Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

To the Issue of the Early Ethnic History of Bargu-Buryat Community

https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2016-23-1-99-106

Abstract

The article presents versions and the hypothesis of early Barga - Buryat ethnogenesis and further branching of ethnic history. The study is based on ethnonym materials, as well as the latest research in the field of the history of these peoples. By the time of the disintegration of the Mongolian Empire the territory of Bargujin-Tokum was a part of the Yuan state. However, after ascent of the new Ming dynasty the northern territories remained out of control of Ming China. The ethnic history of this region was practically never reflected in written sources prior to the coming of Russians from the northwest and Manchu from southeast in the early 17th century. The ethnic history of Northern Mongolia, Baikal region and Cis-Hovsgol area in the Ming epoch has practically never been a subject of research. The majority of modern scholars consider this period a “dark age” of history. Historical ethnonymics forms the basis of this research paper. The key terms for the study are “Bargu” and “Buryat”. By the 17th century Buryat ethnonym almost lost its meaning in the local environment due to long usage in the nomadic-community stage of development in the peaceful period when various ethnoterritorial entities became dominant, such as the Bulagats on the Angara, Ekhirits on the Upper Lena, Ikinats on the Angara and Oka, Ashibagats on the Uda and Oka, Gotols on the Ida, Batulins on the Upper Kuda and so on. In this period the ethnonym Buryat lost its political significance among the carriers, but it was widely used by the neighboring peoples from whom the Russians first learnt about the “Brats”. In the stem of the brat/bratskii term apparently lied a Turkic (Khakass or Altaic) exoethnonym pyrat-purat in which the radical pyra-pura was a phonetic variant of the word “wolf”. A return to the common ethnonym was characteristic of the consolidation processes. Another characteristic feature was a new phase on the development of the ethnogenetic legends and myths in which Buryadai became the father of Ekhirit and Bulgadai and a brother to Horidoi. All these myths are based on the real historical events when the local population went through a long period of ethnic contacts as a result of which a unity with the single Mongolian proto-Buryat language was formed. The Buryat ethnonym evolved from its medieval spreading only on the Mongolian-speaking population groups and became common for all population groups in Cisbaikalia who, in their turn, already switched to Mongolian (Buryat) language.

About the Author

B. Z. Nanzatov
Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Affiliate of the RAS
Russian Federation


References

1. Banzarov D. Sobranie sochinenij [Collected works]. Ulan-Ude, BNC SO RAN Publ., 1997, 250 p. (In Russ.).

2. Baskakov N. A. Modeli tjurkskih jetnonimov i ih tipologicheskaja klassifi kacija [Models of the Türkic ethnonyms and their typological classifi cation]. Onomastika Vostoka (Onomastics of the East). Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980, pp. 199–207 (In Russ.).

3. Bertagaev T. A. Ob etnonimakh burjat i kurikan. [On Buriat and Kurikan ethnonyms]. Jetnonimy (Ethnonyms). Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1970, pp. 130–132 (In Russ.).

4. Buryaad-orod slovar’. Burjatsko–russkij slovar’, sost. K. M. Cheremisov [Buryat- Russian dictionary]. Compiled by K. M. Cheremisov. Moscow, Sovet. entsiklopedia Publ., 1973, 804 p. (In Russ.).

5. Buyandelger Dzh. Jetnicheskaja istorija bargutov (XV–XVII vv.) [Ethnic history of barguts (15– 17 centuries)]. Kul’turnoe nasledie narodov Central’noj Azii [The Cultural heritage of peoples of Central Asia.]. Ulan-Ude, BNC SO RAN Publ., 2012, Issue 3, pp. 183–205 (In Russ.).

6. Drevnetjurkskij slovar’ [Ancient Turkic dictionary]. Leningrad Nauka Publ., 1969, 676 p. (In Russ.).

7. Eremeev D. E. K semantike tjurkskoj jetnonimii [To the semantics of Turkic ethnonymics]. Jetnonimy (Ethnonyms). Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1970, pp. 133–141 (In Russ.).

8. Etnolingvisticheskij atlas MNR [Ethnolinguistic Atlas of the MPR]. Ulaanbaatar, Shua khevlel, 1979, 74 p., 145 sheets (In Russ.).

9. Khangalov M. N. Sobranie sochinenij [Collected works]. Ulan-Ude, Buryat Book Publ., 1960, vol. 3, 421 p. (In Russ.).

10. Malyavkin A. G. Tanskie khroniki o gosudarstvah Central’noj Azii [Tansky Chronicles of the Central Asian States]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1989, 432 p. (In Russ.).

11. Mitroshkina A. G. K jetimologii jetnonima burjat [To the etymology of the “Buryat” ethnonym]. Problemy burjatskoj fi lologii i kul’tury (Problems of Buryat philology and culture). Irkutsk, Irkutsk State University Publ., 1995, pp. 29–30 (In Russ.).

12. Mongol’sko-russkij slovar’, sost. A. Luvsandendev [Mongolian-Russian Dictionary. Compiled by A. Luvsandendev]. Moscow, State Publishing House of Foreign and National Dictionaries, 1957, 716 p. (In Russ.).

13. Nanzatov B. Z. Barguzinskij okrug v XIX v. (voprosy jetnicheskoj istorii regiona i jetnicheskij sostav naselenija) [Barguzinsky district in the nineteenth century (problems of ethnic history of the region and the ethnic composition of the population)]. Vestnik Burjatskogo nauchnogo centra (Bulletin of Buryat Scientifi c Centre), 2015, no. 2 (18), pp. 11–30 (In Russ.).

14. Nanzatov B. Z., Sodnompilova M. M. Alarskaja stepnaja duma (jetnicheskij sostav i rasselenie alarskih burjat v XIX v.) [The Alar’s Steppe Duma (Ethnic Composition and Settlement of the Alar’ Buryats in the 19th Century)]. Vestnik Burjatskogo nauchnogo centra (Bulletin of Buryat Scientifi c Centre), 2013, no. 2 (10), pp. 47–57 (In Russ.).

15. Nimaev D. D. Daury i barguty: problemy jetnicheskoj istorii [The Daur and the Barga people: problems of ethnic history]. Arheologija, jetnografi ja i antropologija Evrazii (Archeology, Ethnography and anthropology of Eurasia), 2010, no. 2, pp. 122– 127 (In Russ.).

16. Petrov K. I. K istorii dvizhenija kirgizov na Tjan’-shan’ i ih vzaimootnoshenij s ojratami v XII– XV vv. [To the history of the movement of Kyrgyz people on Tien Shan and their relationship with the Oirats in the 12–15 centuries]. Frunze, Publishing house of Academy of Sciences of the Kirghiz SSR, 1961, 212 p. (In Russ.).

17. Rashid-ad-din. Sobranie sochinenij [Collected works]. Moscow; Leningrad, Vostochnaya liter-ra (Oriental literature), 1952, vol. 1, book 1, 221 p. (In Russ.).

18. Rumyantsev G. N. Proishozhdenie horinskih burjat [The Origin of the Khori Buryats]. Ulan-Ude, Buryat Book. Publ., 1962. 268 p. (In Russ.).

19. Sanzheev G. D. Nekotorye voprosy jetnonimiki i drevnej istorii mongol’skih narodov [Some questions of ethnonymics in the ancient history of Mongolian peoples]. Jetnicheskie i istorikokul’turnye svjazi mongol’skih narodov (Ethnic and historical- cultural ties of the Mongolian peoples). Ulan-Ude, Buryat Book. Publ., 1983, pp. 47– 49 (In Russ.).

20. Sokrovennoe skazanie mongolov, per. S. A. Kozina [The Secret history of the Mongols]. Translated by S. A. Kozin. Ulan-Ude, Buryat Book. Publ., 1990, 147 p. (In Russ.).

21. Sukhbaatar G. Sjan’bi. Ulaanbaatar, Shukh khevlel, 1971, 217 p. (In Mongolian).

22. Ushnitsky V. V. Plemena Bargudzhin-tokuma i problema proishozhdenija naroda Sakha [Tribes of Bargudzhin-Tacoma and the problem of the origin of the Sakha people]. Severo-Vostochnyj gumanitarnyj vestnik (The North- East Humanitarian Bulletin), 2011, no. 2 (3), pp. 5–10 (In Russ.).

23. Tsydendambaev C. B. Burjatskie istoricheskie hroniki i rodoslovnye [Buryat historical chronicles and genealogies]. Ulan-Ude, Buryat Book. Publ., 1972, 662 p. (In Russ.).

24. Zoriktuev B. R. O proishozhdenii i semantike jetnonima burjat [On the origin and semantics of the ethnonym Buryat]. Mongolo-burjatskie jetnonimy (Mongolian-Buryat ethnonyms). Ulan-Ude, Buryat Book. Publ., 1996, pp. 8–31 (In Russ.).

25. 黑龙;巴尔 虎 人 驻防 辽宁 之 踪迹//西部 蒙古 论 坛 – 乌鲁木齐 [Hei Long, Baerguren Zufang LiaoningZhizongji, Xibu Menggu Luntan (Journal of the Western Mongolian Studies) (Khej Lun, Bargu, settled in Liaoning province)]. Urumchi, 2013, no. 3, pp. 20–24 (In Chinese).

26. 柳沢 明, 岫巖のバルグ人 // 北東アジア研 究 – 県立大学北東アジア地域研究セン タ [Yanagisawa Akira,Kō gan (Xiuyan) no Barugujin (Janagisava Akira, Sjujan’ Bargu), Hokutō Ajia chiki kenkyū – Shimanekenritsu daigaku, 2008, № 3], 2008, no. 3, pp. 47–66 (In Japanese).


Review

For citations:


Nanzatov B.Z. To the Issue of the Early Ethnic History of Bargu-Buryat Community. Oriental Studies. 2016;9(1):99-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2075-7794-2016-23-1-99-106

Views: 424


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)