Neolithic Patterns from the Vilovatoye Site: New Radiocarbon Chronology Data
https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2023-69-5-1177-1187
Abstract
Introduction. The article presents some latest absolute dates for Neolithic pottery from the Vilovatoye site, the latter being characterized by a most impressive pottery collection from the Middle and Late Neolithic across the forest-steppe Volga River basin. Goals. The work shall introduce a series of radiocarbon dates for Neolithic patterns of the Vilovatoye site. To facilitate this, the paper shall describe the vessels that yielded such radiocarbon dates, analyze and interpret the absolute values, compare the latter to those of the Middle Volga culture. Materials and methods. In 2018–2019, shards from a total of fourteen Neolithic vessels excavated in the site of Vilovatoye were selected. Four of them were decorated with pricks of different shapes, one bore pricks combined with blackened lines, and nine vessels had comb stamps. Radiocarbon dating by liquid scintillation was conducted at the Radiocarbon Laboratory of Herzen University. Results. The pricked vessels of the Vilovatoye site dated from the third quarter of the 6th millennium BC to the second quarter of the 5th millennium BC. These results tend to well correlate with dates yielded by pricked pottery of the Middle Volga culture. The shards of the vessel decorated with pricks and blackened lines were dated to the first half of 5th millennium BC. The absolute dates for the comb-imprinted pottery cluster within a vast interval — from the last quarter of the 6th millennium BC to the third quarter of the 5th millennium BC. So, the latter dates also well correlate with available radiocarbon values for comb-ornamented pottery of both the Vilovatoye site and the Middle Volga culture. Conclusions. The newly obtained radiocarbon values shall significantly add to the set of dates for the Middle Volga culture. Those are evidence that the traditions of pricked and comb-stamped pottery somewhat co-existed — on the Vilovatoye site in particular, and within the Middle Volga culture at large.
Keywords
About the Authors
Konstantin M. AndreevRussian Federation
Cand. Sc. (History), Associate Professor
Anatoly V. Somov
Russian Federation
Laboratory Assistant
Marianna A. Kulkova
Russian Federation
Dr. Sc. (Geology and Mineralogy), Associate Professor
References
1. Andreev K. M. The Early Neolithic in the Volga Forest-Steppe. Cand. Sc. (history) thesis abstract. St. Petersburg, 2015. 24 p. (In Russ.)
2. Andreev K. M., Kudashov A. S., Somov A. V., Shalapinin A. A. The Neolithic–Eneolithic transition in the forest-steppe and forest Middle Volga region: Forms, models and chronological framework. Ural Historical Journal. 2023. Is. 1(78). Pp. 15–25. (In Russ.)
3. Andreev K. M., Vybornov A. A. The Early Neolithic in the Volga Forest-Steppe: The Elshanka Culture. Samara: Porto-Print, 2017. 272 p. (In Russ.)
4. Kovalyukh N. N., Skripkin V. V. Archaeological pottery: Radiocarbon dating by liquid scintillation. In: Radiocarbon Dating in Archaeological and Paleoecological Research. C onference proceedings (9-12 April 2007, St. Petersburg). St. Petersburg: Institute for the History of Material Culture (RAS), Teza, 2007. Pp. 120–126. (In Russ.)
5. Kulkova M. A. Radiocarbon dating of ancient pottery. Samara Journal of Science. 2014. No. 3(8). Pp. 115–122. (In Russ.)
6. Mamonov A. E. Elshanka culture. In: K abytov P. S. (ed.) History of Samara Volga Region: From Earliest Times to Present Days. Stone Age. Samara: Samara Scientific Center (RAS), 2000. Pp. 147–176. (In Russ.)
7. Morgunova N. L. The site of Ivanovo in Orenburg Oblast. In: Archaeological Cultures of the Northern Caspian. Kuybyshev: Kuybyshev State Pedagogical Institute, 1988. Pp. 106–122. (In Russ.)
8. Shalapinin A. A. To the problem of chronological correlation of the Neolithic and Eneolithic complexes from the forest-steppe Volga region. Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2017. Vol. 19. No. 3(2). Pp. 380–388. (In Russ.)
9. Somov A. V., Shalapinin A. A. The ratio of the Neolithic and Eneolithic complexes of the forest-steppe Volga region according to radiocarbon dating. Samara Journal of Science. 2019. Vol. 8. No. 2(27). Pp. 229–239. (In Russ.)
10. Vasilyev I. B., Vybornov A. A. Neolithic Volga Region. Kuybyshev: Kuybyshev State Pedagogical Institute, 1988. 112 p. (In Russ.)
11. Vasilyev I. B., Vybornov A. A., Gabyashev R. S., Morgunova N. L., Penin G. G. The site of Vilovatoye in the Transvolga forest-steppe. In: Eneolithic Eastern Europe. Kuybyshev: Kuybyshev State Pedagogical Institute, 1980. Pp. 151–189. (In Russ.)
12. Vybornov A. A. Neolithic Volga-Kama Region. Samara: Samara State Pedagogical University, 2008. 490 p. (In Russ.)
13. Vybornov A. A., Andreev K. M., Kulkova M. A., Nesterov E. M. Radiocarbon chronology of forest-steppe area of the Volga River basin. In: Zaytseva G. I., Lozovskaya O. V., Vybornov A. A., Mazurkevich A. N. (comps.) Radiocarbon Neolithic Chronology of Eastern Europe in the VII–III Millennium BC. Smolensk: Svitok, 2016. Pp. 74–96. (In Russ.)
14. Vybornov A. A., Andreev K. M., Kulkova M. A., Philippsen B. Radiocarbon chronology of the Volga-Kama Neolithic. Ural Historical Journal. 2018. Is. 3(60). Pp. 66–77. (In Russ.)
15. Vybornov A. A., Mamonov A. E., Korolev A. I., Ovchinnikova N. V. Neolithic pottery from Lebyazhinka IV of the Volga forest-steppe. In: Bulletin of Samara State Pedagogical University. Department of History. Samara, 2007. Pp. 107–155. (In Russ.)
16. Vybornov A. A., Kulkova M. A. Chronology issues of the Neolithic cultures in the Volga-Kama Basin. The Volga River Region Archaeology. 2021. Vol. 3(37). Pp. 42–54. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Andreev K.M., Somov A.V., Kulkova M.A. Neolithic Patterns from the Vilovatoye Site: New Radiocarbon Chronology Data. Oriental Studies. 2023;16(5):1177-1187. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2023-69-5-1177-1187