Between Russia’s Legal System and Sharia Norms: The Fate of the Law of 13 May 1830 On Prohibition of Any Deviations for Mohammedans from General Burial Regulations

Introduction. The article deals with an aspect of religious policy of the Russian Empire in the second quarter of the nineteenth century that concerned the legal regulation of the terms of burial of the deceased, which affected the rules of burial for Muslims. It aims to analyze the case of state and police law interfering with the religious canons of Russian Muslims. Materials and methods. The office records of the Orenburg Muftiate help clarify the historiographical thesis on the controversy of the 1830 law and shed light on its social consequences. The research is based on the methodological approaches of the new imperial history and the socio-cultural analysis of Russian society as a “big society”. The research methods include comparative historical, source study, textual and psycho historical. Results. While preparing and implementing the law of 13 May 1830, “О neotstuplenii ot obshchikh pravil pri pogrebenii musulman” (On non-departure from the general rules for the burial of Muslims), the authorities used the Orenburg Muftiate, entrusted with the announcement of the law and administrative control over the parish clergy. The military administration took an active part in coordinating actions to comply with the new funeral order. The reactive policy of the authorities towards the mullahs and the population of the Bashkir cantons created tension around the religious issues. A petition to Nicholas I, attempting at a dialogue between Bashkirs and the authorities, had the opposite effect and led to increased polarization of the society and the government. Results.  The legislative innovation on the unification of the terms of burial, including the territories with a Muslim population, was controversial from its very beginning. The officials in the center had a clearer understanding of the regional tasks of the administration when ready to admit that the Muslims may be excluded from the law. The Orenburg Mufti was somewhat unclear about the political plans to unify burial traditions and saw his principal goal in a diplomatic settlement of emerging bureaucratic issues. According to the present author, there is a connection between attempts to change the burial canons of Muslims and the religious agenda of the 1835 rebellion in the Urals. The state rulemaking attempt turned out to be ineffective in the realm of religious canons.

1. National Archive of the Republic of Bashkortostan.

2. Ufa Federal Research Centre (RAS), Scientific Archive.

3. Arapov D. Yu. (comp.) Islam in Imperial Russia: Legislative Acts, Descriptions, Statistics. Moscow: Akademkniga, 2001. 367 p. (In Russ.)

4. Asfandiyarov A. Z. Bashkiria Divided into Cantons, 1798–1865. Ufa: Kitap, 2005. 256 p. (In Russ.)

5. Azamatov D. D. Orenburg Mohammedan Spiritual Association, Late 18th – 19th Centuries. Ufa: Gilem, 1999. 194 p. (In Russ.)

6. Davletbaev B. S. Rebellion of 1835. In: Usmanov Kh. F. (ed.) History of Bashkortostan: From Earliest Times to the 1860s. Ufa: Kitap, 1996. Pp. 417–426. (In Russ.)

7. Druzhinin N. M. State Peasants and Count Pavel D. Kiselyov’s Reforms. Moscow; Leningrad: USSR Academy of Sciences, 1945. Vol. 1. 631 p. (In Russ.)

8. Farkhshatov M. N. Muslim clergy. In: Prozorov S. M. (comp., ed.) Islam in Provinces of Imperial Russia: An Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, 2006. Vol. I. Pp. 286–292. (In Russ.)

9. Imperial Edict Proclaimed by Boyar Musin-Pushkin On Burial on the Third Day and Capital Punishment for Homicide of Deformed Newborns by Midwives. In: Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire. Coll. I. No. 1964. Vol. 4: 1700–1712. St. Petersburg: H. I. M. Own Chancery (Second Section), 1830. 881 p. (In Russ.)

10. Imperially Approved Opinion of the State Council to Confirm That the Statute of 28 January 1708 On Ban on Burial within Three Days Be Duly Observed. In: Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire. Coll. II. No. 893. Vol. 3: 1872. St. Petersburg: H. I. M. Own Chancery (Second Section), 1830. 1138 p. (In Russ.)

11. Senate Edict Prepared in Accordance with the Imperially Approved Decree of the Committee of Ministers On Prohibition of Any Deviations for Mohammedans from General Burial Regulations. In: Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire. Coll. II. Vol. 5. Part 1: 1830. No. 3659. St. Petersburg: H. I. M. Own Chancery (Second Section), 1831. 822 p. (In Russ.)

12. Shirgazin A. R., Kalimullina D. B. Ufa. Monuments of Islamic Architecture. Ufa: Gilem, 2008. 120 p. (In Russ.)

13. Shukshintsev I. S. 1835 disturbances in Bashkiria. In: Transactions of Orenburg Scholarly Archival Commission. Orenburg: Executive Office of Orenburg Governorate, 1903. Vol. XI. Pp. 97–107. (In Russ.)