More on the Glottochronological Classification of the Samoyedic Languages: New Field and Archival Data

Introduction. Classification of the Samoyedic languages ranks among most popular topics of Uralistics in recent years, with at least six different perspectives — often in contradiction with one another — expressed by leading experts. In fact, there is no single subgroup of the Samoyedic languages on which all the authors would unanimously agree. Goals. The article attempts an analysis of word lists of the Samoyedic languages available on the LingvoDoc platform (lingvodoc.ispras.ru) — recorded from the last native speakers and collected from archives. Materials and methods. The LingvoDoc platform stores a total of 16 Samoyedic-language dictionaries (and text concordances) containing some basic vocabularies. Ten dictionaries were compiled from native speakers (Nenets, Enets, Nganasan, and Selkup dialects), while six others were derived from archival and published sources. They are processed using the glottochronology formula developed by S. Starostin. The LingvoDoc-based analysis yields 3D proximity degree graphs calculated depending on divergence time points of the Samoyedic language unity. Results. It has been determined that, from a glottochronological perspective, there was a certain proximity between Nenets, Enets, and Nganasan traditionally grouped into the North Samoyedic cluster, while Selkup, Mator, and Kamassian are regarded as South Samoyedic. However, these communities were short-lived enough, a longer period of unity be observed between Mator and Kamassian, and between Nenets and Enets. The highest number of words with no etymology in other basic vocabulary lists was found in Selkup dialects (up to 18 lexemes) and in the Nganasan language (13 words), which attests to their prolonged isolated existence. Conclusions. The current analysis supports the validity of the traditional classification of the Samoyedic languages. The involvement of materials from early Selkup texts provides more reliable evidence for delineating a South Samoyedic group.

1. Alatalo J. Sölkupisches Wörterbuch: Aufzeichnungen von Kai Donner, U. T. Sirelius und Jarmo Alatalo (Lexica Societatis Fenno-Ugricae XXX). Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne, 2004. 465 p. (In Germ.)

2. Bakró-Nagy M., Laakso J., Skribnik E. (eds.) The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2022. 1184 p. (In Eng.)

3. Barmich M. Ya., Vello I. A. Nenets-Russian and Russian-Nenets Dictionary: The Forest Dialect. St. Petersburg: Prosveshchenie, 2002. 288 p. (In Nen. and Russ.)

4. Blažek V. On the classification of the Samoyedic languages. Dedicated to the memory of Eugene Helimski (1950–2007). Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen. 2016. Vol. 63. Pp. 79–125. (In Eng.)

5. Bykonya V. V. (ed.) Selkup-Russian Dictionary. Tomsk: Tomsk State Pedagogical University, 2005. 348 p. (In Selk. and Russ.)

6. Collinder B. Comparative Grammar of the Uralic Languages. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1960. 416 p. (In Eng.)

7. Donner K. Kamassisches Wörterbuch nebst Sprachproben und Hauptzügen der Grammatik / bearbeitet und herausgegeben von A. J. Joki (Lexica Societatis Fenno-Ugricae VIII). Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, 1944. 215 p. (In Germ.)

8. Helimski E. A. Earliest Hungarian-Samoyedic Parallels: Linguistic and Ethnogenetic Interpretations. Moscow: Nauka, 1982. 164 p. (In Russ.)

9. Helimski E. Die matorische Sprache. Wörterverzeichnis – Grundzüge der Grammatik – Sprachgeschichte. Unter Mitarbeit von B. Nagy (Studia Uralo-Altaica 42). Szeged: Typo System, JATE Finnougor Tanszék, 1997. 475 p. (In Germ.)

10. Helimski E. Mator and Northern Samoyed. Materials to a paper read on May 16, 1997 for the Finno-Ugric Society, Helsinki (Posthumous publication. Ed. by A. Urmanchieva). In: Gusev V., Urmanchieva A., Anikin A. (eds.) Siberica et Uralica: In memoriam Eugen Helimski (Studia Uralo-Altaica 56). Szeged: University of Szeged, 2022. Pp. 479–495. (In Eng.)

11. Helimski E., Kahrs U. Nordselkupisches Wörterbuch von F. G. Mal'cev (1903). Hamburg: Hamburger Finnisch-Ugrische und Sibirische Materialien, 2001. 155 p. (In Germ.)

12. Janhunen J. Samojedischer Wortschatz: Gemeinsamojedische Etymologien (Castrenianumin Toimitteita 17). Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura, 1977. 185 p. (In Germ.)

13. Janhunen J. Samoyedic. In: Abondolo D. (ed.) The Uralic Languages. London: Routledge, 1998. Pp. 457–479. (In Eng.)

14. Kassian A., Starostin G., Dybo A., Chernov V. The Swadesh wordlist. An attempt at semantic specification. Journal of Language Relationship. 2010. No. 4. Pp. 46–89. (In Eng.)

15. Katz H. Zur Phonologie des Motorisch-Karagassisch-Taigischen. In: Redei K. (ed.) Studien zur Phonologie und Morphonologie der uralischen Sprachen. Akten der dritten Tagung für uralische Phonologie (Eisenstadt, 28. Juni – 1. Juli 1984 (Studia Uralica 4). Wien: Verband der wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften Osterreichs, 1987. Pp. 336–348. (In Germ.)

16. Kazakevich O. A., Budyanskaya E. M. The Selkup Dialect Dictionary: Northern Selkup. O. Kazakevich (ed.). Yekaterinburg: Basko, 2010. 368 p. (In Selk. and Russ.)

17. Koryakov Yu. B. Language vs. dialect question and Samoyedic languages. Ural-Altaic Studies. 2018. No. 4 (31). Pp. 156–217. (In Russ.)

18. Rédei K. Uralisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, Vol. 1, parts 1-3 (1986). Vol. 1, parts 4-5 (1987). Vol. 1, part 6 (1988). Vols. 2, 3 (1988). 905 p. (In Germ.)

19. Starostin G. Lexicostatistics as a basis for language classification: increasing the pros, reducing the cons. In: Fangerau H., Geisler H., Halling Th., Martin W. (eds.) Classification and Evolution in Biology, Linguistics and the History of Science: Concepts – Methods – Visualization. Stuttgart: F. Steiner, 2013. Pp. 125–146. (In Eng.)

20. Starostin G. Preliminary lexicostatistics as a basis for language classification: A new approach. Journal of Language Relationship. 2010. No. 3. Pp. 79–116. (In Eng.)

21. Starostin S. A. Comparative historical linguistics and lexicostatistics. In: Linguistic Reconstruction and Earliest History of the East. Conference discussion proceedings. Pt. 1. Moscow: Nauka — GRVL, 1989. Pp. 3–39. (In Russ.)

22. Starostin S. A. Writings in Linguistics. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskikh Kultur, 2007. 928 p. (In Russ.)

23. Starostin S. Preliminary results of application of ‘recalibrated’ glottochronology to classification of Eurasian language families. In: Paper Presented at Workshop on Prehistoric Chronology: Language, Genes and Migrations Being Held at the Santa Fe Institute, March 2004. (In Eng.)

24. Tadmor U. Loanwords in the world’s languages. Findings and results. In: Haspelmath M., Tadmor U. (eds.) Loanwords in the World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009. Pp. 55–75. (In Eng.)

25. Tereshchenko N. M. Nenets-Russian Dictionary. Moscow: Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya, 1965. 942 p. (In Russ.)

26. Urmanchieva A. Yu. Reconstructing the Linguistic Landscape of Western Siberia: A Study of the Samoyedic Languages. Dr. Sc. (Philology) thesis. Moscow, 2023. 280 p. (In Russ.)