Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

Institutions of Public Government in Manchu-Mongolian Polities, 1900s–1920s: A Case Study of Hulunbuir

https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2023-68-4-718-726

Abstract

Introduction. The paper attempts an insight into how institutions of public government developed in Manchu-Mongolian polities throughout the 1900s–1920s — and focuses on the geopolitically and strategically important Chinese region of Hulunbuir. Goals. The article aims to explore the transformation of power structures in Hulunbuir, reveal some internal contradictions and the split in bureaucratic circles that occurred under the influence of various political forces between 1908 and 1920.To facilitate this, the work shall examine the structure of the Manchu Eight Banner system in the region, analyze the new policies of Qing authorities in Hulunbuir, trace changes in the public government structure across the region in 1912–1915, follow how (and why) Hulunbuir lost its autonomy in 1920. Conclusion. As is shown, the hierarchical structure of Hulunbuir’s administrative powers — despite the attempts to change it undertaken by various political forces — did still retain the traditional features of the Manchu Eight Banner system by 1920. At the level of regional authorities, the shaping of policies was largely influenced by internal contradictions between various ethnic groups of Hulunbuir. However, even when it came to join Outer Mongolia in 1912–1915, authorities of Hulunbuir used each and every possibility to maintain independence in external and internal affairs, finances. The dramatic changes of 1917–1919 in the situation — in and around Hulunbuir — triggered that the decision-making apparatus preferred to abolish Hulunbuir’s autonomy and turn it into a mere periphery of the Republic of China.

About the Authors

Bazar D. Tsybenov
Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the RAS (6, Sakhyanova St., 670047 Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (History), Senior Research Associate



Leonid V. Kuras
Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the RAS (6, Sakhyanova St., 670047 Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Dr. Sc. (History), Chief Research Associate



Victoria E. Tsyrempilova
Dorzhi Banzarov Buryat State University (24a, Smolina St., Ulan-Ude 670000, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (History), Senior Lecturer



References

1. Informant 1: Oyuunbilig, b. 1965, ethnic Barga, clan Galzut. Rec. in Amgalang (New Barag Left Banner, Hulunbuir, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, People’s Republic of China), 2019. (In Mong.)

2. Archive of Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire.

3. Central Archive of the Federal Security Service of Russia.

4. State Archive of Irkutsk Oblast.

5. Atwood C. P. State service, lineage and locality in Hulun Buir. East Asian History. 2005. December. No. 30. Pp. 5–22. (In Eng.)

6. Atwood C. P. Young Mongols and Vigilantes in Inner Mongolia’s Interregnum Decades, 1911–1931. Leiden, Boston, Köln: Brill, 2002. 1168 p. (In Eng.)

7. Dudin P. N. Barga as a part of the Russian strategic interests in Eastern Asia in the first quarter of the XX century: Treaty aspect. Genesis: Historical Research. 2020. No. 8. Pp. 12– 25. DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2020.8.33689. (In Russ.)

8. Galindeviin Myagmarsambuu T. History and Ethnography of Barga. Vol. 1: A Concise History of Barga, 1734–1960. Ulaanbaatar: Soyombo Printing, 2021. 335 p. (In Mong.)

9. Kormazov V. A. Barga: An Economic Essay. Harbin: Chinese Eastern Railway, 1928. 281 p. (In Russ.)

10. Kuras L. V., Tsybenov B. D. Manuscript from the State Archives of the Irkutsk region «Historical information about the fragility of the political situation of Hulunbuir» as a source on the history of relations between Outer Mongolia and Hulun-Buir in 1912–1915. Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS. 2023. No. 1(23). Pp. 150–160. DOI: 10.31696/2618-7302-2023-1-150-160. (In Russ.)

11. Kuzmin S. L. Barga and Kharachin Issues in East Asian History: Early-to-Mid Twentieth Century. Vol. 1. Moscow: KMK, 2021. 407 p. (In Russ.)

12. Kuzmin S. L. Barga and Kharachin Issues in East Asian History: Early-to-Mid Twentieth Century. Vol. 2. Moscow: KMK, 2022. 260 p. (In Russ.)

13. Lan Mei-Hua. The 1911 Independence Movement in Mongolia: Striving for a United Mongolian State. Ulaanbaatar: Soyombo Printing, 2011. 210 p. (In Mong.)

14. Meshchersky A. S. Meat Procurement Expedition to Mongol-Inhabited Territories. Vladivostok-Manchuria Region. Barga Autonomy. Activity Report Materials, 1915 to 1918. Vol. 12. Shanghai: Russian Book Publ., 1920. 39 p. (In Russ.)

15. Sun Jing. Study on the administrative divisions in China’s border areas from the perspective of nation-state building — Changes to the administrative divisions in Inner Mongolia in the 20th century. Asian Social Science. 2018. Vol. 14. No. 6. Pp. 98–105. (In Eng.)

16. Tsybenov B. D. A new source on the relationship between Hulun Buir and Outer Mongolia in 1912–1915. Nauchnyi dialog. 2021. No. 2. Pp. 422–435. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2021-2-422-435. (In Russ.)

17. Tsybenov B. D. A Twentieth-Century Sociopolitical History of the Dagu. Ulan-Ude: Buryat Scientific Center (SB RAS), 2022. 474 p. (In Russ.)

18. Tsybenov B. The case file of Aula Samdin (Fumingtai): A historical and biographical aspect. Studia Orientalia Slovaca. 2021. Vol. 20. No. 1. Pp. 85–112. (In Eng.)


Review

For citations:


Tsybenov B.D., Kuras L.V., Tsyrempilova V.E. Institutions of Public Government in Manchu-Mongolian Polities, 1900s–1920s: A Case Study of Hulunbuir. Oriental Studies. 2023;16(4):718-726. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2023-68-4-718-726

Views: 297


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)