Preview

Oriental Studies

Advanced search

About the Amount and Nature of Turkic-Mongolian and Turkic-Tungusic Lexical Relations in a New Perspective: the Role of the Theory of Genetic Relationship of the Altaic Languages in the Identification of Ancient Language Contacts

Abstract

The article represents new facts concerning the problem of ancient language communications and facts confirming the interaction of Turkic languages with Mongolic and Tungus-Manchu ones. The paper shows that the words representing cultural lexicon of Turkic languages were repeatedly borrowed into both the Mongolic and Tungus-Manchu languages and dialects, and those were Turkic languages - many of them extinct nowadays - that were sources of such diverse loans. The materials under consideration constitute a new episode in studies of the mentioned interlingual relations. And when it comes to the description of lexical structure of Altaic languages in the historical and areal perspectives, the presented facts prove interesting both in terms of theory and practice. The paper concludes that all revealed patterns of the kind are characterized by some features as follows: 1) the words to be compared are beyond the systems of correspondences inherent to the comparative and historical phonetics of Tungus-Manchu languages, but match the Turkic system of correspondences exactly for the specific consonants - δ, š, z, j - and are somewhat congruent with the uncommon transformations of vowels typical, e.g., for the Chuvash language; 2) the vast majority of patterns revealed during the search of correspondences for the targeted Turkic roots show no significant semantic differences, otherwise their semantic divergences match the divergence processes to be witnessed in Turkic languages as such, etc. Together with the similar facts in these languages there are such forms of words which help us reconstruct the lexical units as elements of common Altaic lexicon. The article concludes that the goals of further studies of areal relations between Turkic, Mongolic and Tungus-Manchu languages should comprise systemization and linguo-geographic analysis of the facts mirroring elements of such extinct languages dated 3 000 years back (when the Tungus-Manchu group split up resulting in the divergence of the Turkic languages that were in contact with diffusing dialects of the Common Tungus-Manchu parent language), and, thus, deepening the prospects of Turkic studies by 1 700 years from the period of the earliest Turkic written monuments.

About the Author

Aleksey A. Burykin
Institute for Linguistic Studies of the RAS
Russian Federation


References

1. БАМРС - Большой академический монгольско-русский словарь. В 4-х т. / отв. ред. Г. Ц. Пюрбеев. Т. 1. А-Г. 520 с.; Т. 2. Д-О. 536 с.; Т. 3. Ө-Ф. 440 с. М.: Academia, 2001; Т. 4. Х-Я. М.: Academia, 2002. 532 с.

2. Бурыкин А. А. Роль монгольских языков для алтаистических исследований // История развития монгольских языков. Улан-Удэ: Изд-во БНЦ СО РАН, 1999. С. 19-42.

3. Бурыкин А. А. О взаимном соотношении отдельных групп алтайских языков и об относительном объеме изменений в отдельных группах алтайских языков: «древние», «новые», и «новейшие» алтайские языки // Вестник угроведения. 2014. № 4 (19). С. 21-33.

4. Бурыкин А. А. Методы сравнительно-исторического языкознания, алтайская теория и тюрко-монгольские языковые связи (Реплика на статью В. И. Рассадина) // Урало-алтайские исследования. 2015. № 4(19). С. 93-105.

5. ДТС - Древнетюркский словарь / ред. В. М. Наделяев, Д. М. Насилов, Э. Р. Тенишев, А. М. Щербак. Л.: Наука, Ленинградск. отд., 1969. 677 с.

6. Менгес К. Г. Тюркское IdI «господин», некоторые его рефлексы в тюркских языках и параллели в других языковых семьях // Turcologica-1976. Л.: Наука, Ленингр. отд., 1976. С. 101-110.

7. Севортян, 1 - Этимологический словарь тюркских языков. В 7 т. М., 1975-2003. Т. 1. Севортян Э. В. Этимологический словарь тюркских языков: Общетюркские и межтюркские основы на гласные. М.: Наука, 1974. 768 с.

8. Серебренников Б. А., Гаджиева Н. З. Сравнительно-историческая грамматика тюркских языков. М.: Наука, 1986. 304 с.

9. ССТМЯ - Сравнительный словарь тунгусо-маньчжурских языков / отв. ред. В. И. Цинциус. Т. 1. Л.: Наука, 1975. 673 с.; Т. 2. Л.: Наука, 1977. 992 с.

10. Татаринцев Б. И. О происхождении тюркского названия неба (тенгре) и его соответствий // Советская тюркология. 1984. № 4. С. 73-84.

11. Татаринцев Б. И. Избранные научные труды. Кызыл: Тываполиграф, 2009. 287 с.


Review

For citations:


Burykin A.A. About the Amount and Nature of Turkic-Mongolian and Turkic-Tungusic Lexical Relations in a New Perspective: the Role of the Theory of Genetic Relationship of the Altaic Languages in the Identification of Ancient Language Contacts. Oriental Studies. 2017;10(5):190-198. (In Russ.)

Views: 300


ISSN 2619-0990 (Print)
ISSN 2619-1008 (Online)