Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

Tobolsk Reserve Museum of History and Architecture: Introducing a Seventeenth/Mid-Eighteenth-Century Quiver

https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2023-68-4-786-810

Abstract

Introduction. The paper examines a richly decorated leather quiver (ВО-73) housed at Tobolsk Reserve Museum of History and Architecture. This quiver has never been subject to scholarly research. Goals. The study aims to introduce the artefact into scientific circulation, date it, and clarify its cultural attribution. Results. The article reveals the quiver arrived in Tobolsk Governorate Museum in 1890 to mid-1891. Typologically, such quivers cluster with a wide range of Central Asian quivers dating to the mid-16th through mid-19th centuries CE, but differ from other Mongolian and South Siberian quivers on a number of construction and ornamental details, such as a high pointed back, massive upper ‘eye’ extended far forward, and absence of decorative metal plates on the outer side of the quiver (except for belt buckles and rivets on the edges). All quivers of this type known to date come from Southern Siberia, Southeast Kazakhstan, and Tibet, i.e. the regions invaded by Western Mongols — Oirats (Dzungars, Khoshuts, Dorbets, etc.) — in the 17th to mid-18th centuries. And the period when quivers of this type were used coincides with that of the Oirat domination across the aforementioned territories, which makes it possible to view such quivers as Oirat-type ones. Quivers produced by Tibetan craftsmen could be distinguished within this type due to Tibetan ornamental patterns, the latter quivers be referred to as Oirat-Tibetan ones. Oirat-type quivers may have emerged in the mid-16th to early 17th centuries across Western Mongolia, Southern Siberia, Southeast and East Kazakhstan. Quivers of this type could have arrived in Tibet with troops of Güshi Khan and his allies in the late 1630s, and are far less likely to have emerged in Tibet to be further disseminated by Oirats towards Southern Siberia and Southeast Kazakhstan. The quiver from Tobolsk Reserve Museum of History and Architecture is distinguished by mounting plates made (or ornamented) by a craftsman that tended to follow the Moslem cultural tradition. Conclusions. Our analysis of the quiver’s decorative elements and ornamental patterns suggests that the artefact was produced by an Oirat or Tibetan craftsman — to be later ornated by a Moslem jeweler. The quiver may have also been completely produced by a Central Asian craftsman in the Oirat style. Anyway, the customer was definitely a well-to-do Chakar (West Siberian) Kalmyk or Dzungar warrior. So, it was manufactured during the existence of Siberian and Central Asian Oirat states — in the 17th to mid-18th centuries. The quiver could have been delivered to Western Siberia as an item of trade, a diplomatic gift or a trophy of war. 

About the Authors

Leonid A. Bobrov
Novosibirsk State University (1, Pirogov St., 630090 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Dr. Sc. (History), Professor, Leading Research Associate



Igor V. Balyunov
Tobolsk Reserve Museum of History and Architecture (1/4, Krasnaya Ploshchad, 626152 Tobolsk, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (History), Chief Research Associate



References

1. Tobolsk Reserve Museum of History and Architecture. Accession Register Card. ТМ-5423. Inv. no. ВО-73. 1 p. (In Russ.)

2. Alexander D. G. Islamic Arms and Armor in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2015. 336 p. (In Eng.)

3. Antiques from Siberia: Collections of Tobolsk Museum. Tobolsk Revival Foundation. Tobolsk, Verona: GRAFIC, 2000. 277 p. (In Russ.)

4. Bobrov L. A. Dzungars — the last imperial nomads. In: Bazarov B. V., Kradin N. N. (eds.) Nomadic Empires of Eurasia: Particularities of Historical Dynamics. Moscow: Nauka – Vostochnaya Literatura, 2019. Pp. 364–398. (In Russ.)

5. Bobrov L. A., Alekseev D. P. Smolensk State Reserve Museum: A Kalmyk ‘Framed’ Helmet Reviewed. Mongolian Studies (Elista). 2022; 14(2): 247–263. DOI: 10.22162/2500-1523-2022-2-247-263. (In Russ.).

6. Bobrov L. A., Baitenova S. O., Nastich V. N. Once again about the helmet with golden notch from the collection of the North Kazakhstan Regional Museum. Universum Humanitarium. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 44–65. (In Russ.)

7. Bobrov L. A., Balyunov I. V. ‘Big’ Oirat spherocylindrical helmet in the Tobolsk Historical and Architectural Museum-Reserve depositary. Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research. 2022. Vol. 34. No. 1. Pp. 226–249. DOI: 10.14258/tpai(2022)34(1).-13. (In Russ.)

8. Bobrov L. A., Borisenko A. Yu., Khudyakov Yu. S. Military Science in Siberia: Interaction between Turko-Mongols and Russians in the Late Middle Ages and Modern Era. Coursebook. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University, 2010. 288 p. (In Russ.)

9. Bobrov L. A., Kabuldinov Z. E., Agatay U. M. An Oirat sphero-cylindrical helmet and arming cap from the Central State Museum collection of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Archaeology, Ethnography & Anthropology of Eurasia. 2022. Vol. 50. No. 4. Pp. 91–98. DOI: 10.17746/1563-0110.2022.50.4.091-098. (In Russ.)

10. Bobrov L. A., Khudyakov Yu. S. Mongolian influence on military affairs of Tibetans in the late Middle Ages and early modern period. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2006. Vol. 5. No. 3. Suppl. 2. Pp. 188–234. (In Russ.)

11. Bobrov L. A., Khudyakov Yu. S. Nomads of Central Asia and Southern Siberia: Weapons and Tactics in the Late Middle Ages and Modern Era (15th – Early-to-Mid 18th Centuries). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University (Faculty of Philology and Arts), 2008. 770 p. (In Russ.)

12. Bobrov L. A., Pilipenko S. A., Martyushov R. A. Late medieval Central Asian quiver from the collection of the Novokuznetsk Museum of Local Lore. Universum Humanitarium. 2023. No. 1. Pp. 12–32. (In Russ.)

13. Bobrov L. A., Pink I. B. Arrows and quivers of the Kazakh warriors from the funds of the Tula State Museum of Arms. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2014. Vol. 13. No. 3. Pp. 243–255. (In Russ.)

14. Bobrov L. A., Ryumshin M. A. “... And against them, they could not withstand anywhere and they are not able to fight against them”. Arms and military tactical aspect of the Kalmyk-Nogai and Kalmyk-Tatar wars during the first half – middle of the 17th century. Golden Horde Civilization. 2015. No. 8. Pp. 357–378. (In Russ.)

15. Bobrov L. A., Zozulya S. S. Armor plates from the excavations of V. V. Radlov in the collection of the State Historical Museum. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2022. Vol. 21. No. 5. Pp. 115–130. DOI: 10.25205/1818-7919-2022-21-5-115-130. (In Russ.)

16. Dekker P. Early lacquered quiver. 2020. On: Mandarin Mansion. Available at: https://www.mandarinmansion.com/item/early-tibetan-or-mongolian-lacquered-quiver (accessed: 19 December 2022). (In Eng.)

17. Dekker P. Rare Jinchuan quiver. 2019. On: Mandarin Mansion. Available at: https://www.mandarinmansion.com/item/rare-jinchuan-quiver (accessed: 19 December 2022). (In Eng.)

18. Dekker P. Tibetan bowcase and quiver. 2021. On: Mandarin Mansion. Available at: https://www.mandarinmansion.com/item/tibetan-bowcase-quiver (accessed: 19 December 2022). (In Eng.)

19. Dekker P. Tibetan or Mongolian quiver. 2019. On: Mandarin Mansion. Available at: https://www.mandarinmansion.com/item/tibetan-or-mongolian-quiver (accessed: 19 December 2022). (In Eng.)

20. Kocheshkov N. V. Folk Arts of Mongols. Moscow: Nauka, 1973. 200 p. (In Russ.)

21. Korneev G. B. Sacred Banners of Oirats and Kalmyks. Elista: Golden Abode of the Shakyamuni Buddha, 2022. 232 p. (In Russ.)

22. LaRocca D. Warriors of the Himalayas: Rediscovering the Arms and Armor of Tibet. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art; New Haven, London: Yale University Press, 2006. 307 p. (In Eng.)

23. Mohamed B. (ed.) The Arts of the Muslim Knight: The Furusiyya Art Foundation Collection. Milan: Skira, 2008. 416 p. (In Eng.)

24. Molodin V. I., Sobolev V. I., Solovyov A. I. Baraba in the Late Middles Ages. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1990. 262 p. (In Russ.)

25. Nadtochy Yu. S. Tobolsk Reserve Museum. Sverdlovsk: Central Ural Book Publ., 1988. 239 p. (In Russ.)

26. Prokopenko V. M. Saadaks with flat quivers: Europe, 16th–17th centuries. Part 1: Design. On: Kitab Hona — The Well of Knowledge. Military sciences. Ranged weapons. Posted on 27 March 2012. Available at: https://www.kitabhona.org.ua/libwar_bow/kolchan1-1.html (accessed: 7 December 2022). (In Russ.)

27. Prokopenko V. M. Saadaks with flat quivers: Europe, 16th–17th centuries. Part 2: Catalogue. On: Kitab Hona — The Well of Knowledge. Military sciences. Ranged weapons. Posted on 27 March 2012. Available at: https://www.kitabhona.org.ua/libwar_bow/kolchan1-2.html (accessed: 7 December 2022). (In Russ.)

28. Shevtsova A. A. Kazakh Ornamental Patterns: Origins and Tradition. Moscow: Kazakhskaya Diaspora, 2007. 240 p. (In Russ.)

29. Shim H. The Zunghar conquest of Central Tibet and its influence on Tibetan military institutions in the 18th century. Revue d’Etudes Tibetaines. 2020. No. 53. Pp. 56–113. (In Eng.)

30. Solovyov A. I. Weapons and Armour: Siberian Weaponry from the Stone Age to the Middle Ages. Novosibirsk: INFOLIO-Press, 2003. 224 p. (In Russ.)

31. Tepkeev V. T. Kalmyks in the Northern Caspian: 1630s–1670s. Elista: Dzhangar, 2012. 376 p. (In Russ.)

32. The Complete Collection of Treasures of the Palace Museum, Beijing 56: Armaments and Military Provisions. Beijing: Commercial Press, 2008. 264 p. (In Eng.)

33. Tumanovsky V. E. (ed.) Imperial Armory. St. Petersburg: Atlant, 2002. 408 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Bobrov L.A., Balyunov I.V. Tobolsk Reserve Museum of History and Architecture: Introducing a Seventeenth/Mid-Eighteenth-Century Quiver. Oriental Studies. 2023;16(4):786-810. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2023-68-4-786-810

Views: 1149


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)