Emotive Suggestiveness in Contemporary Chinese Fictional Discourse: A Case Study of Yu Hua’s To Live (1992)
https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2023-68-4-1004-1014
Abstract
Introduction. The study examines some theoretical aspects and outlines practical approaches to the analysis of emotive density and its suggestiveness in contemporary Chinese fictional discourse. The work’s shift of attention focus to stylistic emotive attractors and points of structural tension in the text has formed a research interface, and makes it possible to identify some approaches to the analysis of emotive density in contemporary Chinese fictional discourse. Goals. The study aims to determine the functions of emotivity in the language of literary text in terms of ethnocultural specificity and semantic realization through the example of Yu Hua’s To Live (1992). Materials and methods. Theoretically, the work contains traces of integral and suggestive linguistics related to functional syntax and pragmatics, all that to yield an interdisciplinary approach. The artistic agenda of the novel acts as an isolated subjective world model and is viewed as a cognitive set of emotive attractions, the latter’s understanding and perception be determined by personal and social experiences along the axis ‘author–character–reader’. Results. Emotivity and emotional modes of Chinese fictional discourse are characterized by spatial connectivity between structural tension elements, the function of plot-building, individual features inherent to the speakers’ speech portraits, and actual speech effects on the recipient. Becoming a central element of text, emotivity acts as a meta-entity. The systemic stylistic relations of the multi-level linguistic units of the literary text and discourse tend to reflect the general correlation potentials between the functional/semantic fields of emotivity, expressiveness and modality.
About the Author
Alexander V. IgnatenkoRussian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Philology), Associate Professor
References
1. Bull P., Waddle M. “Stirring it up!” Emotionality in audience responses to political speeches. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2021. Vol. 25. No. 3. Pp. 611–627. DOI:10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-611-627. (In Eng.)
2. Buyanova L. Yu., Nechay Yu. P. Emotivity and Emotiogenity of Language: Explication and Conceptualization Tools. Moscow: Flinta, 2021. 232 p. (In Russ.)
3. Dobrosklonskaya T. G. Markers of emotionality in Russian news coverage of the 75-th anniversary of WWII Victory. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2021. Vol. 25. No. 3. Pp. 705–722. DOI:10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-705-722. (In Eng.)
4. Firth-Godbehere R. A Human History of Emotion: How the Way We Feel Built the World We Know. Moscow: MIF, 2022. 320 p. (In Russ.)
5. Ignatenko A. V. Features of the language game in Liu Zhenyun’s prose on the example of the novel “I Am not Pan Jinlian”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Asian and African Studies. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 3. Pp. 507–523. DOI: 10.21638/spbu13.2022.308. (In Russ.)
6. Ignatenko A. V. Features of parenthetical constructions in Mo Yan’s novel “Tired of Being Born and Dying” (2005). Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology. 2023. Vol. 22. No. 4: Oriental Studies. Pp. 115–126. DOI: 10.25205/1818-7919-2023-22-4-115-126. (In Russ.)
7. Ignatenko A. V., Kondratova T. I. An Introduction to Chinese Literature: From Ancient Times to Present Days. Moscow: VKN, 2022. 448 p. (In Russ.)
8. Iriskhanova O. K. Focus Game in Language: Semantics, Syntax and Pragmatics of Defocusing. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoy Kultury, 2014. 319 p. (In Russ.)
9. Kiklewicz A. Typology of pragmatic implications from the point of view of interaction between pragmatics and semantics. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2022. Vol. 26. No. 1. Pp. 139–161. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-26538. (In Russ.)
10. Kozlova L. A. Metaphor as the refection of culture determined cognition. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2020. Vol. 24. No. 4. Pp. 899–925. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-4-899-925. (In Russ.)
11. Ozyumenko V. I., Larina T. V. Threat and fear: Pragmatic purposes of emotionalisation in media discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2021. Vol. 25. No. 3. Pp. 746–766. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-746-766. (In Russ.)
12. Sazhina E. V., Semak D. S. «Emotionality» and «emotivity» in linguistics: To distinguish the notions. Epokha nauki (Era of Science). 2019. No. 20. Pp. 565–568. (In Russ.)
13. Shakhovsky V. I. Lexical-Semantic System of Language: Categorizing Emotion. Voronezh: Voronezh State University, 1987. 190 p. (In Russ.)
14. Shakhovsky V. I. Linguistic Theory of Emotion. Monograph. Moscow: Gnozis, 2008. 416 p. (In Russ.)
15. Speshnev N. A. The Chinese: Distinct Features of Ethnic Psychology. St. Petersbrug: KARO, 2017. 336 p. (In Russ.)
16. Sun Yu., Kalinin O. I., Ignatenko A. V. The use of metaphor power indices for the analysis of speech impact in political public speeches. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2021. Vol. 25. No. 1. Pp. 250–277. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-1-250-277. (In Russ.)
17. Trubkina A. I. Communicative-pragmatic potential of emotionality in a literary text. Baltic Humanitarian Journal. 2020. Vol. 9. No. 1 (30). Pp. 312–314. (In Russ.)
18. Way L. C. Trump, memes and the Alt-right: Emotive and affective criticism and praise. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2021. Vol. 25. No. 3. Pp. 789–809. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-789-809. (In Eng.)
19. Wierzbicka A. Emotion and facial expression: A semantic perspective. Culture & Psychology. 1995. Vol. 1. No. 2. Pp. 227–258. (In Eng.)
20. Yu Hua. To Live. Beijing: Zuòjiā chūbǎn shè, 2014. 191 p. (In Chin.)
21. Yu Hua. To Live. R. Shapiro (transl.), O. Lipkin (ed.). Moscow: Tekst, 2014. 190 p. (In Russ.)
22. Zappettini F., Ponton D. M., Larina T. V. Emotionalisation of contemporary media discourse: A research agenda. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2021. Vol. 25. No. 3. Pp. 586–610. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-586-610. (In Eng.)
Review
For citations:
Ignatenko A.V. Emotive Suggestiveness in Contemporary Chinese Fictional Discourse: A Case Study of Yu Hua’s To Live (1992). Oriental Studies. 2023;16(4):1004-1014. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2023-68-4-1004-1014