertaining ethnographic information discussed in the article shows that such items as belts and horse equipment elements had a symbolic meaning in the society in question, especially in terms of status. The examination of written sources shows social differentiation in the Kimak society. More detailed information was obtained thanks to the archaeological evidence. The differences between the rich burials were noticeable both in terms of the funeral rite and in the grave goods. For example, such burials may comprise several belts or may comprise other valuable goods except for belts; also, the burials differed in terms of the number of horses buried with the deceased. Thus, the authors conclude that the available information indicates the existence of various categories of warriors in the Kimak society, which need to be further researched.

1. Ageeva E. I., Maksimova A. G. 1955 Report by Pavlodar Archaeological Expedition. In: Transactions of the Institute for Historical, Archaeological and Ethnographic Research. Vol. 7. Alma-Ata: Kazakh SSR Academy of Sciences, 1959. Pp. 32–58. (In Russ.)

2. Akishev K. A. (ed.) An Archaeological Map of Kazakhstan. Alma-Ata: Kazakh SSR Academy of Sciences, 1960. 449 p. (In Russ.)

3. Akishev K. A. (ed.) Archaeological Sites in the Catchment Area of Shulbinsk Hydropower Plant. Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1987. 280 p. (In Russ.)

4. Alekhin Yu. P. Kurgan of Kimek nobility in the Rudny Altai. In: Preserving and Exploring Cultural Heritage of the Altai. Barnaul: Altai State University, 1998. Vol. IX. Pp. 201–203. (In Russ.)

5. Arslanova F. Kh. Archaeological Sites of the Middle Irtysh. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis abstract. Alma-Ata, 1964. 18 p. (In Russ.)

6. Arslanova F. Kh. Bobrovka burial site. Izvestiya AN KazSSR. Ser. obshch. nauk. 1963. No. 4. Pp. 68–84. (In Russ.)

7. Arslanova F. Kh. Göktürk burials in Eastern Kazakhstan. In: Culture of Kazakhstan’s Ancient Livestock Breeders and Crop Growers. Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1969. Pp. 43–57. (In Russ.)

8. Arslanova F. Kh. Kimek military burials of Zevakino burial site. In: Arslanova F. Kh. Essays on Medieval Archaeology of the Upper Irtysh. Vol. III. Astana: Margulan Institute of Archaeology, 2013. Pp. 28–92. (In Russ.)

9. Arslanova F. Kh. Kipchak kurgans near Leontyevka village. In: Arslanova F. Kh. Essays on Medieval Archaeology of the Upper Irtysh. Vol. III. Astana: Margulan Institute of Archaeology, 2013. Pp. 130–132. (In Russ.)

10. Arslanova F. Kh. Kurgans with cremated remains in the Upper Irtysh. In: Kazakhstan Explored and Excavated. Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1972. Pp. 56–76. (In Russ.)

11. Arslanova F. Kh. Long kurgans of the Irtysh Valley. In: Sources on the History of Western Siberia. History and Archaeology. Omsk: Omsk State University, 1987. Pp. 50–69. (In Russ.)

12. Arslanova F. Kh. Medieval burial site in the Irtysh Valley. Sbornik Ministerstva vysshego i srednego spetsial’nogo obrazovaniya KazSSR. Istoriya, filosofiya, ekonomika. 1963. No. III. Pp. 278–302. (In Russ.)

13. Artykbaev Zh. O. The Middle Irtysh: A Perspective from Contestable Issues of Eurasian Steppe History. Pavlodar: Toraighyrov (Pavlodar) University, 2007. Vol. 1. Pp. 81–101. (In Russ.)

14. Atavin A. G. Nomads of South Russia’s forest steppe and steppe areas, late 9th to mid 13th centuries AD (Pechenegs, Torks, Cumans): Funeral rites and social hierarchy. In: Antiquities of South Russia. Collected papers (In memoriam A. G. Atavin). Moscow: Taus, 2008. Pp. 71–105. (In Russ.)

15. Chkhaidze V. N. Silver tableware from the nomad burials of 13th–14th centuries on the east European Plain. The Volga River Region Archaeology. 2017. No. 4 (22). Pp. 275–296. (In Russ.)

16. Gorbunov V. V. People of the Srostki culture and their military art. In: Altai-Sayan Highlands and History of Colonization by Nomads. Barnaul: Altai State University, 2007. Pp. 60–63. (In Russ.)

17. Habdulina M. K. New data on the study of the Tasmola archaeological culture of Saryarka. Turkic Studies Journal. 2019. Vol. 1. No. 2. Pp. 21–33. (In Russ.)

18. Khaiyndyrynmay Bagay-ool. In: Tuvan Folktales. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1994. Pp. 50–225. (In Russ.)

19. Khasenova B. M. The art metalwork of the Kimaks: Symbols of gender identity. Golden Horde Civilization. 2016. Vol. 9. Pp. 16–23. (In Russ.)

20. Khasenova B. M. The status of a woman in Kimak society in works of F. Kh. Arslanova. Kazakhstan Archeology. 2019. No. 1 (3). Pp. 61–72. (In Russ.)

21. Khasenova B. M. Women’s headdress: Gender identity in Kimek society. In: Kadyrbaev Readings – 2012. Conference proceedings. Aktobe: Archaeology and Ethnology Center of Aktobe Region, 2012. Pp. 365–371. (In Russ.)

22. Klyashtorny S. G. Steppe emperies: Emergence, triumph, collapse. In: Klyashtorny S. G., Savinov D. G. Steppe Empires of Ancient Eurasia. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University (Faculty of Asian and African Studies), 2005. Pp. 7–180. (In Russ.)

23. Kramarovsky M. G. The Gold of Genghis Khan’s Descendants: Cultural Heritage of the Golden Horde. St. Petersburg: Slawiya, 2001. 364 p. (In Russ.)

24. Kumekov B. E. Kimek Confederation, 9th–11th Centuries AD: Arabic Accounts. Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1972. 156 p. (In Russ.)

25. Margulan A. Kh. Explanatory note to Schedule of Archaeology Department. In: Beysenov A. Z., Loman V. G. (eds.) Archaeological Heritage of Central Kazakhstan: Research and Preservation. Collected scholarly papers. Almaty: Begazy-Tasmola, 2017. Vol. 1. Pp. 53–54. (In Russ.)

26. Mogilnikov V. A. Kurgans with mud-brick structures in the south of Western Siberia. Vestnik Arheologii, Antropologii i Etnografii. 1999. No. 2. Pp. 64–68. (In Russ.)

27. Omarov G. K., Besetayev B. B., Baimukha­nov N. B., Sagyndykova S. T. Weapons and horse equipment of the medieval nomads of the East Kazakhstan (Based on materials from the Ayan burial ground). The World of the Great Altai. 2020. No. 6 (2). Pp. 942–957. (In Russ.)

28. Omarov G., Besetayev B. Medieval nomads of Eastern Kazakhstan: A case study of Tuyetas and Ayan burial sites. In: The Great Steppe. History and Culture. World of Ancient Turks. Exhibition catalogue. Vol. III. Nur-Sultan, 2019. Pp. 34–41. (In Russ.)

29. Pletneva S. A. Pechenegs, Torks and Cumans in steppes of South Russia. In: Materials and Studies in the Archaeology of the USSR. Moscow: Nauka, 1958. Vol. 68. Pp. 151–227. (In Russ.)

30. Pletneva S. A. Pechenegs, Torks, Cumans. In: Steppes of Medieval Eurasia. Moscow: Nauka, 1981. Pp. 213–222. (In Russ.)

31. Potemkina T. M. Hierarchy of Cuman nobility: A case study of burials containing status related items. In: Steppes of Medieval Europe. Archaeological Studies. The Cuman Era. Donetsk: Donetsk University, 2012. Vol. 10. Pp. 7–36. (In Russ.)

32. Samashev Z. S. Monuments of medieval nomads in the upper reaches of the Qaraqaba River, Southwestern Altai. In: The Altai and Eurasian Antiquities. Collective monograph. Novosibirsk: Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography (SB RAS), 2016. Pp. 379–409. (In Russ.)

33. Savinov D. G. Old Turkic tribes in the mirror of archaeology. In: Klyashtorny S. G., Savinov D. G. Steppe Empires of Ancient Eurasia. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University (Faculty of Asian and African Studies), 2005. Pp. 276–301. (In Russ.)

34. Seregin N. N. Social Structures of Early Medieval Turks from the Altai-Sayan and Central Asia: A Case Study of Burial Sites. Barnaul: Altai State University, 2013. 206 p. (In Russ.)

35. Seregin N. N. Symbols of power in the early middle age Turkic societies of Central Asia (On the basis if archaeological materials). Ural Historical Journal. 2015. No. 4 (49). Pp. 77–85. (In Russ.)

36. Shvetsov M. L. The song of the steppe. Arkheologiia Evraziiskikh Stepei (Archaeology of the Eurasian Steppes). 2017. No. 5. Pp. 108–116. (In Russ.)

37. The Great Steppe. History and Culture. World of Ancient Turks. Exhibition catalogue. Vol. III. Nur-Sultan, 2019. 454 p. (In Kaz., Russ. and Eng.)

38. Tokhtabaeva Sh. Zh. The Silver Route of Kazakh Craftsmen. Almaty: Dayk-Press, 2005. 472 p. (In Russ.)

39. Trifonov Yu. I., Ilyushin A. M., Alekhin Yu. P. Kipchaks of Kazakhstan: Newly discovered archaeological materials reviewed. In: Archaeological Questions of Northern and Central Asia. Kemerovo, Guryevsk: Kuzbass State Technical University, 1998. Pp. 220–233. (In Russ.)

40. Tӧrbat Ts. et al. A rock tomb of the ancient Turkic period in the Zhargalant Khairkhan mountains, Khovd aimag, with the oldest preserved horse-head fiddle in Mongolia – A preliminary report. In: Current Archaeological Research in Mongolia. Bonn: University of Bonn, 2009. Pp. 365–383. (In Eng.)

41. Zuev Yu. A. Old Turkic social terms in one 8th century Chinese text. In: Archaeological Questions of Kazakhstan. Almaty; Moscow: Nauka, 1998. Pp. 153–161. (In Russ.)