Absurd and Paradoxical Proverbs in Tuvan: Ontological and Logical Aspects of the Categorization of Proverbial Semantics

Introduction. The article deals with absurd and paradoxical proverbs resulting from the categorization of proverbial semantics according to the criterion of ‘relation to reality’ in the ontological or logical aspects. Goals. The study aims to identify quantitative and qualitative features of ontological and logical contradictions to reality traced in semantics of Tuvan proverbs. Materials and methods. The work analyzes a total of 770 Tuvan proverbs contained in Tuvan Proverbs and Sayings (1966), Proverbs and Sayings of the Tuvan People (2020), and other sources. The publication employs the author’s methodology for semantics categorization of aphoristic units and their differentiation into semantic types according to the criterion of ‘relation to reality’. Results. The article reveals that one in eight Tuvan proverbs literally (in the direct sense) contradict the existing order of things in the world. The ontological nature of a contradiction to reality in a proverb is implemented via the semantics of the absurd, which is motivated by a situational or verbal context, and it is impossible to interpret the literal content of the proverb — from the viewpoint of logical (rational) thinking — being unaware of that very context. The logical nature of the contradiction to reality in the proverb is implemented via the semantics of the paradox, which can be motivated epistemologically, semantically or formally, and logically. Only one structural part of a proverb can be contrary to reality, and this part always dominates in terms of general content. The Tuvan proverbs that contradict reality are distinguished by the presence of absurdity semantics in one of their structural parts, and that of paradox in the other one. Conclusions. An unexpectedly large number of absurd and paradoxical proverbs in the Tuvan proverb corpus attests to that it is reality’s perception and comprehension — based on the ontological and/or logical contradictions to objective reality — that take a significant place in the Tuvan view of the world.

1. Budup B. K. (comp.) Proverbs and Sayings of the Tuvan People. Kyzyl: Tuva Book Publ., Raduga Tuvy, 2020. 112 p. (In Tuv.)

2. Khadakhane M., Sagan-ool O. (comps.) Tuvan Proverbs and Sayings. Kyzyl: Tuva Book Publ., 1966. 172 p. (In Tuv. and Russ.)

3. Tenishev E. R. (ed.) Tuvan-Russian Dictionary. Moscow: Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya, 1968. 648 p. (In Tuv. and Russ.)

4. Abakumova O. B. Proverbs in Language, Consciousness, and Communication: Cognitive Modelling of Ideas behind a Proverb in Discourse, and Referential/Evaluative Typology of Russian, English, Spanish, French, and Czech Proverbs about Truth and Lies. St. Petersburg: Aleph-Press, 2013. 353 p. (In Russ.)

5. Bochina T. G. Contrast in Tuvan proverbs. The New Research of Tuva. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 37–46. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25178/nit.2022.1.3

6. Bolat-ool R. V., Pelevina N. N. On woman’s image in Tuvinian and German proverbs. Vestnik Khakasskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N. F. Katanova. 2017. No. 21. Pp. 29–32. (In Russ.)

7. Bredis M. A., Ivanov E. E. Proverbial factors in translating Tuvan proverbs in the light of normative and poly-lingual paremiography (As contrasted to Russian and English languages). The New Research of Tuva. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 17–36. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25178/nit.2022.1.2

8. Bredis M. A., Ivanov E. E. Typology of proverbs of the Baltic-Finnish peoples of Russia about wealth and poverty (On the European paremiological material). Bulletin of Ugric Studies. 2021. Vol. 11. No. 4. Pp. 607–615. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.30624/2220-4156-2021-11-4-607-615

9. Bredis M. A., Ivanov E. E., Lomakina O. V., Nelyubova N. Yu., Kuzhuget Sh. Yu. A lexicographical description of Tuvan proverbs: Principles, structure and an ethnolinguoculturological commentary as compared to European paremies. The New Research of Tuva. 2021. No. 4. Pp. 143–160. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25178/ nit.2021.4.11

10. Bredis M. A., Lomakina O. V. (eds.) Paremiology without Borders. Moscow: RUDN University, 2020. 244 p. (In Russ.)

11. Budegechieva T. B. Tuvan Culture: The Material and the Spiritual, Traditions and Innovations. Kyzyl: Tuvan State University, 2018. 115 p. (In Russ.)

12. Burenina O. (ed.) The Absurd and Beyond. Collected papers. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoy Kultury, 2004. 448 p. (In Russ.)

13. Chugunekova A. N. Symbolism of numbers in Khakass and Tuvan paremiology. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2019. No. 10–2(37). Pp. 18–21. (In Russ.)

14. Dorzhu K. B. Comparison of how negative and reproachful qualities of people are expressed in Russian and Tuvan sayings. Vestnik of Tuvan State University. 2012. No. 1. Pp. 94–98. (In Russ.)

15. Egorova A. I., Kondakova A. P., Kuzhuget M. A. Gender stereotypes in Tuvan proverbs and sayings. The New Research of Tuva. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 18–31. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25178/nit.2020.1.2

16. Ivanov E. E. ‘Paradoxes’ and ‘kōans’ as semantic types of aphoristic phrases. BSPU Bulletin. 2002. No. 2 (32). Pp. 82–88. (In Bel.)

17. Ivanov E. E. Aphorism as an object of linguistics: The main properties. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics. 2020. Vol. 11. No. 4. Pp. 659–706. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22363/2313-2299-2020-11-4-659-706

18. Ivanov E. E. Aphoristic units recurrence in modern Russian language. Russian Language Studies. 2019. Vol. 17. No. 2. Pp. 157–170. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22363/2618-8163-2019-17-2-157–170

19. Ivanov E. E. Functions of aphoristic units in the Russian language. Russian Language Studies. 2022. Vol. 20. No. 2. Pp. 167–185. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22363/2618-8163-2022-20-2-167-185

20. Ivanov E. E. Paradoxical proverbs in Russian and Belarusian. Vestnik NovSU. Issue: Philological Sciences. 2014. No. 77. Pp. 21–24. (In Russ.)

21. Ivanov E. E. Semantic typology of aphorism in Slavic and Germanic languages. In: Mlacek J., Ďurčo P. (eds.) Phraseological Studies. 2003. Vol. III. Pp. 43–60. (In Bel.)

22. Ivanov E. E. Semantic typology of Tuvan proverbs (Empirical and axiological aspects). The New Research of Tuva. 2022. No. 4. Pp. 317–337. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25178/nit.2022.4.22

23. Ivanov E. E. Semantics of aphoristic phrases: A case study of Slavic and Germanic language materials. Journal of the Belarusian State University. 2004. No. 1. Pp. 63–68. (In Bel.)

24. Ivanov E. E., Lomakina O. V. Paremiology: At the Crossroads of Languages and Cultures. Moscow: RUDN University, 2021. 246 p. (In Russ.)

25. Ivanov E. E., Lomakina O. V., Nelyubova N. Yu. Semantic analysis of Tuvan proverbs: models, imagery, concepts (against the European paremiological background). The New Research of Tuva. 2021. No. 3. Pp. 232–248. DOI: 10.25178/nit.2021.3.17

26. Ivanov E. E., Lomakina O. V., Petrushevskaya J. A. The national specificity of the proverbial fund: Basic concepts and procedure for determining. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics. 2021. Vol. 12. No. 4. Pp. 993–1032. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22363/2313-2299-2021-12-4-993-1032

27. Ivanov E. E., Marfina Zh. V., Shkuran O. V. Animal nouns in Tuvan proverbs and sayings: Problems of studying and aspects of functioning. The New Research of Tuva. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 47–68. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25178/nit.2022.1.4

28. Ivanov E., Petrushevskaia J. Etymology of English proverbs. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2015. Vol. 8. No. 5. Pp. 864–872. (In Eng.)

29. Ivanova E. V. Proverbial World Views: A Case Study of English and Russian Proverbs. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University, 2002. 155 p. (In Russ.)

30. Ivanova E. V. The World in English and Russian Proverbs. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University, 2006. 280 p. (In Russ.)

31. Kechil-ool S. V., Saaya O. M. Specifics of phraseological units with the component “ear” in the Tuvinian language in comparison with the Russian. Philology. Theory & Practice. 2016. No. 9–2(63). Pp. 107–109. (In Russ.)

32. Kechil-ool S. V., Saaya O. M. The semantic peculiarities of phraseological units with the component “hand” in the Tuvan and Russian languages. Philology. Theory & Practice. 2017. No. 6–1(72). Pp. 92–95. (In Russ.)

33. Kolesnikova S. M. Gradable semantics in Russian and Tuvan proverbs. The New Research of Tuva. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 90–103. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25178/nit.2022.1.6

34. Konyashkin A. M., Chadamba Sh. S. Linguoculturological aspect of the Tuva paremias in texts of the Russian literary translations. The World of Science, Culture and Education. 2017. No. 6(67). Pp. 616–618. (In Russ.)

35. Kurbatsky G. N. Tuvans in Their Folklore: Historical and Ethnographic Aspects of Tuvan Folklore. Kyzyl: Tuvan Book Publ., 2001. 464 p. (In Russ.)

36. Kuusi M. Concerning folk paradoxes. In: Ilomaki H. (ed.) Mind and Form in Folklore. Selected Essays of Matti Kuusi. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, 1994. Pp. 131–141. (In Eng.)

37. Kuzhuget Sh. Yu., Suvandii N. D., Dambaa Sh. V., Lamazhaa Ch. K. The concept of төрел (‘relative’) in the Tuvan linguistic world picture. The New Research of Tuva. 2019. No. 3. Pp. 149–157. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25178/nit.2019.3.12

38. Lamazhaa Ch. K. Archaization of Society: The Tuvan Phenomenon. Moscow: Librokom, 2013. 272 p. (In Russ.)

39. Lamazhaa Ch. K. Essays on Contemporary Tuvan Culture. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2021. 192 p. (In Russ.)

40. Lamazhaa Ch. K. Tuva: Between Past and Future. 2nd ed., rev. and suppl. St. Petersburg: Aletheia, 2011. 368 p. (In Russ.)

41. Levin Yu. I. Logical/semiotic experiment in folklore. In: Levin Yu. I. Selected Works. Poetics. Semiotics. Moscow: Yazyki Russkoy Kultury, 1998. Pp. 504–519. (In Russ.)

42. Lomakina O. V. (ed.) Paremiology in Discourse. Moscow: URSS, Lenand, 2015. 294 p. (In Russ.)

43. Lomakina O. V. Tuvan pa­remiology: Its linguoculturological and linguoaxiological potential. The New Research of Tuva. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 6–16. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25178/nit.2022.1.1

44. Moskvitcheva S. A., Aleksandrova O. I., Ebzeeva Yu. N. Folklore culturemes in the structure of cultural representations of Tuvan people. The New Research of Tuva. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 164–182. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25178/nit.2022.1.11

45. Nelyubova N. Yu. Axiological dominants of paremies as typological markers in Russian, Tuvan and French ethnic cultures. The New Research of Tuva. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 146–163. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25178/ nit.2022.1.10

46. Petrushevskaya J. A. Belarusian Proverbs: Language Specifics and Ethnic Features. Mogilev: Kuleshov Mogilev State University, 2021. 220  p. (In Bel.)

47. Petrushevskaya J. A. Methodology for determining national, international and universal in Belarusian phraseology and paremiology. WEST – EAST. Scientific Journal of International Scientific Pedagogical Organization of Philologists (ISPOP). 2021. Vol 5. No. 1. Pp. 61–72. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.33739/2587-5434-2021-3-1-61-72

48. Petrushevskaya J. A. Tuvan and Belarusian proverbial parallels (Typological community amid ethnocultural specificity). The New Research of Tuva. 2022. No. 3. Pp. 241–263. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25178/ nit.2022.3.16

49. Petrushevskaya Yu. A. The universal and the national in paremiological system of language: Analyzing Enlkish and Belarusian language materials. In: Ivanov E. E. (ed.) Acta Germano-Slavica. Vol. 6. Mogilev: Kuleshov Mogilev State University, 2015. Pp. 213–216. (In Russ.)

50. Salchak A. M. Image of wolf in Tuvan and English proverbs. Symbol of Science. 2019. No. 6. Pp. 25–27. (In Russ.)

51. Seliverstova E. I. Binary structures in Tuvan proverbs as a manifestation of the nationally marked vision of the world. The New Research of Tuva. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 115–130. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25178/nit.2022.1.8

52. Semenenko N. N. Russian Paremias: Functions, Semantics, Pragmatics. Stary Oskol: ROSA, 2011. 355 p. (In Russ.)

53. Zinovieva E. I., Alyoshin A. S. The family in comparative paremies of Tuvan, Swedish and Russian languages. The New Research of Tuva. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 131–145. DOI: 10.25178/nit.2022.1.9

54. Zolbayar G., Bayarsaikhan B. (eds.) Tsengel Tuvans: Folklore and Literature. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2020. 152 p. (In Russ.)