Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

Living Space Structure in Bashkir Traditional Etiquette

https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2021-58-6-1281-1289

Abstract

Introduction. In traditional culture, proxemic behavior is of great importance. The article is based on the results of the research on the structuring of the dwelling and the observance of ethno-etiquette norms within the framework of the traditional living space of the Bashkirs. The aim was to study the structure of the living space, interiors, and the stylistics of behavior in the traditional dwelling. Materials and methods. The main research sources were the author’s unpublished field materials, as well as published folklore texts, reports of the participants of academic expeditions of the 18th century, which contain valuable information about the temporary and permanent dwellings of Bashkirs. Methods used for the analysis were comparative-historical, typological, structural-semantic, and descriptive. The chronological framework of the study covers the period between the 18th and early 20th centuries. Results. The research shows that the structuring of living space is closely related to ancient beliefs, religion, and the ethnic history of the people. Vertical and horizontal divisions of the dwelling and analysis of space distribution inside the yurt indicate that the dwelling was perceived as a model of the world. The horizontal structuring of the inner space was associated with the ancient knowledge of the Bashkirs about the cardinal points, later enriched with Muslim teachings. In their behavior in the interiors, the Bashkirs were guided by the structural-semantic model of the dwelling, the entire developed space. In this aspect, gender, age, and social status were important factors of the traditional etiquette. The dwelling represented a cultivated, protected space, separating “one’s own” space from “other’s”, according to the structure of the internal space, and creating conditions for variable behavior; family members and guests followed binary oppositions, such as left versus right, male versus female, honorable versus less honorable, the parts for guests and household activities, top and bottom, center and periphery.

About the Author

Rozaliya R. Bayazitova
Institute of History, Language and Literature, Ufa Federal Research Centre of the RAS (71, Oktyabrya Ave., 450054 Ufa, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (History), Associate Professor, Senior Research Associate



References

1. Expeditions to Baymaksky, Beloretsky, Burzyansky, and Kugarchinsky Districts (Republic of Bashkortostan, Russian Federation), 2003–2017. (In Bash.)

2. Baiburin A. K. House in Rituals and Representations of East Slavs. Leningrad: Nauka, 1983. 191 p. (In Russ.)

3. Bakaeva E. P., Sangadzhiev Yu. I. Dwelling Culture: Ethnic Traditions and Contemporary Priorities among Kalmyks. Elista: Dzhangar, 2005. 196 p. (In Russ.)

4. Bikbulatov N. V. et al. The Bashkirs: Ethnic History and Traditional Culture. R. Yusupov (ed.). Ufa: Bashkirskaya Entsiklopediya, 2002. 248 p. (In Russ.)

5. Bikbulatov N. V., Fatykhova F. F. Family and Household Life of Bashkirs, 19th–20th Centuries. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. 189 p. (In Russ.)

6. Georgi I. G. Bashkirs. In: Description of Russia’s Peoples, Their Household Rites, Customs, Faiths, and Other Peculiarities. Part Two: Tatar Peoples and Other Yet Unidentified Tribes of Northern Siberia. St. Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences, 1799. P. 106. Available at: http://elib.shpl.ru/ru/nodes/14951-ch-2-o-narodah-tatarskogo-plemeni-i-drugih-ne-reshennogo-esche-proishozhdeniya-severnyh-sibirskih-1799#mode/inspect/page/134/zoom/5 (accessed: October 30, 2021). (In Russ.)

7. Kalimullin B. G. Bashkir Villages: Planning and Construction. Ufa: Bashkortostan Book Publ., 1959. 108 p. (In Russ.)

8. Khisamitdinova F. G. A Bashkir Mythological Dictionary. Moscow: Nauka, 2010. 452 p. (In Bash. and Russ.)

9. Radlov V. V. From Siberia: Pages of the Diary. K. Tsivina, B. Chistova (transl.); S. Vainshtein (comment., afterword). Moscow: GRVL, 1989. 749 p. (In Russ.)

10. Rudenko S. I. The Bashkirs: Historical and Ethnographic Essays. Ufa: Kitap, 2006. 376 p. (In Russ.)

11. Salmin A. K. Semantics of Chuvash House. Cheboksary: Chuvash State Institute for the Humanities, 1998. 64 p. (In Russ.)

12. Sharaeva T. I. Sacred code in the space of Kalmyk traditional dwelling. Oriental Studies. 2020. Vol. 13. No. 1. Pp. 41–54. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22162/2619-0990-2020-47-1-41-54

13. Shitova S. N. Bashkir Traditional Settlements and Dwellings, 1850s – 1920s. Moscow: Nauka, 1984. 254 p. (In Russ.)

14. Tokarev S. A. Ethnographic research of material culture: Methodology revisited. Sovetskaya etnografiya. 1970. No. 4. Pp. 3–17. (In Russ.)

15. Toleubaev A. Yurt in representations, beliefs and rites of Kazakhs. In: Nomadic Dwelling among Peoples of Central Asia Kazakhstan. Moscow: Nauka, 2000. Pp. 165–178. (In Russ.)

16. Uraksin Z. G. Ethnolinguistic aspect of Bashkir word. Yadkyar. 2000. No. 1. Pp. 73–77. (In Russ.)

17. Yanbukhtina A. G. Bashkir House: Folk Traditions in Interior Design. Ufa: Kitap, 1993. 136 p. (In Russ.)

18. Yusupov R. M. Bashkir yurt: Origin and main evolution stages. In: Yusupov R. M. et al. Bashkir Yurt. Ufa: Institute of History, Language and Literature (UFRS RAS), 2010. Pp. 5–16. (In Russ.)

19. Zhukovskaya N. L. Nomads of Mongolia: Culture, Traditions, Symbols. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, 2002. 247 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Bayazitova R.R. Living Space Structure in Bashkir Traditional Etiquette. Oriental Studies. 2021;14(6):1281-1289. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2021-58-6-1281-1289

Views: 356


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)