Russian-British Economic Rivalry in Eastern Persia at the turn of the 20th Century: Kerman and Sistan

Introduction. The economic development of Eastern Persian provinces Kerman and Sistan — and the latter’s role in Russian-British economic rivalry — throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries remains somewhat understudied in both Russian and foreign historiographies. Goals. The article attempts an analysis of key trends in the development of Sistan and Kerman at the turn of the 20th century and their significance in foreign economic activities of both Great Britain and Russia. Materials and methods. The paper investigates reports by Russian diplomats to have headed Consulates to Kerman and Sistan. The employed research methods are the historical/genetic, historical/comparative, and historical/typological ones. Results. Russian diplomats paid great attention to peculiarities of Kerman and Sistan’s development, with due regard of their ethnic compositions, climatic conditions, and economic potentials. The article emphasizes that for a long time foreign trade of Kerman and Sistan was dominated by the British Empire which used, first of all, the potential and experience gained by India in organizing trade with Persia. The analysis of the Russian diplomatic reports shows since the late 19th century Russia — driven by its own foreign economic ambitions in Eastern Persia — was showing great interest in these provinces. St. Petersburg was aware of the impossibility of maintaining political dominance in Persia without strengthening its economic presence in the country, including in regions traditionally dominated by the British Empire. This initiative of St. Petersburg caused great concern in London. Conclusions. In the late 19th – early 20th centuries, Russia succeeded in challenging the positions of the British Empire in Sistan and Kerman markets, even in the segment of textile exports traditionally dominated by Great Britain. At the same time, when it comes to describe the obvious achievements of Russia in Persia’s eastern provinces it should be noted that Russian entrepreneurs showed little interest in developing trade with Kerman and Sistan. Therefore, most foreign economic operations were to be implemented with the active participation of Russian diplomatic missions. However, on the eve of WWI Russia’s entrepreneurs did take an initiative of their own, and thus paved further trade success in Sistan and Kerman.

1. Adamov A. Kerman Province: A report by Consul to Kerman. In: Collected Consular Reports. The Year 1908 (Year Eleven). Vol. 2. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1908. Pp. 279–330. (In Russ.)

2. Belyaev D. Essay on Kerman: A report by Secretary of Consulate to Kerman. In: Collected Consular Reports. The Year 1907 (Year Ten). Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1907. Pp. 54–59. (In Russ.)

3. Kumar R. India and the Persian Gulf Region, 1858–1907: A Study in British Imperial Policy. London: Asia Publishing House, 1965. 259 p. (In Eng.)

4. Miller A. Notes on Sistan: A message by Resident Medical Officer of Vice-Consulate to Sistan. In: Collected Consular Reports. The Year 1903 (Year Six). Vol. 4. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1903. Pp. 339–344. (In Russ.)

5. Miller A. Russian trade in Persia revisited: A report by Consul to Kerman. In: Collected Consular Reports. The Year 1905 (Year Eight). Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1905. Pp. 49–55. (In Russ.)

6. Miller A. Trade of Bahramabad: A report by Consul to Kerman. In: Collected Consular Reports. The Year 1907 (Year Ten). Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1907. Pp. 3–15. (In Russ.)

7. Miller A. Trade of Sistan, 1903–1904: A report by Administrative Officer of Vice-Consulate to Sistan. In: Collected Consular Reports. The Year 1904 (Year Seven). Vol. 4. St. Petersburg: Tovarishchestvo Khudozhestvennoy Pechati, 1904. Pp. 251–257. (In Russ.)

8. Naumova N. A. Sistan and Balochistan in the confrontation between Russia and Great Britain in Eastern Persia in the last third of the 19th – early 20th centuries. Humanities and Law Research. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 86–98. (In Russ.)

9. Naumova N. A. The state of the economy and foreign trade of Khurasan and South Persia on the eve of World War I in the reports of Russian diplomats (The case of Consulate General in Meshed and Vice-Consulate in Bandar Bushehr). Humanities and Law Research. 2021. No. 1. Pp. 73–80. (In Russ.)

10. Olson J. Anglo-Iranian Relations During World War I. London: Frank Cass, 1984. 305 p. (In Eng.)

11. Salnikova A. V. British-Russian Rivalry in Central Asia: Late 19th to Early 20th Centuries. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis abstract. Ivanovo, 2009. 24 p. (In Russ.)

12. Senchenko I. P. Imperial Russia, the Arabian Peninsula, and the Persian Gulf: Collected Histories. St. Petersburg: Aletheia 2018. 600 p. (In Russ.)

13. Sergeev E. Yu. The Great Game, 1856–1907: Myths and Realias of Russian-British Relations in Central and East Asia. Moscow: KMK, 2012. 454 p. (In Russ.)

14. Shevel A. A. English-Russian cooperation and rivalry in Persia in 1905–1914. The Bryansk State University Herald. 2015. No. 2. Pp. 190–195. (In Russ.)

15. Siegel J. Endgame: Britain, Russia and the Final Struggle for Central Asia. London: I. B. Tauris, 2002. 273 p. (In Eng.)

16. Sukhorukov S. A. Iran between Britain and Russia: From Politics to Economy. St. Petersburg: Aletheia 2009. 173 p. (In Russ.)