Nomadic Communities of Central Eurasia, 18th – Early 20th Centuries CE: Household and Economic Responsibilities of Men and Women Revisited

Introduction. In early nomadic societies of Central Asia, gender was the major factor in the division of labor. However, the written sources and archaeological evidence in the field do not provide enough detail to describe this division, hence the solution to the problem may be sought in the ethnographical data of the peoples, nomadic in their recent past. The article aims to analyze the household responsibilities of men and women in the nomadic societies in Central Eurasia in the 18th – early 20th centuries to use this data for a reconstruction of the gender labor division of the early nomadic societies in the region. Materials and methods. The study makes use of published sources on the recent nomads. Notably, the present authors proceed from the fact that, granted the largely conservative character of nomadic economy and the regional environment that remained unchanged in the period in question, the forms of regional nomadic economies were largely of a similar type. Hence, it may be possible to use the data on recently nomadic peoples for the reconstruction of the economy, culture, and socio-economic structures of the ancient nomads of the Eurasian steppes. Results. The undertaken analysis of the sources indicates a clear gender division of economic activities in the Eurasian nomadic societies in the 18th – early 20th cc. Tradition prescribed the division of household duties into strictly male and female, and any violation of the gender roles was discouraged. Conclusions. The range of economic responsibilities of men and women was clearly circumscribed in the nomadic societies of Central Eurasia, their ethnic affiliation and religion playing no part in the existent labor division structures. Men took care of the herds, keeping them safe and enlarging their number; crafts were also largely men’s field; men’s duties included maintenance and protection of caravans, as well as protection of the family and aul, property and livestock from enemy raids and baranta. Women were involved in childcare and domestic chores, including processing of animal raw materials, looking after livestock in the aul, cooking food, and collecting fuel for winter seasons. Thus, the data on labor division between men and women characteristic of the recent nomads makes it possible to reconstruct the gender labor division in the societies of the early nomads in the Eurasian steppe.Introduction. In early nomadic societies of Central Asia, gender was the major factor in the division of labor. However, the written sources and archaeological evidence in the field do not provide enough detail to describe this division, hence the solution to the problem may be sought in the ethnographical data of the peoples, nomadic in their recent past. The article aims to analyze the household responsibilities of men and women in the nomadic societies in Central Eurasia in the 18th – early 20th centuries to use this data for a reconstruction of the gender labor division of the early nomadic societies in the region. Materials and methods. The study makes use of published sources on the recent nomads. Notably, the present authors proceed from the fact that, granted the largely conservative character of nomadic economy and the regional environment that remained unchanged in the period in question, the forms of regional nomadic economies were largely of a similar type. Hence, it may be possible to use the data on recently nomadic peoples for the reconstruction of the economy, culture, and socio-economic structures of the ancient nomads of the Eurasian steppes. Results. The undertaken analysis of the sources indicates a clear gender division of economic activities in the Eurasian nomadic societies in the 18th – early 20th cc. Tradition prescribed the division of household duties into strictly male and female, and any violation of the gender roles was discouraged. Conclusions. The range of economic responsibilities of men and women was clearly circumscribed in the nomadic societies of Central Eurasia, their ethnic affiliation and religion playing no part in the existent labor division structures. Men took care of the herds, keeping them safe and enlarging their number; crafts were also largely men’s field; men’s duties included maintenance and protection of caravans, as well as protection of the family and aul, property and livestock from enemy raids and baranta. Women were involved in childcare and domestic chores, including processing of animal raw materials, looking after livestock in the aul, cooking food, and collecting fuel for winter seasons. Thus, the data on labor division between men and women characteristic of the recent nomads makes it possible to reconstruct the gender labor division in the societies of the early nomads in the Eurasian steppe.Introduction. In early nomadic societies of Central Asia, gender was the major factor in the division of labor. However, the written sources and archaeological evidence in the field do not provide enough detail to describe this division, hence the solution to the problem may be sought in the ethnographical data of the peoples, nomadic in their recent past. The article aims to analyze the household responsibilities of men and women in the nomadic societies in Central Eurasia in the 18th – early 20th centuries to use this data for a reconstruction of the gender labor division of the early nomadic societies in the region. Materials and methods. The study makes use of published sources on the recent nomads. Notably, the present authors proceed from the fact that, granted the largely conservative character of nomadic economy and the regional environment that remained unchanged in the period in question, the forms of regional nomadic economies were largely of a similar type. Hence, it may be possible to use the data on recently nomadic peoples for the reconstruction of the economy, culture, and socio-economic structures of the ancient nomads of the Eurasian steppes. Results. The undertaken analysis of the sources indicates a clear gender division of economic activities in the Eurasian nomadic societies in the 18th – early 20th cc. Tradition prescribed the division of household duties into strictly male and female, and any violation of the gender roles was discouraged. Conclusions. The range of economic responsibilities of men and women was clearly circumscribed in the nomadic societies of Central Eurasia, their ethnic affiliation and religion playing no part in the existent labor division structures. Men took care of the herds, keeping them safe and enlarging their number; crafts were also largely men’s field; men’s duties included maintenance and protection of caravans, as well as protection of the family and aul, property and livestock from enemy raids and baranta. Women were involved in childcare and domestic chores, including processing of animal raw materials, looking after livestock in the aul, cooking food, and collecting fuel for winter seasons. Thus, the data on labor division between men and women characteristic of the recent nomads makes it possible to reconstruct the gender labor division in the societies of the early nomads in the Eurasian steppe.

1. Akishev K. A. Revisiting the origin of nomadism in arid territories of ancient Kazakhstan. In: Surveys and Excavations in Kazakhstan. Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1972. Pp. 31–46. (In Russ.)

2. Alpyspaeva G. A., Zhuman G., Jumaliyeva L. T., Abdykarimova Sh. T. Legal status of Kazakh woman in family and society, 19th – early 20th century: Eyewitness accounts of Russian contemporaries. Bylye Gody. 2020. Vol. 55. No. 1. Pp. 370–381. (In Russ.)

3. Batyrov V. V. Kalmyk Traditional Culture, Mid to Late 19th Century: Historical Essays. Elista: Kalmyk Humanities Research Institute (RAS), 2016. 226 p. (In Russ.)

4. Batyrov V. V., 1770s–1850s: Historical Essays. Elista: Kalmyk Humanities Research Institute (RAS), 2014. 250 p. (In Russ.)

5. Bentkovsky I. V. Kalmyk woman of Bolshederbetsky District in physiological, religious and social perspectives. In: The Out of Favor Ones. Russian Writers to Explore the Caucasus. Anthology. In 3 vols. Vol. 2. Stavropol: Stavropol State University, 2011. Pp. 450–468. (In Russ.)

6. Bronevsky S. B. Major General Bronevsky’s notes on Kirghiz-Kaisaks of the Middle Horde. Otechestvennye zapiski. 1830. No. 124. Pp. 194–285. (In Russ.)

7. Bronevsky S. B. Major General Bronevsky’s notes on Kirghiz-Kaisaks of the Middle Horde. Otechestvennye zapiski. 1830. No. 43. Pp. 70–96. (In Russ.)

8. Bukeikhan A. N. Qazaqs of Adai Uyezd. In: The Qazaqs. Anthropological Essays. Vol. 3. Ser. Qazaqstan’. Leningrad: Special Committee for the Research of Soviet Republics (USSR Acad. of Sc.), 1927. Pp. 59–82. (In Russ.)

9. Bukeikhanov A. N. The Kazakhs: Historical and Ethnographic Writings. 2nd ed., suppl. Astana: Altyn Kitap, 2007. 303 p. (In Russ.)

10. Carpine P. Ystoria Mongalorum quos nos Tartaros appellamus (History of the Mongols, Which We call Tartars). In: William of Rubruck and Giovanni da Pian del Carpine’s Journeys to the Eastern Parts. Almaty: Gylym, 1993. Pp. 20–74. (In Russ.)

11. Cheremshansky V. M. Orenburg Governorate in Economic, Statistical, Ethnographic, and Industrial Perspectives. Ufa: Orenburg Governorate Office, 1859. 472 p. (In Russ.)

12. Daulbaev B. A narrative about Kirghizes of Turgay Oblast, 1830–1880. Zapiski Orenburgskogo otdela Imperatorskogo Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva. 1881. No. 4. Pp. 98–117. (In Russ.)

13. Dobrosmyslov A. I. Livestock Breeding in Turgay Oblast. Orenburg: P. Zharinov, 1895. 360 p. (In Russ.)

14. Dzhundzhuzov S. V. Family life and economic activities of the baptized Kalmyks of the Stavropol Kalmyk army in the first half of the XIX century: influence of acculturation and adherence to traditions. Vestnik of Orenburg State Pedagogical University. Electronic Scientific Journal. 2019. No. 2 (30). Pp. 169–178. Available at: http://www.vestospu.ru/archive/2019/articles/9_2_2019.html (accessed: July 10, 2021). (In Russ.) DOI: 10.32516/2303-9922.2019.30.9

15. Essays on the Trans-Ural Steppe and Inner, Or Bukey, Horde. Moscow: V. Grachev & Co., 1859. 91 p. (In Russ.)

16. Galimeeva M. V. The image of the man in Kalmyk and Kazakh linguistic cultures. Bulletin of Kalmyk University. 2018. No. 37 (1). Pp. 69–75. (In Russ.)

17. Galkin M. N. Central Asia and Orenburg Governorate: Ethnographic Materials. St. Petersburg: Kukol-Yasnopolsky, 1867. 250 p. (In Russ.)

18. Georgi J. G. Description of Russia’s Peoples, Their Household Rites, Customs, Clothes, Dwellings, Handicrafts, Games, Faiths, and Other Peculiarities. Part Two: Tatar Peoples and Other Yet Unidentified Tribes of Northern Siberia. St. Petersburg: I. Glazunov, 1799. 178 p. (In Russ.)

19. Guins G. C. About Kirghiz auls: Travel sketches from Central Asia. Istoricheskie vesti. 1913. Vol. CXXXIV. Pp. 285–332. (In Russ.)

20. Heins A. K. Kirghiz essays. Part III. Voennyi sbornik. 1866. Vol. L. Pp. 99–126. (In Russ.)

21. Heins A. K. Kirghiz-Kaisaks (In steppes of the Trans-Urals). In: Heins A. K. Collected Literary Works. Vol. I. St. Petersburg: M. Stasyulevich, 1897. Pp. 21–177. (In Russ.)

22. Herodotus. Histories (excerpts). In: Kuznetsova T. M. (comp.) The Scythians: A Chrestomathy. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1992. Pp. 38–84. (In Russ.)

23. Hippocrates. On Airs, Waters, and Places. In: Kuznetsova T. M. (comp.) The Scythians: A Chrestomathy. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1992. Pp. 87–91. (In Russ.)

24. Ibragimov I. I. Kirghiz people: Ethnographic essays. In: Russian Turkestan. Collected papers. Moscow: Katkov & Co., 1872. Vol. 2. Pp. 120–152. (In Russ.)

25. Ivanov I. S. Inner Kirghiz Horde: A Brief Statistical Essay. Astrakhan: Astrakhan Governorate Office, 1891. 103 p. (In Russ.)

26. Kazantsev I. A Description of Kirghiz-Kaisaks. St. Petersburg: Obshchestvennaya Polza, 1867. 231 p. (In Russ.)

27. Khazanov A. M. The era of early nomads in Eurasian steppes. In: Early Nomads of Central Asia and Kazakhstan. Conference abstracts. Leningrad: Nauka, 1975. Pp. 23–25. (In Russ.)

28. Krasovsky N. I. Geography and Statistics of Russia: Materials Collected by General Staff Officers. Land of Siberian Kirghizes. Part 1. St. Petersburg: Tranzschel, Rätger & Schneider, 1868. 472 p. (In Russ.)

29. Krasovsky N. I. Geography and Statistics of Russia: Materials Collected by General Staff Officers. Land of Siberian Kirghizes. Part 2. St. Petersburg: Tranzschel, Rätger & Schneider, 1868. 464 p. (In Russ.)

30. Krasovsky N. I. Geography and Statistics of Russia: Materials Collected by General Staff Officers. Land of Siberian Kirghizes. Part 3. St. Petersburg: Tranzschel, Rätger & Schneider. 282 p. (In Russ.)

31. Kuropatkin A. Turkmenia and Turkmens. St. Petersburg: V. Poletika, 1879. 57 p. (In Russ.)

32. Land Use Practices of Kirghiz Nomads in the Southern Part of Fergana Oblast (Osh, Skobelev and Kokand Uyezds). Collected materials. Tashkent: V. Ilyin, 1915. 230 p. (In Russ.)

33. Land Use Practices of Kirghizes in the Chu and Lower Talas River Basins, Chernyaevsky and Aulieatinsky Uyezds of Syr Darya Oblast. Collected materials. Tashkent: V. Ilyin, 1915. 225 p. (In Russ.)

34. Land Use Practices of Kirghizes: Materials Collected and Compiled by the Expedition for the Research of Steppe Oblasts. Vol. V: Turgay Oblast, Kostanay Uyezd. Voronezh: V. Isaev, 1903. 805 p. (In Russ.)

35. Lepekhin I. I. Across Different Provinces of Russia, 1770: A Continuance of Travel Notes by Ivan Lepekhin, Academician and Medical Doctor. St. Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences, 1772. 338 p. (In Russ.)

36. Lepekhin I. I. Travel Notes of Academician Lepekhin. Ser. ‘Complete Research Travels across Russia’. Vol. 3. Parts 1, 2. St. Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences, 1821. 540 p. (In Russ.)

37. Levshin A. Description of Kirghiz-Qazaq, Or Kirghiz-Kaisak, Hordes and Steppes. Part 3: Ethnographic Messages. St. Petersburg: K. Kray, 1832. 304 p. (In Russ.)

38. Mikhailov F. A. Indigenous Peoples of Transcaspian Oblast and Their Life: An Ethnographic Essay. Ashkhabad: K. Fedorov, 1900. 80 p. (In Russ.)

39. Musabalina G. Woman in Kazakh traditional family: A Historical aspect. Herald of Turkic World. 2016. No. 1 (10). Pp. 71–75. (In Russ.)

40. Nalivkin V. P. Native Inhabitants: Past and Present. Tashkent: Turkestan Printing Partnership, 1913. 144 p. (In Russ.)

41. Nazarov F. Notes on Some Peoples and Lands of Soviet Central Asia. Moscow: Nauka — GRVL, 1968. 77 p. (In Russ.)

42. Ochir-Goryaeva M. A. Age and status of the woman in nomadic society: An ethno-archaeological insight. Mongolian Studies. 2018. No. 15. Pp. 108–123. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22162/2500-1523-2018-15-108-123

43. P. Kirghizes of Semipalatinsk Oblast: Rites reviewed. Russkiy vestnik. 1878. Vol. 137. No. 9, September. Pp. 22–66. (In Russ.)

44. Polosmak N. V. Horsemen of Ukok Plateau. Novosibirsk: INFOLIO-Press, 2001. 336 p. (In Russ.)

45. Rau I. A. Woman and man in families of ancient Turks and other nomads. Kazakh National Pedagogical University after Abai Bulletin. Series of Sociological and Political Sciences. 2012. No. 2 (38). Pp. 94–96. (In Russ.)

46. Rubruck W. The Journey of William of Rubruck to the Eastern Parts in the Blessed Summer of 1253. In: William of Rubruck and Giovanni da Pian del Carpine’s Journeys to the Eastern Parts. Almaty: Gylym, 1993. Pp. 76–173. (In Russ.)

47. Rudenko S. Qazaqs of the Uil and Sagyz River Basins: An essay on everyday life. In: The Qazaqs. Anthropological Essays. Vol. 3. Ser. Qazaqstan’. Leningrad: Special Committee for the Research of Soviet Republics (USSR Acad. of Sc.), 1927. Pp. 7–32. (In Russ.)

48. Schmidt Yu. Kirghiz Steppe to the South of Aral-Irtysh Watershed, Akmola Oblast: An Essay. Omsk: Omsk District Headquarters, 1894. 149 s.

49. Schneider E. R. Qazaq ornamental patterns. In: The Qazaqs. Anthropological Essays. Vol. 3. Ser. Qazaqstan’. Leningrad: Special Committee for the Research of Soviet Republics (USSR Acad. of Sc.), 1927. Pp. 135–171. (In Russ.)

50. Shkapsky Or. Status of woman among Central Asian nomads. Sredne-Aziatskiy vestnik. 1896. No. 6–7. Pp. 1–19. (In Russ.)

51. Silberhelm (comp.) Military Statistical Review of the Russian Empire. Vol. 17. Part 3: Kirghiz Steppe of Western Siberia. St. Petersburg: Imperial General Staff, 1852. 74 p. (In Russ.)

52. Stasevich I. V. Social Status of Kazakh Woman: Traditions and Contemporaneity. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2011. 202 p. (In Russ.)

53. Suleimanova R. N. ‘She is reasonably well positioned…’: The views of local researchers of the second half of XIX – early XX c. on the position of women in traditional society (On the example of the Bashkirs). Woman in Russian Society. 2016. No. 2 (79). Pp. 69–81. (In Russ.)

54. Tairov A. D. Land use system in nomadism: Historical destinies of nomads from Ural and Kazakhstan steppes, 1st Millennium BCE. In: Nomads of Ural and Kazakhstan Steppes. Yekaterinburg: Nauka, 1993. Pp. 3–23. (In Russ.)

55. Tishin V. V. Form of family among ancient Turks and its ties to economic functions revisited. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. 2012. No. 4. Pp. 92–107. (In Russ.)

56. Tishin V. V., Seregin N. N. Woman’s status in ancient Turkic society. Historical Psychology & Sociology. 2015. No. 1. Pp. 109–127. (In Russ.)

57. Tronov V. D. Kirghiz Anthropology and Ethnology. Collected materials. St. Petersburg: P. Yablonsky, 1891. 42 p. (In Russ.)

58. Tsypilova S. S. A woman in medieval Mongolia: A brief historical survey. Humanitarian Vector. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 6. Pp. 141–145. (In Russ.)

59. Tsypilova S. S. Status and role of the Mongolian woman in the family (The XII–XIII centuries). Manuscript. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 10. Pp. 104–107. (In Russ.)

60. Ulanov M. S., Tyumidova M. E. The status of the woman in the traditional culture of Kalmyk ethnos. Bulletin of Kalmyk University. 2018. No. 39 (3). Pp. 172–179. (In Russ.)

61. Vámbéry Á. Essays on Central Asia. Moscow: A. Mamontov & Co., 1868. 363 p. (In Russ.)

62. Wulfsohn E. S. The Kirghiz. Moscow: S. Kurnin & Co., 1901. 79 p. (In Russ.)

63. Yagodin V. N. Khorezm and the Volga – Urals, early to mid-1st millennium CE: Ties revisited. In: Archaeology and Ethnography of Bashkiria. 1971. Vol. IV. Pp. 103–107. (In Russ.)

64. Yagodin V. N. Nomads in northwestern frontiers of Khorezm. In: Interaction between Nomadic Cultures and Ancient Civilizations. Symposium abstracts. Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1987. Pp. 133–135. (In Russ.)

65. Yelnitsky K. Non-Russian Populations of Siberia and Russian Central Asia: Ethnographic Essays. St. Petersburg: D. Poluboyarinov, 1895. 135 p. (In Russ.)

66. Yusupov Kh. Tribes of early nomads in Northwest Turkmenistan. In: Interaction between Nomadic Cultures and Ancient Civilizations. Symposium abstracts. Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1987. Pp. 129–130. (In Russ.)

67. Yuzefovich V. Kirghizes of Turgay Oblast: Household life reviewed. Russkiy vestnik. 1880. No. 4. Pp. 799–832. (In Russ.)

68. Zavalishin I. A Description of Western Siberia. Vol. 3: Kirghiz Steppe of Siberia. Moscow: Katkov & Co., 1867. 145 p. (In Russ.)

69. Zeland N. The Kirghiz: An ethnological essay. Zapiski Zapadno-Sibirskogo otdeleniya Imperatorskogo Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva. 1885. Vol. VII. No. 2. Pp. 1–78. (In Russ.)

70. Zhapekova G. K. The status of women in traditional Kazakh society. Al-Farabi Kazakh National University Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Political Science. 2014. No. 1 (46). Pp. 78–86. (In Russ.)

71. Zhelezchikov B. F. Sarmatians of the Southern Cis-Urals: Some issues of livestock breeding economy revisited. In: Monuments of Nomads from the Southern Urals. Ufa: USSR Academy of Sciences (Bashkiria Branch), 1984. Pp. 3–17. (In Russ.)