Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

The Site of Shapi: A New Eneolithic Monument in the Ryn-Peski Desert (Northern Caspian)

https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2023-67-3-533-547

Abstract

Introduction. A continental stage in the Northern Caspian geological history began with the Mangyshlak regression when sands that would shape the Ryn Desert were freed from marine waters, and the region started being actively invaded by humans, which is evidenced by numerous Stone Age sites. The bulk of the latter are represented by ‘open-air’ materials — some mixed complexes with few ceramic remains — and this does complicate chronological attributions of such archaeological collections. So, the study of monuments with preserved ‘cultural layers’ instrumental in obtaining a series of absolute dates is a primary task in understanding historical and cultural processes of the Mesolithic/Eneolithic in the Northern Caspian. Goals. The article aims to introduce into scientific circulation some materials discovered at the site of Shapi in the Ryn-Peski Desert. Materials and methods. The site of Shapi is located in the north-northwest of the Ryn Desert, 30 km south of Lake Aralsor in present-day Bokey Orda District of West Kazakhstan Region. The stone artefacts obtained are few enough, mainly of quartzitic sandstone, and number 67, e.g., 6 items are tools — arrowheads, an arrowhead fragment, a notched piece, a flake with a distinguished point, and a flake with retouch. There are 8 flint artefacts, including 5 tools — an arrowhead, fragments of blades with retouch, and two flakes with retouch. A pit was dug out on the spot abundant in finds, and it yielded bone remains of cattle, goats and sheep, a horse, a camel, and a dog (wolf). Results. Despite tool forms are few enough, one can note the presence of pieces with bifacial retouch and concave-based arrowheads with small wings. Species composition analysis of the bone remains shows those are dominated by cloven-hoofed animals, essentials of the examined bone complex attest to these are kitchen waste. Bone remains at depths of 20–40 and 40–60 cm yielded a series of calibration dates between 4048 and 3956 BCE. Conclusions. Chronologically, the site clusters with Late Eneolithic ones, and may be attributed to the late Khvalynsk and Altata cultures.

About the Authors

Talgat B. Mamirov
Margulan Institute of Archaeology, Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (44, Dostyk Ave., 050010 Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan)
Kazakhstan

Cand. Sc. (History), Deputy Director 



Yerlan Ye. Klyshev
Margulan Institute of Archaeology, Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (44, Dostyk Ave., 050010 Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan) Makhambet Utemisov West Kazakhstan University (162, N. Nazarbayev Ave., 090000 Uralsk, Republic of Kazakhstan)
Kazakhstan

MA (History), Junior Research Associate

Lecturer



Samrat R. Kuandyk
Margulan Institute of Archaeology, Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (44, Dostyk Ave., 050010 Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan)
Kazakhstan

MA (Archaeology), Junior Research Associate



Mambet S. Shagirbayev
Margulan Institute of Archaeology, Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (44, Dostyk Ave., 050010 Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan)
Kazakhstan

MA (Museum Studies and Monument Protection), Research Associate



References

1. Galkin L. L. Volga-Ural Expedition (Institute of Archaeology, USSR Academy of Sciences) in Guryev and Mangyshlak Regions of the Kazakh SSR: 1978 Progress Reports. At: Margulan Institute of Archaeology, Archives. File 1682, fasc. 122. Coll. 11. Cat. 2. Inv. no 351. 30 p. (In Russ.)

2. Melentyev A. N. Caspian Team of Astrakhan Expedition (Leningrad Branch, Institute of Archaeology, USSR Academy of Sciences): 1969 Progress Report. At: Margulan Institute of Archaeology, Archives. Coll. 11. Cat. 2. File 1133. 17 p. (In Russ.)

3. Barynkin P. P. Eneolithic and Early Bronze Age in the Northern Caspian. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis abstract. Moscow, 1992. 25 p. (In Russ.)

4. Barynkin P. P. Kairshak VI: Eneolithic site in southern parts of the Volga-Ural river system reviewed. In: Merpert N. Ya. (ed.) Neolithic and Eneolithic in the Northern Caspian. Kuybyshev: Kuybyshev State Institute of Education, 1989. Pp. 106–118. (In Russ.)

5. Barynkin P. P. Northern Caspian: Newly discovered Eneolithic sites reviewed. In: Archeological Sites in the European USSR. Voronezh: Voronezh State Institute of Education, 1985. Pp. 59–75. (In Russ.)

6. Barynkin P. P., Vasilyev I. B. Kara-Khuduk site of the Khvalynsk culture in the Northern Caspian. In: Merpert N. Ya. (ed.) Archaeological Cultures in the Northern Caspian. Kuybyshev: Kuybyshev State Institute of Education, 1988. Pp. 123–142. (In Russ.)

7. Gorashchuk I. V. Mesolithic and Early Neolithic in the Northern Caspian: Stone Tools. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis abstract. Yekaterinburg, 2007. 26 p. (In Russ.)

8. Gorashchuk I. V. Sites of the Khvalynsk culture: Stone tool manufacturing techniques. In: Questions of Volga Archaeology. Jubilee edition. Vol. 3. Samara: Samara Scientific Center (RAS), Institute of Volga History and Archaeo­logy, Samara State Institute of Education, 2003. Pp. 118–134. (In Russ.)

9. Ivanov I. V., Vasilyev I. B. Holocene in the Ryn Desert of the Volga-Ural River System: Man, Nature and Soils. Moscow: Intellect, 1995. 264 p. (In Russ.)

10. Komarov A. M. Mesolithic in the Northern Caspian. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis abstract. Izhevsk, 2000. 22 p. (In Russ.)

11. Komarov A. M. Mesolithic in the Northern Caspian: A history of research. In: Nekhoroshev P. E., Skripkin A. S. (eds.) Lower Volga Archaeology. In 4 vols. Vol. 1. Volgograd: Volgograd Science Press, 2016. Pp. 154–163. (In Russ.)

12. Komarov A. M., Lastovsky A. A. Lower Volga: Current physiographic conditions and paleogeography. In: Nekhoroshev P. E., Skripkin A. S. (eds.) Lower Volga Archaeology. In 4 vols. Vol. 1. Volgograd: Volgograd Science Press, 2016. Pp. 164–173. (In Russ.)

13. Kozin E. V. Neolithic in the Northern Caspian. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis abstract. Izhevsk, 2002. 27 p. (In Russ.)

14. Kuzmina I. E. Holocene in the Northern Caspian: Mammals. In: Merpert N. Ya. (ed.) Archaeological Cultures in the Northern Caspian. Kuybyshev: Kuybyshev State Institute of Education, 1988. Pp. 173–188. (In Russ.)

15. Kuznetsov P. V. Chronology of the Khvalynsk culture of the Volga-Ural Region. In: Burova N. D. et al. (eds.) Radiocarbon Dating in Archaeology and Paleoecology: Past, Present, Future. Jubilee conference proceedings (St. Petersburg, 23–25 November 2020). St. Petersburg: Institute of Material Culture History (RAS), 2020. Pp. 47–49. (In Russ.)

16. Lastovsky A. A., Komarov A. M. Monuments with microlithic tools in lower parts of the Maly Uzen River. In: Merpert N. Ya. (ed.) Archaeological Cultures in the Northern Caspian. Kuybyshev: Kuybyshev State Institute of Education, 1988. Pp. 42–51. (In Russ.)

17. Maev E. G. Stages of the Mangyshlak Regression of the Caspian Sea. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya. 2009. No. 1. Pp. 15–20. (In Russ.)

18. Melentyev A. N. Mesolithic in the Northern Caspian. KSIA. 1977. Is. 149. Pp. 100–108. (In Russ.)

19. Tsibin V. A., Shalapinin A. A. The Eneolithic burial of Maksimovka I soil burial ground from the Samara Trans-Volga Region. Science Journal of VolSU. History. Area Studies. International Relations. 2019. Vol. 24. No. 3. Pp. 6–16. (In Russ.)

20. Vybornov A., Zaitseva G., Kovaliukh N., Kulkova M., Skripkin V., Possnert G. Chronological problems with neolithization of the Northern Caspian Sea area and the forest steppe Povolzhye region. Radiocarbon. 2012. Vol. 54. No. 3–4. Pp. 795–799. (In Eng.)

21. Yudin A. I. Eneolithic in the Volga Steppes: Settlement of Kumyska. Saratov: Nauchnaya Kniga, 2012. 212 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Mamirov T.B., Klyshev Ye.Ye., Kuandyk S.R., Shagirbayev M.S. The Site of Shapi: A New Eneolithic Monument in the Ryn-Peski Desert (Northern Caspian). Oriental Studies. 2023;16(3):533-547. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2023-67-3-533-547

Views: 320


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)